Case: Torres v. JetBlue Airways Corporation

1:25-cv-00634 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: Feb. 5, 2025

Closed Date: June 14, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case putative class action alleging that JetBlue Airways violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state and city disability-discrimination laws by refusing to consider reasonable accommodations for job duties it classified as essential functions. On February 5, 2025,  a JetBlue employee whose left arm was amputated below the elbow, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of himself and a proposed class of other disable…

This is a case putative class action alleging that JetBlue Airways violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state and city disability-discrimination laws by refusing to consider reasonable accommodations for job duties it classified as essential functions.

On February 5, 2025,  a JetBlue employee whose left arm was amputated below the elbow, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of himself and a proposed class of other disabled JetBlue employees in New York.  He sued JetBlue under the ADA, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff alleged that JetBlue placed him on unpaid leave and effectively terminated his active employment after he requested accommodations because he could not independently open and close aircraft doors.He sought declaratory and injunctive relief for himself and the proposed class. For himself individually, he also sought reinstatement, back pay and benefits, compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and other relief. This case was assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. 

According to the complaint, the employee began working in JetBlue’s airport operations at LaGuardia Airport in April 2022 and successfully handled counter, gate, and baggage-office assignments. During occasional gate shifts, a co-worker briefly assisted with aircraft doors without disrupting operations.  After management directed the employee to request a formal accommodation, JetBlue allegedly denied it, deemed aircraft-door operation an essential function, rejected alternatives, and placed the employee on unpaid leave. The employee claims the task was absent from the written job description and that JetBlue failed to assess the request individually or engage in the required accommodation process. 

The plaintiff brought this case as a putative class action. The proposed class consisted of qualified JetBlue employees in New York with disabilities requiring reasonable accommodations who had been, or reasonably feared that they would be subjected to JetBlue’s alleged policy of refusing to evaluate accommodations for duties it deemed essential job functions. 

After the complaint was filed, JetBlue filed a motion to dismiss the case.However, the case was settled on June 10, 2025, through a private settlement between the parties for both the employee’s individual and class claims. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. Accordingly, the court dismissed the case on June 14, 2025.

This case is now closed. 

Summary Authors

Bode Turner (9/14/2026)

Kyle O'Hara (2/21/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69612641/parties/torres-v-jetblue-airways-corporation/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Dorfman, Matthew (New York)

Goodell, Maia Beth (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Berman, Colby (New York)

Berti, Raymond Joseph (New York)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:25-cv-00634

Class Action Complaint

Feb. 5, 2025

Feb. 5, 2025

Complaint
26

1:25-cv-00634

Letter

June 12, 2025

June 12, 2025

Other

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69612641/torres-v-jetblue-airways-corporation/

Last updated Sept. 6, 2026, 5:17 p.m.

Docket for: Torres v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 5, 2025

COMPLAINT against JetBlue Airways Corporation filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18735268 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Christopher Torres. (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

Clearinghouse
2 Feb. 5, 2025

Civil Cover Sheet.. by Christopher Torres (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

RECAP
3 Feb. 5, 2025

Proposed Summons. by Christopher Torres (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

RECAP
4 Feb. 5, 2025

Summons Issued as to JetBlue Airways Corporation. (SDM) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

RECAP
5 Feb. 5, 2025

Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (SDM) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

RECAP
6 Feb. 5, 2025

This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 5, 2025

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Feb. 5, 2025

Status Report Order

Feb. 5, 2025

Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM)

Feb. 5, 2025

ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before February 26, 2025, describing Plaintiff's efforts to serve Plaintiff's complaint and a summons on Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file the letter required by this order, or if Plaintiff's letter demonstrates a lack of diligence in attempting service, then the Court is unlikely to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to complete service under Rule 4(m) in the absence of unusual circumstances demonstrating good cause.The Court will not extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the letter required by this order unless Plaintiff requests an extension in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 2/5/2025. (KM)

7 Feb. 7, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Torres. JetBlue Airways Corporation served on 2/6/2025, answer due 2/27/2025. (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 02/07/2025)

RECAP
8 Feb. 10, 2025

SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by March 17, 2025, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff's counsel shall notify Defendant's counsel of this scheduling order, in writing, as soon as reasonably possible.Although the Court will be amenable to a reasonable extension of Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint, the Court will require the parties to demonstrate additional good cause to adjourn the deadline for filing the joint letter and proposed case management plan required by this order because the Court does not need Defendant's answer to set a discovery schedule. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 2/10/2025. (ICP) (Entered: 02/10/2025)

RECAP
9 Feb. 24, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Raymond Joseph Berti on behalf of JetBlue Airways Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

RECAP
10 Feb. 24, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Colby Berman on behalf of JetBlue Airways Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Berman, Colby) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

RECAP
11 Feb. 24, 2025

Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, 7 Summons Returned Executed by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

RECAP
12 Feb. 24, 2025

Corporate Disclosure Statement by JetBlue Airways Corporation identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 25, 2025

ORDER: The Court grants Defendant's motion for an extension of time, see ECF No. 11, and Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 14, 2025. The parties' deadline to file the joint letter and case management plan required by the Court's prior scheduling order, see ECF No. 8, remains March 17, 2025. As the parties do not dispute that service was effectuated on February 6, 2025, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant need file the service letter referenced in the Court's Order of February 5, 2025. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 2/25/2025. (GEM)

Feb. 25, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

13 Feb. 26, 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christopher Torres re 8 Status Report Order,,,, (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 02/26/2025)

RECAP
14 March 14, 2025

Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 03/14/2025)

RECAP
15 March 17, 2025

Letter in connection with Initial Status Conference by JetBlue Airways Corporation (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 03/17/2025)

RECAP
16 March 17, 2025

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Proposed (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 03/17/2025)

RECAP
17 March 21, 2025

Letter response to defendant's pre-motion letter to dismiss by Christopher Torres (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

RECAP
18 March 24, 2025

STIPULATION and Proposed Confidentiality Order by JetBlue Airways Corporation (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 03/24/2025)

RECAP
March 26, 2025

ORDER: Defendant has filed a pre-motion letter in anticipation of a proposed motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, see ECF No. 14, and Plaintiff has filed a responsive letter, see ECF No. 17 . Plaintiff shall file an additional letter on or before April 2, 2025, which shall address whether Plaintiff believes the complaint can be amended to address the issues raised in Defendant's letter. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/26/2025. (GEM)

March 26, 2025

Status Report Order

19 March 27, 2025

Letter re: Order of March 26, 2025 and potential amendment of Complaint by Christopher Torres (Goodell, Maia) (Entered: 03/27/2025)

RECAP
20 March 27, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Dorfman on behalf of Christopher Torres (aty to be noticed) (Dorfman, Matthew) (Entered: 03/27/2025)

RECAP
21 March 28, 2025

ORDER: The Court adopts the parties' proposed case management plan, see ECF No. 16, as the Court's scheduling order required by Rule 16(b), with the adjustments reflected in the accompanying order. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/28/2025. (GEM) (Entered: 03/28/2025)

RECAP
22 March 28, 2025

ORDER: The Court so-orders the parties' proposed confidentiality order, see ECF No. 18, except that the Court will not retain jurisdiction over all persons subject to this order to the extent necessary to enforce any obligations arising hereunder. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/28/2025. (GEM) (Entered: 03/28/2025)

RECAP
March 28, 2025

ORDER: The Court denies Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference, see ECF No. 14, because the Court deems a conference to be unnecessary. Defendant shall file opening papers in support of Defendant's motion to dismiss on or before April 28, 2025. Plaintiff shall file opposition papers on or before May 28, 2025, and Defendant shall file reply papers on or before June 11, 2025. The parties' motion papers shall comply with the page limits and other requirements described in Section IV.B of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/28/2025. (GEM)

March 28, 2025

Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference

23 April 28, 2025

Notice of MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint in it's Entirety, or, in the Alertnative, To Dismiss or Strike Plaintiff's Class Claims by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Exhibit A Airport Operations, # 3 Exhibit B Jetbridge accommodation email, # 4 Exhibit C EEOC Charge of Discrimination - Christopher Torres (10.26.23), # 5 Exhibit D Position Statement (1.5.24)) (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

RECAP
24 May 2, 2025

Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 05/02/2025)

RECAP
May 2, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery AND Status Report Order

May 2, 2025

ORDER: The Court grants the parties' joint request to extend all remaining discovery deadlines in the Court's scheduling order, see ECF No. 21, by 45 days, and to extend Defendant's deadline to reply to Plaintiff's opposition to its motion to dismiss or strike by 7 days, see ECF No. 24 . Given the significant time afforded by these new deadlines, any further extensions are unlikely in the absence of extraordinary circumstances demonstrating good cause, and the fact that the parties have been pursuing settlement negotiations will not by itself constitute good cause. Finally, the parties shall provide a joint status update on or before June 13, 2025, regarding the outcome of the mediation scheduled for June 10, 2025. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 5/2/2025. (PN)

25 May 28, 2025

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 23 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint in it's Entirety, or, in the Alertnative, To Dismiss or Strike Plaintiff's Class Claims filed by Christopher Torres. (Dorfman, Matthew) (Entered: 05/28/2025)

RECAP
26 June 12, 2025

Letter Re: Settlement in Principle and Requesting Stay of Deadlines (Joint) by JetBlue Airways Corporation (Berti, Raymond) (Entered: 06/12/2025)

Clearinghouse
June 13, 2025

Order Dismissing Case

June 13, 2025

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the parties' letter, see ECF No. 26, which indicates that the parties have reached a settlement in principle, the Court dismisses this case with leave to reopen on or before July 14, 2025, if the parties' settlement is not finalized by then. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 6/13/2025. (GEM)

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Disability Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 5, 2025

Closing Date: June 14, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Physically disabled former employee of JetBlue, seeking to represent all qualified JetBlue employees in New York with disabilities that require reasonable accommodations, who have been or reasonably fear they will be subject to JetBlue’s discriminatory policy of not evaluating reasonable accommodations for anything deemed an essential job function.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Mooted before ruling

Defendants

Other

JetBlue

Defendant Type(s):

Transportation

Facility Type(s):

Non-government for-profit

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.

State law

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of New York 1:25-cv-00634

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Unknown

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Issues

Disability and Disability Rights:

Disability, unspecified

Reasonable Accommodations

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Recommended Citation