Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
66 cases, 64 documents
Ordered by
DISABILITY RIGHTS
Noel v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission

1:11-cv-00237 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Jan. 13, 2011

Closed Date: Dec. 31, 2020

On January 13, 2011, New York wheelchair users and several disability rights organizations filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs sued the the New York Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the New York City Human Rights Law. Represented by Disabilities Right Advocates, the plaintiffs claimed the TLC failed to give meaningful access to per…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
CODING IN PROCESS
R.F M. v. Nielsen

1:18-cv-05068 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: June 7, 2018

Case Ongoing

None
JAIL CONDITIONS
Gray v. County of Riverside

5:13-cv-00444 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: May 8, 2013

Case Ongoing

COVID-19 Summary: This class action about medical care in the Riverside County jails settled in 2015. On April 4, 2020, plaintiffs brought a motion to enforce the consent decree, seeking implementation of expert-endorsed coronavirus-related protocols including social distancing. On April 16, the Court agreed, requiring planning and potentially prisoner transfers. A formal COVID-19 plan was approved in July 2020 and revised in October 2020. On May 8, 2013, three prisoners in Riverside county ja…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard

4:11-cv-04071 | U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota

Filed Date: May 27, 2011

Case Ongoing

This is a case challenging an abortion restriction in the state of South Dakota. According to the plaintiffs, South Dakota H.B. 1217 sought to restrict women's access to abortion services in South Dakota by (1) imposing what was at the time the longest mandatory delay in the country; (2) forcing every woman who sought an abortion to disclose and discuss private personal and medical information with an unlicensed, non-medical organization opposed to her decision; (3) requiring physicians to enga…
DISABILITY RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Kerrigan v. Phila. Bd. of Elections

2:07-cv-00687 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

None
PRISON CONDITIONS
Morris v. Voinovich

1:93-cv-00436 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: June 28, 1993

Case Ongoing

On 06/28/1993, inmates at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility filed a Section 1983 class action suit, pro se, in the Southern District of Ohio against officials in Youngstown, Ohio of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Plaintiffs' claims were related to the treatment of prisoners during the prison riot that occurred in April 1993. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants locked as many as ten inmates in a cell, failed to protect them from violence, did not provide them with w…
DISABILITY RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Dracut School Committee v. Bureau of Speal Educ. Appeals of the Massachusetts Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Educ.

1:09-cv-10966 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

None
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.

5:11-cv-03162 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: June 27, 2011

Closed Date: 2016

On June 27, 2011, the EEOC, on behalf of a Muslim woman, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 against Abercrombie and Fitch Stores, Inc. and Hollister Co. California LLC. The EEOC asked the court for a permanent injunction, compensatory damages, and punitive damages, claiming 1) the defendants failed to accommodate the sincerely held religious belief and the practice of wearing a hijab…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT

2:04-cv-04762 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: June 1, 2004

Closed Date: 2010

In June 2004, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC filed this suit against Diversified Paratransit, Inc., Paul's Yellow Cab (d/b/a Yellow Cab), and Inland Express, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against the charging party and other employees on the basis of race and sex. Complainant alleged that she was subjected to racially and sexually …
DISABILITY RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
American Council of the Blind of Indiana v. Indiana Election Commission

1:20-cv-03118 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

None