Case: Puente Arizona v. Arpaio

2:14-cv-01356 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: June 18, 2014

Closed Date: Jan. 26, 2018

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On June 18, 2014, Puente Arizona, an immigrant advocacy organization, along with two undocumented workers from the state of Arizona and a minister, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the state of Arizona under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Represented by private counsel, the ACLU of Arizona, the immigrant rights clinic of U.C. Irvine Law School, and the National Day Labor Organizing Network (NDLON), plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent further unconstitutional arrests and prosecutions, attorney’s fees as well as costs of suit, and the expungement of records for the two plaintiffs who, they alleged, had been improperly convicted. The plaintiffs challenged certain provisions of Arizona’s identity theft laws, which prohibit using a false identity to gain employment.

The plaintiffs claimed that the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause mandates that federal law preempts that state law, because employment of immigrants is an area over which Congress has reserved exclusive authority.

Arizona amended its identity theft laws to combat the “growing problem” of employment-related identity theft. H.B. 2779, also called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act” (“LAWA”), amended Arizona’s “aggravated identity theft” statute, A.R.S. § 13-2009. It defined aggravated identity theft as the use of information of any another person, real or fictitious person, with the intent of obtaining employment. H.B. 2745, titled “Employment of Unauthorized Aliens” (“EUA”), supplemented the Legal Arizona Workers Act by defining the offense of identity theft to include use of another’s information, real or fictitious, “with the intent to obtain or continue employment.” The bill specifically made this type of forgery, targeted at undocumented workers, a Class 3 felony, punishable by up to 7 years. These bills were passed, at least in part, in order to solve Arizona’s “illegal immigration problem.”

The plaintiffs claimed that in enacting Section 1 of LAWA and Section 1 of EUA (“Section 1s”), Arizona impermissibly intruded on the federal government’s exclusive authority to regulate immigration, legislated in a field occupied by the federal government and imposed unauthorized burdens and penalties on noncitizens, all in violation of the Supremacy Clause. The plaintiffs claimed that Arizona’s worker identity provisions were therefore facially preempted and the defendants could not enforce them. The plaintiffs further claimed that Section 1s constitute impermissible discrimination against noncitizens on the basis of alienage, in violation of the federal Constitution's Equal Protection clause.

The two undocumented plaintiffs in this case claimed to be personally affected by these laws. The plaintiffs, neither of whom had ever previously been charged with or convicted of a crime, were arrested at their respective places of employment by Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”) deputies. Both were charged with using a false identity to work. Both plaintiffs pled guilty to their respective charges and were left with felony convictions that they believed would follow them for life, possibly impacting their chances for future immigration relief.

On Aug. 7, 2014, the plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint and filed a motion for preliminary injunction the following day. On Sept. 10, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction along with a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ first amended complaint.

On Jan. 5, 2015, Judge Campbell granted plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction and enjoined the defendants from enforcing A.R.S. § 2009(A)(3) and the portion of A.R.S. § 13−2008(A) that addresses actions committed "with the intent to obtain or continue employment." 76 F.Supp.3d 833 (2015). All the defendants -- the State, the County, and the Sheriff -- appealed.

While the appeal was being litigated in the 9th Circuit, the case continued in the District Court. On Mar.27, 2015 Judge Campbell denied reconsideration of the preliminary injunction. 2015 WL 1432674.

On July 7, 2015, the plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint. A month later Judge Campbell granted defendant’s motion that the matter not be conducted as a class action. In addition, Judge Campbell decided several discovery related matters: See 2016 WL 722949 (February 24, 2016); 2016 WL 2587991 (May 5, 2016).

On May 2, 2016, the 9th Circuit completed its review of the preliminary injunction appeal, and reversed the district court. In an opinion by Judge Richard C. Tallman, the Court of Appeals held that the District Court erred in its ruling that Arizona’s employment-related identity theft laws were preempted in all applications. Therefore, the preliminary injunction was vacated and remanded for further proceedings to adjudicate the plaintiffs' remaining claims, including the "as-applied" preemption challenge. (The Court dismissed Maricopa County’s appeal, in particular, for lack of jurisdiction.) 2016 WL 1730588, 821 F.3d 1098.

Back in District Court discovery proceeded. On July 1, 2016, defendants moved for summary judgment, and 5 days later plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment. Judge Campbell heard oral argument on Oct. 13, 2016 and issued an order on Nov. 22. He granted in part both plaintiffs' and defendants' summary judgment motions on the preemption issue, and granted defendants' summary judgment motion on the equal protection issue. Judge Campbell held that federal immigration law demonstrated a clear Congressional intent to preempt only state prosecution of identity fraud in the employment eligibility process (the federal Form I-9), but not in other employment-related fraud (including Arizona's identity theft and forgery statutes). Further, Judge Campbell held that the Arizona statutes did not violate Equal Protection. Although the legislature enacted the laws to combat illegal immigration, it also did so to combat identity theft, a legitimate state interest. The statutes were also facially neutral, and thus survived rational-basis review. 2016 WL 6873294.

Plaintiff then moved for injunctive relief on Dec. 16, 2016; Judge Campbell held a motion hearing on Mar. 9, 2017 and issued an order on Mar. 27. He entered judgment declaring that under the Supremacy Clause and ICRA, defendants were preempted from using information submitted solely for the federal employment verification process, in order to prosecute violations of A.R.S. § 13-2002, A.R.S § 13-2008(A), or A.R.S § 13-2009(A)(3). Judge Campbell enjoined MCSO from this practice, and ordered the Sheriff to create and distribute a written policy within 60 days. 2017 WL 1133012.

On Oct. 25, 2017, Judge Campbell awarded $1,015,990 in attorneys' fees and $20,532.08 in non-taxable expenses to plaintiffs, against the Maricopa County Attorney in his official capacity, the Maricopa County Sheriff in his official capacity, and Maricopa County. Defendants could appeal by Jan. 26, 2018, but did not do so.

	Document
2:14-cv-01356	Docket [PACER]	Jan. 28, 2018	Jan. 28, 2018 Docket
1 2:14-cv-01356	Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 Complaint
8 2:14-cv-01356	Order	June 20, 2014	June 20, 2014 Order/Opinion
128 2:14-cv-01356	Order	Dec. 1, 2014	Dec. 1, 2014 Order/Opinion
133 2:14-cv-01356	Order	Jan. 5, 2015	Jan. 5, 2015 Order/Opinion 76 F.Supp.3d 833
164 2:14-cv-01356	Order	March 27, 2015	March 27, 2015 Order/Opinion 2015 WL 1432674
191 2:14-cv-01356	Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	July 7, 2015	July 7, 2015 Complaint
373 2:14-cv-01356	Order	Jan. 22, 2016	Jan. 22, 2016 Order/Opinion 2016 WL 7743406
430 2:14-cv-01356	Order	Feb. 19, 2016	Feb. 19, 2016 Order/Opinion 2016 WL 7227552
440 2:14-cv-01356	Order	Feb. 24, 2016	Feb. 24, 2016 Order/Opinion 2016 WL 722949

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Puente Arizona v. Arpaio American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Arizona	In June 2014, the ACLU of Arizona with co-counsel University of California- Irvine Law Immigrant Rights Clinic, National Day Laborer Organizing Network and the Law Office of Ray A. Ybarra Maldonado f…	May 5, 2016	May 5, 2016 https://www.acluaz.org/...
Puente V. Arpaio: Stop the Raids! Puente Arizona	On June 18, 2014, alongside our members who have been arrested in workplace raids, we filed a lawsuit against Arpaio, Montgomery, and MCSO challenging two state laws that turn immigrants into felons …	May 26, 2016	May 26, 2016 https://puenteaz.wordpress.com/...

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-10575454 filed by Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona, Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola. (submitted by Anne Lai) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014) 1 Exhibit View on PACER 2 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 Clearinghouse
2	SUMMONS Submitted by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (submitted by Anne Lai) (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons)(KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014) 1 Summons View on PACER 2 Summons View on PACER 3 Summons View on PACER	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 PACER
3	Corporate Disclosure Statement by Puente Arizona. (submitted by Anne Lai) (KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014)	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 PACER
4	Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-10575454. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-14-01356-PHX-DGC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014)	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 PACER
5	Summons Issued as to Joseph M Arpaio, Robert Halliday, Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons)(KMG). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. (Entered: 06/18/2014) 1 Summons View on PACER 2 Summons View on PACER 3 Summons View on PACER	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 PACER
6	NOTICE re: Notice of Constitutional Challenge to A State Statute Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1(a)(1)(B) by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona . (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 06/18/2014)	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 PACER
7	MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Anne Lai on behalf of plaintiffs Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, and Puente Arizona. (BAS) (Entered: 06/18/2014)	June 18, 2014	June 18, 2014 PACER
8	ORDER. Motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/20/2014. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 06/20/2014)	June 20, 2014	June 20, 2014 Clearinghouse
9	ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 06/26/2014)	June 26, 2014	June 26, 2014 PACER
10	NOTICE of Appearance by Ann Thompson Uglietta on behalf of Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 07/03/2014)	July 3, 2014	July 3, 2014 PACER
11	SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Joseph Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)	July 10, 2014	July 10, 2014 PACER
12	SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Bill Montgomery, Maricopa County Attorney on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)	July 10, 2014	July 10, 2014 PACER
13	SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Maricopa County on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)	July 10, 2014	July 10, 2014 PACER
14	SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Process re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Robert Halliday, Director, Arizona Department of Public Safety on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)	July 10, 2014	July 10, 2014 PACER
15	STIPULATION Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Fed. R.Civ. P. Rule 12(B) Motions and/or Responsive Pleadings (First Request) by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 07/11/2014) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	July 11, 2014	July 11, 2014 PACER
16	NOTICE re: Notice of Compliance by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona re: 8 Order . (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/11/2014)	July 11, 2014	July 11, 2014 PACER
17	ORDER pursuant to 15 Stipulation: All Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 8/15/2014. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/18/2014. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 07/18/2014)	July 18, 2014	July 18, 2014 PACER
18	MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Jessica Karp Bansal by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Bansal, Jessica) (Entered: 07/25/2014)	July 25, 2014	July 25, 2014 PACER
19	ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 18 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 07/30/2014)	July 30, 2014	July 30, 2014 PACER
20	MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Sameer M Ashar on behalf of Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, and Puente Arizona. (BAS) (Entered: 08/01/2014)	Aug. 1, 2014	Aug. 1, 2014 PACER
21	ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 20 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 08/01/2014)	Aug. 1, 2014	Aug. 1, 2014 PACER
22	STIPULATION re Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1) Amendment to Complaint by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2014) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	Aug. 7, 2014	Aug. 7, 2014 PACER
23	AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona, Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola.(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2014)	Aug. 7, 2014	Aug. 7, 2014 PACER
24	Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 23 Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2014)	Aug. 7, 2014	Aug. 7, 2014 PACER
25	MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Brief/MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) Modified to correct text on 8/8/2014* (REW). (Entered: 08/07/2014) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	Aug. 7, 2014	Aug. 7, 2014 PACER
26	FILED at 30 - LODGED Proposed Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support re: 25 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 2 Exhibit Index and Exhibits 1-6 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 3 Exhibits 7-16 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 4 Declaration of Carlos Garcia, # 5 Declaration of Nicolas De La Fuente, # 6 Declaration of Noemi Romero, # 7 Declaration of Sara Cervantes Arreola, # 8 Declaration of Rev. Susan E. Frederick-Gray, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) Modified to correct text on 8/8/2014* (REW). (Entered: 08/07/2014) 1 Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda View on PACER 2 Exhibit Index and Exhibits 1-6 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda View on PACER 3 Exhibits 7-16 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda View on PACER 4 Declaration of Carlos Garcia View on PACER 5 Declaration of Nicolas De La Fuente View on PACER 6 Declaration of Noemi Romero View on PACER 7 Declaration of Sara Cervantes Arreola View on PACER 8 Declaration of Rev. Susan E. Frederick-Gray View on PACER 9 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	Aug. 7, 2014	Aug. 7, 2014 PACER
27	MOTION for Leave to File Legislative Records in Non-Electronic Form by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) Modified on 8/8/2014 (REW). (Entered: 08/07/2014) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	Aug. 7, 2014	Aug. 7, 2014 PACER
28	ORDER, the Stipulation 22 is granted; the Complaint shall be amended to substitute Robert Halliday, Director of the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS), with the State of Arizona as a defendant in this matter. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/8/14. (REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)	Aug. 8, 2014	Aug. 8, 2014 PACER
29	ORDER, the motion to file brief in excess of page limits 25 is granted; the Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged as Doc. 26 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/8/14.(REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)	Aug. 8, 2014	Aug. 8, 2014 PACER
30	MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Pochoda Declaration, # 2 Attachment 1, # 3 Attachment 2, # 4 Garcia Declaration, # 5 De La Fuente Declaration, # 6 Romero Declaration, # 7 Arreola Declaration, # 8 Frederick-Gray Declaration)(REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014) 1 Pochoda Declaration View on PACER 2 Attachment 1 View on PACER 3 Attachment 2 View on PACER 4 Garcia Declaration View on PACER 5 De La Fuente Declaration View on PACER 6 Romero Declaration View on PACER 7 Arreola Declaration View on PACER 8 Frederick-Gray Declaration View on PACER	Aug. 8, 2014	Aug. 8, 2014 PACER
31	ORDER, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Legislative Records in Non-electronic Form 27 is granted; Plaintiffs may file with the Clerk the following audio/video recordings, along with their certification letters, in non-electronic form: (1) House Government Committee Meeting, H.B. 2779 (February 20, 2007), (2) Senate Committee of the Whole Meeting and Third Reading of Bills, H.B. 2779 (May 23, 2007). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/8/14. (REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)	Aug. 8, 2014	Aug. 8, 2014 PACER
32	* MOTION for Order Directing Plaintiffs to Provide a Red-Lined First Amended Complaint and Extending Time for Responsive Pleadings re: 23 Amended Complaint Request for Expedited Ruling by Joseph M Arpaio. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Iafrate, Michele). * Added MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer on 8/12/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/11/2014) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	Aug. 11, 2014	Aug. 11, 2014 PACER
33	* Joinder DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTYS AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERYS JOINDER IN DEFENDANT MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF JOSEPH ARPAIOS MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO PROVIDE A RED-LINED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS DOC. # 32 by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to add document linkage on 8/12/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/12/2014)	Aug. 12, 2014	Aug. 12, 2014 PACER
34	NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A - 1st Amended Complaint with Track Changes)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/12/2014) 1 Exhibit Ex. A - 1st Amended Complaint with Track Changes View on PACER	Aug. 12, 2014	Aug. 12, 2014 PACER
35	NOTICE re: Plaintiffs' Notice of Lodging and Service of Certified Legislative Records by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona re: 31 Order on Motion for Leave to File . (Bansal, Jessica) (Entered: 08/12/2014)	Aug. 12, 2014	Aug. 12, 2014 PACER
36	SUMMONS Submitted by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/13/2014)	Aug. 13, 2014	Aug. 13, 2014 PACER
37	Summons Issued as to Arizona, State of. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. (Entered: 08/14/2014)	Aug. 14, 2014	Aug. 14, 2014 PACER
38	SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Acceptance of Service re: Summons and 1st Amended Complaint upon State of Arizona on August 14, 2014. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/14/2014)	Aug. 14, 2014	Aug. 14, 2014 PACER
39	ORDER finding as moot 32 Motion file a redline version of first amended complaint; granting 32 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Joseph M Arpaio answer due 8/26/2014. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/15/2014.(DGC, nvo) (Entered: 08/15/2014)	Aug. 15, 2014	Aug. 15, 2014 PACER
40	ORDER re: 33 Joinder filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery, Maricopa, County of answer due 8/26/2014; Bill Montgomery answer due 8/26/2014. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/15/2014. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 08/15/2014)	Aug. 15, 2014	Aug. 15, 2014 PACER

Case: Puente Arizona v. Arpaio

2:14-cv-01356 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Case Summary

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details