Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
5 cases, 129,339 documents
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
In Re: Initiative Petition No. 395, State Question No. 761

No. 110545 | Oklahoma state supreme court

Filed Date: March 29, 2012

Closed Date: Oct. 29, 2012

This is an action challenging an Oklahoma ballot initiative that would have used the initiative process to ban abortion in the state. This challenge was filed by the ACLU, the ACLU of Oklahoma, and the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of six Oklahoma voters. On March 29, 2012, the challengers filed a protest to Initiative Petition No. 395 in the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The challengers were entitled to bring their challenge directly to the Oklahoma Supreme Court under Oklahoma law. Okla.…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice v. Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy

CV-2013-1640 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Aug. 8, 2013

Closed Date: Jan. 28, 2014

This is a case about a law banning access to emergency contraception. On August 8, 2013, this action was filed in the Oklahoma District Court for Oklahoma County. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, the plaintiffs were the Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice and an individual Oklahoma resident. They brought this case against the Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy to challenge an Oklahoma law that restricted access to over-the-counter emergency contraception. The case was as…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Tummino v. Von Eschenbach

1:05-cv-00366 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: Jan. 21, 2005

Closed Date: April 5, 2013

This is a case about the Food and Drug Administration’s rules surrounding access to Plan B emergency contraceptives (“ECs”). On January 21, 2005, the plaintiffs—including numerous individual members of the Morning-After-Pill (“MAP”) Conspiracy, a non-profit coalition of feminist organizations leading grassroots efforts to ensure that ECs are available over-the-counter (“OTC”)—sued the FDA in the Eastern District of New York. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, they requested decl…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Deanda v. Becerra

2:20-cv-00092 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: April 10, 2020

This is a case about minors' confidential access to contraception through the federally-funded Title X program. On April 10, 2020, a parent filed this lawsuit in the Amarillo Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas before District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk. The suit named as defendants the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs for the United States. Represented by attorneys at The Filmore Law Fir…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Irish 4 Reproductive Health v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

3:18-cv-00491 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

Filed Date: June 26, 2018

The suit challenged a settlement agreement between the Trump Administration and the University of Notre Dame to deny students, employees, and their dependents insurance coverage of contraceptive care guaranteed to them by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The lawsuit also challenged the Trump administration’s interim final rules announced in October 2017 that would have allowed virtually any employer or university to refuse to comply with the ACA contraceptive coverage requirement. On June 26, 201…