Case: Gilbert v. Gedney

3:15-cv-00393 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada

Filed Date: July 31, 2015

Closed Date: 2016

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On July 31, 2015, an inmate at the Northern Nevada Correctional Center (NNCC) living with hepatitis C filed this lawsuit in the District Court of Nevada. Representing himself, the plaintiff sued numerous medical and administrative personnel at the prison under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. He claimed that the defendants demonstrated deliberate indifference to serious medical needs resulting from his hepatitis C. The plaintiff …

On July 31, 2015, an inmate at the Northern Nevada Correctional Center (NNCC) living with hepatitis C filed this lawsuit in the District Court of Nevada. Representing himself, the plaintiff sued numerous medical and administrative personnel at the prison under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. He claimed that the defendants demonstrated deliberate indifference to serious medical needs resulting from his hepatitis C. The plaintiff sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, including nominal, punitive, and compensatory damages.

Plaintiff's bloodwork had revealed he was suffering from irreparable liver damage and was at risk of death from liver failure. Plaintiff had repeatedly informed defendants of his condition since his incarceration in 2012, but received no treatment. Specifically, his requests for Harvoni, a treatment that would cure his hepatitis C, were denied for being "too expensive." According to the complaint, one defendant, a doctor who sits on the hepatitis committee at the prison, told plaintiff that "the courts look to us [NNCC doctors] for medical opinions. So whether you need treatment or not, if we say you don't, the Court will side with us."

In January 2016, the court stayed the case to allow opportunity for the parties to settle. An Inmate Early Mediation Conference was scheduled for May 17, 2016. Plaintiff filed a motion for an Inmate Advocate, whose role is to help the inmate to understand mediation proceedings, but was denied.

On May 6, 2016, the parties asked for a time extension, as they were confident they would soon settle the case through informal settlement negotiations and wanted to avoid waste of judicial resources as well as the plaintiff's $350 filing fee. Plaintiff had previously filed to proceed in forma pauperis, but would still be responsible for the $350 regardless of the court's ruling on his motion, which would only occur if mediation failed to resolve the case.

Ten days later the parties filed to dismiss the case with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs. The terms of the private settlement agreement are unknown. The case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Sara Denbo (2/7/2019)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6051957/parties/gilbert-v-gedney/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:15-cv-01874

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983

July 31, 2015

July 31, 2015

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6051957/gilbert-v-gedney/

Last updated June 20, 2026, 5:51 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 July 31, 2015

Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis

1 Complaint

View on PACER

2 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
2 July 31, 2015

Notice to Prisoner re case received & number assigned

RECAP
July 31, 2015

Assign Judges in Civil Case

3 Sept. 22, 2015

ORDER - A decision on # 1 IFP Application is deferred. FURTHER ORD P shall submit a complaint by 10/22/2015. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall send P 1983 form with instructions, and a copy of his handwritten # 1 -1 complaint. (Form, instructions, copy of co mplaint attached hereto for electronic transmittal to P via NNCC law library. ) FURTHER ORD if P does not timely comply with this order dismissal of this action may result. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/22/2015. ( Attachments: # 1 1983 Form, # 2 1983 Instructions, # 3 Complaint ) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1 1983 Form

View on PACER

2 1983 Instructions

View on PACER

3 Complaint

View on PACER

RECAP
4 Sept. 29, 2015

Complaint

RECAP
5 Oct. 19, 2015

ORDER - # 1 IFP Application is DENIED without prejudice to file a new application. Clark SHALL SEND P approved IFP form w instructions. ( Attached to this Order; electronically sent to Plaintiff via NNCC law library. ) IFP or $400 filing fee due by 11/18/2015. Clerk shall retain complaint but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/19/2015. ( Attachments: # 1 IFP Form, for Distribution to Plaintiff, # 2 IFP Instructions, for Distribution to Plaintiff )(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

RECAP
6 Oct. 21, 2015

Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis

RECAP
7 Jan. 20, 2016

Screening Order

1 Complaint

View on PACER

RECAP
8 Feb. 10, 2016

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
9 Feb. 11, 2016

Motion

RECAP
10 Feb. 12, 2016

Minute Order

RECAP
11 Feb. 17, 2016

Order Setting Inmate Early Mediation Conference

RECAP
12 Feb. 19, 2016

Minute Order Setting Hearing on Motion

RECAP
13 Feb. 19, 2016

Response

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit A-1

View on PACER

3 Exhibit A-2

View on PACER

4 Exhibit A-3

View on PACER

RECAP
14 Feb. 23, 2016

Motion

RECAP
15 Feb. 24, 2016

Order on Motion to Extend Time/Shorten Time regarding Discovery or Nondispositive matter

RECAP
16 Feb. 25, 2016

Reply

RECAP
17 March 7, 2016

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 3/7/2016 before Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Crtrm Administrator: Katie Lynn Ogden; Pla Counsel: Harry D. Gilbert, In Pro Per (Telephonically); Def Counsel: John Ward; FTR #: FTR; Time of Hearing: 10:01:53 a.m. - 10:38:37 a.m.; Courtroom: 2. After hearing oral argument, IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's 9 Request and Order for Inmate Advocate to be Present During Mediation Meeting is DENIED. The parties are advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's order. Court adjourns at 10:38 a.m. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

RECAP
18 May 6, 2016

Stipulation

RECAP
19 May 6, 2016

Order on Stipulation

RECAP
20 May 9, 2016

Minute Order

RECAP
21 May 16, 2016

Stipulation of Dismissal

RECAP
22 May 17, 2016

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice per ECF No. 21 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Nevada

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Special Collection(s):

Hepatitis C Treatment in Jails and Prisons

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 31, 2015

Closing Date: 2016

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A prisoner at the Northern Nevada Correctional Center (NNCC) suffering from liver damage from hepatitis C.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

Northern Nevada Correctional Center

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Other Dockets:

District of Nevada 3:15-cv-00393

District of Nevada 1:15-cv-01874

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conditions of confinement

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Hepatitis

Medical care, general

Medication, administration of

Recommended Citation