Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
125 cases
Ordered by
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Jones v. Chopra

1:18-cv-02132 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Sept. 13, 2018

Closed Date: Jan. 18, 2024

This case concerns alleged racial and gender discrimination at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. On September 13, 2018, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, plaintiffs brought this suit against the acting director of the CFPB and the Bureau itself on behalf of a putative class of “racial minorities and females who worked for the CFPB as Consumer Response Specialists and who were subjected to discrimination and retaliation by CFPB due to their race or gender.” Filing …

Case Dismissed (Voluntary)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
State of Missouri v. Starbucks Corp.

4:25-cv-00165 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Filed Date: Feb. 11, 2025

This is a case about the legality of companies' diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. On February 10, 2025, the state of Missouri filed this lawsuit against Starbucks in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Missouri argued that various aspects of Starbucks' DEI program were discriminatory in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Missouri state law. Missouri sought a declaratory judgment that Starbucks…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Kuang v. United States Department of Defense

4:18-cv-03698 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: June 21, 2018

Closed Date: May 3, 2021

On June 21, 2018, plaintiffs—lawful permanent residents ("LPRs")—filed a class action complaint against the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”) in the Northern District of California. Represented by private counsel as well as the ACLU Foundations of Northern and Southern California, the plaintiffs alleged that a new DOD policy—promulgated via a memo on October 13—unfairly targeted LPRs and unlawfully prevented them from serving in the nation’s military. The DOD policy noted that LPRs could not b…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

Reversed

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Bird v. Barr

1:19-cv-01581 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: May 29, 2019

On May 29, 2019, a group of female Intelligence Analyst and Agent Trainees at the FBI’s Training Academy in Quantico, Virginia filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of themselves and a class of more than 125 female Agent and Analyst Trainees who had been subjected to similar gender-based harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. The plaintiffs sued the Attorney General of the United States in his official capacity under Title VII of the…
JAIL CONDITIONS
Martos v. Miami-Dade County Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

1:16-cv-21501 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Filed Date: April 28, 2016

Closed Date: Oct. 24, 2016

On April 28, 2016, Disability Rights Florida brought this lawsuit against the Miami-Dade Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (MDCR) on behalf of two deaf persons (Plaintiffs A and B) who had been denied disability accommodations by MDCR. Plaintiffs alleged that despite knowing of plaintiffs’ disabilities and despite judicial rulings ordering MDCR to provide plaintiffs with American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters and other accommodations, MDCR consistently failed to do so during their…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Moorhead v. Lane

2:86-cv-02020 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Filed Date: Jan. 21, 1986

This case was a civil rights class action against Illinois prison officials. It alleged discrimination against incarcerated women in housing, training, and pay. It culminated in a consent decree which required the construction of an all-women minimum-security prison and a “good faith” effort to reform education and vocational programs for women. Six incarcerated women filed a class action complaint on January 21, 1986, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Under 42 U.…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Hopson v. Baltimore / Carter v. Baltimore City Police Dept.

1:04-cv-03842 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Dec. 6, 2004

Closed Date: March 19, 2015

On December 6, 2004, a group of African-American police officers brought a lawsuit against their employer, the Baltimore Police Department (BPD), as well as various other municipal entities, including the City of Baltimore and the Baltimore City Council, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The plaintiffs alleged that they had been discriminated against in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e and giving rise to a cause of action …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
United States v. Nassau County Police Department

9:77-cv-01881 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: Sept. 21, 1977

Prior to 1974, the Nassau County Police Department (NCPD) had separate job classifications for male and female police officers, and fewer than 1% of uniformed positions were filled by policewomen. By 1974, the height, weight, age, physical agility, and educational requirements were the same for men and women. Consequently, the height, weight, and agility requirements had a disproportionate impact on women. Furthermore, a written exam administered to all applicants screened out over 90% of Black…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Bernardi v. Yeutter

3:73-cv-01110 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Aug. 10, 1976

Closed Date: Feb. 1, 1994

Gene Bernardi was hired as a sociologist at the United States Forest Service in July 1968. Less than a year later, she was promoted based on a panel's evaluations of her work. However, two years later, the panel declined to recommend her for another promotion. Subsequently, Bernardi requested and received a second evaluation that contradicted the first, now recommending her for promotion. Despite the new recommendation, the Director of Personnel Management declined to offer her the advancement …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

3:88-cv-01467 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 22, 1988

Closed Date: 2004

On April 22, 1988, employees of Lucky Stores ("Lucky") brought this suit against Lucky and Alpha Beta Co. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs brought this suit on behalf of a class of all female, Black, and Hispanic employees of Lucky, past, present, and future. Plaintiffs alleged that Lucky discriminated against them on the basis of race, sex, and/or national origin in Lucky's employment practices including initial job assignment, training, and pr…