Case: City of Seattle v. Trump

2:25-cv-01435 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: July 31, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged provisions of Executive Order No. 14173 (the "Anti-Diversity Order") and Executive Order No. 14168 (the "Gender Order"), which imposed new conditions on recipients of federal contracts and grants. The City of Seattle contended that the Executive Orders unlawfully imposed vague conditions on federal funding, thereby jeopardizing essential municipal services such as transportation, housing, and public safety by threatening to withhold funds based on policies promoting diversi…

This case challenged provisions of Executive Order No. 14173 (the "Anti-Diversity Order") and Executive Order No. 14168 (the "Gender Order"), which imposed new conditions on recipients of federal contracts and grants. The City of Seattle contended that the Executive Orders unlawfully imposed vague conditions on federal funding, thereby jeopardizing essential municipal services such as transportation, housing, and public safety by threatening to withhold funds based on policies promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or "gender ideology". 

On July 31, 2025, the City of Seattle filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against the President of the United States, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal agencies and their officials. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants' actions violated the Separation of Powers doctrine, the Spending Clause, the Fifth and Tenth Amendments, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Specifically, the plaintiff contended that the challenged Orders were unconstitutionally vague in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and that Defendants' actions were arbitrary and capricious, in excess of statutory authority, and contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity, in violation of the APA. The plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that the Orders were unlawful, an injunction barring their enforcement, and an award of costs and attorneys' fees. The case was assigned to U.S. Senior District Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.

The plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on August 26, 2025 seeking to enjoin the defendants from enforcing the False Claims Act certification requirement (Section 3(b)(iv)) of the Anti-Diversity Order and the federal funding condition (Section 3(g)) of the Gender Order with respect to any grants awarded to Seattle.

On October 31, 2025, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The court found that Seattle was likely to succeed on its APA claim because the federal agencies imposed funding conditions derived from executive policies not authorized by Congress, thereby violating the separation of powers and exceeding their statutory authority. The court further concluded that the agencies acted arbitrarily and capriciously by failing to provide a reasoned explanation for the challenged requirements. It also concluded that the City demonstrated irreparable harm and that both the balance of equities and the public interest favored granting injunctive relief. 2025 WL 3041905. On December 29, 2025, the defendants appealed the preliminary injunction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 

In the appellate court, the defendants moved on January 9, 2026 to stay the proceedings pending the issuance of a mandate in County of King et al. v Turner (25-3664). The court granted this motion on January 12. 

Back in the District Court, the plaintiffs filed the first amended complaint on April 7, 2026. Eight new plaintiffs were added: the City of Cleveland; the City of Columbus; the City of Durham; the City of Portland; Allegheny County; Hennepin County; Prince George’s County; and Ramsey County. The description of harm as well as the relief requested was expanded to apply to all of these plaintiffs. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy, and Department of Labor were added as defendants. The plaintiffs added factual allegations in the amended complaint, including that: (1) the Anti-Diversity Order’s certification requirement exceeds statutory authority, and (2) the Gender Order’s language describing “promotion of gender ideology” is overly broad and susceptible to discriminatory enforcement. New details were also added about the financial impact of the Orders on the plaintiffs, specifically as it relates to health initiatives, infrastructure, and workforce development. 

On May 1, the plaintiffs moved for a second preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the defendants from  enforcing Section 3(b)(iv) of the Anti-Diversity Order and Section 3(g) of the Gender Order in connection with any grants to the additional Plaintiffs added in the amended complaint. The motion noted that the plaintiffs were not seeking relief that had already been obtained in other matters including King County et al. v. Turner (2:25-cv-00814) and Chicago v. Noem (1:25-cv-12765). 

The defendants moved to consolidate this case with City of Shoreline v. U.S. Department of Transportation (2:26-cv-01311) on May 29. The court granted this motion on June 2, holding that the cases would be consolidated for the purpose of joining the motions for preliminary injunction because the relief sought and arguments brought were similar. 

On June 29, 2026, the court granted a preliminary injunction in both this case and City of Shoreline, and denied the defendants’ request for a bond and stay of the preliminary injunctions; the defendants were enjoined from enforcing Section 3(b)(iv) of the Anti-Diversity Order and Section 3(g) of the Gender Order against the plaintiffs. 2026 WL 1862024. The court held that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their APA claims because the challenged conditions in the Orders were contrary to the law and exceeded statutory authority as Congress, not the Executive, determines conditions pertaining to federal spending. Further, the court reasoned that the plaintiffs would face irreparable harm based upon the detailed evidence that the plaintiffs submitted demonstrating the conditions in the Orders would threaten funding used for public safety, emergency preparedness, transportation infrastructure, housing, health care, and workforce development. Lastly, the court found that the balance of equities and the public interest favored the plaintiffs because while the federal government has an interest in ensuring that funds are used for their authorized purposes, it does not have an interest in enforcing conditions that would likely violate the APA. While the defendants sought a bond and a stay of this preliminary injunction, the court denied these requests, holding that the defendants did not meet the standard for a stay or demonstrate that they would suffer any material harm from the injunction. 

As of July 6, 2026, this case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Kara Wilczynski (7/9/2026)

Emma Vayda (8/5/2025)

Dahlia Gottlieb (12/2/2025)

Related Cases

City of Shoreline v. United States Department of Transportation, Western District of Washington (2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70977516/parties/city-of-seattle-v-trump/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney, Emily J. (Washington)

Attorney, Rebecca S. (Washington)

Attorney, Mr. Jeffrey (Washington)

Attorney for Defendant

Attorney, Sarah Louise (Washington)

Attorney, Daniel Tenny, (Washington)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

2:25-cv-01435

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

July 31, 2025

July 31, 2025

Complaint
7

2:25-cv-01435

Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Aug. 26, 2025

Aug. 26, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
22

2:25-cv-01435

Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction

City of Seattle v. Trump et al.

Oct. 31, 2025

Oct. 31, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 3041905

42

2:25-cv-01435

First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

City of Seattle et al. v. Trump et al.

April 7, 2026

April 7, 2026

Complaint
81

2:25-cv-01435

Stipulated Motion to Consolidate and Proposed Briefing Schedule

City of Seattle et al. v. Trump et al.

June 2, 2026

June 2, 2026

Order/Opinion
85

2:25-cv-01435

Order Granting Seattle Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and the City of Shoreline's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

City of Seattle et al. v. Trump et al.

June 29, 2026

June 29, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 1862024

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70977516/city-of-seattle-v-trump/

Last updated Sept. 6, 2026, 3:47 a.m.

Docket for: City of Seattle v. Trump
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 July 31, 2025

COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-9099237) filed by City of Seattle. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons Donald J. Trump, # 3 Summons United States of America, # 4 Summons Pamela Bondi, # 5 Summons United States Department of Justice, # 6 Summons Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, # 7 Summons Catherine Eschbach, # 8 Summons Office of Management and Budget, # 9 Summons Russell Vought, # 10 Summons U.S. Department of Transportation, # 11 Summons Sean Duffy, # 12 Summons Federal Transit Administration, # 13 Summons Tariq Bokhari, # 14 Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security, # 15 Summons Kristi Noem, # 16 Summons U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, # 17 Summons Scott Turner)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons Donald J. Trump

View on PACER

3 Summons United States of America

View on PACER

4 Summons Pamela Bondi

View on PACER

5 Summons United States Department of Justice

View on PACER

6 Summons Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs

View on PACER

7 Summons Catherine Eschbach

View on PACER

8 Summons Office of Management and Budget

View on PACER

9 Summons Russell Vought

View on PACER

10 Summons U.S. Department of Transportation

View on PACER

11 Summons Sean Duffy

View on PACER

12 Summons Federal Transit Administration

View on PACER

13 Summons Tariq Bokhari

View on PACER

14 Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security

View on PACER

15 Summons Kristi Noem

View on PACER

16 Summons U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

View on PACER

17 Summons Scott Turner

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 July 31, 2025

NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-00814-BJR, by Plaintiff City of Seattle. (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

RECAP
3 July 31, 2025

Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought (Attachments: # 1 Summons USA, # 2 Summons Pam Bondi, # 3 Summons US Department of Justice, # 4 Summons Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Program, # 5 Summons Catherine Eschbach, # 6 Summons Office of Management and Budget, # 7 Summons Russell Vought, # 8 Summons US Department of Transportation, # 9 Summons Sean Duffy, # 10 Summons Federal Transit Administration, # 11 Summons Tariq Bokhari, # 12 Summons USCIS, # 13 Summons Kristi Noem, # 14 Summons US Department of Housing and Ur, # 15 Summons Scott Turner) (HH) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

RECAP
4 July 31, 2025

MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This case is hereby transferred to the Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein, United States Senior District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the case number ending in "BJR" and must bear Judge Rothstein's name in the upper right-hand corner of the document. Judge John H. Chun no longer assigned to case. Authorized by Judge John H. Chun. (APH) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

RECAP
July 31, 2025

Add and Terminate Judges

July 31, 2025

Judge John H. Chun added. (HH)

5 Aug. 1, 2025

STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. (NAW) (Entered: 08/01/2025)

RECAP
6 Aug. 11, 2025

ENTERED IN ERROR, please disregard ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/8/2025, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/15/2025, Joint Status Report due by 9/22/2025. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (NAW) Modified on 8/11/2025 (NAW) (Entered: 08/11/2025)

RECAP
7 Aug. 26, 2025

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

Clearinghouse
8 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Jeffrey B. Coopersmith filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
9 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Daniel Eder filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
10 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Tanya Kim filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
11 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Brian Maxey filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
12 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Harold D. Scoggins filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

RECAP
13 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Gregory Wong filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
14 Aug. 26, 2025

DECLARATION of Sharman Wood filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
15 Aug. 26, 2025

PRAECIPE re 8 Declaration, 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff City of Seattle (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey B. Coopersmith)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

RECAP
16 Sept. 16, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Annalisa L Cravens on behalf of Defendants Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought. (Cravens, Annalisa) (Entered: 09/16/2025)

RECAP
17 Sept. 16, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah Louise Bishop on behalf of Defendants Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 09/16/2025)

RECAP
18 Sept. 16, 2025

RESPONSE, by Defendants Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought, to 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (Cravens, Annalisa) (Entered: 09/16/2025)

RECAP
19 Sept. 30, 2025

REPLY, filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle, TO RESPONSE to 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

RECAP
20 Sept. 30, 2025

Supplemental DECLARATION of Tanya Kim filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

RECAP
21 Oct. 17, 2025

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Annalisa L Cravens for Defendants Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought. (Cravens, Annalisa) (Entered: 10/17/2025)

RECAP
22 Oct. 31, 2025

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION1. Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED;2. Defendants, their officials, agents, employees, assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participati ng with them and all other federal Departments and Agencies are enjoined from enforcing Section 3(b)(iv) of the Anti-Diversity Order and Section 3(g) of the Gender Order against Seattle;3. Defendants, their officials, agents, employees, assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participating with them and all other federal Departments and Agencies shall immediately treat any actions taken to implement or enforce Section 3(b)(iv) of the Anti-DiversityOrder and Section 3(g) of the Gender O rder against Seattle as null, void, and rescinded, and may not retroactively apply such conditions to grant agreements executed during the effective period of this preliminary injunction. Defendants shall immediately take every step necessary to effe ctuate this order, including clearing any administrative, operational, or technical hurdles to implementation;4. Defendants' counsel shall provide written notice of this Order to all Defendants, agencies, and their employees on the third day following issuance of this Order;5. By the end of the third day after issuance of this Order, Defendants shall file on this Court's electronic docket and serve upon Plaintiff a Status Report documenting the actions they have taken to comply with this Order, including a copy of the notice and an explanation as to whom the notice was sent; and6. This Order remains in effect pending further orders from this Court.Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(CJS)

Clearinghouse
23 Nov. 3, 2025

DECLARATION of Sarah L. Bishop re 22 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction,,,,,,, Set Deadlines,,,,,, by Defendants Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 11/03/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

RECAP
24 Dec. 29, 2025

NOTICE OF APPEAL to Ninth Circuit (25-8096) re 22 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Defendants Tariq Bokhari, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Catherine Eschbach, Federal Transit Administration, Kristi Noem, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought. No fee required- US Government Party (cc: USCA) (Bishop, Sarah) Modified on 12/31/2025 to add CCA#. (RE). (Entered: 12/29/2025)

RECAP
25 Dec. 29, 2025

TIME SCHEDULE ORDER/USCA CASE NUMBER (25-8096) as to 24 Notice of Appeal,, filed by Tariq Bokhari, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Catherine Eschbach, Office of Management and Budget, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Justice, United States of America, Pamela Bondi, Sean Duffy, Kristi Noem, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, Russell Vought. (RE) (Entered: 12/31/2025)

RECAP
26 Jan. 6, 2026

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Rachel Elizabeth Hay for Plaintiff City of Seattle. (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/06/2026)

RECAP
27 March 23, 2026

MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff City of Seattle. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/13/2026, (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 3/24/2026 to strike noting date per 5 Standing Order (CJS). (Entered: 03/23/2026)

1

View on RECAP

RECAP
28 March 24, 2026

MINUTE ORDER Having reviewed Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 27, the Court instructs Defendants to notify the Court by Friday, April 3, 2026 whether it intends to oppose the motion. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (CJS) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

RECAP
March 24, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Standing Order for Civil Cases ("Standing Order") (Dkt. No. 5 ), the Court HEREBY STRIKES the noting date for the Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 27 ). Instead, pursuant to Section II.A. Paragraph 3 of the Standing Order, the opposition to the motion is due twenty-one (21) days after the date on which the motion was filed and the reply is due fourteen (14) days after the opposition is filed. This Minute Order does not strike the motion; rather, it strikes the noting date. The Court will consider the motion upon the completion of briefing in accordance with the foregoing schedule. In the future, the Court expects the parties to comply with the terms of the Standing Order. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (CJS)

March 24, 2026

2 - Minute Order AND ~Util - Terminate Deadlines/Hearings

March 24, 2026

2 - Minute Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

29 April 3, 2026

RESPONSE by All Defendants re 28 Minute Order,, Set Deadlines, (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 04/03/2026)

RECAP
30 April 6, 2026

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall have 14 days to file the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(CJS) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

RECAP
31 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Anthony D. Jones FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Prince George's County, MD. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598767 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
32 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jada Lewis FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Ramsey County, MN (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598776 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
33 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Naomi Sheffield FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle City of Portland, OR (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598779 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
34 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Rebecca Holschuh FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Hennepin County, MN (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598780 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party(PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
35 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Bradley Cousins FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Ramsey County, MN (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598782 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
36 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David Gorski FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Hennepin County, MN (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598784 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
37 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Richard N. Coglianese FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Columbus, OH (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598790 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party(PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
38 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Sarah Laws FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle City of Durham, NC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598795 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
39 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Sofia Hernandez FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle City of Durham, NC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598796 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party (PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
40 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Lisa G. Michel FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Allegheny County, PA (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598799 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party(PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
41 April 7, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Stacey D'Andrea FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Seattle Ramsey County, MN (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598804 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2026 to correct represented party(PS). (Entered: 04/07/2026)

RECAP
42 April 7, 2026

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants filed by City of Seattle. (Attachments: # 1 Summons United States Environmental Agency, # 2 Summons Lee Zeldin, # 3 Summons United States Federal Aviation Administration, # 4 Summons Bryan Bedford, # 5 Summons Federal Highway Administration, # 6 Summons Sean McMaster, # 7 Summons Federal Railroad Administration, # 8 Summons David Fink, # 9 Summons United States Department of Health and Human Services, # 10 Summons Robert F. Kennedy, # 11 Summons Thomas J. Engels, # 12 Summons United States Department of Agriculture, # 13 Summons Brooke Rollins, # 14 Summons United States Department of Energy, # 15 Summons Chris Wright, # 16 Summons United States Department of Labor, # 17 Summons Lori Chavez-DeRemer, # 18 Summons United States Health Resources & Services Administration)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

1 Summons United States Environmental Agency

View on PACER

2 Summons Lee Zeldin

View on PACER

3 Summons United States Federal Aviation Administration

View on PACER

4 Summons Bryan Bedford

View on PACER

5 Summons Federal Highway Administration

View on PACER

6 Summons Sean McMaster

View on PACER

7 Summons Federal Railroad Administration

View on PACER

8 Summons David Fink

View on PACER

9 Summons United States Department of Health and Human Services

View on PACER

10 Summons Robert F. Kennedy

View on PACER

11 Summons Thomas J. Engels

View on PACER

12 Summons United States Department of Agriculture

View on PACER

13 Summons Brooke Rollins

View on PACER

14 Summons United States Department of Energy

View on PACER

15 Summons Chris Wright

View on PACER

16 Summons United States Department of Labor

View on PACER

17 Summons Lori Chavez-DeRemer

View on PACER

18 Summons United States Health Resources & Services Administration

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
43 April 8, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jeffrey B Coopersmith on behalf of Plaintiffs Allegheny County, City of Cleveland, City of Columbus, City of Durham, City of Portland, City of Seattle, Hennepin County, Prince George's County, Ramsey County. (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

RECAP
44 April 8, 2026

ORDER re 31 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Anthony D. Jones for Plaintiff Prince George's County, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(KB) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

RECAP
45 April 8, 2026

ORDER re 32 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, 35 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, 41 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorneys Jada Lewis, Bradley Cousins, and Stacey D'Andrea for Plaintiff Ramsey County, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(KB) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

RECAP
46 April 8, 2026

ORDER re Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed at dockets 31-41 inclusive: The Court ADMITS Attorney Lisa G. Michel for Allegheny County, Richard N. Coglianese for City of Columbus, Sarah Laws; Sofia Hernandez for City of Durham, Naomi Sheffield for City of Portland, Rebecca Holschuh; David Gorski for Hennepin County, Anthony D. Jones for Prince George's County, Jada Lewis; Bradley Cousins; Stacey D'Andrea for Ramsey County, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis.No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

RECAP
April 8, 2026

Notice to PHV and Local Counsel Unable to Process Application

April 8, 2026

Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Viceat dockets #31-41 by attorney Anthony D. Jones, Jada Lewis, Naomi Sheffield, Rebecca Holschuh, Bradley Cousins, David Gorski, Richard Coglianese, Sarah Laws, Sofia Hernandez, Lisa Michel, Stacy D'Andrea will not be processed at this time. Sponsoring attorney Coopersmith must file a notice of appearance for each noted plaintiff, per Local Rules pertaining to Pro Hac Vice sponsorship. Please contact the Attorney Admissions Clerk at 206-370-8400 or WAWD_Admissions@wawd.uscourts.gov with additional questions. (Ad hoc Attorney Anthony D. Jones, Jada Lewis, Naomi Sheffield, Rebecca Holschuh, Bradley Cousins, David Gorski, Richard Coglianese, Sarah Laws, Sofia Hernandez, Lisa Michel, Stacy D'Andrea) (PS)

April 8, 2026

Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

47 April 9, 2026

Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Bryan Bedford, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Thomas J Engels, Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, David Fink, Health Resources and Services Administration, Robert F Kennedy, Jr, Sean McMaster, Brooke Rollins, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Energy, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Chris Wright, Lee Zeldin. (CJS) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
48 April 9, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Caroline Turco FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE by Plaintiff City of Portland. Receipt No. AWAWDC-9598781 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
49 April 9, 2026

ORDER re 48 Application. The Court ADMITS Attorney Caroline Turco for City of Portland, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
50 April 9, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Amy Powell FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9604727 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
51 April 9, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gary DiBianco FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9604831 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
52 April 9, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kunyu Ching FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9604861 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
April 9, 2026

Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

April 9, 2026

Notice to PHV and Local Counsel Unable to Process Application

April 9, 2026

Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 50 51 52 by attorney Amy Powell, Gary DiBianco, Kunyu Ching will not be processed at this time. The Pro Hac attorney must submit a Pro Hac Vice access request via Manage My Account on PACER, under the Maintenance tab. See page 2 of the Pro Hac Vice Application Guide for detailed instructions. Please contact the Attorney Admissions Clerk at 206-370-8400 or WAWD_Admissions@wawd.uscourts.gov with additional questions. (Ad hoc Attorney Amy Powell, Gary DiBianco, Kunyu Ching) (PS)

53 April 10, 2026

ORDER re 50 52 Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Amy Powell, Kunyu Ching for City of Cleveland, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

RECAP
April 10, 2026

Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

54 April 13, 2026

ORDER re 51 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Gary DiBianco for City of Cleveland, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

RECAP
April 13, 2026

Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

55 April 17, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Mark Griffin FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9622947 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

RECAP
56 April 17, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Elena N. Boop FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9622955 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

RECAP
57 April 17, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Alejandro Gonzalez Mercado FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9622963 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

RECAP
58 April 17, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Shirley Tomasello FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Cleveland (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9622972 (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

RECAP
April 17, 2026

Notice to PHV and Local Counsel Unable to Process Application

April 17, 2026

Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 55, Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 58, Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 56, Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 57 by attorneys Mark Griffin, Elena N. Boop, Alejandro Gonzalez Mercado, Shirley Tomasello will not be processed at this time. The Pro Hac attorneys must submit a Pro Hac Vice access request via Manage My Account on PACER, under the Maintenance tab. See page 2 of the Pro Hac Vice Application Guide for detailed instructions. Please contact the Attorney Admissions Clerk at 206-370-8400 or WAWD_Admissions@wawd.uscourts.gov with additional questions. (Ad hoc Attorneys Mark Griffin, Elena N. Boop, Alejandro Gonzalez Mercado, Shirley Tomasello) (ELS)

59 April 20, 2026

ORDER re 55 56 57 58 Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorneys Mark Griffin, Elena Boop, Alejandro Gonzalez Mercado, Shirley Tomasello for City of Cleveland, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

RECAP
April 20, 2026

Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

60 April 28, 2026

Stipulated MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LENGTH LIMITS, filed by All Plaintiffs. Noting Date 4/28/2026, (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) Modified on 5/5/2026 to strike noting date per Standing Order (CJS). (Entered: 04/28/2026)

RECAP
61 May 1, 2026

Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
62 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of John Fornier filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
63 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Christopher Long filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
64 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Stephen Sayre filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
65 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Tim Flora filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
66 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Joseph W. Mathews filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
67 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Raymond Lee filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
68 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Angela Fair filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
69 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Alexandra Kotze filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
70 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Joy Anderson filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
71 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of David Steinmuller filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
72 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of James D. DeRosa filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
73 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Bryant L. Francis filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
74 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Colleen Majeski filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
75 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of David Margolius filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
76 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Mary E. McNamara filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
77 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Calley Mersmann filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
78 May 1, 2026

DECLARATION of Cecilia Rodriguez filed by All Plaintiffs re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
May 5, 2026

2 - Minute Order AND ~Util - Terminate Deadlines/Hearings

May 5, 2026

MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to the Standing Order for Civil Cases ("Standing Order") (Dkt. No. 5 ), the Court HEREBY STRIKES the noting date for the parties' stipulated motion (Dkt. No. 60 ). This Minute Order does not strike the stipulated motion; rather, it strikes the noting date. The Court considers the stipulated motion upon filing. In the future, the Court expects the partiesto comply with the terms of the Standing Order. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (CJS)

79 May 22, 2026

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 05/22/2026)

RECAP
80 May 29, 2026

Stipulated MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE, filed by Defendants Todd Blanche, Sean Duffy, Federal Transit Administration, MarkWayne Mullin, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs, Office of Management and Budget, Ashley Romanias, Donald J Trump, Scott Turner, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Russell Vought, Matthew Welbes. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 05/29/2026)

RECAP
81 June 2, 2026

ORDER granting the Parties' 80 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's consolidated Reply due by 6/5/2026. DOT Defendants' Surreply responding only to the City of Shoreline's additional arguments due by 6/12/2026. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.The parties are directed to file the remaining briefs in both cases.(CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

Clearinghouse
82 June 5, 2026

REPLY, filed by All Plaintiffs, TO RESPONSE to 61 Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Coopersmith, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/05/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Washington

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 31, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The City of Seattle, the City of Cleveland, the City of Columbus, the City of Durham, the City of Portland, Allegheny County, Hennepin County, Prince George’s County, and Ramsey County

Plaintiff Type(s):

City/County Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Attorney General of the United States

Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Highway Administration

Federal Railroad Administration

Federal Transit Administration

Health Resources and Services Administration

Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs

Office of Management and Budget

President of the United States

United States Department of Agriculture

United States Department of Energy

United States Department of Homeland Security

United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

United States Department of Justice

United States Department of Labor

United States Department of Transportation

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Federalism (including 10th Amendment)

Separation of Powers

Spending/Appropriations Clauses

Other Dockets:

Western District of Washington 2:25-cv-01435

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 25-08096

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General/Misc.:

Funding

Discrimination Basis:

Gender identity

Recommended Citation