Case: Clayton v. Dejoy

Legal Defense Fund

COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36807811 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Adrianne Clayton. (Attorney Daniel A Osborn added to party Adrianne Clayton(pty:pla))(Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 01/27/2024)

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adrianne Clayton. (Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 01/27/2024)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by plaintiff Adrianne Clayton. (Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 01/27/2024)

NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adrianne Clayton, (Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 01/27/2024)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (et) (Entered: 01/29/2024)

Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) (Entered: 01/29/2024)

60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Louise Dejoy. (et) (Entered: 01/29/2024)

STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. See order for details. (ys) (Entered: 02/02/2024)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adrianne Clayton, upon Defendant Louise Dejoy served on 2/16/2024, answer due 4/16/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childress, US Attorneys Office Central District of California. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to United States Postal Service. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 02/26/2024)

SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Adrianne Clayton, upon Defendant Louise Dejoy served on 3/22/2024, answer due 4/22/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reservice of Summons, Complaint, and Documents to US Attorney Central District and US Attorney General (Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 04/04/2024)

SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Adrianne Clayton, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reservice of Summons, Complaint, and Documents to US Attorney Central District and US Attorney General (Osborn, Daniel) (Entered: 04/04/2024)

STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Louise Dejoy answer now due 6/12/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by defendant Louise Dejoy.(Attorney John Christopher Korevec added to party Louise Dejoy(pty:dft))(Korevec, John) (Entered: 04/15/2024)

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Matthew J Smock counsel for Defendant Louise Dejoy. Adding Matthew J. Smock as counsel of record for Louise Dejoy for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Louise Dejoy. (Attorney Matthew J Smock added to party Louise Dejoy(pty:dft))(Smock, Matthew) (Entered: 04/15/2024)

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 6/26/2024 re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), 12, Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by defendant Louise Dejoy. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Korevec, John) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

ORDER, 14 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days): The Court, having considered the parties Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS that Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended by fourteen (14) days, to June 26, 2024. (shb) (Entered: 06/12/2024)

Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Defendant Louise Dejoy. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Smock, Matthew) (Entered: 06/24/2024)

ORDER UPON STIPULATION EXTENDS DEFENDANTS DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO JULY 26, 2024 16 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (lc) (Entered: 06/26/2024)

STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Finalization of Anticipated Policy Changes filed by defendant Louise Dejoy. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Korevec, John) (Entered: 07/26/2024)

ORDER STAYING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The Court, having considered the parties Stipulation to Stay Case, and good cause appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS that the case will be stayed until January 27, 2025. Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is likewise extended to January 27, 2025. The parties are ordered to file a status report in this case no later than October 25, 2024. (shb) (Entered: 07/30/2024)

STATUS REPORT Joint filed by Defendant Louise Dejoy. (Smock, Matthew) (Entered: 10/24/2024)

STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Policy Update filed by Defendant Louise Dejoy. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Smock, Matthew) (Entered: 01/24/2025)

ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Stay Case 21 : The Court, having considered the parties Stipulation to Extend Stay, and good cause appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS that the stay in this case is extended until May 30, 2025. Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to May 30, 2025. (shb) (Entered: 01/28/2025)

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Matthew J Smock counsel for Defendant Louise Dejoy. Matthew J. Smock is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Louise Dejoy. (Smock, Matthew) (Entered: 04/01/2025)

Order

Order