Case: Complaint on Behalf of Terminated Probationary Employees

None | No Court

Filed Date: Feb. 14, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is an administrative complaint filed on Feb. 14, 2025, with the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) by complainants (through counsel, Alden Law Group and Democracy Forward), alleging that the Trump Administration's mass termination of thousands of federal probationary employees constituted prohibited personnel practices under 5 U.S.C. 2302, the civil service statute.  They sought to represent a class of all such probationary employees and to stay the terminations.   On Feb. 21, 2025, the Offic…

This is an administrative complaint filed on Feb. 14, 2025, with the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) by complainants (through counsel, Alden Law Group and Democracy Forward), alleging that the Trump Administration's mass termination of thousands of federal probationary employees constituted prohibited personnel practices under 5 U.S.C. 2302, the civil service statute.  They sought to represent a class of all such probationary employees and to stay the terminations.  

On Feb. 21, 2025, the Office of Special Counsel found "reasonable grounds to believe that the Agencies engaged in prohibited personnel practices," and therefore requested the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to enter an immediate 45-day stay of the terminations.  The Office of Special Counsel was led by Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger.  President Trump had fired Dellinger in January, but after Dellinger sued, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted a temporary restraining order against that firing, and the Supreme Court declined to immediately interfere.   

In this case, the OSC MSPB filing explained that termination of probationary employees that was not for performance reasons had to follow the procedures for a "Reduction in Force" or RIF, and that the Administration had not followed those procedures.  

In addition, OSC issued a broader statement: "The Special Counsel believes other probationary employees are similarly situated to the six workers for whom he currently is seeking relief.  Dellinger is considering ways to seek relief for a broader group without the need for individual filings with OSC." 

At the MSPB, the case was heard by Raymond Limon. Noting that he was required to grant the stay request unless it was "inherently unreasonable," He granted the requested 45-day stay on Feb. 25, 2025, he granted, finding "reasonable grounds to believe that each of the six agencies engaged in a prohibited personnel practice under 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(12)."  He instructed the agencies to restore those employees to their same duties and pay as before. This case is ongoing. 

Related Cases

U.S. Office of Special Counsel, ex rel. v. Department of Agriculture, No Court (2025)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

None

Summary Termination of Federal Employees: Request to Stay Probationary Terminations

Feb. 14, 2025

Feb. 14, 2025

Complaint

U.S. Office of Special Counsel's Initial Request for Stay of Personnel Actions

U.S. Office of Special Counsel v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Special Counsel Dellinger Statement on Request that MSPB Stay Terminations of Probationary Employees

Feb. 24, 2025

Feb. 24, 2025

Press Release

CB-1208-25-0017-U-1

Order on Stay Request

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

CB-1208-25-0016-U-1

Order on Stay Request

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

CB-1208-25-0014-U-1

Order on Stay Request

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

CB-1208-25-0015-U-1

Order on Stay Request

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

CB-1208-25-0018-U-1

Order on Stay Request

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

CB-1208-25-0019-U-1

Order on Stay Request

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

Docket

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Labor Rights

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Appointments/Civil Service)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 14, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Federal probationary civil service employees fired en masse by the Trump Administration

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Democracy Forward

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

United States, Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Merit System Principles, 5 U.S.C §§ 2301 et seq.

Special Case Type(s):

Out-of-court

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

Civil Service