Making civil rights litigation information and documents accessible, for free.
This is development
Docket Number
Key Dates
Filing Date
Settlement / Judgment Date
Terminating Date
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Case Details
Outcome
Issues
Document Details
Document Filing Date
Document Citation (Choose One)
Use this for most court reporters
S.Ct. reporter and WL only
LEXIS and L.Ed. only
3:12-cv-02265 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Filed Date: Dec. 17, 2012
Case Ongoing
Order
Feb. 28, 2023
0:15-cv-02210 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Filed Date: May 1, 2015
Closed Date: July 26, 2021
Re: Lawrence Maxcy, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated v. Paul Schnell, et al. Letter
July 21, 2021
3:01-cv-30199 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Filed Date: Oct. 31, 2001
Memorandum and Order Regarding Remedy
Feb. 22, 2007
6:92-cv-00013 | U.S. District Court for the District of Montana
Filed Date: Feb. 13, 1992
Joint Submission of Revised Settlement Agreement
Langford v. Racicot
Feb. 23, 2018
2:11-cv-01100 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Filed Date: June 10, 2011
Closed Date: Jan. 30, 2018
Order Awarding Fees and Costs
April 15, 2014
2:10-cv-04049 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Filed Date: Oct. 26, 2010
Status Report
P.B. v. John White
Dec. 6, 2016
8:09-cv-00456 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
Filed Date: Dec. 16, 2009
Closed Date: 2012
Memorandum and Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
Aug. 16, 2011
2:06-cv-00761 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Filed Date: May 31, 2006
Closed Date: 2010
Special Verdict Form
Strange v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, Inc.
Nov. 9, 2009
4:02-cv-05849 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed Date: Dec. 17, 2002
Closed Date: Sept. 29, 2014
Order [Re Discovery Issues]
Jan. 11, 2008
1:02-cv-01239 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Filed Date: June 28, 2002
Memorandum Opinion and Order [Holding That Plaintiff Has Standing To Challenge 28 C.F.R. 540.20(b) And That It Violates The First Amendment Guarantee Of Free Speech]
Aug. 9, 2007