Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
647 cases, 129,048 documents
Ordered by
PRISON CONDITIONS
Wilson v. Kelley

68-11647 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: 1968

Closed Date: Dec. 16, 1968

Plaintiffs, black and white current, former, and prospective inmates in Georgia penal institutions, brought a civil rights law suit through counsel affiliated in various ways with the ACLU in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against all the state's prison and jail officials alleging violations of their Eighth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. They sought declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, the complaint sought (1) to abolish racial segregat…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Gibson v. McEvers

3:79-03151 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Filed Date: July 20, 1979

Closed Date: 1980

On July 20, 1979, an inmate of the Logan Correction center in Lincoln, Illinois, filed a lawsuit pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the assistant warden, other prison officials, and members of the parole board in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The complaint alleged that as a black inmate, he received unequal treatment in disciplinary proceedings in violation of his due process rights and that defendants prevented his use of the law library in violation of…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. McCREA EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.

8:06-cv-02565 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2006

Closed Date: July 26, 2009

The Baltimore district office of the EEOC brought this suit against McCrea Equipment Company, Inc., in September 2006, in the District Court of Maryland. The complaint alleged that two female employees were subjected to sexual harassment by a Systems Administrator and retaliation by unnamed employees for complaining to management. The hostile work environment created by the sexual harassment and retaliation led to the constructive discharge of the employees. One employee was subjected to racial…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

2:03-cv-04277 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Filed Date: Sept. 10, 2003

Closed Date: 2007

The Philadelphia office of the EEOC brought this suit against Ernst & Young LLP, an accounting firm, in September 2003, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complainant alleged that the defendant engaged in hostile work environment and quid pro quo sexual harassment (under Title VII and NJ state law), retaliation, defamation, and invasion of her privacy. Specifically, complainant alleges that her supervisor, a lesbian, repeatedly retaliated against her because she de…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. GREENBRIER

2:03-cv-00693 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Closed Date: June 2, 2004

The EEOC's Norfolk office sued Greenbrier Pontiac - Oldsmobile - GMC Trucks - KIA, Inc., a Virginia auto dealership, on September 30, 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The EEOC alleged that Greenbrier violated Title VII when it discriminated against one of its employees based on race (African American), created a hostile work environment for that employee when other employees made racist comments and hung a noose around a radio in the servicing shop, which c…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Oxycare Plus

5:03-cv-00243 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 26, 2003

Closed Date: 2007

In September 2003, the EEOC district office of El Paso, Texas brought this suit against Oxycare Plus, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was alleged that the defendant unlawfully limited the aggrieved employee's hours by denying her the right to work weekends or to work on an "on call" basis. It was also alleged that the employee was unlawfully discharged. …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

3:02-cv-00441 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: June 24, 2002

Closed Date: May 28, 2003

The EEOC's Richmond district office sued Greyhound Lines, Inc., a nationwide bus company, on June 24, 2002 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The EEOC claimed that Greyhound violated Title VII after discriminating against an employee based on his religion (Fourth Tabernacle, Church of God and Saints of Christ) by refusing to accommodate his religious practices and retaliating against him by firing him when he applied for accommodation to his regional office. The …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. GENERAL MOTORS, UAW

2:00-cv-74345 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2000

Closed Date: Jan. 17, 2001

The EEOC's Detroit district office sued General Motors Corporation, a national auto manufacturer, and the United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 909, a local union to which the aggrieved employee belonged, on September 29, 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The EEOC's complaint alleged that GM and the UAW violated the Americans with Disabilities Act when they discriminated against the aggrieved employee by failing to a…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Fresh Express Farms Inc.

5:02-cv-04614 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 24, 2002

Closed Date: 2007

In September 2002, the EEOC district office of San Francisco, California brought this suit against Fresh Express, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleged that a defendant maintained a sexually hostile work environment when it failed to discipline a supervisor who refused to stop making unwanted sexual advances. The complaint also alleged that the defendant retaliated against the aggrieved employee when she complained about the harassment.…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO

2:04-cv-02007 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 24, 2004

Closed Date: June 8, 2007

In September 2004, the EEOC's Phoenix District Office brought this suit against Blockbuster, a video rental chain, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to an EEOC press release, the complaint alleged that Blockbuster violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to make a reasonable accommodate for the charging party's religious beliefs. Specifically, the defendant refused to allow the charging part…