Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
35 cases, 37 documents
Ordered by
PRISON CONDITIONS
Marquiz v. Romer

1:92-cv-01470 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: July 28, 1992

Closed Date: 1997

On July 28, 1992, sixteen inmates of the Limon Correctional Facility in Colorado filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Colorado Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The plaintiffs alleged that their constitutional rights had been violated by overcrowding, inadequate staffing, denial of access to legal services, failure to provide adequate accommodations for disabled persons under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and problematic cla…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Valentine v. Beyer

3:85-cv-04401 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Filed Date: Sept. 9, 1985

Closed Date: 1994

On Sept. 9, 1985, inmates at the Trenton State Prison in New Jersey filed this lawsuit, pro se, under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against the New Jersey Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The plaintiffs asked the court for injunctive relief, alleging that the prison's legal assistance program was inadequate and denied them access to the courts. The district court (Judge Robert E. Cowen) granted injunctive relief to the plaintiffs, and the defendants app…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Mason v. Granholm

5:05-cv-73943 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Oct. 13, 2005

On October 13, 2005, current and former female prisoners filed a class-action lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). Plaintiffs were originally members of a certified class-action suit pending in Michigan state court, Neal v. MDOC, LC No. 96-006986-CZ. The Neal plaintiffs alleged violations of their state civil rights under the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rig…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine, Inc., d/b/a IHOP

2:06-cv-00715 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: June 26, 2006

Closed Date: 2014

On June 26, 2006, the Equal Employment Opportunity Council's (EEOC) Milwaukee District Office filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on behalf of two female employees and a class of similarly situated employees of the Defendant companies. The three Defendants were: 1) Management Hospitality of Racine, doing business as International House of Pancakes (IHOP); 2) the company's former president; and 3) Flipmeastack, Inc (Flip), an Illinois corporation doing busines…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. AMERICAN EAGLE, SIMMONS AIRLINES, AMERICAN AIRLINE

3:98-cv-00763 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: March 24, 1998

Closed Date: May 30, 2001

In March 1998, the Dallas District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against AMR Eagle, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., and related businesses in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The EEOC alleged that the defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") by refusing to hire flight attendant applicants who were disabled but could still perform the essential job functions required for the position. After numerous discovery disputes, the charging party i…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. MORGAN STANLEY

1:01-cv-08421 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Sept. 10, 2001

Closed Date: July 12, 2007

In September 2001, the New York District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from an EEOC press release that the complaint alleged that the defendant discriminated against the charging party, a female employee, and up to one hundred other women on th…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Ramirez v. Cintas Corporation

3:04-cv-00281 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Jan. 20, 2004

On January 20, 2004, Cintas Corporation employees filed a lawsuit against Cintas under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, and the California Unfair Business Practices Act, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs, represented initially by private counsel, asked the Court for declaratory, equitable, and compensatory relief, claiming that Cintas…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Jordan v. Pugh

1:02-cv-01239 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: June 28, 2002

Closed Date: 2007

In this prison conditions case brought in 2002 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, a federal prisoner in the U.S. Bureau of Prison's (BOP) Florence, Colorado Administrative Maximum (ADX) Detention Unit, claimed violation of First Amendment rights in his pro se federal tort claim against BOP officials. The defendants administered 28 C.F.R. 540.20, a BOP prison regulation restricting inmates from publishing articles under their bylines. The plaintiff, represented by the Univ…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Abrams v. General Electric

1:95-cv-01734 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York

Filed Date: Dec. 7, 1995

Closed Date: 2001

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.]  This is a case about Employer age discrimination by General Electric in New York.  It was filed on December 7, 1196, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.  
DISABILITY RIGHTS
Ulibarri v. City and County of Denver

1:07-cv-01814 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: Aug. 28, 2007

Closed Date: 2012

On August 28, 2007, three deaf individuals and two deaf advocacy groups filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against the City and County of Denver, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys from the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, the Center for the Rights of Parents with Disabilities, and private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, …