Case: Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

1:25-cv-00916 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 28, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenges President Trump's March 25, 2025, Executive Order (EO) 14246 titled "Addressing Risks from Jenner & Block." (To see the Clearinghouse's collection of legal challenges to actions by the second Trump Administration, click here.) Like similar EOs from President Trump in March 2025 that targeted other private law firms, EO 14246 purported to restrict access to federal buildings for Jenner's more than 900 attorneys and staff; instructed federal agencies not to meet or engage wit…

Like similar EOs from President Trump in March 2025 that targeted other private law firms, EO 14246 purported to restrict access to federal buildings for Jenner's more than 900 attorneys and staff; instructed federal agencies not to meet or engage with Jenner personnel; ordered agencies to immediately take steps to suspend the active security clearances held by Jenner’s employees; required the firm's clients to disclose their business with Jenner regardless of "whether that business is related to the subject of [any] government contract"; directed termination of "any contract … for which Jenner has been hired to perform any service"; called the firm "partisan" and "discriminatory"; and questioned Jenner's "values and priorities" because of its association with, or representation of, certain individuals.

As a result, Jenner & Block, a global law firm based out of Chicago, filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on March 28, 2025. Jenner was represented by Cooley, another private law firm. The lawsuit named several federal agencies and their corresponding agency heads as defendants, including the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Communications Commission, the Office of Management and Budget, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of Personnel Management, the General Services Administration, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Department of Defense, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of the Interior, the Department of the Treasury, the U.S. Postal Service, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and any other agencies subject to the EO "Addressing Risks from Jenner & Block."

Jenner alleged that the EO violated its First Amendment free speech and associational rights, including viewpoint discrimination, retaliation, and the Petition Clause (counts I-VI); Fifth Amendment procedural and substantive due process (counts VII-IX); the Equal Protection Clause (count X); and Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to counsel (counts XI-XII). Jenner also alleged that the order was ultra vires and violated the separation of powers (count XIII). As such, the plaintiff sought emergency and permanent injunctive relief against the punitive measures specified in the EO. The plaintiff also requested a declaratory judgment that the EO is unconstitutional.

The court determined on March 28, 2025 that this case was not sufficiently related to the Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice case (summarized by the Clearinghouse here), and this case was randomly assigned to District Judge John D. Bates. Per the court's order:

Although both law firms are being targeted in similar ways in these separate Executive Orders, the facts of each case differ: the punitive measures imposed on Perkins Coie arise solely from the firm's representation of clients disliked by the President, while the punitive measures imposed on Jenner & Block in this new case arise, in part, from the firm's representation of clients disliked by the President but also, in part, from professional work performed at the United States Department of Justice by a former Jenner & Block partner who was not affiliated with the law firm at the time of the work to which the President objects.

On the same day (March 28), Jenner filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO), which the court heard and granted. As reported, the order paused parts of the EO instructing agencies to terminate contracts with Jenner and its clients, as well as the the EO's directives seeking to limit the firm’s access to federal officials and buildings.

The following week, on April 1, District Judge Bates ordered that: (1) with the consent of both parties, the TRO was extended until final judgment in this matter, and (2) briefing shall occur by April 17, 2025.

On April 8, 2025, Jenner filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims, for declaratory relief, and to permanently enjoin the government from implementing or enforcing EO 14246 in any way. The same day (April 8), the government filed a motion to dismiss. The government argued that each section of the EO was within the Executive's established authority. The government also stated, "[t]he Executive Order directs agencies to do what they should already be doing, declines to contract with entities who act inconsistently with valid social policies regarding discrimination, and calls for the lawful examination of security clearances and government access of employees of Plaintiff’s firm." A hearing on the motions was scheduled for April 28, 2025.

Later that week, District Judge Bates granted over 15 motions for leave to file amicus briefs in support of the plaintiff's April 8 motion, including by 807 law firms in the U.S. (docket no. 45); 676 law professors who study, write, and teach at law schools throughout the U.S. (docket no. 36); 342 retired federal and state court judges (docket no. 79); and 60 media organizations and press freedom advocates (docket no. 49).

	Document
1 1:25-cv-00916	Complaint JENNER & BLOCK LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Complaint
2-1 1:25-cv-00916	Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff Jenner & Block LLP’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order JENNER & BLOCK LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Pleading / Motion / Brief
9 1:25-cv-00916	Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Order/Opinion 2025 WL 946993
14 1:25-cv-00916	Order	April 1, 2025	April 1, 2025 Order/Opinion
19-1 1:25-cv-00916	Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff Jenner & Block LLP's Motion for Summary Judgment and For Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief	April 8, 2025	April 8, 2025 Pleading / Motion / Brief
19 1:25-cv-00916	Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief	April 8, 2025	April 8, 2025 Pleading / Motion / Brief
20-1 1:25-cv-00916	Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss	April 8, 2025	April 8, 2025 Pleading / Motion / Brief

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Jenner & Block Lawsuit Website Jenner & Block	A website created by Jenner & Block to track the lawsuit, including filings and press coverage.	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 https://www.jennerfirm.com/...
EO 14246 - Addressing Risks From Jenner & Block President Donald Trump	Declaring that Jenner & Block LLP "abandoned the profession's highest ideals, condoned partisan 'lawfare,' and abused its pro bono practice to engage in activities that undermine justice and the inte…	March 25, 2025	March 25, 2025 https://www.federalregister.gov/...

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT against SCOTT BESSENT, PAMELA J. BONDI, BRENDAN CARR, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, STEPHEN EHEKIAN, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, CHARLES EZELL, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, TULSI GABBARD, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ANNA M. GOMEZ, PETE HEGSETH, ANDREA LUCAS, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, OTHER AGENCIES SUBJECT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER ADDRESSING RISKS FROM JENNER & BLOCK, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NATHAN SIMINGTON, GEOFFREY STARKS, The United States of America, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RUSSELL T. VOUGHT, LEE ZELDIN ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11573517) filed by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Civil Cover Sheet, # 12 Summons, # 13 Summons, # 14 Summons, # 15 Summons, # 16 Summons, # 17 Summons, # 18 Summons, # 19 Summons, # 20 Summons, # 21 Summons, # 22 Summons, # 23 Summons, # 24 Summons, # 25 Summons, # 26 Summons, # 27 Summons, # 28 Summons, # 29 Summons, # 30 Summons, # 31 Summons, # 32 Summons, # 33 Summons, # 34 Summons, # 35 Summons, # 36 Summons, # 37 Summons, # 38 Summons, # 39 Summons, # 40 Summons, # 41 Summons, # 42 Summons, # 43 Summons, # 44 Summons, # 45 Summons, # 46 Summons, # 47 Summons, # 48 Summons, # 49 Summons, # 50 Summons, # 51 Summons, # 52 Summons, # 53 Summons, # 54 Summons, # 55 Summons, # 56 Summons, # 57 Summons, # 58 Summons, # 59 Summons, # 60 Summons, # 61 Summons, # 62 Summons, # 63 Supplement)(Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025) 1 Exhibit 1 View on PACER 2 Exhibit 2 View on RECAP 3 Exhibit 3 View on RECAP 4 Exhibit 4 View on RECAP 5 Exhibit 5 View on RECAP 6 Exhibit 6 View on RECAP 7 Exhibit 7 View on RECAP 8 Exhibit 8 View on RECAP 9 Exhibit 9 View on PACER 10 Exhibit 10 View on PACER 11 Civil Cover Sheet View on RECAP 12 Summons View on RECAP 13 Summons View on PACER 14 Summons View on PACER 15 Summons View on PACER 16 Summons View on PACER 17 Summons View on PACER 18 Summons View on PACER 19 Summons View on PACER 20 Summons View on PACER 21 Summons View on PACER 22 Summons View on PACER 23 Summons View on PACER 24 Summons View on PACER 25 Summons View on PACER 26 Summons View on PACER 27 Summons View on PACER 28 Summons View on PACER 29 Summons View on PACER 30 Summons View on PACER 31 Summons View on PACER 32 Summons View on PACER 33 Summons View on PACER 34 Summons View on PACER 35 Summons View on PACER 36 Summons View on PACER 37 Summons View on PACER 38 Summons View on PACER 39 Summons View on PACER 40 Summons View on PACER 41 Summons View on PACER 42 Summons View on PACER 43 Summons View on PACER 44 Summons View on PACER 45 Summons View on PACER 46 Summons View on PACER 47 Summons View on PACER 48 Summons View on PACER 49 Summons View on PACER 50 Summons View on PACER 51 Summons View on PACER 52 Summons View on PACER 53 Summons View on PACER 54 Summons View on PACER 55 Summons View on PACER 56 Summons View on PACER 57 Summons View on PACER 58 Summons View on PACER 59 Summons View on PACER 60 Summons View on PACER 61 Summons View on PACER 62 Summons View on PACER 63 Supplement View on PACER	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Clearinghouse
	Case Assigned/Reassigned	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	.Order	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	Scheduling Order	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	Motion Hearing AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
2	MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Michael A. Attanasio in Support of Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit 12, # 15 Exhibit 13, # 16 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Perrelli in Support of Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, # 17 Text of Proposed Order)(Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025) 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for a Temporary Res View on Clearinghouse 2 Declaration Declaration of Michael A. Attanasio in Support of Motion for a Tempo View on RECAP 3 Exhibit 1 View on PACER 4 Exhibit 2 View on PACER 5 Exhibit 3 View on PACER 6 Exhibit 4 View on PACER 7 Exhibit 5 View on PACER 8 Exhibit 6 View on PACER 9 Exhibit 7 View on PACER 10 Exhibit 8 View on PACER 11 Exhibit 9 View on PACER 12 Exhibit 10 View on PACER 13 Exhibit 11 View on PACER 14 Exhibit 12 View on PACER 15 Exhibit 13 View on PACER 16 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Perrelli in Support of Motion for a Tempora View on RECAP 17 Text of Proposed Order View on RECAP	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Clearinghouse
3	NOTICE - Certificate of Counsel in Compliance with Local Civil Rule 65.1 by JENNER & BLOCK LLP re 2 Motion for TRO,, (Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
4	NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. Case related to Case No. 1:25-cv-00716-BAH. (Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Clearinghouse
	Case Assigned to Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zmtm)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
5	NOTICE of Appearance by David E. Mills on behalf of JENNER & BLOCK LLP (Mills, David) (Entered: 03/28/2025)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 RECAP
6	SUMMONS (51) Issued Electronically as to SCOTT BESSENT(in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), SCOTT BESSENT(in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury), PAMELA J. BONDI, DOUG BURGUM, BRENDAN CARR, JUDY W. CHANG, MARK C. CHRISTIE, DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, CAROLINE A. CRENSHAW, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, STEPHEN EHEKIAN, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, CHARLES EZELL, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW N. FERGUSON, TULSI GABBARD, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ANNA M. GOMEZ, PETE HEGSETH, MELISSA HOLYOAK, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., ANDREA LUCAS, KRISTI NOEM, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, HESTER M. PEIRCE, WILLIE L. PHILLIPS, DAVID ROSNER, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, LINDSAY S. SEE, NATHAN SIMINGTON, GEOFFREY STARKS, DOUG TULINO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MARK T. UYEDA, RUSSELL T. VOUGHT, LEE ZELDIN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 03/28/2025) 1 Notice and Consent View on PACER	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
7	LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JENNER & BLOCK LLP (Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 03/28/2025)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 RECAP
	MINUTE ORDER (paperless), upon consideration of plaintiff's 1 Complaint in this case, which was directly, rather than randomly, assigned to the undersigned Judge, this Court concludes that plaintiff's 4 Notice of Related Case ("Notice"), indicating that this case is "related" to another case brought by a different plaintiff against similar federal government defendants, Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice et al., 25-cv-716 (BAH), is erroneous, since these two cases are not related in a manner contemplated by D.D.C. LCvR 40.5(a)(3) (defining related civil cases) and 40.5(c)(1) (allowing direct assignment of "new case to the judge to whom the oldest related case is assigned"). The legal issues involved in the two cases appear to be substantially similar, making the instinct to keep and decide the cases together understandable and even tempting for preservation of judicial resources by allowing a single judge to become familiar with applicable legal principles in both cases. Nonetheless, the two cases involve different issues of fact and arise from different events, and thus strict adherence to the Local Rules of the Court requires assignment through the normal random assignment procedures of this District. See D.D.C. LCvR 40.5(a)(3). LCvR 40.5(a)(3) provides that cases may properly be deemed related when, as pertinent here, they "(ii) involve common issues of fact, or (iii) grow out of the same event or transaction..." This case and Perkins Coie do not involve common issues of fact or arise out of the same event or transaction. Executive Order ("E.O.") No. 14230, at issue in Perkins Coie, cites, as justification for the punitive measures applied to all employees of the targeted firm, the President's dislike of Perkins Coie's representation of his political opponent (i.e., "Hillary Clinton"), Exec. Order No. 14230 § 1, 90 Fed. Reg. 11781 (Mar. 11, 2025), and Perkins Coie's representation, sometimes pro bono, of clients seeking enforcement of voting rights (i.e., "Perkins Coie has worked with activist donors... to judicially overturn popular, necessary, and democratically enacted election laws"; referring to work for what the E.O. calls "anti-democratic election changes"), id. §§ 1, 3, and rights to continue service as transgender individuals in the U.S. Military (i.e., "Perkins Coie LLP has filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, including one designed to reduce military readiness"), see Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Addresses Risks from Perkins Coie LLP (Mar. 6, 2025), https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/03/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-adresses-risks-from-perkins-coie-llp/. In contrast to the focus on Perkins Coie's provision of legal services to clients disliked by the President as the sole reasons for E.O. No. 14230, the E.O. at issue in this newly assigned case, see Addressing Risks from Jenner & Block ("Jenner E.O.") (Mar. 25, 2025), https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/addressing-risks-from-jenner-block/ (not yet published in the Federal Register), cites as justification for the punitive measures on all employees of Jenner & Block, both (1) the firm's representation of clients and issues disfavored by the President, including gender and immigration issues, see id. § 1, and (2) the professional tasks undertaken by a former partner of Jenner & Block, Andrew Weissmann, during a time when he was not employed by the firm and worked as a prosecutor on the Special Counsel investigation, led by former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Mueller. Although both law firms are being targeted in similar ways in these separate Executive Orders, the facts of each case differ: the punitive measures imposed on Perkins Coie arise solely from the firm's representation of clients disliked by the President, while the punitive measures imposed on Jenner & Block in this new case arise, in part, from the firm's representation of clients disliked by the President but also, in part, from professional work performed at the United States Department of Justice by a former Jenner & Block partner who was not affiliated with the law firm at the time of the work to which the President objects.While, as noted, the reasons for relating the new case brought by Jenner & Block with the case brought by Perkins Coie are understandable, since both challenge Executive Orders carrying similar punitive measures and thereby raise similar questions of law, strict adherence to the normal process of random case assignment is crucial to ensure "fair and equal distribution of cases to all judges, avoid[] public perception or appearance of favoritism in assignments, and reduce[] opportunities for judge-shopping," Tripp v. Exec. Off. of President, 196 F.R.D. 201, 202 (D.D.C. 2000), and the reasons given to justify these orders do not involve the same underlying events or facts in the way contemplated by LCvR 40.5(a)(3). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to reassign this case randomly, pursuant to D.D.C. LCvR 40.3, since the exception provided for "related case" assignment in D.D.C. LCvR 40.5 does not apply. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 28, 2025. (lcbah2)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
8	NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Lawson on behalf of All Defendants (Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 03/28/2025)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	Case Reassigned to Judge John D. Bates. Judge Beryl A. Howell is no longer assigned to the case. (zjd)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	Case Randomly Reassigned to Judge John D. Bates. Judge Beryl A. Howell is no longer assigned to the case. (zjd) Modified on 3/28/2025 to indicate random reassignment. (ztnr)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: The Court will hold a hearing on 2 plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order today, March 28, 2025, at 5:45pm in Courtroom 30. A public line will be available at: 833-990-9400; meeting ID: 367524674. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/28/2025. (lcjdb2)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
	Minute Entry for Proceeding held on 3/28/2025 before Judge John D. Bates: Motion Hearing re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Order forthcoming GRANTING 2 Motion for TRO. Joint Status Report due by 12:00 pm on 3/31/2025. (Court Reporter Jeff Hook) (zed)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 PACER
9	TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Upon consideration of 2 plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated on the record at today's hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/28/2025. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 03/28/2025)	March 28, 2025	March 28, 2025 Clearinghouse
10	TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING before Judge John D. Bates held on March 28, 2025. Page Numbers: 1 - 76. Date of Issuance: March 31, 2025. Court Reporter: Jeff Hook. Telephone number: 202-354-3373. Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the Transcript Order FormFor the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchased from the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 4/21/2025. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/1/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/29/2025.(Hook, Jeff) (Entered: 03/31/2025)	March 31, 2025	March 31, 2025 PACER
11	STATUS REPORT by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 03/31/2025) 1 Exhibit View on RECAP	March 31, 2025	March 31, 2025 RECAP
12	STATUS REPORT by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 03/31/2025)	March 31, 2025	March 31, 2025 RECAP
13	Joint STATUS REPORT by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 03/31/2025) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on RECAP	March 31, 2025	March 31, 2025 RECAP
14	ORDER extending 9 TRO and setting briefing schedule. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 4/1/2025. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 04/01/2025)	April 1, 2025	April 1, 2025 Clearinghouse
15	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Kristine A. Forderer, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11583264. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Kristine A. Forderer in Support, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 04/01/2025) 1 Declaration of Kristine A. Forderer in Support View on PACER 2 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER 3 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	April 1, 2025	April 1, 2025 PACER
16	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- John C. Bostic, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11583267. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of John C. Bostic in Support, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Attanasio, Michael) (Entered: 04/01/2025) 1 Declaration of John C. Bostic in Support View on RECAP 2 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER 3 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	April 1, 2025	April 1, 2025 RECAP
	MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 15 Kristine A. Forderer's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) Click for instructions. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 4/2/2025. (lcjdb2)	April 2, 2025	April 2, 2025 PACER
	Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice	April 2, 2025	April 2, 2025 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 16 John C. Bostic's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) Click for instructions. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 4/2/2025. (lcjdb2)	April 2, 2025	April 2, 2025 PACER
17	NOTICE of Appearance by Kristine Forderer on behalf of JENNER & BLOCK LLP (Forderer, Kristine) (Entered: 04/02/2025)	April 2, 2025	April 2, 2025 PACER
18	NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Bostic on behalf of JENNER & BLOCK LLP (Bostic, John) (Entered: 04/02/2025)	April 2, 2025	April 2, 2025 PACER
19	MOTION for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief by JENNER & BLOCK LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff Jenner & Block LLP's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief, # 2 Statement of Facts, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Michael A. Attanasio in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief, # 4 Exhibit 1, # 5 Exhibit 2, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8, # 12 Exhibit 9, # 13 Exhibit 10, # 14 Exhibit 11, # 15 Exhibit 12, # 16 Exhibit 13, # 17 Exhibit 14, # 18 Exhibit 15, # 19 Exhibit 16, # 20 Exhibit 17, # 21 Exhibit 18, # 22 Exhibit 19, # 23 Exhibit 20, # 24 Exhibit 21, # 25 Exhibit 22, # 26 Exhibit 23, # 27 Exhibit 24, # 28 Exhibit 25, # 29 Exhibit 26, # 30 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Perrelli in Support of Plaintiff Jenner & Block LLP's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief, # 31 Text of Proposed Order)(Attanasio, Michael). Added MOTION for Permanent Injunction on 4/9/2025 (zjm). (Entered: 04/08/2025) 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff Jenner & Block L View on Clearinghouse 2 Statement of Facts View on RECAP 3 Declaration Declaration of Michael A. Attanasio in Support of Plaintiff's M View on RECAP 4 Exhibit 1 View on RECAP 5 Exhibit 2 View on RECAP 6 Exhibit 3 View on RECAP 7 Exhibit 4 View on RECAP 8 Exhibit 5 View on RECAP 9 Exhibit 6 View on RECAP 10 Exhibit 7 View on RECAP 11 Exhibit 8 View on RECAP 12 Exhibit 9 View on RECAP 13 Exhibit 10 View on RECAP 14 Exhibit 11 View on RECAP 15 Exhibit 12 View on RECAP 16 Exhibit 13 View on RECAP 17 Exhibit 14 View on RECAP 18 Exhibit 15 View on RECAP 19 Exhibit 16 View on RECAP 20 Exhibit 17 View on RECAP 21 Exhibit 18 View on RECAP 22 Exhibit 19 View on RECAP 23 Exhibit 20 View on RECAP 24 Exhibit 21 View on RECAP 25 Exhibit 22 View on RECAP 26 Exhibit 23 View on RECAP 27 Exhibit 24 View on RECAP 28 Exhibit 25 View on RECAP 29 Exhibit 26 View on RECAP 30 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Perrelli in Support of Plaintiff Jenner & B View on RECAP 31 Text of Proposed Order View on RECAP	April 8, 2025	April 8, 2025 Clearinghouse
20	MOTION to Dismiss by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 04/08/2025) 1 Memorandum in Support View on Clearinghouse 2 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	April 8, 2025	April 8, 2025 PACER
21	STATUS REPORT by SCOTT BESSENT(in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), SCOTT BESSENT(in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury), PAMELA J. BONDI, DOUGLAS J. BURGUM, BRENDAN CARR, JUDY W. CHANG, MARK C. CHRISTIE, DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, CAROLINE A. CRENSHAW, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, STEPHEN EHEKIAN, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, CHARLES EZELL, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW N. FERGUSON, TULSI GABBARD, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ANNA M. GOMEZ, PETER B. HEGSETH, MELISSA HOLYOAK, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR, ANDREA LUCAS, KRISTI NOEM, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, OTHER AGENCIES SUBJECT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER ADDRESSING RISKS FROM JENNER & BLOCK, HESTER M. PEIRCE, WILLIE L. PHILLIPS, DAVID ROSNER, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, LINDSAY S. SEE, NATHAN SIMINGTON, GEOFFREY STARKS, DOUG TULINO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MARK T. UYEDA, RUSSELL T. VOUGHT, LEE ZELDIN. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Lawson, Richard) (Entered: 04/08/2025) 1 Exhibit 1 View on RECAP	April 8, 2025	April 8, 2025 RECAP
22	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Andrew G. Pappas, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11603140. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AUSTIN TYLER MARSHALL. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Andrew G. Pappas)(Marshall, Austin) (Entered: 04/09/2025) 1 Declaration Declaration of Andrew G. Pappas View on PACER	April 9, 2025	April 9, 2025 PACER
23	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- David B. Rosenbaum, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11603146. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AUSTIN TYLER MARSHALL. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of David B. Rosenbaum)(Marshall, Austin) (Entered: 04/09/2025) 1 Declaration Declaration of David B. Rosenbaum View on PACER	April 9, 2025	April 9, 2025 PACER
24	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Eric M. Fraser, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11603148. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AUSTIN TYLER MARSHALL. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Eric M. Fraser)(Marshall, Austin) (Entered: 04/09/2025) 1 Declaration Declaration of Eric M. Fraser View on PACER	April 9, 2025	April 9, 2025 PACER
25	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Joseph N. Roth, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11603149. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AUSTIN TYLER MARSHALL. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Joseph N. Roth)(Marshall, Austin) (Entered: 04/09/2025) 1 Declaration Declaration of Joseph N. Roth View on PACER	April 9, 2025	April 9, 2025 PACER
26	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Joshua J. Messer, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11603150. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AUSTIN TYLER MARSHALL. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Joshua J. Messer)(Marshall, Austin) (Entered: 04/09/2025) 1 Declaration Declaration of Joshua J. Messer View on PACER	April 9, 2025	April 9, 2025 PACER
27	MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Mary R. O'Grady, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11603152. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AUSTIN TYLER MARSHALL. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Mary R. O'Grady)(Marshall, Austin) (Entered: 04/09/2025) 1 Declaration Declaration of Mary R. O'Grady View on PACER	April 9, 2025	April 9, 2025 PACER

Case: Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

1:25-cv-00916 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Case Summary

Related Cases

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details