Filed Date: Feb. 28, 2023
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding complete
This case concerns the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”). On February 28, 2023, Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against Park National Bank (“PNB”). The complaint was filed following an investigation done as part of the DOJ’s Combating Redlining Initiative started in October of 2021. The U.S. sought to remedy PNB’s alleged discriminatory practices in mortgage lending. The U.S. alleged that PNB’s business practices from 2015 to at least 2021 amounted to unlawful redlining in the Columbus, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area (“Columbus MSA”). The U.S. sought declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, damages, a civil penalty, and any additional relief justice may require.
The U.S. alleged that PNB’s business practices were designed to and successfully discriminated against people of color in the Columbus MSA. Of the 433 census tracts in the Columbus MSA, some 73 of them are majority Black and Hispanic. The bank’s self-designated assessment areas broke these tracts down into two, and one group called the Columbus Lending Area (“Columbus”) contained 375 census tracts, and with all of the 73 majority Black and Hispanic tracts contained therein. From 2015 to 2021, PNB had 36 unique branch locations open in Columbus (between 20 and 32 at a time), but not a single branch location was in a majority Black and Hispanic neighborhood. Additionally, few tracts bordering on majority Black and Hispanic neighborhoods contained branch locations. Furthermore, the U.S. alleged that PNB was aware of these issues and failed to take adequate steps to mitigate them through advertising, outreach or in another manner. As a result, PNB received disproportionately low home loan applications, and fewer successful home loans originating from majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. Finally, PNB’s internal oversight committees were cognizant of these issues, but failed to follow through on stated plans to fix them. The U.S. alleged that PNB’s practices and policies constituted unlawful redlining in violation of the FHA, and the ECOA.
Also on February 28, 2023, a joint motion to approve a Consent Judgment by the plaintiff was filed. The consent judgment was signed on March 2, 2023 by Judge Edmund A. Sargus. The terms of the order were as follows:
This consent order is to remain in effect for five years, or if PNB has not invested the requisite $7.75 million in a loan subsidy fund at the close of five years, then until three months after PNB has finished investing that money.
Summary Authors
Nina Charap (3/19/2023)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66907131/parties/united-states-v-park-national-bank/
Downey, Michael John (Ohio)
Harris, Jaclyn Anne (Ohio)
Burton, Glenn Lukus (Ohio)
Glassman, Benjamin C (Ohio)
Helpling, Elizabeth (Ohio)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66907131/united-states-v-park-national-bank/
Last updated Dec. 21, 2024, 2:55 p.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: Ohio
Case Type(s):
Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance
Key Dates
Filing Date: Feb. 28, 2023
Case Ongoing: Yes
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
United States of America
Plaintiff Type(s):
U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff
Attorney Organizations:
U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Park National Bank (Columbus, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Area), Private Entity/Person
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. § 1691
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Amount Defendant Pays: $7.75M Loan Subsidy Fund
Order Duration: 2023 - 2028
Issues
General/Misc.:
Access to public accommodations - privately owned
Discrimination Area:
Discrimination Basis:
Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):
Affected Race(s):