Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Thank you!

DONATE

Case: Puente Arizona v. Arpaio

2:14-cv-01356 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: June 18, 2014

Closed Date: Jan. 26, 2018

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On June 18, 2014, Puente Arizona, an immigrant advocacy organization, along with two undocumented workers from the state of Arizona and a minister, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the state of Arizona under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Represented by private counsel, the ACLU of Arizona, the immigrant rights clinic of U.C. Irvine Law School, and the National Day Labor Organizing Network (NDLON), plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive r…

On June 18, 2014, Puente Arizona, an immigrant advocacy organization, along with two undocumented workers from the state of Arizona and a minister, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the state of Arizona under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Represented by private counsel, the ACLU of Arizona, the immigrant rights clinic of U.C. Irvine Law School, and the National Day Labor Organizing Network (NDLON), plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent further unconstitutional arrests and prosecutions, attorney’s fees as well as costs of suit, and the expungement of records for the two plaintiffs who, they alleged, had been improperly convicted. The plaintiffs challenged certain provisions of Arizona’s identity theft laws, which prohibit using a false identity to gain employment.

The plaintiffs claimed that the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause mandates that federal law preempts that state law, because employment of immigrants is an area over which Congress has reserved exclusive authority.

Arizona amended its identity theft laws to combat the “growing problem” of employment-related identity theft. H.B. 2779, also called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act” (“LAWA”), amended Arizona’s “aggravated identity theft” statute, A.R.S. § 13-2009. It defined aggravated identity theft as the use of information of any another person, real or fictitious person, with the intent of obtaining employment. H.B. 2745, titled “Employment of Unauthorized Aliens” (“EUA”), supplemented the Legal Arizona Workers Act by defining the offense of identity theft to include use of another’s information, real or fictitious, “with the intent to obtain or continue employment.” The bill specifically made this type of forgery, targeted at undocumented workers, a Class 3 felony, punishable by up to 7 years. These bills were passed, at least in part, in order to solve Arizona’s “illegal immigration problem.”

The plaintiffs claimed that in enacting Section 1 of LAWA and Section 1 of EUA (“Section 1s”), Arizona impermissibly intruded on the federal government’s exclusive authority to regulate immigration, legislated in a field occupied by the federal government and imposed unauthorized burdens and penalties on noncitizens, all in violation of the Supremacy Clause. The plaintiffs claimed that Arizona’s worker identity provisions were therefore facially preempted and the defendants could not enforce them. The plaintiffs further claimed that Section 1s constitute impermissible discrimination against noncitizens on the basis of alienage, in violation of the federal Constitution's Equal Protection clause.

The two undocumented plaintiffs in this case claimed to be personally affected by these laws. The plaintiffs, neither of whom had ever previously been charged with or convicted of a crime, were arrested at their respective places of employment by Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”) deputies. Both were charged with using a false identity to work. Both plaintiffs pled guilty to their respective charges and were left with felony convictions that they believed would follow them for life, possibly impacting their chances for future immigration relief.

On Aug. 7, 2014, the plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint and filed a motion for preliminary injunction the following day. On Sept. 10, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction along with a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ first amended complaint.

On Jan. 5, 2015, Judge Campbell granted plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction and enjoined the defendants from enforcing A.R.S. § 2009(A)(3) and the portion of A.R.S. § 13−2008(A) that addresses actions committed "with the intent to obtain or continue employment." 76 F.Supp.3d 833 (2015). All the defendants -- the State, the County, and the Sheriff -- appealed.

While the appeal was being litigated in the 9th Circuit, the case continued in the District Court. On Mar.27, 2015 Judge Campbell denied reconsideration of the preliminary injunction. 2015 WL 1432674.

On July 7, 2015, the plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint. A month later Judge Campbell granted defendant’s motion that the matter not be conducted as a class action. In addition, Judge Campbell decided several discovery related matters: See 2016 WL 722949 (February 24, 2016); 2016 WL 2587991 (May 5, 2016).

On May 2, 2016, the 9th Circuit completed its review of the preliminary injunction appeal, and reversed the district court. In an opinion by Judge Richard C. Tallman, the Court of Appeals held that the District Court erred in its ruling that Arizona’s employment-related identity theft laws were preempted in all applications. Therefore, the preliminary injunction was vacated and remanded for further proceedings to adjudicate the plaintiffs' remaining claims, including the "as-applied" preemption challenge. (The Court dismissed Maricopa County’s appeal, in particular, for lack of jurisdiction.) 2016 WL 1730588, 821 F.3d 1098.

Back in District Court discovery proceeded. On July 1, 2016, defendants moved for summary judgment, and 5 days later plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment. Judge Campbell heard oral argument on Oct. 13, 2016 and issued an order on Nov. 22. He granted in part both plaintiffs' and defendants' summary judgment motions on the preemption issue, and granted defendants' summary judgment motion on the equal protection issue. Judge Campbell held that federal immigration law demonstrated a clear Congressional intent to preempt only state prosecution of identity fraud in the employment eligibility process (the federal Form I-9), but not in other employment-related fraud (including Arizona's identity theft and forgery statutes). Further, Judge Campbell held that the Arizona statutes did not violate Equal Protection. Although the legislature enacted the laws to combat illegal immigration, it also did so to combat identity theft, a legitimate state interest. The statutes were also facially neutral, and thus survived rational-basis review. 2016 WL 6873294.

Plaintiff then moved for injunctive relief on Dec. 16, 2016; Judge Campbell held a motion hearing on Mar. 9, 2017 and issued an order on Mar. 27. He entered judgment declaring that under the Supremacy Clause and ICRA, defendants were preempted from using information submitted solely for the federal employment verification process, in order to prosecute violations of A.R.S. § 13-2002, A.R.S § 13-2008(A), or A.R.S § 13-2009(A)(3). Judge Campbell enjoined MCSO from this practice, and ordered the Sheriff to create and distribute a written policy within 60 days. 2017 WL 1133012.

On Oct. 25, 2017, Judge Campbell awarded $1,015,990 in attorneys' fees and $20,532.08 in non-taxable expenses to plaintiffs, against the Maricopa County Attorney in his official capacity, the Maricopa County Sheriff in his official capacity, and Maricopa County. Defendants could appeal by Jan. 26, 2018, but did not do so.

On Jan. 26, 2018, the parties notified the court that they had reached a settlement. The docket does not include the terms.

This case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Matt Ramirez (5/24/2016)

Ava Morgenstern (1/29/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attrorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4134142/parties/puente-arizona-v-arpaio/


Judge(s)

Campbell, David G. (Arizona)

Tallman, Richard C. (Washington)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Anchors, Sarah R. (Arizona)

Ashar, Sameer M. (California)

Bansal, Jessica Karp (California)

Bendor, Joshua David R. (Arizona)

Brody, Kathleen E. (Arizona)

Carrillo, Jose A. (Arizona)

Diaz, Hector J. (Arizona)

Hermes, Edward J.B. (Arizona)

Judge(s)

Campbell, David G. (Arizona)

Tallman, Richard C. (Washington)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Anchors, Sarah R. (Arizona)

Ashar, Sameer M. (California)

Bansal, Jessica Karp (California)

Bendor, Joshua David R. (Arizona)

Brody, Kathleen E. (Arizona)

Carrillo, Jose A. (Arizona)

Diaz, Hector J. (Arizona)

Hermes, Edward J.B. (Arizona)

Lai, Anne (Arizona)

MacLean, Emilou (California)

MacLean [inactive], Emilou (California)

Panuco, Cindy (California)

Piovia-Scott, Joshua (California)

Pochoda, Daniel Joseph (Arizona)

Stormer, Dan Lewis (California)

Vosburgh, Jessica Myers (Alabama)

Waters, Renee Jeanette (Arizona)

Ybarra Maldonado, Ray A. (Arizona)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Draye, Dominic Emil (Arizona)

Elliott, Stephanie Susan (Arizona)

Heathcotte, Brock Jason (Arizona)

Hethmon, Michael M. (District of Columbia)

Iafrate, Michele Marie (Arizona)

Irish, Douglas L. (Arizona)

Liddy, Thomas P (Arizona)

Mangum, J. Kenneth (Arizona)

Miller, Keith Joseph (Arizona)

Nelson, Katherine Cazan (Arizona)

Tryon, G Michael (Arizona)

Uglietta, Ann Thompson (Arizona)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:14-cv-01356

Docket [PACER]

Jan. 28, 2018

Jan. 28, 2018

Docket
1

2:14-cv-01356

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

Complaint
8

2:14-cv-01356

Order

June 20, 2014

June 20, 2014

Order/Opinion
128

2:14-cv-01356

Order

Dec. 1, 2014

Dec. 1, 2014

Order/Opinion
133

2:14-cv-01356

Order

Jan. 5, 2015

Jan. 5, 2015

Order/Opinion
164

2:14-cv-01356

Order

March 27, 2015

March 27, 2015

Order/Opinion
191

2:14-cv-01356

Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

July 7, 2015

July 7, 2015

Complaint
373

2:14-cv-01356

Order

Jan. 22, 2016

Jan. 22, 2016

Order/Opinion
430

2:14-cv-01356

Order

Feb. 19, 2016

Feb. 19, 2016

Order/Opinion
440

2:14-cv-01356

Order

Feb. 24, 2016

Feb. 24, 2016

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4134142/puente-arizona-v-arpaio/

Last updated Nov. 29, 2022, 3:12 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-10575454 filed by Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona, Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola. (submitted by Anne Lai) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
2

SUMMONS Submitted by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (submitted by Anne Lai) (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons)(KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014)

1 Summons

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
3

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Puente Arizona. (submitted by Anne Lai) (KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014)

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
4

Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-10575454. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-14-01356-PHX-DGC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KMG) (Entered: 06/18/2014)

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
5

Summons Issued as to Joseph M Arpaio, Robert Halliday, Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons)(KMG). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. (Entered: 06/18/2014)

1 Summons

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
6

NOTICE re: Notice of Constitutional Challenge to A State Statute Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1(a)(1)(B) by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona . (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 06/18/2014)

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
7

MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Anne Lai on behalf of plaintiffs Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, and Puente Arizona. (BAS) (Entered: 06/18/2014)

June 18, 2014

June 18, 2014

PACER
8

ORDER. Motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/20/2014. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 06/20/2014)

June 20, 2014

June 20, 2014

PACER
9

ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 06/26/2014)

June 26, 2014

June 26, 2014

PACER
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Ann Thompson Uglietta on behalf of Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 07/03/2014)

July 3, 2014

July 3, 2014

PACER
11

SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Joseph Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)

July 10, 2014

July 10, 2014

PACER
12

SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Bill Montgomery, Maricopa County Attorney on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)

July 10, 2014

July 10, 2014

PACER
13

SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Maricopa County on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)

July 10, 2014

July 10, 2014

PACER
14

SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Affidavit of Process re: Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Corporate Disclosure Statement, June 20, 2014 Order and Notice of Constitutional Challenge upon Robert Halliday, Director, Arizona Department of Public Safety on June 23, 2014. (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2014)

July 10, 2014

July 10, 2014

PACER
15

STIPULATION Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Fed. R.Civ. P. Rule 12(B) Motions and/or Responsive Pleadings (First Request) by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 07/11/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 11, 2014

July 11, 2014

PACER
16

NOTICE re: Notice of Compliance by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona re: 8 Order . (Pochoda, Daniel) (Entered: 07/11/2014)

July 11, 2014

July 11, 2014

PACER
17

ORDER pursuant to 15 Stipulation: All Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 8/15/2014. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/18/2014. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 07/18/2014)

July 18, 2014

July 18, 2014

PACER
18

MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Jessica Karp Bansal by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Bansal, Jessica) (Entered: 07/25/2014)

July 25, 2014

July 25, 2014

PACER
19

ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 18 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 07/30/2014)

July 30, 2014

July 30, 2014

PACER
20

MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Sameer M Ashar on behalf of Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, and Puente Arizona. (BAS) (Entered: 08/01/2014)

Aug. 1, 2014

Aug. 1, 2014

PACER
21

ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 20 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 08/01/2014)

Aug. 1, 2014

Aug. 1, 2014

PACER
22

STIPULATION re Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1) Amendment to Complaint by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 7, 2014

Aug. 7, 2014

PACER
23

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona, Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola.(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2014)

Aug. 7, 2014

Aug. 7, 2014

PACER
24

Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 23 Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2014)

Aug. 7, 2014

Aug. 7, 2014

PACER
25

*MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Brief/MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) *Modified to correct text on 8/8/2014* (REW). (Entered: 08/07/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 7, 2014

Aug. 7, 2014

PACER
26

*FILED at 30 - LODGED Proposed Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support re: 25 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 2 Exhibit Index and Exhibits 1-6 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 3 Exhibits 7-16 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 4 Declaration of Carlos Garcia, # 5 Declaration of Nicolas De La Fuente, # 6 Declaration of Noemi Romero, # 7 Declaration of Sara Cervantes Arreola, # 8 Declaration of Rev. Susan E. Frederick-Gray, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) *Modified to correct text on 8/8/2014* (REW). (Entered: 08/07/2014)

1 Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Index and Exhibits 1-6 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda

View on PACER

3 Exhibits 7-16 to Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda

View on PACER

4 Declaration of Carlos Garcia

View on PACER

5 Declaration of Nicolas De La Fuente

View on PACER

6 Declaration of Noemi Romero

View on PACER

7 Declaration of Sara Cervantes Arreola

View on PACER

8 Declaration of Rev. Susan E. Frederick-Gray

View on PACER

9 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 7, 2014

Aug. 7, 2014

PACER
27

MOTION for Leave to File Legislative Records in Non-Electronic Form by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) Modified on 8/8/2014 (REW). (Entered: 08/07/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 7, 2014

Aug. 7, 2014

PACER
28

ORDER, the Stipulation 22 is granted; the Complaint shall be amended to substitute Robert Halliday, Director of the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS), with the State of Arizona as a defendant in this matter. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/8/14. (REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)

Aug. 8, 2014

Aug. 8, 2014

PACER
29

ORDER, the motion to file brief in excess of page limits 25 is granted; the Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged as Doc. 26 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/8/14.(REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)

Aug. 8, 2014

Aug. 8, 2014

PACER
30

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Pochoda Declaration, # 2 Attachment 1, # 3 Attachment 2, # 4 Garcia Declaration, # 5 De La Fuente Declaration, # 6 Romero Declaration, # 7 Arreola Declaration, # 8 Frederick-Gray Declaration)(REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)

1 Pochoda Declaration

View on PACER

2 Attachment 1

View on PACER

3 Attachment 2

View on PACER

4 Garcia Declaration

View on PACER

5 De La Fuente Declaration

View on PACER

6 Romero Declaration

View on PACER

7 Arreola Declaration

View on PACER

8 Frederick-Gray Declaration

View on PACER

Aug. 8, 2014

Aug. 8, 2014

PACER
31

ORDER, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Legislative Records in Non-electronic Form 27 is granted; Plaintiffs may file with the Clerk the following audio/video recordings, along with their certification letters, in non-electronic form: (1) House Government Committee Meeting, H.B. 2779 (February 20, 2007), (2) Senate Committee of the Whole Meeting and Third Reading of Bills, H.B. 2779 (May 23, 2007). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/8/14. (REW) (Entered: 08/08/2014)

Aug. 8, 2014

Aug. 8, 2014

PACER
32

* MOTION for Order Directing Plaintiffs to Provide a Red-Lined First Amended Complaint and Extending Time for Responsive Pleadings re: 23 Amended Complaint Request for Expedited Ruling by Joseph M Arpaio. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Iafrate, Michele). * Added MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer on 8/12/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/11/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 11, 2014

Aug. 11, 2014

PACER
33

* Joinder DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTYS AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERYS JOINDER IN DEFENDANT MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF JOSEPH ARPAIOS MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO PROVIDE A RED-LINED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS DOC. # 32 by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to add document linkage on 8/12/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/12/2014)

Aug. 12, 2014

Aug. 12, 2014

PACER
34

NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A - 1st Amended Complaint with Track Changes)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/12/2014)

1 Exhibit Ex. A - 1st Amended Complaint with Track Changes

View on PACER

Aug. 12, 2014

Aug. 12, 2014

PACER
35

NOTICE re: Plaintiffs' Notice of Lodging and Service of Certified Legislative Records by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona re: 31 Order on Motion for Leave to File . (Bansal, Jessica) (Entered: 08/12/2014)

Aug. 12, 2014

Aug. 12, 2014

PACER
36

SUMMONS Submitted by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/13/2014)

Aug. 13, 2014

Aug. 13, 2014

PACER
37

Summons Issued as to Arizona, State of. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. (Entered: 08/14/2014)

Aug. 14, 2014

Aug. 14, 2014

PACER
38

SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona: Acceptance of Service re: Summons and 1st Amended Complaint upon State of Arizona on August 14, 2014. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/14/2014)

Aug. 14, 2014

Aug. 14, 2014

PACER
39

ORDER finding as moot 32 Motion file a redline version of first amended complaint; granting 32 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Joseph M Arpaio answer due 8/26/2014. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/15/2014.(DGC, nvo) (Entered: 08/15/2014)

Aug. 15, 2014

Aug. 15, 2014

PACER
40

ORDER re: 33 Joinder filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery, Maricopa, County of answer due 8/26/2014; Bill Montgomery answer due 8/26/2014. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/15/2014. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 08/15/2014)

Aug. 15, 2014

Aug. 15, 2014

PACER
41

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTYS AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. # 30] by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 08/20/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 20, 2014

Aug. 20, 2014

PACER
42

* Joinder in Maricopa County and Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery's 33 Motion (Joinder) for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Defendant Joseph M Arpaio. (Iafrate, Michele) * Modified to add document linkage on 8/21/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/20/2014)

Aug. 20, 2014

Aug. 20, 2014

PACER
43

RESPONSE to Motion re: 41 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTYS AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. # 30] filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 08/21/2014)

Aug. 21, 2014

Aug. 21, 2014

PACER
44

REPLY to Response to Motion re: 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 41 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTYS AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. # 30] DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTYS AND MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. ## 30, 41] filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 08/25/2014)

Aug. 25, 2014

Aug. 25, 2014

PACER
45

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 08/26/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 26, 2014

Aug. 26, 2014

PACER
46

First MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike by Joseph M Arpaio. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Iafrate, Michele) (Entered: 08/26/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 26, 2014

Aug. 26, 2014

PACER
47

* (Filed at Docs 55 and 56 ) LODGED Proposed LODGED: PROPOSED DEFRENDNATS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY'S AND MARICOPA COUNTY'S COMBINED MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PER FED. R. CIV. P 12 (B)(6) MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN PARAGRAPHS IN FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PER FED. R. CIV. P. 12 (F), JOINDER IN DEFENDANT ARPAIO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B) (1) DOC.#23). Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) Modified on 9/10/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/26/2014)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 26, 2014

Aug. 26, 2014

PACER
48

* (Filed at Doc. 53 ) LODGED Proposed Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike re: 46 First MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike . Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Joseph M Arpaio. (Iafrate, Michele) Modified on 9/10/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 08/26/2014)

Aug. 26, 2014

Aug. 26, 2014

PACER
49

Joinder re: 44 Reply to Response to Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. ## 30, 41] by Defendant Joseph M Arpaio. (Iafrate, Michele) (Entered: 08/26/2014)

Aug. 26, 2014

Aug. 26, 2014

PACER
50

STIPULATION re: 48 Lodged Proposed Document, 47 Lodged Proposed Document Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply Briefs for Defendants Arpaio, Montgomery and Maricopa County's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Motions by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
51

ORDER. Telephonic Conference set for 9/11/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell to discuss briefing schedule for pending motion for preliminary injunction and motions to dismiss. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall initiate a conference call to include all counsel and the Court. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/10/2014. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
52

ORDER granting 46 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged as Doc. 48 on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/10/14. (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
53

MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION to Strike (All Redundant, Immaterial or Impertinent Matter re 23 Amended Complaint) by Joseph M Arpaio. (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
54

ORDER granting 45 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged on the Court's docket as Doc. 47 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/10/14. (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
55

MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(6), MOTION to Strike Certain Paragraphs of 23 First Amended Complaint by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Index and Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

1 Index and Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
56

Joinder re: 53 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Index and Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(LAD) (Same PDF as 55, redocketed to reflect Joinder) (Entered: 09/10/2014)

1 Index and Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 10, 2014

Sept. 10, 2014

PACER
57

* JOINDER re: 53 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tryon, G) * Modified to correct event; attorney noticed on 9/11/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/11/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 11, 2014

Sept. 11, 2014

PACER
58

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge David G Campbell: Telephone Conference held on 9/11/2014. ORDERED granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Response due 9/26/14. Reply due 10/10/2014. FURTHER ORDERED granting 50 Stipulation Response/Reply Deadlines Re: 55 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint, 53 MOTION to Dismiss Case,MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 57 MOTION for Joinder re: 53 MOTION to Dismiss Case. Responses due 10/6/2014. Replies due 10/31/2014. Court will rule without oral argument unless otherwise ordered. APPEARANCES: Telephonic appearance by Anne Lai and Jessica Bansal for Plaintiffs. Telephonic appearance by Michele Iafrate for Defendant Joseph Arapio. Telephonic appearance by Ann Uglietta, Thomas Liddy,J Kenneth Mangum for Defendants Bill Montgomery and County of Maricopa. Telephone appearance by G Michael Tryon for Defendant State of Arizona.Motion Hearing re: Motion for preliminary injunction is set for 10/16/2014 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell. Court will set aside 2 hours for oral argument unless notified by the parties that evidence will be presented and additional time is needed. (Court Reporter Elva Cruz-Lauer.) Hearing held 1:31 PM to 2:03 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (TCA) (Entered: 09/11/2014)

Sept. 11, 2014

Sept. 11, 2014

PACER
59

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Arizona, State of for proceedings held on 9/11/14, Judge David G Campbell hearing judge(s). (Tryon, G) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
60

RESPONSE in Opposition re: 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 8 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 9 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 10 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 11 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 12 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 13 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 14 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott)(Tryon, G) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

1 Exhibit Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

8 Exhibit Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

9 Exhibit Exhibit 8 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

10 Exhibit Exhibit 9 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

11 Exhibit Exhibit 10 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

12 Exhibit Exhibit 11 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

13 Exhibit Exhibit 12 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

14 Exhibit Exhibit 13 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

15 Exhibit Exhibit 14 to Declaration of Stephanie Elliott

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
61

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of Page Limit by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tryon, G) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
62

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Joseph M Arpaio. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Iafrate, Michele) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
63

* (Filed at Doc. No. 69 ) LODGED Proposed Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction re: 62 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction . Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Joseph M Arpaio. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Cover, 1-5, A-H, 6-8)(Iafrate, Michele) Modified on 9/29/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/26/2014)

1 Exhibit Cover, 1-5, A-H, 6-8

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
64

* MOTION for Leave to File DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to correct filer (removing Joseph M Arpaio as filer) on 9/29/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/26/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
65

* LODGED Proposed LODGED: DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY'S AND MARICOPA COUNTY'S (1) COMBINED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND (2) THEIR JOINDER IN DEFENDANT SHERIFF ARPAIO'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ON THE BASIS OF LACK OF STANDING [DOC 26]. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to correct filer (removing Joseph M. Arpaio as a filer) on 9/29/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/26/2014)

Sept. 26, 2014

Sept. 26, 2014

PACER
66

** STRICKEN PER ORDER 73 ** Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 65 Lodged Proposed Document by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit Part 1, # 3 Exhibit Part 2, # 4 Exhibit Part 3, # 5 Exhibit Part 4, # 6 Exhibit Part 5, # 7 Exhibit Part 6, # 8 Exhibit Part 7, # 9 Exhibit Part 8, # 10 Exhibit Part 9, # 11 Exhibit Part 10, # 12 Exhibit Part 11, # 13 Exhibit Part 12, # 14 Exhibit Part 13, # 15 Exhibit Part 14, # 16 Exhibit Part 15, # 17 Exhibit Part 16, # 18 Exhibit Part 17, # 19 Exhibit Part 18, # 20 Exhibit Part 19, # 21 Exhibit Part 20, # 22 Exhibit Part 21, # 23 Exhibit Part 22, # 24 Exhibit Part 23, # 25 Exhibit Part 24, # 26 Exhibit Part 25, # 27 Exhibit Part 26, # 28 Exhibit Part 27, # 29 Exhibit Part 28, # 30 Exhibit Part 29, # 31 Exhibit Part 30, # 32 Exhibit Part 31, # 33 Exhibit Part 32)(Uglietta, Ann) Modified on 9/30/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/27/2014)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Part 1

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Part 2

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Part 3

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Part 4

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Part 5

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Part 6

View on PACER

8 Exhibit Part 7

View on PACER

9 Exhibit Part 8

View on PACER

10 Exhibit Part 9

View on PACER

11 Exhibit Part 10

View on PACER

12 Exhibit Part 11

View on PACER

13 Exhibit Part 12

View on PACER

14 Exhibit Part 13

View on PACER

15 Exhibit Part 14

View on PACER

16 Exhibit Part 15

View on PACER

17 Exhibit Part 16

View on PACER

18 Exhibit Part 17

View on PACER

19 Exhibit Part 18

View on PACER

20 Exhibit Part 19

View on PACER

21 Exhibit Part 20

View on PACER

22 Exhibit Part 21

View on PACER

23 Exhibit Part 22

View on PACER

24 Exhibit Part 23

View on PACER

25 Exhibit Part 24

View on PACER

26 Exhibit Part 25

View on PACER

27 Exhibit Part 26

View on PACER

28 Exhibit Part 27

View on PACER

29 Exhibit Part 28

View on PACER

30 Exhibit Part 29

View on PACER

31 Exhibit Part 30

View on PACER

32 Exhibit Part 31

View on PACER

33 Exhibit Part 32

View on PACER

Sept. 27, 2014

Sept. 27, 2014

PACER
67

ORDER granting 61 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/29/2014.(DGC, nvo) (Entered: 09/29/2014)

Sept. 29, 2014

Sept. 29, 2014

PACER
68

ORDER granting 62 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged on the Court's docket as Doc. 63 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/29/14. (LAD) (Entered: 09/29/2014)

Sept. 29, 2014

Sept. 29, 2014

PACER
69

RESPONSE to 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Joseph M Arpaio. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits) (LAD) (Entered: 09/29/2014)

1 Exhibits

View on PACER

Sept. 29, 2014

Sept. 29, 2014

PACER
70

*NOTICE of Errata DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS NOTICE OF ERRATTA AND MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTATION OF LODGED PROPOSED EXHIBIT 11 IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS LODGED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. ## 65, 66-3] by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit)(Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to correct event; attorney noticed on 9/30/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/29/2014)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

3 Exhibit

View on PACER

4 Exhibit

View on PACER

Sept. 29, 2014

Sept. 29, 2014

PACER
71

Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 70 Notice of Errata Proposed Order by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 09/29/2014)

Sept. 29, 2014

Sept. 29, 2014

PACER
72

MOTION Clarification re: 58 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Telephone Conference, Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings, Terminate Stipulation, Common Prompts (Text Only), 60 Response in Opposition to Motion by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 09/29/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 29, 2014

Sept. 29, 2014

PACER
73

ORDER - 1. Defendants' motion to exceed page limits (Doc. 64 ) is granted. The Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged as Doc. 65 . 2. Defendants' motion to supplement exhibits (Doc. 70 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The Court will not ask the Clerk's office to substitute exhibits in documents already filed with the Court. The Clerk is directed to strike Doc. 66 . Counsel for Defendants Maricopa County shall refile the exhibits in the correct order and form. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/30/14. (LAD) (Entered: 09/30/2014)

Sept. 30, 2014

Sept. 30, 2014

PACER
74

RESPONSE in Opposition to 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (LAD) (Entered: 09/30/2014)

Sept. 30, 2014

Sept. 30, 2014

PACER
75

Joinder in Defendant Sheriff Arpaio's 69 Response in Opposition to 30 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (LAD) (same PDF as 74, redocketed to reflect filing of Joinder) (Entered: 09/30/2014)

Sept. 30, 2014

Sept. 30, 2014

PACER
76

* Additional Attachments to Main Document re: PER COURT ORDER [DOC. 73 ], RE-FILED EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS (1) COMBINED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND (2) THEIR JOINDER IN DEFENDANT SHERIFF ARPAIOS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ON THE BASIS OF LACK OF STANDING [DOC. 74, 75 ] by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit Part 1, # 3 Exhibit Part 2, # 4 Exhibit Part 3, # 5 Exhibit Part 4, # 6 Exhibit Part 5, # 7 Exhibit Part 6, # 8 Exhibit Part 7, # 9 Exhibit Part 8, # 10 Exhibit Part 9, # 11 Exhibit Part 10, # 12 Exhibit Part 11, # 13 Exhibit Part 12, # 14 Exhibit Part 13, # 15 Exhibit Part 14, # 16 Exhibit Part 15, # 17 Exhibit Part 16, # 18 Exhibit Part 17, # 19 Exhibit Part 18, # 20 Exhibit Part 19, # 21 Exhibit Part 20, # 22 Exhibit Part 21, # 23 Exhibit Part 22, # 24 Exhibit Part 23, # 25 Exhibit Part 24, # 26 Exhibit Part 25, # 27 Exhibit Part 26, # 28 Exhibit Part 27, # 29 Exhibit Part 28, # 30 Exhibit Part 29, # 31 Exhibit Part 30, # 32 Exhibit Part 31, # 33 Exhibit Part 32)(Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to correct document linkage on 10/2/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 09/30/2014)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Part 1

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Part 2

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Part 3

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Part 4

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Part 5

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Part 6

View on PACER

8 Exhibit Part 7

View on PACER

9 Exhibit Part 8

View on PACER

10 Exhibit Part 9

View on PACER

11 Exhibit Part 10

View on PACER

12 Exhibit Part 11

View on PACER

13 Exhibit Part 12

View on PACER

14 Exhibit Part 13

View on PACER

15 Exhibit Part 14

View on PACER

16 Exhibit Part 15

View on PACER

17 Exhibit Part 16

View on PACER

18 Exhibit Part 17

View on PACER

19 Exhibit Part 18

View on PACER

20 Exhibit Part 19

View on PACER

21 Exhibit Part 20

View on PACER

22 Exhibit Part 21

View on PACER

23 Exhibit Part 22

View on PACER

24 Exhibit Part 23

View on PACER

25 Exhibit Part 24

View on PACER

26 Exhibit Part 25

View on PACER

27 Exhibit Part 26

View on PACER

28 Exhibit Part 27

View on PACER

29 Exhibit Part 28

View on PACER

30 Exhibit Part 29

View on PACER

31 Exhibit Part 30

View on PACER

32 Exhibit Part 31

View on PACER

33 Exhibit Part 32

View on PACER

Sept. 30, 2014

Sept. 30, 2014

PACER
77

NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Susan Elliott on behalf of Arizona, State of. (Elliott, Stephanie) (Entered: 10/01/2014)

Oct. 1, 2014

Oct. 1, 2014

PACER
78

RESPONSE to Motion re: 72 MOTION Clarification re: 58 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Telephone Conference, Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings, Terminate Stipulation, Common Prompts (Text Only), 60 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Tryon, G) (Entered: 10/02/2014)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2

View on PACER

Oct. 2, 2014

Oct. 2, 2014

PACER
79

RESPONSE to Motion re: 72 MOTION Clarification re: 58 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Telephone Conference, Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings, Terminate Stipulation, Common Prompts (Text Only), 60 Response in Opposition to Motion (Supplemental Response) filed by Arizona, State of. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Tryon, G) (Entered: 10/02/2014)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

Oct. 2, 2014

Oct. 2, 2014

PACER
80

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Telephonic Conference - Briefing Schedule Proceedings held on 09/11/2014, before Judge Campbell. Court Reporter: Elva Cruz-Lauer. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber by filing a Transcript Order Form on the docket before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10/23/2014. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/3/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/31/2014. (RAP) (Entered: 10/03/2014)

Oct. 2, 2014

Oct. 2, 2014

PACER
81

ORDER granting 72 Motion for Clarification. The Court's intent at the status conference on September 11, 2014, was that all defendants respond to the preliminary injunction motion by September 26, 2014, including the State. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10-3-14. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC) (Entered: 10/03/2014)

Oct. 3, 2014

Oct. 3, 2014

PACER
82

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of Page Limit by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lai, Anne) (Entered: 10/06/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 6, 2014

Oct. 6, 2014

PACER
83

* (Filed at Doc. 92 and 93 ) LODGED Proposed Plaintiffs' Consolidated Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Motions to Strike re: 55 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint, 53 MOTION to Dismiss CaseMOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint, 82 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of Page Limit . Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Declaration of Anne Lai)(Lai, Anne) Modified on 10/15/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 10/06/2014)

1 Supplement Declaration of Anne Lai

View on PACER

Oct. 6, 2014

Oct. 6, 2014

PACER
84

MOTION to Supplement DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT EVIDENTIARY RECORD RE: VICTIMS AND A.R.S.§ 13-2008(A) IN SUPPORT OF THEIR COMBINED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. ## 74, 76] by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 10/09/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 9, 2014

Oct. 9, 2014

PACER
85

* (Filed at Doc. 134 ) LODGED Proposed LODGED: SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF DEBORAH MACKENZIE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY'S AND MARICOPA COUNTY'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC ## 74, 76]. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) Modified on 1/5/2015 (LAD). (Entered: 10/09/2014)

Oct. 9, 2014

Oct. 9, 2014

PACER
86

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of Page Limit by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bansal, Jessica) (Entered: 10/10/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 10, 2014

Oct. 10, 2014

PACER
87

* (Filed at Doc. 95 ) LODGED Proposed Plaintiffs' Consolidated Reply to Defendants' Responses to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction re: 86 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of Page Limit . Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 2 Declaration of Carlos Garcia)(Bansal, Jessica) Modified on 10/15/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 10/10/2014)

1 Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda

View on PACER

2 Declaration of Carlos Garcia

View on PACER

Oct. 10, 2014

Oct. 10, 2014

PACER
88

* OBJECTION DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS LODGED EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO PLAINTIFFS LODGED REPLY RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DOC. ## 30, 87, 87-1, 87-2] by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to add document linkage on 10/14/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 10/13/2014)

Oct. 13, 2014

Oct. 13, 2014

PACER
89

* Joinder DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS JOINDER IN DEFENDANT STATE OF ARIZONAS AND DEFENDANT SHERIFF ARPAIOS EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS RE: HISTORY AND FACIAL VALIDITY OF STATE IDENTITY THEFT STATUTES IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DOC. ## 30, 60, 69 by Defendants Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) * Modified to add document linkage on 10/14/2014 (LAD). (Entered: 10/13/2014)

Oct. 13, 2014

Oct. 13, 2014

PACER
90

Joinder re: 88 Objection to Plaintiffs' Lodged Exhibits Attached to Plaintiffs' Lodged Reply re: Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. ## 30, 87, 87-1, 87-2] by Defendant Joseph M Arpaio. (Iafrate, Michele) (Entered: 10/13/2014)

Oct. 13, 2014

Oct. 13, 2014

PACER
91

ORDER granting 82 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged on the Courts docket as Doc. 83 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/15/14. (LAD) (Entered: 10/15/2014)

Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

PACER
92

CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE to 55 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint, 53 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Strike 23 Amended Complaint filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Anne Lai)(LAD) (Entered: 10/15/2014)

1 Declaration of Anne Lai

View on PACER

Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

PACER
93

CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE to 53 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Anne Lai)(LAD) (same PDF as 92, redocketed to use Response to Motion to Dismiss for Law of Jurisdiction event) (Entered: 10/15/2014)

1 Declaration of Anne Lai

View on PACER

Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

PACER
94

ORDER granting 86 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Clerk shall accept for filing the document lodged on the Court's docket as Doc. 87 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/15/14. (LAD) (Entered: 10/15/2014)

Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

PACER
95

CONSOLIDATED REPLY to Response to 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda, # 2 Supplemental Declaration of Carlos Garcia)(LAD) (Entered: 10/15/2014)

1 Supplemental Declaration of Daniel J. Pochoda

View on PACER

2 Supplemental Declaration of Carlos Garcia

View on PACER

Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

PACER
96

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge David G Campbell: Motion Hearing held on 10/16/2014. Oral argument. ORDERED taking under advisement 30 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Court will issue an order. APPEARANCES: Anne Lai, Jessica Bansal, Ray Maldonado, Daniel Pochoda, Joshua Bendor for Plaintiffs. Michael Tryon and Stephanie Elliott for Defendant State of Arizona. Michele Iafrate for Defendant Joseph Arpaio. Ann Uglietta, J Kenneth Mangum, and Douglas Irish for Defendant Bill Montgomery and County of Maricopa. (Court Reporter Laurie Adams.) Hearing held 12:59 PM to 3:11 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (TCA) (Entered: 10/16/2014)

Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

PACER
97

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Joseph M Arpaio for proceedings held on 10/16/2014, Judge David G Campbell hearing judge(s). (Iafrate, Michele) Modified on 10/17/2014 (RAP). (Entered: 10/17/2014)

Oct. 17, 2014

Oct. 17, 2014

PACER
98

MOTION for Leave to File DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO THE COURTS QUESTION AS TO SCOPE OF 8 U.S.C. § 1324C FOR THE COURTS CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANTS RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION THERETO [DOC. ## 26, 74, 87] by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Uglietta, Ann) (Entered: 10/20/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

PACER
99

* (Filed at Doc. 135 ) LODGED Proposed DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO THE COURTS QUESTION AS TO SCOPE OF 8 U.S.C. § 1324C FOR THE COURTS CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANTS RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION THERETO [DOC. ## 26, 74, 87]. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Maricopa, County of, Bill Montgomery. (Uglietta, Ann) Modified on 1/5/2015 (LAD). (Entered: 10/20/2014)

Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

PACER
100

RESPONSE to Motion re: 98 MOTION for Leave to File DEFENDANTS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY MONTGOMERYS AND MARICOPA COUNTYS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO THE COURTS QUESTION AS TO SCOPE OF 8 U.S.C. § 1324C FOR THE COURTS CONSIDERATION OF PLAI filed by Guadalupe Arredondo, Sara Cervantes Arreola, Susan E Frederick-Gray, Puente Arizona. (Lai, Anne) (Entered: 10/21/2014)

Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 18, 2014

Closing Date: Jan. 26, 2018

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two undocumented workers prosecuted for aggravated identity theft, an immigrant advocacy organization, and three ministers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Attorney Organizations:

National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON)

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

State of Arizona, State

Maricopa County (Maricopa), County

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Supremacy Clause

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Litigation

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Amount Defendant Pays: 1036522.08

Order Duration: 2017 - None

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Discrimination Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Issues

General:

Classification / placement

Disparate Treatment

False arrest

Placement in detention facilities

Discrimination-basis:

Immigration status

National origin discrimination

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Criminal prosecution

Detention - criteria

Employment

Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties

Undocumented immigrants - state and local regulation