Case: Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Sebelius

1:13-cv-02611 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: Sept. 24, 2013

Closed Date: 2018

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 24, 2013, a group of non-profit Catholic-based organizations filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Colorado under the First Amendment, Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and the Administrative Procedure Act against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs, who all provide healthcare to their employees through the Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, were represented by the public interest firm Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. The plaintiffs asked the court to rule that the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) contraception insurance mandate, even with the accommodation for non-profit religious organizations, was unconstitutional. Specifically, the plaintiffs asked for both a preliminary and permanent injunction to keep the government from enforcing the contraception insurance mandate.

On October 24, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. The defendants opposed this motion on the grounds that the accommodation to the ACA mandate did not substantially burden the plaintiffs' religious freedom under RFRA or cause the plaintiffs irreparable harm.

On November 8, 2013, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of standing, or, alternatively for summary judgment. On December 27, 2013, Judge William J. Martinez denied the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of standing. On December 27, 2013, the plaintiff appealed the court's decision to deny preliminary injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit (No. 13-1540). On December 31, 2013, the appellate court denied the plaintiff's motion for an emergency injunction. That same day, however, Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor granted plaintiff's requested injunction pending receipt of a response by the government. On January 24, 2014, the Supreme Court issued an injunction pending appeal, stating:

"If the employer applicants inform the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing that they are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services, the respondents are enjoined from enforcing against the applicants the challenged provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related regulations pending final disposition of the appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. To meet the condition for injunction pending appeal, applicants need not use the form prescribed by the Government and need not send copies to third-party administrators. The Court issues this order based on all of the circumstances of the case, and this order should not be construed as an expression of the Court's views on the merits."

On March 6, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to consolidate this appeal with two similar cases: Southern Nazarene University v. Sebelius and Reaching Souls International v. Sebelius. On March 31, 2014, the Court of Appeals denied the defendant's motion to consolidate.

However, on July 14, 2015, the Court of Appeals denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction in an opinion that joined this case and Southern Nazarene University v. Sebelius. (794 F.3d 1151). The same day, the plaintiffs petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The plaintiffs objected to using the expanded accommodation designed by the court, in which they would not have to notify their insurers directly about their religious opposition to contraception, but would have to communicate that opposition and the name of their insurer to the Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs requested a rehearing en banc, but the Tenth Circuit denied the request in an order on September 3, 2015. 799 F.3d 1315.

On November 6, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case in order to consider whether notifying the federal government by signing a form identifying the employer as a religious nonprofit that objects to the contraceptive services mandate (so that the government can work with the insurer or benefits provider to ensure employees have contraceptive coverage) violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or constitutes the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling government interest. This case was consolidated with six other cases dealing with this issue. Together, the cases are known as Zubik v. Burwell [II].

This case was argued on March 23, 2016. On March 29, 2016, in an unusual move, the Supreme Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs suggesting a solution to their disagreement, in which employees could still receive contraception coverage without employers giving any notice to the government. On May 16, 2016, the Court issued a per curiam order remanding all seven cases to their respective courts of appeals, ordering the lower courts to give the parties time to come to agreement on an approach that "accommodates petitioners’ religious exercise while at the same time ensuring that women covered by petitioners’ health plans 'receive full and equal health coverage, including contraceptive coverage.'" 578 U.S. 403. The Court took no position on the merits of this case.

While the case was back in the District Court, President Trump issued an Executive Order in May 2017 directing the Department of Health and Human Services to address conscience-based objections to the preventive care mandate. The Department of Health and Human Services followed the Executive Order, issuing an exemption to religious organizations like the Little Sisters of the Poor. The case was dismissed voluntarily on June 26, 2018 and the case is now closed.

	Document
1:13-cv-02611	Docket [PACER] Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius	Jan. 28, 2019	Jan. 28, 2019 Docket
1 1:13-cv-02611	Class Action Complaint Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius	Sept. 24, 2013	Sept. 24, 2013 Complaint 2013 WL 5331098
52 1:13-cv-02611	Order Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius	Dec. 27, 2013	Dec. 27, 2013 Order/Opinion 6 F.Supp.3d 1225
13-00691	Order (Temporarily Enjoining Respondents) Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius Supreme Court of the United States	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013 Order/Opinion 571 U.S.
1:13-cv-02611	Order (Denying Plaintiffs-Appellants' Emergency Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal) Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013 Order/Opinion 134 S.Ct. 893
13-00691	Order in Pending Case Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius Supreme Court of the United States	Jan. 24, 2014	Jan. 24, 2014 Order/Opinion 571 U.S. 1171
01019459253 0:13-01540	Order Denying Preliminary Injunction, US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit	July 14, 2015	July 14, 2015 Order/Opinion 794 F.3d 1191
10299849 0:13-01540	Order Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit	Sept. 3, 2015	Sept. 3, 2015 Order/Opinion 799 F.3d 1315
15-00105	Supreme Court Order Granting Certiorari Little Sisters of the Poor for the Aged v. Sebelius Supreme Court of the United States	Nov. 6, 2015	Nov. 6, 2015 Order/Opinion 577 U.S. 971
15-00105	Opinion Supreme Court of the United States	May 16, 2016	May 16, 2016 Order/Opinion 578 U.S. 403

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT against Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-3547495), filed by Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc., Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Summons Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, # 11 Summons United States Department of Health and Human Services, # 12 Summons Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, # 13 Summons United States Department of Labor, # 14 Summons Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, # 15 Summons United States Department of the Treasury, # 16 Summons Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado, # 17 Summons Eric Holder, United States Attorney General)(Scherz, Carl) (Entered: 09/24/2013) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER 2 Exhibit A View on PACER 3 Exhibit B View on PACER 4 Exhibit C View on PACER 5 Exhibit D View on RECAP 6 Exhibit E View on RECAP 7 Exhibit F View on PACER 8 Exhibit G View on PACER 9 Exhibit H View on PACER 10 Summons Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health a View on PACER 11 Summons United States Department of Health and Human Services View on PACER 12 Summons Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor View on PACER 13 Summons United States Department of Labor View on PACER 14 Summons Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury View on PACER 15 Summons United States Department of the Treasury View on PACER 16 Summons Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney's Office for the District of Color View on PACER 17 Summons Eric Holder, United States Attorney General View on PACER	Sept. 24, 2013	Sept. 24, 2013 RECAP
2	CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Scherz, Carl) (Entered: 09/24/2013)	Sept. 24, 2013	Sept. 24, 2013 PACER
3	NOTICE of RELATED CASES by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Scherz, Carl) (Entered: 09/24/2013)	Sept. 24, 2013	Sept. 24, 2013 PACER
4	Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) (Entered: 09/24/2013)	Sept. 24, 2013	Sept. 24, 2013 PACER
5	SUMMONS issued by Clerk. Magistrate Judge Consent Form attached. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, ) (Entered: 09/24/2013) 1 Summons View on PACER 2 Summons View on PACER 3 Summons View on PACER 4 Summons View on PACER 5 Summons View on PACER 6 Summons View on PACER 7 Summons View on PACER 8 Magistrate Judge Consent Form View on PACER	Sept. 24, 2013	Sept. 24, 2013 PACER
6	ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Magistrate Judge Boland is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 09/25/2013. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) (Entered: 09/25/2013)	Sept. 25, 2013	Sept. 25, 2013 PACER
7	NOTICE OF NON ADMITTED ATTORNEYS. Mark L. Rienzi has entered appearance as attorney in this case based on signing the complaint. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 11.1A, an attorney must be a member of the court's bar to enter an appearance. The attorney records of the court do not reflect that counsel is a member of the bar. Unless an application for admission to the bar of the court or a motion to withdraw in this case is received within 20 days of the date of this entry, further action may be taken by the court. Text Only Entry (mjfsl, ) (Entered: 10/01/2013)	Oct. 1, 2013	Oct. 1, 2013 PACER
8	DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc.. (Rienzi, Mark) (Entered: 10/07/2013)	Oct. 7, 2013	Oct. 7, 2013 PACER
9	NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Carl C. Scherz on behalf of Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Scherz, Carl) (Entered: 10/15/2013)	Oct. 15, 2013	Oct. 15, 2013 PACER
10	NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Seth Michael Roberts on behalf of Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/15/2013)	Oct. 15, 2013	Oct. 15, 2013 PACER
11	ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 1/13/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/16/2013. (ervsl, ) (Entered: 10/17/2013)	Oct. 17, 2013	Oct. 17, 2013 RECAP
12	NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Bradley Philip Humphreys on behalf of All Defendants (Humphreys, Bradley) (Entered: 10/17/2013)	Oct. 17, 2013	Oct. 17, 2013 PACER
13	NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Daniel Howard Blomberg on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Blomberg, Daniel) (Entered: 10/21/2013)	Oct. 21, 2013	Oct. 21, 2013 PACER
14	NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Adle Auxier Keim on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Keim, Adle) (Entered: 10/22/2013)	Oct. 22, 2013	Oct. 22, 2013 PACER
15	MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I_Mother Loraine Decl., # 2 Exhibit J_Brother Quirk Decl., # 3 Exhibit K_O Centro Injunction, # 4 Exhibit L_USCCB Directives)(Blomberg, Daniel) (Entered: 10/24/2013) 1 Exhibit I_Mother Loraine Decl. View on RECAP 2 Exhibit J_Brother Quirk Decl. View on RECAP 3 Exhibit K_O Centro Injunction View on PACER 4 Exhibit L_USCCB Directives View on PACER	Oct. 24, 2013	Oct. 24, 2013 RECAP
16	NOTICE of Delivery of Process to U.S. Attorney's Office by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/24/2013)	Oct. 24, 2013	Oct. 24, 2013 PACER
17	SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. United States Department of Health and Human Services served on 10/17/2013, answer due 11/7/2013. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/24/2013)	Oct. 24, 2013	Oct. 24, 2013 PACER
18	ORDER: This matter is before the Court on 15 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. To permit the Court adequate time to address the Motion in advance of the January 1, 2014 deadline, the Court SETS the following briefing schedule: Defendants shall respond to the Motion no later than November 8, 2013, and Plaintiffs may reply by November 15, 2013. After reviewing the briefing, the Court will determine whether a hearing on the Motion is necessary. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/24/2013. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1, ) (Entered: 10/24/2013)	Oct. 24, 2013	Oct. 24, 2013 PACER
19	MOTION to Certify Class and Memdorandum in Support by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit O, # 4 Exhibit P)(Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/29/2013) 1 Exhibit M View on PACER 2 Exhibit N View on PACER 3 Exhibit O View on PACER 4 Exhibit P View on PACER	Oct. 29, 2013	Oct. 29, 2013 PACER
20	SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/31/2013)	Oct. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013 PACER
21	SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Jacob J. Lew served on 10/10/2013, answer due 10/31/2013. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/31/2013)	Oct. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013 PACER
22	SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Thomas E. Perez served on 10/7/2013, answer due 10/28/2013. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/31/2013)	Oct. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013 PACER
23	SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Kathleen Sebelius served on 10/8/2013, answer due 10/29/2013. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/31/2013)	Oct. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013 PACER
24	SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. United States Department of Labor served on 10/7/2013, answer due 10/28/2013. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/31/2013)	Oct. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013 PACER
25	NOTICE of Delivery of Process to Eric Holder, United States Attorney General by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Roberts, Seth) (Entered: 10/31/2013)	Oct. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013 PACER
26	MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Defendants Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 11/07/2013)	Nov. 7, 2013	Nov. 7, 2013 PACER
27	ORDER denying Defendants' Motion for Extension of Page Limits 26 . Defendants' Motion is DENIED. This Court's Revised Practice Standard III.B requires "All requests for the Court to take any action... must be contained in a separate, written motion[.]" Furthermore, this District's Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(c) specifically states that "A motion shall not be included in a response or reply... [and] shall be made in a separate paper." Therefore, Defendants' Motion is DENIED because the relief sought by said Motion is contrary to this Court's Revised Practice Standards as well as this District's Local Rules. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/7/2013. Text Only Entry(wjmsec, ) (Entered: 11/07/2013)	Nov. 7, 2013	Nov. 7, 2013 PACER
28	NOTICE of Filing of Certified Administrative Record by Defendants Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury (Attachments: # 1 Index of Administrative Record, # 2 Certification of Administrative Record)(Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 11/08/2013) 1 Index of Administrative Record View on PACER 2 Certification of Administrative Record View on PACER	Nov. 8, 2013	Nov. 8, 2013 PACER
29	BRIEF in Opposition to 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendants Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 11/08/2013)	Nov. 8, 2013	Nov. 8, 2013 PACER
30	MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 11/08/2013)	Nov. 8, 2013	Nov. 8, 2013 RECAP
31	MOTION to File Amicus Brief by Amicus American Civil Liberties Union. (Amiri, Brigitte) (Entered: 11/08/2013)	Nov. 8, 2013	Nov. 8, 2013 PACER
32	ORDER: This matter is before the Court on 31 the American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado's Motion to Participate as Amici Curiae and Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 15 and in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment 30 . The Motion to Participate as Amici Curiae is GRANTED. Amici's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment is ACCEPTED as filed. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/12/2013. Text Only Entry(wjmsec, ) (Entered: 11/12/2013)	Nov. 12, 2013	Nov. 12, 2013 PACER
34	Conventionally Filed ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (Text Only Entry - Available in other format at the Clerk's Office) by Defendants Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury.3 CD's Material placed in oversized area A-7-7 of the Clerk's Office.(ervsl, ) (Modified on 11/14/2013 Conventionally filed documents)(ervsl, ). (Entered: 11/13/2013)	Nov. 12, 2013	Nov. 12, 2013 PACER
33	ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Defendants' 30 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. To permit the Court to consider the merits of the Motion to Dismiss in conjunction with Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Court hereby SETS the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's response to the Motion shall be filed by November 22, 2013, Defendants may reply no later than November 29, 2013. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/13/2013. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1, ) (Entered: 11/13/2013)	Nov. 13, 2013	Nov. 13, 2013 PACER
35	Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 19 MOTION to Certify Class and Memdorandum in Support by Defendants Jacob J. Lew, Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury. (Bennett, Michelle) (Entered: 11/15/2013)	Nov. 15, 2013	Nov. 15, 2013 PACER
36	ORDER granting 35 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 19 . The Defendants' Motion is GRANTED for good cause shown. Defendants' deadline to file their Response to Plaintiffs' Motion is extended up to and including sixty days after the Court resolves Plaintiffs' pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction 15 and Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment 30 . SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/15/2013. Text Only Entry(wjmsec, ) (Entered: 11/15/2013)	Nov. 15, 2013	Nov. 15, 2013 PACER
37	REPLY IN SUPPORT of 15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M Mother Loraine Supplemental Declaration, # 2 Exhibit N Brother Quirk Supplemental Declaration, # 3 Exhibit O Self-Certification Form)(Rienzi, Mark) (Modified on 11/18/2013 edited the title of the text to reflect the title of the document filed) (ervsl, ). (Entered: 11/15/2013) 1 Exhibit M Mother Loraine Supplemental Declaration View on PACER 2 Exhibit N Brother Quirk Supplemental Declaration View on PACER 3 Exhibit O Self-Certification Form View on PACER	Nov. 15, 2013	Nov. 15, 2013 PACER
38	Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Support of re: 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Zubik v. Sebelius)(Rienzi, Mark) Modified on 11/22/2013 to correct event and title (dkals, ). (Entered: 11/22/2013) 1 Exhibit Zubik v. Sebelius View on PACER	Nov. 22, 2013	Nov. 22, 2013 PACER
39	ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Supplement Authority in Support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction 38 . Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED for failure meaningfully to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634 (D. Colo. 2003). SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/22/2013. Text Only Entry(wjmsec, ) (Entered: 11/22/2013)	Nov. 22, 2013	Nov. 22, 2013 PACER
40	Unopposed MOTION for Leave to file Supplemental Authority in Support of 15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Christiam Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado, Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Zubik v. Sebelius)(Rienzi, Mark) (Modified on 11/25/2013 edited the title of the text to reflect that this is a motion)(ervsl, ). (Entered: 11/22/2013) 1 Exhibit Zubik v. Sebelius View on PACER	Nov. 22, 2013	Nov. 22, 2013 PACER

Case: Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Sebelius

1:13-cv-02611 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Case Summary

Related Cases

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Docket

Case Details