Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case: Oregon Advocacy Center v. Mink

3:02-cv-00339 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: March 19, 2002

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon on March 19, 2002, by the Oregon Advocacy Center (“OAC”), representing criminal patients unable to stand trial due to mental illness; the Metropolitan Public Defender Services, Inc. (“MPD”); and a criminal patient who waited 23 days after being found unfit to stand trial before admittance to a proper mental health treatment facility. The plaintiffs sued the Oregon Department of Human Services (“DHS”) under the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness (“PAIMI”) Act, 42 U.S.C. § 10805. The plaintiffs were represented by Disabilities Rights Oregon, the Protection & Advocacy organization for the state of Oregon. The complaint for this case is not available in electronic form, but according to the Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law by District Court Judge Owen M. Panner, the plaintiffs sought declaratory and permanent injunctive relief along with attorneys’ fees and costs. 2002 WL 35578910 (D. Or. 2002).

The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants violated Oregon criminal patients’ Due Process constitutional rights by failing to promptly transfer these individuals to an appropriate state mental health hospital, leaving them in various country jails without proper treatment. On March 25, 2002, Oregon State Hospital (“OSH”) had a list of 11 criminal patients unable to stand trial, who were awaiting transport to a facility. Plaintiffs claim that the county jails in which these criminal patients were residing while awaiting transfer were unequipped to handle these types of patients. They claimed that these jails were “rudimentary”, “lack[ed] people who [were] trained to care for mentally ill people”, while one in particular was described as having “virtually no mental health treatment” at all. According to the plaintiffs, the wait time for these individuals was unacceptable, and the criminal patient population had a high suicide risk and that psychosis can be an emergency requiring immediate treatment; therefore, prompt transfer to a proper mental health facility that can help deal with these situations would be critical. 2002 WL 35578910 (D. Or. 2002).

On March 19, 2002, the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. This motion was denied by Judge Panner on March 25, 2002. On March 29, 2002, the defendants filed a motion for protective order, but it was denied by Judge Panner on the same day.

On May 10, 2002, Judge Panner entered a Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law. 2002 WL 35578910 (D. Or. 2002). The district court found all individuals have a right to be free from incarceration, absent a criminal conviction. Specifically, the court found that it was the state’s interest to assist restoring competency to criminal patients, not to punish them. The court stated that while Oregon county jails did not have the capacity to provide adequate mental health treatment tailored to rehabilitate or restore competency, OSH does. The court recognized that persons found unable to stand trial, yet remain incarcerated, were entitled to prompt treatment in a rehabilitative facility, as even short periods of incarceration could cause extreme harm. The court held that the defendants violated the due process rights of the criminal patients unfit to stand trial. Accordingly, the court ordered that all admissions of these individuals to a state hospital be done in a reasonably timely manner no more than seven days after an order determining a criminal defendant to be unable to stand trial due to mental incapacities. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the order. 2002 WL 35578910 (D. Or. 2002).

On May 14, 2002, the defendants filed a notice of appeal from the Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law and filed a motion to stay judgment pending appeal. The next day Judge Panner entered a judgment for the plaintiffs, while also retaining jurisdiction to enforce the injunction. 2002 WL 35578888 (D. Or. 2002). On May 27, 2002, Judge Panner denied the defendants’ May 14 motion to stay, concluding that the defendants failed to show a strong showing that their appeal was likely to succeed. Judge Panner was eventually proven correct on this conclusion, as on March 6, 2003, Ninth Circuit of The United States Court of Appeals affirmed District Court Judge Panner’s judgment in an opinion by Circuit Judge Raymond C. Fisher. 322 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court of Appeals concluded that OAC had standing to bring the suit, and upheld the district court’s injunction.

The plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys’ fees on May 15, 2002, which Judge Panner granted on May 29 of that same year. The plaintiffs were awarded $53,062.50 in attorneys’ fees and $600.86 in costs. On July 30, 2003, the 9th Circuit Court awarded plaintiffs an additional $31,252.50 in attorneys’ fees to cover the appeal.

show full summary

Summary Authors

Matt Ramirez (6/16/2016)

Sean Drohan (6/16/2021)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4366402/parties/oregon-advocacy-center-v-mink/

Judge(s)

Panner, Owen Murphy (Oregon)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Wilde, Kathleen L. (Oregon)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Georges, Katherine Greene (Oregon)

Wasserman, Richard D. (Oregon)

Other Attorney(s)

Hurley, Mary (Oregon)

Active

Judge(s)

Panner, Owen Murphy (Oregon)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Wilde, Kathleen L. (Oregon)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Georges, Katherine Greene (Oregon)

Wasserman, Richard D. (Oregon)

Other Attorney(s)

Hurley, Mary (Oregon)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
3:02-cv-00339	Docket	Aug. 18, 2003	Aug. 18, 2003 Docket
47 3:02-cv-00339	Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law 2002 WL 35578910	May 10, 2002	May 10, 2002 Order/Opinion
51 3:02-cv-00339	Judgment [entered for Plaintiffs] Oregon Advocacy Center et al v. Mink 2002 WL 35578888	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 Order/Opinion
65 3:02-cv-00339	Order	May 28, 2002	May 28, 2002 Order/Opinion
3:02-cv-00339	Order U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 322 F.3d 1101	March 6, 2003	March 6, 2003 Order/Opinion
77 3:02-cv-00339	ORDER [Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees] Oregon Advocacy Center et al v. Mink	May 29, 2003	May 29, 2003 Order/Opinion
79 0:02-35530	Order U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	Aug. 1, 2003	Aug. 1, 2003 Order/Opinion

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Providing Restorative Treatment when Unable to Aid and Assist in Defense Mental Health Rights Proj, Litigation	In 2002 under our former name—the Oregon Advocacy Center (“OAC”)—we brought a landmark civil rights case against the state because people with mental illness were languishing in jail. The Ninth Circu…	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 https://www.droregon.org/...

show / hide resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4366402/oregon-advocacy-center-v-mink/

Last updated July 13, 2022, 3:06 a.m.

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	Verified Complaint Filing Fee collected. Receipt #: 443045 issued. Filed by A.J. Madison, Metropolitan Public Defenders Incorporated, Oregon Advocacy Center against Stanley Mazur-Hart, Bobby Mink. (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/19/2002)	March 19, 2002	March 19, 2002 RECAP
2	Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Filed by all plaintiffs. (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/19/2002)	March 19, 2002	March 19, 2002 PACER
3	Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 2 ) (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/19/2002)	March 19, 2002	March 19, 2002 PACER
4	Affidavit of Notification. Filed by all plaintiffs. (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/19/2002)	March 19, 2002	March 19, 2002 PACER
5	Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order and Notice of Case Assignment: Case assigned to the Honorable Garr M. King. Discovery to be completed by 7/18/2002. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 8/19/2002. Pretrial Order due by 8/19/2002. (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/19/2002)	March 19, 2002	March 19, 2002 PACER
6	CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Order setting hearing on plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order for Friday, March 22,2002 at 10:00AM. ORDER that defendant's opposition papers be filed by March 21,2002 by NOON. Response due by 3/21/2002. Hearing set for 3/22/2002 at 10:00 AM. (Related documents(s) 2 ) Ordered by Judge Ancer L.Haggerty. (md, ) (Entered: 03/20/2002)	March 19, 2002	March 19, 2002 PACER
7	Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Filed by Stanley Mazur-Hart, Bobby Mink. (Related motion(s) 2 ) (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/22/2002)	March 21, 2002	March 21, 2002 PACER
8	Affidavit of Stanley Mazur-Hart, Ph.D.. Filed by Stanley Mazur-Hart, Bobby Mink. (Related document(s) 7 ) (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/22/2002)	March 21, 2002	March 21, 2002 PACER
9	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Filed by A.J. Madison, Metropolitan Public Defenders Incorporated, Oregon Advocacy Center. (Related document(s) 2 ) (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/22/2002)	March 21, 2002	March 21, 2002 PACER
10	CIVIL MINUTES:Record of time set for hearing on Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order. After counsel for defendant stated that she had some concerns that one of the plaintiffs (Metropolitan Defenders Office) was a former employer of Judge Haggerty, Judge Haggerty recused himself from this hearing. ORDER resetting thehearing on plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (2) before Judge Owen Panner at 2:00PM, Monday, March 25,2002. (Related documents(s) 2 ) Ordered by Judge Ancer L.Haggerty. Counsel Present for Plaintiff: Kathy Wilde. Counsel Present for Defendant: Kathryn Georges. Court Reporter: Nancy Walker. (md, ) (Entered: 03/22/2002)	March 22, 2002	March 22, 2002 PACER
11	Affidavit of Stanley Mazur-Hart, Ph.D. Filed by Stanley Mazur-Hart. (pvh, ) (Entered: 03/22/2002)	March 22, 2002	March 22, 2002 PACER
12	Declaration of Barry Engle. Filed by Oregon Advocacy Center. (pvh, ) (Entered: 04/01/2002)	March 22, 2002	March 22, 2002 PACER
13	Supplemental Affidavit of Leslie Martinez. Filed by all defendants. (pvh, ) (Entered: 04/01/2002)	March 25, 2002	March 25, 2002 PACER
16	CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Hearing: Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Preliminary Injunction is Denied; Court Trial set for 4/8/2002 at 02:00PM in Portland. (Related documents(s) 2 ) Ordered by Judge Owen M. Panner. Court Reporter: Dennis Apodaca. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/02/2002)	March 25, 2002	March 25, 2002 PACER
17	Order Establishing Trial Date & Procedures. Signed 3/25/02 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/02/2002)	March 26, 2002	March 26, 2002 PACER
14	Motion for Protective Order . (Expedited Decision requested). Filed by all defendants. (pvh, ) (Entered: 04/01/2002)	March 29, 2002	March 29, 2002 PACER
18	ORDER:Record of Telephone Conference: Order Denying Defendants Motion for a Protective Order (Related Doc # 14 ) except as to the deposition of Dr. Steven Fritz. by Judge Owen M. Panner. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/02/2002)	March 29, 2002	March 29, 2002 PACER
15	Order Requiring the Release of Confidential Psychiatric Records & Information. Signed 4/1/02 by Judge James A. Redden. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/01/2002)	April 1, 2002	April 1, 2002 PACER
19	Motion for Order Requiring the Release of Confidential Psychiatric Records & Information. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/02/2002)	April 1, 2002	April 1, 2002 PACER
20	Answer to Complaint & Affirmative Defenses (Related Doc # 1 ). Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
21	Motion in limine. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
22	Trial Brief Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
23	Affidavit of Leslie Martinez. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
24	Affidavit of John Keogh. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
25	Affidavit of Linda Brandeberry. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
26	Witness List. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
27	Affidavit of Stanley Mazur-Hart, PhD. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
28	Exhibit List. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/04/2002)	April 3, 2002	April 3, 2002 PACER
29	Transcript of TRO Hearing held on 3/25/02 before Judge Owen M. Panner. Court Reporter: Dennis W. Apodaca. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/05/2002)	April 4, 2002	April 4, 2002 RECAP
30	Response to Issues Raised in Defendants Trial Brief. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 22 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/09/2002)	April 5, 2002	April 5, 2002 PACER
31	Supplemental Exhibit List. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/09/2002)	April 5, 2002	April 5, 2002 PACER
32	Supplemental Witness Statement. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/09/2002)	April 5, 2002	April 5, 2002 PACER
33	Objection(s) to Testimony of Plaintiffs Witnesses. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/10/2002)	April 8, 2002	April 8, 2002 PACER
34	Objection(s) to Plaintiffs Exhibits. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/10/2002)	April 8, 2002	April 8, 2002 PACER
35	Defendants Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/10/2002)	April 8, 2002	April 8, 2002 PACER
36	Motion for Protective Order. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/10/2002)	April 8, 2002	April 8, 2002 PACER
37	CIVIL MINUTES: Record of first day of court trial: Evidence adduced; Findings & Conclusions to Follow. Defendants Motions in Limine are Denied. Plaintiffs & Defendants exhibits received. (Related documents(s) 21 ) Ordered by Judge Owen M. Panner. Court Reporter: Dennis Grube. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/10/2002)	April 8, 2002	April 8, 2002 PACER
38	Memorandum in Support of Motion for Protective Order. Filed by all defendants. (Related document(s) 36 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/10/2002)	April 8, 2002	April 8, 2002 PACER
39	Brief Plaintiffs Post-Trial Brief. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/12/2002)	April 12, 2002	April 12, 2002 PACER
42	Brief Post-Trial Brief. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/18/2002)	April 15, 2002	April 15, 2002 PACER
40	Response to Defendants Post-Trial Brief. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/16/2002)	April 16, 2002	April 16, 2002 PACER
41	Notice of Case Reassignment by Judge Garr M. King: Case reassigned from Garr M. King to Owen M. Panner. (pvh, ) (Entered: 04/17/2002)	April 17, 2002	April 17, 2002 PACER
44	Response to Plaintiffs Post-Trial Brief. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/18/2002)	April 17, 2002	April 17, 2002 PACER
43	Stipulated Protective Order: Signed 4/16/02 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 04/18/2002)	April 18, 2002	April 18, 2002 PACER
45	Supplemental Brief Supplemental Post-Trial Brief. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/06/2002)	May 3, 2002	May 3, 2002 PACER
46	Supplemental Brief on the Issue of Remedy. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/13/2002)	May 9, 2002	May 9, 2002 PACER
47	Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Signed 5/9/02 by Judge Owen M.Panner. (See formal 14-Page document) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/13/2002)	May 10, 2002	May 10, 2002 PACER
48	Notice of Appeal to USCA from Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law # 47 entered on 5/13/02 Filing fee collected. Receipt # 444144 issued.. Filed by all defendants. Transcript due by 7/15/2002. (Related document(s) 47 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/15/2002)	May 14, 2002	May 14, 2002 PACER
49	Motion for Stay Judgment & Injunction Pending Appeal (Expedited Consideration Requested). Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/15/2002)	May 14, 2002	May 14, 2002 PACER
50	Memorandum in Support of Motion for a Stay of Judgment & Injunction Pending Appeal. Filed by all defendants. (Related document(s) 49 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/15/2002)	May 14, 2002	May 14, 2002 PACER
51	Judgment:Based on this court's findings of fact & conclusions of law, judgment is entered for Plaintiffs. This court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce the injunction entered. Signed 5/15/02 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (See formal 2-Page Judgment) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/16/2002)	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 RECAP
52	Motion for Attorney Fees & Costs. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/16/2002)	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 PACER
53	Memorandum in Support of Motion for an Award of Fees. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 52 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/16/2002)	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 PACER
54	Declaration of Kathleeen L. Wilde in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for An Award of Attorneys Fees. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 52 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/16/2002)	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 PACER
55	Response to Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief on the Issue of Remedy. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/16/2002)	May 15, 2002	May 15, 2002 PACER
57	Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Motion for A Stay Pending Appeal (Document filed as a Brief). Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related motion(s) 49 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/20/2002)	May 16, 2002	May 16, 2002 PACER
58	Motion for Clarification & Modify Injunction. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/20/2002)	May 16, 2002	May 16, 2002 PACER
56	Reply to Motion in Support of Motion to Stay Judgment & Injunction Pending Appeal. Filed by all defendants. (Related motion(s) 49 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/20/2002)	May 17, 2002	May 17, 2002 PACER
59	Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Clarify & Modify Injunction. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related motion(s) 58 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/20/2002)	May 17, 2002	May 17, 2002 PACER
60	Amended Reply In Support Of Motion To Stay Judgment And Injunction Pending Appeal. Filed by all defendants. (Related document(s) 49 ) (tomg, ) (Entered: 05/22/2002)	May 20, 2002	May 20, 2002 PACER
61	Supplemental Brief In Support Of Motion To Stay. Filed by all defendants. (Related document(s) 49 ) (tomg, ) (Entered: 05/22/2002)	May 20, 2002	May 20, 2002 PACER
62	Affidavit of Stanley Mazur-Hart, PH.D. In Support of Defendants' Motion To Stay Judgment And Injunction Pending Appeal. Filed by all defendants. (Related document(s) 49 ) (tomg, ) (Entered: 05/22/2002)	May 21, 2002	May 21, 2002 PACER
63	Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for an Award of Attorneys Fees. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 52 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/29/2002)	May 23, 2002	May 23, 2002 PACER
64	Response to Discovery Motion Response to Defendants Supplemental Briefs in Support of Motion for a Stay. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related motion(s) 49 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/29/2002)	May 24, 2002	May 24, 2002 PACER
65	ORDER:Order: Denying Defendants Motion for a Stay (Related Doc # 49 & Motion for Clarification (Related Doc # 58 ). (See formal 4-Page Order) Signed on 5/27/02 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/29/2002)	May 28, 2002	May 28, 2002 PACER
66	Amended Notice of Appeal to USCA from the Judgment # 51 entered on 5/16/02. Filed by Bobby Mink. Transcript due by 7/29/2002. (Related document(s) 51 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/03/2002)	May 30, 2002	May 30, 2002 PACER
	Notification of Appeal Sent	June 3, 2002	June 3, 2002 PACER
67	Docket number 02-35530 assigned by the United States Court of Appeals. USDC Notice of Appeal Doc. # 48 .. (Related document(s) 48 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/04/2002)	June 3, 2002	June 3, 2002 PACER
68	Time Schedule Order from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Appellant to file transcript order form by 6/13/02; Transcripts to be filed by 7/15/02; Appellants opening bried is due 8/30/02; Appellees brief is due 9/30/02. USDC Notice of Appeal Doc. # 48 and USCA #02-35530... Transcript due by 7/15/2002. (Related document(s) 48 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/04/2002)	June 3, 2002	June 3, 2002 PACER
69	Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motions. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/10/2002)	June 3, 2002	June 3, 2002 PACER
70	Memorandum in Opposition Objections to Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Fees. Filed by all defendants. (Related motion(s) 52 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/10/2002)	June 3, 2002	June 3, 2002 PACER
71	Transcript Ordering form for Transcript(s) of Proceedings held on 4/8/02 & 5/25/02.. Filed by all defendants. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/21/2002)	June 14, 2002	June 14, 2002 PACER
72	Docket number 02-35530 assigned by the United States Court of Appeals. USDC Amended Notice of Appeal Doc. # 66 .. (Related document(s) 66 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 06/25/2002)	June 24, 2002	June 24, 2002 PACER
73	Second Amended Notice of Appeal to USCA from order # 48, 66 entered on 5/28/02. Filed by all defendants. Transcript due by 8/26/2002. (Related document(s) 48, 66 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 07/10/2002)	June 27, 2002	June 27, 2002 PACER
	Notification of Appeal Sent	July 15, 2002	July 15, 2002 PACER
	Appeal Record Sent to USCA	July 31, 2002	July 31, 2002 PACER
74	Transcript of Proceedings held on 4/8/02 (Court Trial) before Judge Owen M. Panner. Court Reporter: Dennis R. Grube. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 08/02/2002)	Aug. 2, 2002	Aug. 2, 2002 PACER
75	Certificate of Record transmitted to USCA. USDC Notice of Appeal Doc. # 73, 48 and USCA # 02-35550. (fh, ) (Entered: 12/16/2002)	Dec. 16, 2002	Dec. 16, 2002 PACER
76	Mandate from US Court of Appeals: The Decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED USDC Notice of Appeal Doc. # 66, 48 and USCA # 02-35530. (fh, ) (Entered: 04/16/2003)	April 1, 2003	April 1, 2003 PACER
	Appeal Record Returned	May 14, 2003	May 14, 2003 PACER
77	ORDER:Order: Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Related Doc # 52 ); Plaintiffs are awarded $53,062.50 in attorney fees & $600.86 in costs. Signed on 5/29/03 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 05/30/2003)	May 29, 2003	May 29, 2003 PACER
78	Satisfaction of Judgment: $53,663.36 has been paid to plaintiffs. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 51 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 07/11/2003)	July 9, 2003	July 9, 2003 PACER
79	Order from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Appellees unopposed motion for attorneys fees is granted. A certified copy of this order sent to the districtcourt shall serve to amend this courts mandate. USDC Notice of Appeal Doc. # 76, 48 and USCA #02-35530.. . (fh, ) (Entered: 08/06/2003)	Aug. 1, 2003	Aug. 1, 2003 PACER
80	Satisfaction of Judgment: Attorneys fees in the amount of $31,252.50. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 51 ) (Kirk, ) (Entered: 08/19/2003)	Aug. 15, 2003	Aug. 15, 2003 PACER
81	ORDER:Record of Order: Mooting Motion for Extension of Time (Related Doc # 69 ) by Judge Owen M. Panner. (Kirk, ) (Entered: 08/19/2003)	Aug. 18, 2003	Aug. 18, 2003 PACER
82	Attorney Substitution	May 9, 2019	May 9, 2019 PACER
83	Attorney Appearance	May 9, 2019	May 9, 2019 PACER
84	Motion to Substitute Party	May 10, 2019	May 10, 2019 PACER
85	Motion for Order to Show Cause	May 10, 2019	May 10, 2019 PACER
86	Declaration	May 10, 2019	May 10, 2019 PACER
87	Declaration	May 10, 2019	May 10, 2019 PACER
88	Attorney Association	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
89	Attorney Association	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
90	Attorney Association	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
91	Motion for Order to Show Cause	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 RECAP
92	Declaration	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
93	Declaration	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
94	Proposed Order (Show Cause Hrg)	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
95	Declaration	May 16, 2019	May 16, 2019 PACER
96	Attorney Substitution	May 17, 2019	May 17, 2019 PACER

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory: Oregon

Case Type(s):

Mental Health (Facility)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 19, 2002

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Oregon Advocacy Center, a non-profit representing people with mental illness, specifically those found unable to stand trial, the Metropolitan Public Defender Services, Inc., a non-profit representing indigent criminal defendants, and a criminal patient who waited 23 days before admittance to a proper mental health treatment facility.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Oregon Department of Human Services, State

Defendant Type(s):