Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
15 cases, 66 documents
Ordered by
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
American Medical Association v. Stenehjem

1:19-cv-00125 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: June 25, 2019

Case Ongoing

This is a case about constitutional challenges to two North Dakota laws that required physicians to provide patients with misleading and non-medical information about reproductive health. On June 25, 2019, American Medical Association, a North Dakota clinic, and the clinic’s medical director, filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiffs sued the Attorney General o…
POLICING
CODING IN PROCESS
Dundon v. Kirchmeier

1:16-cv-00406 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: Nov. 28, 2016

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) This was a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of protestors who were injured by law enforcement while protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline. On November 28, 2016, a week after over 200 protestors were injured at Backwater Bridge in Standing Rock, North Dakota, this case was filed. Five years later, on December 29, 2021, the court dismissed the case.
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Sinner v. Jaeger

3:20-cv-00076 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: May 6, 2020

NOTE: This case is being tracked in close to real time by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project. So for information, see their tracker. According to their summary as of 09/01/2020, Suit challenged North Dakota constitutional and statutory provisions governing the signature process to place a constitutional amendment on the November 3, 2020 ballot that would create a nonpartisan legislative redistricting process. These provisions require persons to sign a petition in the presence of the in…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
CODING IN PROCESS
MKB Management Corp. v. Stenehjem

9-09-C-02839 | North Dakota state trial court

(This is a temporary summary, while we research the case.) On July 15, 2009, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit on behalf of the only abortion provider in North Dakota challenging a new state law that imposed a variety of new restrictions on the provision of abortions. Restrictions included requirign women to view an active ultrasound at least 24-hours prior to an abortion.
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
CODING IN PROCESS
Access Independent Health Services, Inc. v. Wrigley

08-2022-cv-01608 | North Dakota state trial court

Filed Date: July 6, 2022

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) This case is about North Dakota's trigger ban that prohibited nearly all abortions following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs. The Red River Women's Clinic, the only remaining abortion provider in North Dakota, sought to block enforcement of the ban. On August 25, 2022, Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick granted a preliminary injunction.
PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Tiegs v. Vilsack

3:21-cv-00147 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: July 6, 2021

Case Ongoing

On July 6, 2021, the plaintiffs filed this complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota against the Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator of the Farm Service Agency ("the defendants"). The plaintiffs, white farmers and/or borrowers on a farm loan, claimed that the defendants violated the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act. Specifically, the plaintiffs argued that under Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ("Section 1005"), they…
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger

3:20-cv-00071 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: May 1, 2020

Closed Date: Oct. 23, 2020

COVID-19 Summary: On May 1, 2020, Self Advocacy Solutions N.D., League of Women Voters of North Dakota, and an individual plaintiff filed a complaint against the Secretary of State of North Dakota and the County Auditor of Grand Forks County to challenge the absence of notice and cure procedures for the state’s signature matching requirement. The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief. The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction on May 11, which the court granted on June 3. On A…
PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Ramsey v. Dalrymple

3:14-cv-00057 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: June 6, 2014

Closed Date: June 29, 2015

This federal lawsuit challenges North Dakota's refusal to allow same-sex marriages or recognize those celebrated in other states. It was filed on June 6, 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota, by seven same-sex couples. (Prior to this lawsuit, it seems that North Dakota was the only state that bans same-sex marriage without such a challenge pending.) One couple sought to marry in North Dakota; four were North Dakota residents who had married elsewhere; one couple h…
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
Libertarian Party of North Dakota v. Jaeger

3:10-cv-00064 | U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota

Filed Date: July 16, 2010

On July 16, 2010, the Libertarian Party of North Dakota and three LPND candidates filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota against the state of North Dakota, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They sought a declaratory judgment, alleging that their exclusion from the general ballot after failing to gain a state-imposed threshold number of votes in the primary election violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.On September 3, 2010, the District Court (Ju…
EDUCATION
Department of Education OCR Title IX Investigation of Minot State University

05-14-2061 | No Court

Filed Date: Dec. 18, 2014

Case Ongoing

On December 18, 2014, a student at Minot State University filed a complaint with the US Department of Education, Chicago Office for Civil Rights (OCR). She alleged that school officials failed to respond promptly and equitably to her report of sexual assault by a faculty member in violation of Title IX. On February 26, 2014, OCR announced that it would open an investigation.On July 7, 2016, OCR concluded the investigation and identified a number of substantial compliance issues. First, the Univ…