Case: Roe v. Sims

3:06-cv-03034 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Filed Date: Feb. 14, 2006

Closed Date: March 24, 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about prison officials' deliberate indifference toward the medical needs of incarcerated persons who suffered from hepatitis C. On September 20, 2005, four individuals who were or had been incarcerated at the Illinois Lincoln Correctional Center ("Lincoln") filed this putative class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Judge Harold A. Baker was assigned to the case. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiffs sued Lincoln's w…

This is a case about prison officials' deliberate indifference toward the medical needs of incarcerated persons who suffered from hepatitis C. On September 20, 2005, four individuals who were or had been incarcerated at the Illinois Lincoln Correctional Center ("Lincoln") filed this putative class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Judge Harold A. Baker was assigned to the case.

Represented by private counsel, the plaintiffs sued Lincoln's warden, its medical director, and the director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) under 18 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. They alleged that the defendants had refused to provide medical treatment after the plaintiffs were diagnosed with hepatitis C. The plaintiffs claimed that they requested treatment and then fully complied with IDOC's grievance process when their treatment was refused. The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment regarding the unconstitutionality of the defendants' deliberate indifference. They sought injunctive relief ordering the defendants to comply with federal guidelines regarding treatment of hepatitis C. They also sought compensatory and punitive damages and attorneys' fees. 

After the filing of the complaint and reply, the parties proceeded to discovery. At the close of the discovery period, on April 21, 2006, the defendants moved for the court to sanction the plaintiffs as a consequence of one plaintiff's failure to attend a scheduled deposition. On June 6, 2006, the court granted the motion. It ultimately awarded the defendants their costs associated with that absence: $17.50.

During that same spring, on May 31, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to certify a class defined as: "those inmates within the Department of Corrections who at some point in time during their incarceration had Hepatitis C and elevated liver enzyme levels but received no treatment for that Hepatitis." A few months later, on August 21, the defendants moved for summary judgment.

On March 28, 2007, the court decided both of the outstanding motions. The court denied class certification and granted the motion for summary judgment in part and denied it in part. The court granted summary judgment in favor of two of the three defendants, leaving Lincoln's medical director as the only defendant. The court dismissed the injunctive claims of three of the plaintiffs, reasoning that because they had been released from prison, they were ineligible for injunctive relief. The court also dismissed one plaintiff's pre-incarceration claims as barred by Illinois' statute of limitations. 2007 WL 951920.

After a trial held on February 14-15, 2008, a jury reached verdicts in favor of all four of the plaintiffs and against Lincoln's medical director. The jury awarded each plaintiff $20,000 in compensatory damages and $2,000,000 in punitive damages. The court directed the plaintiffs to file written requests for whatever injunctive relief would be appropriate. The defendant filed a motion on March 4, 2008, for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial.

As requested by the court after trial, on March 6, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a permanent injunction. They asked the court to order IDOC to comply with the current treatment protocol for hepatitis C published by the National Digestive Disease Information Clearinghouse. They requested continuing treatment through public assistance for incarcerated persons who would be released during the course of their treatment. They also asked the court to order IDOC to sue entities who had been unjustly enriched by IDOC's policy of denying treatment. Finally, the plaintiffs asked the court to appoint a physician who would act as an advocate for incarcerated hepatitis C patients. 

While their motion for a permanent injunction was pending, the plaintiffs filed two additional motions: a request for reconsideration of class certification and a request that one of the still-incarcerated plaintiffs be released for medical treatment. Less than a month later, that plaintiff passed away from cirrhosis, the end-stage result of hepatitis C. 

The court denied the plaintiffs' motion to reconsider class certification on June 26, 2008. The plaintiffs' proposed injunctive relief was also denied because, by this point in time, the only plaintiff who remained alive but still in custody had received his requested treatment. The court set a deadline for the incarcerated plaintiff to request injunctive relief, if any was appropriate. Over the next several months, that plaintiff filed two pro se motions for injunctive relief. The court denied the pro se motions on October 22, 2008, noting that counsel needed to file motions on his behalf. Plaintiff's counsel did so on October 24, 2008, requesting a court order that IDOC provide the plaintiff with re-testing for hepatitis C and any additional treatment recommended by the federal guidelines. The plaintiff also asserted that he had been transferred to a different facility in retaliation for his participation in litigation, and he requested a court order to for his transfer back to Lincoln.

On February 18, 2009, the district court ruled on the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law. 2009 WL 10681182. The court granted judgment in the defendant medical director's favor, vacating the jury's verdicts and damages awards regarding three of the four plaintiffs. The court sustained the verdict and compensatory damages award regarding the plaintiff that passed away from cirrhosis, but it reduced the jury's punitive damages award from $2,000,000 to $20,000. Over the next few weeks, the defendant moved for and was awarded $1,065.60 in costs.

As part of the February 18 order, the incarcerated plaintiff's requested injunctive relief was denied as moot because he had been re-tested and found to be hepatitis-free. His transfer request was denied for being outside the scope of this litigation. 

The plaintiffs immediately appealed the district court's judgment in favor of the defendant to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. While that appeal was pending, on March 24, 2009, the district court issued a second amended judgment that substantively reiterated its February 18 order, finalized its remittitur of the damages awarded to the estate of the plaintiff that passed away from cirrhosis, and closed the case. The defendant filed a cross-appeal to the Seventh Circuit one month later.   

On January 28, 2011, Judge Kenneth F. Ripple issued an opinion affirming the district court's decisions. 631 F.3d 843. 

The case is now closed. 

Summary Authors

Jerry Lan (11/16/2022)

Christina Van Wagenen (2/1/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4688514/parties/roe-v-sims/


Judge(s)

Baker, Harold Albert (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Heller, H Kent (Illinois)

Stevens, David (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Rieckenberg, Eric J (Illinois)

Rupcich, Joseph N (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:06-cv-03034

Complaint

Sept. 20, 2005

Sept. 20, 2005

Complaint
27

3:06-cv-03034

Order

March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 951920

50

3:06-cv-03034

Judgment in a Civil Case

Roe v. Elyea

Feb. 19, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008

Order/Opinion

3:06-cv-03034

Order

Roe v. Elyea

June 26, 2008

June 26, 2008

Order/Opinion

2008 WL 11358048

3:06-cv-03034

Order Granting and Denying Post–Trial Motion

Roe v. Elyea

Feb. 18, 2009

Feb. 18, 2009

Order/Opinion

2009 WL 10681182

101

3:06-cv-03034

Order

Roe v. Elyea

March 24, 2009

March 24, 2009

Order/Opinion

09-01723

09-02107

Opinion

Roe v. Elyea

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Jan. 28, 2011

Jan. 28, 2011

Order/Opinion

631 F.3d 843

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4688514/roe-v-sims/

Last updated July 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 20, 2005

COMPLAINT against Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr (Filing fee $ 250; Receipt 4309), filed by Edward J Roe, Anthony P Stasiak, Timothy J Stephen, Jackson Walker.(MT, ilcd) (Entered: 09/20/2005)

RECAP
2 Oct. 7, 2005

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Willard O Elyea. Willard O Elyea waiver sent on 9/21/2005, answer due 11/21/2005. (Heller, H) (Entered: 10/07/2005)

RECAP
3 Oct. 7, 2005

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Edward J Roe. Roger E Walker, Jr waiver sent on 9/21/2005, answer due 11/21/2005. (Heller, H) (Entered: 10/07/2005)

RECAP
4 Oct. 10, 2005

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Edward J Roe. Larry T Sims waiver sent on 10/5/2005, answer due 12/5/2005. (Heller, H) (Entered: 10/10/2005)

RECAP
5 Nov. 21, 2005

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES to Complaint by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr.(Walter, David) (Entered: 11/21/2005)

RECAP
6 Nov. 22, 2005

ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/22/05. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/21/2006 02:15 PM in Courtroom B before Judge Harold A. Baker. See written order.(MT, ilcd) (Entered: 11/22/2005)

RECAP
7 Jan. 24, 2006

CERTIFICATE rule 26 compliance. (Heller, H) (Entered: 01/24/2006)

RECAP
8 Feb. 8, 2006

REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Edward J Roe. (Heller, H) (Entered: 02/08/2006)

RECAP
Feb. 14, 2006

TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/14/06. The plaintiffs are inmates or former inmates at the Logan Correctional Center, Lincoln, Illinois, which is in the United States District Court, Central District of Illinois, Springfield Division. The Rule 16 conference now scheduled for Wednesday, February 15, 2006, is vacated. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Springfield Division.(MT, ilcd)

Feb. 14, 2006

Case transferred in from Urbana Division. Case Number 05-2208. Case assigned to Judge Harold A. Baker and Charles H. Evans. (GU, ilcd)

April 12, 2006

TEXT ORDER: The court adopts the discovery plan proposed by the parties (d/e 8). The clerk is directed to enter the deadlines in the docket. A final pretrial conference is scheduled for March 5, 2007, at 1:30 p.m., by personal appearance by the parties' attorney(s) before the Court in Urbana. No video writ need issue for the plaintiffs' appearances at the final pretrial, as their counsel will appear on their behalf. A bench trial is scheduled for March 12, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., before the court in Urbana. The plaintiff is responsible for timely obtaining and serving the necessary trial subpoenas for his non-party witnesses. Witnesses who are incarcerated in the Illinois Department of Corrections at the time of the trial shall appear at the trial through video conference. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 4/10/2006. (GU, ilcd)

April 12, 2006

Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: Discovery due by 4/20/2006. Motions due by 5/22/2006. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/5/2007 01:30 PM before Judge Harold A. Baker. Bench Trial set for 4/12/2006 09:00 AM before Judge Harold A. Baker. (GU, ilcd)

9 April 21, 2006

MOTION for Sanctions by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. Responses due by 5/5/2006 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Walter, David) (Entered: 04/21/2006)

RECAP
10 May 22, 2006

MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. Responses due by 6/5/2006 (Walter, David) (Entered: 05/22/2006)

RECAP
11 May 31, 2006

MOTION to Certify Class by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 6/14/2006 (Attachments: # 1 exhibit A)(Heller, H) (Entered: 05/31/2006)

RECAP
12 May 31, 2006

MOTION make per deim argument by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 6/14/2006 (Heller, H) (Entered: 05/31/2006)

RECAP
13 June 5, 2006

RESPONSE to Motion re 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. (Heller, H) (Entered: 06/05/2006)

RECAP
14 June 6, 2006

ORDER. Defendants' motion for sanctions is granted in part (d/e 9). By June 13, 2006, Defendants are directed to submit a motion for their expenses relating to Plaintiff Stasiak's deposition. Plaintiff Staskiak shall have 14 days thereafter to respond. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/6/06. (CC, ilcd) (Entered: 06/06/2006)

RECAP
15 June 6, 2006

RESPONSE to Motion re 12 MOTION make per deim argument filed by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. (Walter, David) (Entered: 06/06/2006)

RECAP
16 June 13, 2006

MOTION expenses re: Stasiak deposition re 14 Order on Motion for Sanctions, by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. Responses due by 6/27/2006 (Attachments: # 1 Maninfior Court Reporting Service, Inc.)(Walter, David) (Entered: 06/13/2006)

RECAP
17 June 15, 2006

RESPONSE to Motion re 11 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - part 1# 2 Exhibit 1 - part 2# 3 Exhibit 1 - part 3# 4 Exhibit 2# 5 Exhibit 3 - part 1# 6 Exhibit 3 - part 2# 7 Exhibit 3 - part 3# 8 Exhibit 4# 9 Exhibit 5 - part 1# 10 Exhibit 5 - part 2# 11 Exhibit 5 - part 3# 12 Exhibit 5 - part 4)(Walter, David) (Entered: 06/15/2006)

RECAP
June 19, 2006

TEXT ORDER: Defendants' unopposed motion to extend all deadlines 30 days is granted (d/e 10). Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/19/2006. (MAS, ilcd)

18 June 21, 2006

MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. Responses due by 7/5/2006 (Walter, David) (Entered: 06/21/2006)

RECAP
July 17, 2006

TEXT ORDER: The defendants' unopposed motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline to July 21, 2006, is granted (d/e 18). Other deadlines remain unchanged. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 7/17/2006. (MAS, ilcd)

19 July 21, 2006

MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. Responses due by 8/4/2006 (Walter, David) (Entered: 07/21/2006)

RECAP
20 Aug. 4, 2006

RESPONSE to Motion re 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. (Heller, H) (Entered: 08/04/2006)

RECAP
21 Aug. 21, 2006

MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr.Responses due by 9/11/2006 (Walter, David) (Entered: 08/21/2006)

RECAP
22 Aug. 21, 2006

MEMORANDUM in Support re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, Part 1# 2 Exhibit 1, Part 2# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3, Part 1# 5 Exhibit 3, Part 2# 6 Exhibit 4# 7 Exhibit 5# 8 Exhibit 6, Part 1# 9 Exhibit 6, Part 2# 10 Exhibit 6, Part 3# 11 Exhibit 7, Part 1# 12 Exhibit 7, Part 2# 13 Exhibit 7, Part 3# 14 Exhibit 8# 15 Exhibit 9# 16 Exhibit 10# 17 Exhibit 11)(Walter, David) (Entered: 08/21/2006)

RECAP
23 Sept. 13, 2006

RESPONSE to Motion re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. (Heller, H) (Entered: 09/13/2006)

RECAP
24 Sept. 29, 2006

REPLY to Response to Motion re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. (Walter, David) (Entered: 09/29/2006)

RECAP
Oct. 5, 2006

TEXT ORDER: The plaintiffs' request to strike the defendants' motion for summary judgment as untimely is denied. The plaintiffs do not object to an extension to file dispositive motions; their response asks that, if the extension is granted, that their discovery deadline and expert disclosure deadline be extended as well. The defendants had good cause for filing their motion for summary judgment past the deadline (the need for Dr. Elyea's deposition transcript). The defendants' motion for summary judgment will therefore be considered on its merits. The defendants' motion for an extension is denied as moot (d/e 19). The plaintiffs shall have until October 31, 2006, to file their response to the summary judgment motion. The plaintiffs may attempt to oppose the summary judgment motion with experts of their own, subject to meritorious objections by the defendants, who may file a reply or other appropriate motion within 30 days of the plaintiffs' response. However, the plaintiffs must also make the disclosures required under Rule 26(a)(2) by October 31, 2006, if they seek to rely on experts. The court is not extending the deadlines for expert disclosure at this time. The court is only allowing the plaintiffs to present the experts they wish to be considered. Whether those experts will be considered will be determined after all parties have had a chance to state their positions. The discovery deadline remains unchanged. If the plaintiffs seek a reopening of discovery in order to oppose summary judgment, they must file a motion stating the specific information they seek, explain why the information is necessary to their case, explain why they were unable to obtain the information during discovery, and state how much time they need. As many of the issues in the summary judgment motion are also relevant to the motion to certify class, both motions will be ruled on together. The defendants' motion seeking $17.50 for costs incurred for the no-show deposition of Stasiak is granted (d/e 16). The plaintiffs' motion to make per diem argument is denied as premature (d/e 12). The motion may be renewed when the case is set for trial, if it survives summary judgment. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/5/06. (MAS, ilcd)

25 Oct. 31, 2006

RESPONSE to Motion re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 11 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit deposition of defendant elyea)(Heller, H) (Entered: 10/31/2006)

RECAP
26 Nov. 16, 2006

REPLY to Response to Motion re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Larry T Sims, Willard O Elyea, Roger E Walker, Jr. (Walter, David) (Entered: 11/16/2006)

RECAP
Feb. 21, 2007

TEXT ORDER: The final pretrial conference and trial are cancelled, pending resolution of the motion for summary judgment. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/21/2007. (MAS, ilcd)

27 March 28, 2007

OPINION: 1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part (d/e 21) as follows: a) Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Walker and Sims, who are terminated from this case. b) Summary judgment is gran ted to Defendants on Plaintiff Roe's claims arising from events that occurred before his incarceration in 2003, on the grounds that those claims are barred by the statute of limitations. c) Summary judgment is granted to Defendants on the claim s for injunctive relief by Plaintiffs Roe, Stasiak and Stephen. d) The motion for summary judgment is otherwise denied. 2) Plaintiffs' motion for class determination is denied (d/e 11). 3) A separate text order will enter setting this case for a final pretrial conference and trial. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 3/28/2007. (GU, ilcd)

RECAP
April 27, 2007

TEXT ORDER: The final pretrial conference is scheduled for Thursday, November 1, 2007, at 2:00 p.m., by personal appearance. The proposed final pretrial order is due October 25, 2007. Jury Selection/Jury Trial is scheduled for November 13, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 4/27/2007. (MAS, ilcd)

28 May 2, 2007

MOTION to Substitute Attorney, David M. Walter to be replaced by Eric J. Rieckenberg, by Defendant Willard O Elyea.Responses due by 5/21/2007 (Rieckenberg, Eric) (Entered: 05/02/2007)

RECAP
May 9, 2007

TEXT ORDER: Defendant's motion to substitute counsel is granted (d/e 28). Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 5/9/2007. (MAS, ilcd)

29 July 10, 2007

MOTION to Substitute Attorney, Eric J. Rieckenberg to be replaced by Joseph N. Rupcich, by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 7/27/2007 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 07/10/2007)

RECAP
30 July 16, 2007

RESPONSE to Motion re 29 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, Eric J. Rieckenberg to be replaced by Joseph N. Rupcich, No Objection to Motion filed by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. (Heller, H) (Entered: 07/16/2007)

RECAP
July 19, 2007

TEXT ORDER: Attorney Rieckenberg's Motion to Substitute Attorney 29 is granted. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 7/19/2007. (GU, ilcd)

31 Aug. 16, 2007

MOTION to Continue Trial Date by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 9/4/2007 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 08/16/2007)

RECAP
Sept. 11, 2007

TEXT ORDER: Defendants' unopposed motion to continue trial date is granted (d/e 31). Jury selection/jury trial is rescheduled to February 11, 2008, at 9:00 a.m.. The final pretrial conference remains scheduled for November 1, 2007, at 2:00 p.m., by personal appearance of counsel. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/11/07. (ME, ilcd)

32 Oct. 31, 2007

Proposed Pretrial Order by Willard O Elyea. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 10/31/2007)

RECAP
Oct. 31, 2007

TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/31/07. The Court is in a jury trial at this time. The final pretrial hearing scheduled for 11/1/07 at 2:00 p.m has been vacated. It will rescheduled at a later date.(KW, ilcd)

Nov. 2, 2007

TEXT ORDER: The final pretrial hearing has been scheduled on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, at 1:30 p.m. by personal appearance, at the U. S. District Courthouse, 201 S. Vine St., Urbana, IL., before the Honorable Harold A. Baker, Courtroom B. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/1/2007. (DM, ilcd)

33 Jan. 14, 2008

MOTION to Continue Final Pre-Trial Hearing(No Objection) by Plaintiffs Anthony P Stasiak, Timothy J Stephen, Jackson Walker. Responses due by 1/31/2008 (Heller, H) (Entered: 01/14/2008)

RECAP
Jan. 15, 2008

The motion to continue final pretrial is granted (d/e 33). The final pretrial conference is rescheduled for January 31, 2008, at 1:30 p.m. by personal appearance. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/15/2006. (CT, ilcd)

Jan. 16, 2008

TEXT ORDER: Due to new conflicts in the court's calendar, the final pretrial is rescheduled to February 1, 2008, at 1:30 p.m. by personal appearance before the court in Urbana. Additionally, the jury trial must also be rescheduled, to February 14, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. The clerk is directed to issue writs to secure the presence of Plaintiffs Roe and Walker at the jury trial (see final pretrial order). No writs are necessary for the final pretrial conference, as Plaintiffs are represented by counsel. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/16/2008. (MAS, ilcd)

34 Jan. 28, 2008

MOTION in Limine Regarding Evidence of Indictment and Guilty Plea of Former Department of Corrections Director Donald Snyder by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 2/14/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 01/28/2008)

RECAP
35 Jan. 31, 2008

MOTION in Limine Regarding Evidence Claiming a Connection Between Defendant and the Illegal Actions of Former Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections Donald Snyder by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 2/18/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 01/31/2008)

RECAP
36 Feb. 4, 2008

PRETRIAL ORDER Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/4/08. See written order.(KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/04/2008)

RECAP
Feb. 4, 2008

TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/4/08. Due to the weather and the Courthouse being closed on 2/1/08, the final pretrial hearing has been reset to 2/4/08 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom B before Judge Harold A. Baker. Counsel was notified by telephone on 2/1/08. (KW, ilcd)

Feb. 4, 2008

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Final Pretrial Conference held on 2/4/2008. Appearance for plaintiffs by Kent Heller. Appearances for defendants by Joseph Rupcich and Kelly Choate. Motion in limine will be taken with the trial. Clerk directed to e:sign pretrial order. (Court Reporter TJ.) (KW, ilcd)

37 Feb. 5, 2008

WRIT of Personal Appearance at trial issued for Plaintiff Edward J. Roe. (Faxed copy of Writ to Concordia and Graham CC with original, sealed Writs mailed to both.) (DM, ilcd) (Entered: 02/05/2008)

RECAP
38 Feb. 5, 2008

WRIT of Personal Appearance at trial issued for Plaintiff Jonathan Walker. (Faxed copy of Writ to Concordia and Graham CC with original, sealed Writs mailed to both.) (DM, ilcd) (Entered: 02/05/2008)

RECAP
39 Feb. 11, 2008

MOTION in Limine to Bar Plaintiff Stasiak from Testifying at Trial by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 2/28/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 02/11/2008)

RECAP
Feb. 14, 2008

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Jury Trial held on 2/14/2008. Appearance for plaintiffs by Kent Heller. Plaintiffs Edward Roe and Anthony Stasiak appeared personally. Appearances for defendant by Joseph Rupcich and Kelly Choate. Defendant Willard Elyea appeared personally. Before jury selection, motion hearing held. Motions #34 and 35 are granted, but plaintiffs' counsel will not enter into evidence which will make them moot. Motion #39 is denied. Jury selection held. Jurors sworn to hear the case. Opening statements by the parties. Evidence for the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' counsel offers defendant's exhibits 1-6 into evidence. No objection. Defendant's exhibits 1-6 marked and admitted. Plaintiff rests at 3:46. Jury excused until 2/15/08 at 9:00. Out the presence of the jury. Defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50. Plaintiffs have made a prima facie case. Motion for judgment under Rule 50 is denied. Court in recess until 2/15/08 at 9:30. Plaintiffs remanded to the custody of IDOC. (Court Reporter TJ.) (KW, ilcd)

40 Feb. 15, 2008

JURY VERDICT in favor of plaintiff Stasiak and against defendant Elyea. Compensatory damages $20,000.00 and punitive damages $2,000,000.00(KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
41 Feb. 15, 2008

JURY VERDICT in favor of plaintiff Stephen and against defendant Elyea compensatory damages $20,000.00 and punitive damages $2,000,000.00 (KW, ilcd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/21/2008: # 1 jury verdict) (KW, ilcd). Corrected the jury verdict that was filed on 2/15/08. added on 4/21/2008: (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
42 Feb. 15, 2008

JURY VERDICT in favor of plaintiff Walker and against defendant Elyea in the sum of compensatory damages $20,000.00 and punitive damages $2,000,000.00. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
43 Feb. 15, 2008

JURY VERDICT in favor of plaintiff Roe and against defendant Elyea compensatory damages $20,000.00 and punitive damages $2,000,000.00. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
44 Feb. 15, 2008

Remark: Question from the Court to the jury. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
45 Feb. 15, 2008

Exhibit List. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
46 Feb. 15, 2008

Jury Instructions. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
47 Feb. 15, 2008

Remark: Uncontested issues of fact given to the jury. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
48 Feb. 15, 2008

Defendant's Jury Instructions refused.. (KW, ilcd) (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
49 Feb. 15, 2008

Defendant's EXHIBIT admitted by the plaintiffs. Stored in a folder in the vault. (KW, ilcd) Modified on 2/15/2008 (KW, ilcd). (Entered: 02/15/2008)

RECAP
Feb. 15, 2008

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Court reconvene. Court is minus plaintiffs Ed Roe and Timothy Stephen. Evidence for the defendant. Defendant's motion for judgment under Rule 50; denied. Jury Instruction Hearing held. Closing arguments for the parties. Jury instructions read to the jury. Jury out to delibrate at 12:49. By agreement exhibit 6 will not be given to the jury. Court in recess until jury comes back with a verdict. Jury in with a verdict at 4:19. Verdicts read into the record. Judgment to be entered. Post trial motions due within 10 days. Court in recess at 4:33.Jury Trial completed on 2/15/2008. (Court Reporter TJ.) (KW, ilcd)

50 Feb. 19, 2008

See written Order of 02/18/2009, this Judgment is vacated as to Plaintiffs Walker, Stephen and Stasiak. JUDGMENT in favor of Anthony P Stasiak, Edward J Roe, Jackson Walker, Timothy J Stephen and against Willard O Elyea (KW, ilcd) Modified on 2/18/2009 (DM, ilcd). (Entered: 02/19/2008)

RECAP
51 Feb. 20, 2008

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: See written Order. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 02/20/2008. (DM, ilcd) (Entered: 02/20/2008)

RECAP
52 Feb. 25, 2008

MOTION appointment of Court's expert by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 3/13/2008 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A. Dr. cv, # 2 Exhibit B. fee schedule)(Heller, H) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

RECAP
53 March 4, 2008

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or In the Alternative, MOTION for New Trial by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 3/21/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

RECAP
54 March 4, 2008

MEMORANDUM in Support re 53 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or In the Alternative MOTION for New Trial filed by Defendant Willard O Elyea. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

RECAP
55 March 4, 2008

CERTIFICATE of Compliance with Type Volume Limitation. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

RECAP
56 March 6, 2008

MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 3/24/2008 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A. NDDIC Treatment Guidelines)(Heller, H) (Entered: 03/06/2008)

RECAP
57 March 18, 2008

RESPONSE to Motion re 53 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or In the Alternative MOTION for New Trial filed by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Compliance)(Heller, H) (Entered: 03/18/2008)

RECAP
58 March 20, 2008

RESPONSE to Motion re 56 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Defendant Michael Puisis. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 03/20/2008)

RECAP
59 April 10, 2008

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 51 Add and Terminate Parties, Order by Defendant Michael Puisis. Responses due by 4/28/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 04/10/2008)

RECAP
60 April 18, 2008

MOTION to Appoint Court's Expert Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706 by Defendant Michael Puisis. Responses due by 5/5/2008 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, 2 and 3)(Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 04/18/2008)

RECAP
April 21, 2008

TEXT ORDER: It appears that the scanned-in version of the verdict for the plaintiff Walker covered up the punitive damages award due to the retraction of jurors' names. The clerk is directed to re-scan the original verdict for the plaintiff Walker. Additionally, the court directs the plaintiffs to file a reply to Defendant's response to the motion for permanent injunction, by May 2, 2008. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 04/21/2008. (DM, ilcd)

61 May 2, 2008

MOTION for Reconsideration Class certification by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 5/19/2008 (Heller, H) (Entered: 05/02/2008)

RECAP
62 May 14, 2008

RESPONSE to Motion re 61 MOTION for Reconsideration Class certification filed by Defendant Michael Puisis. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 05/14/2008)

RECAP
63 May 28, 2008

MOTION releasew from prison for medical treatment of plaintiff roe by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 6/16/2008 (Heller, H) (Entered: 05/28/2008)

RECAP
64 June 12, 2008

MOTION to Withdraw 63 MOTION releasew from prison for medical treatment of plaintiff roe, deceased by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 6/30/2008 (Heller, H) (Entered: 06/12/2008)

RECAP
June 16, 2008

TEXT ORDER: A Rule 16 conference is scheduled for June 25, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. by telephone conference. The clerk will initiate the call. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 06/16/2008. (DM, ilcd)

June 25, 2008

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Scheduling Conference held on 6/25/2008. Appearance for plaintiffs by Jason Crowder. Appearance for defendant by Kelly Choate. Written order to be entered. (Court Reporter TJ.) (KW, ilcd)

65 June 26, 2008

ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 06/26/2008: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) The plaintiffs' motion for a permanent injunction is denied (d/e 56); 2) The parties' motions to appoint an expert for purposes of injunctive relief are denied as moot (d/e's 52, 60); 3) The defendant's motion for an extension of time to identify an expert is denied as moot (d/e 59); 4) The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of class certification is denied (d/e 61); 5) The plaintiffs' motion for the release of the plaintiff Roe is denied as moot (d/e 63). The plaintiffs' motion to withdraw the motion for release is denied as moot (d/e 64); 6) By July 17, 2008, Plaintiff Walker is directed to file a motion for the injunctive relief he seeks for himself, if any; and 7) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a), the parties have 90 days after service of a statement noting the death of Plaintiff Roe to move for substitution. It appears that the statement noting death was served on June 12, 2008 (d/e 64). SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (DM, ilcd) (Entered: 06/26/2008)

RECAP
66 July 30, 2008

Motion for Injunctive relief by Jonathan J. Walker. (DM, ilcd) Modified on 8/21/2008 (DM, ilcd). (Entered: 07/30/2008)

RECAP
67 July 31, 2008

MOTION to Substitute Party, Edward Roe to be replaced by Sandy Roe, by Plaintiff Edward J Roe. Responses due by 8/18/2008 (Heller, H) (Entered: 07/31/2008)

RECAP
Aug. 8, 2008

TEXT ORDER: The clerk is directed to send Plaintiff Walker's counsel a copy of the letter Walker filed on July 30, 2008 (d/e 66). Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 08/08/2008. (DM, ilcd)

68 Aug. 13, 2008

MOTION to Supplement 53 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or In the Alternative MOTION for New Trial by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 9/2/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 08/13/2008)

RECAP
69 Aug. 13, 2008

MEMORANDUM in Support re 68 MOTION to Supplement 53 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or In the Alternative MOTION for New Trial filed by Defendant Willard O Elyea. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 08/13/2008)

RECAP
70 Aug. 13, 2008

MOTION to Withdraw 69 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Defendant Willard O Elyea. Responses due by 9/2/2008 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 08/13/2008)

RECAP
71 Aug. 13, 2008

Exhibit to Defendant's Motion to Supplement Post-Trial Motion by Willard O Elyea. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 08/13/2008)

RECAP
Aug. 18, 2008

Text Order: Defendant Elyea's motion to withdraw memorandum is granted (d/e 70). Motion # 68 is withdrawn. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 8/18/08. (ME, ilcd)

72 Aug. 21, 2008

ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 08/21/2008: 1) A hearing regarding the injunctive relief sought by Walker is set for September 25, 2008 at 1:30 p.m. by personal appearance of counsel. Plaintiff Walker shall appear by video conference. The clerk is directed to issue a writ to secure Plaintiff's Walker's video presence at the hearing. If lead counsel in the case cannot appear at the hearing an associate with knowledge of the case and authority to act must appear, and 2) The clerk is directed to re-docket the plaintiff's letter as a motion for injunctive relief, so that it will show as pending on the court's docket. (DM, ilcd) (Entered: 08/21/2008)

RECAP
Aug. 21, 2008

Notice of Docket Text or Event Modification re 66 . Per Judge's Order of August 21st, docket entry 66 was re-docketed as a Motion for Injunctive Relief. (DM, ilcd)

73 Aug. 25, 2008

SECOND MOTION for Injunctive Relief by Plaintiff Jackson Walker. Responses due by 9/11/2008. (DM, ilcd) (Entered: 08/25/2008)

RECAP
Aug. 25, 2008

TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff Roe's motion to substitute is granted (d/e 67). The clerk is directed to change the caption to show that Sandy Roe, as Administrator of the Estate of Edward J. Roe, deceased, is substituted for Plaintiff Roe. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 08/25/2008. (DM, ilcd)

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Special Collection(s):

Hepatitis C Treatment in Jails and Prisons

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 14, 2006

Closing Date: March 24, 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Four individuals who were or had been incarcerated at Lincoln Correctional Center in Illinois sued the center's warden as well as directors at IDOC, because they had not received medical treatment for their hepatitis C infections.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

County

Lincoln Correctional Center

State

Illinois Department of Corrections

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Law-enforcement

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Central District of Illinois 3:06-cv-03034

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 09-01723

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 09-02107

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Amount Defendant Pays: $40,000

Issues

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Hepatitis

Medical care, general

Medication, administration of

Recommended Citation