Case: City of Shoreline v. United States Department of Transportation

2:26-cv-01311 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: April 16, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) The City of Shoreline, Washington filed this action against the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on April 17, 2026. The complaint arose from the DOT's imposition of new anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and anti-gender ideology conditions on Shoreline's $20 million grant under the Federal Highway Administration's (F…

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.)

The City of Shoreline, Washington filed this action against the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on April 17, 2026. The complaint arose from the DOT's imposition of new anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and anti-gender ideology conditions on Shoreline's $20 million grant under the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Program, which had been awarded in 2023 to fund the "West Side Transformation Project"—a multimodal transportation initiative connecting the west side of Interstate 5 to a new Sound Transit light rail station.

Following President Trump's January 2025 executive orders targeting DEI programs and transgender rights, the DOT issued revised 2025 FHWA General Terms and Conditions on April 23, 2025, and a "Duffy Letter" on April 24, 2025, imposing new grant conditions requiring recipients to certify that they do not operate DEI programs violating federal anti-discrimination laws and exposing them to False Claims Act (FCA) liability for non-compliance. Shoreline alleged it faced a "catch-22": rejecting the new conditions risked losing its $20 million grant and halting a project already underway, while accepting them exposed the city to FCA investigations and conflicted with its own local laws supporting DEI and LGBTQ+ individuals. Shoreline brought eight counts under the Spending Clause, separation of powers, the Fifth and Tenth Amendments, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), seeking declaratory relief, vacatur, a stay, and injunctive relief preventing the DOT from imposing these conditions on any funding recipient.

This case is ongoing.

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73202365/parties/city-of-shoreline-v-united-states-department-of-transportation/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Ainsworth-Taylor, Julie K. (Washington)

Ching, Kunyu (Washington)

DiBianco, Gary (Washington)

King, Margaret J (Washington)

Attorney for Defendant

Bishop, Sarah Louise (Washington)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
2

2:26-cv-01311

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

City of Shoreline v. United States Department of Transportation et al.

April 17, 2026

April 17, 2026

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73202365/city-of-shoreline-v-united-states-department-of-transportation/

Last updated Aug. 7, 2026, 10:24 p.m.

Docket for: City of Shoreline v. United States Department of Transportation
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 16, 2026

NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:25-cv-01435; 2:25-cv-00814, by Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

RECAP
2 April 17, 2026

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants filed by City of Shoreline. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(King, Margaret) (Prepayment Waived) Modified on 4/17/2026 to add receipt # AWAWDC-9619672 (MIH). (Entered: 04/17/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
3 April 17, 2026

Notice of Filing Deficiency re 2 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MIH)(cc attorney Julie Ainsworth-Taylor via Ad Hoc) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

RECAP
4 April 17, 2026

Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to all Defendants (MIH) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

RECAP
April 17, 2026

Add and Terminate Judges

April 17, 2026

Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (MIH)

5 April 22, 2026

MINUTE ORDER made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly hereby TRANSFERS the above captioned case as related to 2:25cv00814BJR and 2:25cv01435BJR to the Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein. All future pleadings shall bear the cause number 2:26cv01311BJR.(CJS) (Entered: 04/22/2026)

RECAP
6 April 23, 2026

STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. (NAW) (Entered: 04/23/2026)

RECAP
7 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Julie K. Ainsworth-Taylor on behalf of Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (Ainsworth-Taylor, Julie) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
8 April 30, 2026

AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to Defendants on 4/20/2026, filed by Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
9 April 30, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kunyu Ching FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Shoreline (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9653394 (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
10 April 30, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gary DiBianco FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Shoreline (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9653435 (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
11 April 30, 2026

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Amy Powell FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff City of Shoreline (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9653448 (King, Margaret) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
12 April 30, 2026

ORDER re 9 10 11 Applications for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorneys Kunyu Ching, Gary DiBianco, Amy Powell for City of Shoreline, by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
April 30, 2026

Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

13 May 29, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah Louise Bishop on behalf of Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 05/29/2026)

RECAP
14 May 29, 2026

Stipulated MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE, filed by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation. (Bishop, Sarah) (Entered: 05/29/2026)

RECAP
15 June 2, 2026

ORDER granting the Parties' 14 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

RECAP
16 June 2, 2026

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Plaintiffs in 2:25-cv-01435-BJR, City of Seattle v. Trump et al.The Clerk placed on this docket pursuant to 15 ORDER re the Parties' 14 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The parties are directed to file the remaining briefs in both cases. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

RECAP
17 June 2, 2026

RESPONSE, by Defendants Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation to 16 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction.The Clerk placed on this docket pursuant to 15 ORDER re the Parties' 14 Stipulated Motion TO CONSOLIDATE AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The parties are directed to file the remaining briefs in both cases. (CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

RECAP
June 2, 2026

Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings

June 2, 2026

Set Motion and R&R Deadlines re 16 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Plaintiff's consolidated Reply due by 6/5/2026. DOT Defendants' Surreply responding only to the City of Shoreline's additional arguments due by 6/12/2026. Set per 15 Order. (CJS)

18 June 8, 2026

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff City of Shoreline. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Tricia Juhnke and Exhibits 1-5, # 2 Proposed Order)(Ching, Kunyu) (Entered: 06/08/2026)

1 Declaration of Tricia Juhnke and Exhibits 1-5

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
June 10, 2026

Terminate Motions (Public)

19 June 12, 2026

Surreply

RECAP
20 June 29, 2026

ORDER GRANTING THE CITY OF SHORELINE'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Shoreline's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Shoreline Dkt. 18 ) is GRANTED. By the end of the third court day after issuance of this Order, Defendants shall file on this Court's electronic docket and serve upon Plaintiffs a Status Report documenting the actions they have taken to comply with this Order, including a copy of the notice and an explanation as to whom the notice was sent. This Order shall remain in effect pending further orders from this Court. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (APH)

RECAP
21 June 30, 2026

Joint Status Report Order Form for District Judges

RECAP
22 July 1, 2026

Stipulated Motion

RECAP
23 July 2, 2026

ORDER granting the Parties' 22 Stipulated MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (APH)

RECAP
24 July 8, 2026

Declaration (non motion)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Washington

Case Type(s):

Public Accommodations/ Contracting/ Organizational Discrimination

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 16, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Western District of Washington 2:26-cv-01311

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Recommended Citation