Case: EEOC v. Clark Construction

1:97-cv-00353 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Feb. 20, 1997

Closed Date: June 11, 1997

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's Washington, DC office sued The Clark Construction Group, Inc. and The George Hyman Construction Company on February 20, 1997 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The docket is the only document available for this case and the EEOC's allegations are unknown. The partied settled the case through ADR outside of court and the court dismissed the suit on June 11, 1997.

Summary Authors

Aaron Weismann (6/5/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10293184/parties/eeoc-v-clark-construction/


Judge(s)

Robertson, James (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Guberman, Mark S. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Damato, Joseph Robert (District of Columbia)

Wolffe, Bernadette (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:97-cv-00353

Docket (PACER)

June 11, 1997

June 11, 1997

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10293184/eeoc-v-clark-construction/

Last updated Oct. 6, 2026, 8:46 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. CLARK CONSTRUCTION
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 20, 1997

COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff EEOC; jury demand (JMF) (Entered: 02/26/1997)

RECAP
Feb. 20, 1997

SUMMONS (2) issued for defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU (JMF) (Entered: 02/26/1997)

PACER
Feb. 20, 1997

SUMMONS (2) issued for defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU (JMF)

2 March 28, 1997

WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU . Date waiver sent: 3/14/97 (JMF) (Entered: 04/01/1997)

RECAP
3 April 24, 1997

MOTION filed by defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU to extend time to May 19, 1997 to answer complaint [1-1] (JMF) Modified on 04/25/1997 (Entered: 04/25/1997)

RECAP
4 April 25, 1997

ORDER by Judge James Robertson : granting motion to extend time to May 19, 1997 to answer complaint [1-1] [3-1] by GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU, CLARK CONSTRUCTION ; Answer extended to 5/19/97 for GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU, for CLARK CONSTRUCTION (N) (jeb) (Entered: 04/25/1997)

RECAP
5 May 16, 1997

MOTION (CONSENT) filed by defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU to extend time to 06/02/97 to answer complaint [1-1] (lkn) (Entered: 05/19/1997)

RECAP
6 May 19, 1997

ORDER by Judge James Robertson : granting motion to extend time to 06/02/97 to answer complaint [1-1] [5-1] by GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU, CLARK CONSTRUCTION ; Answer extended to 6/2/97 for GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU, for CLARK CONSTRUCTION status hearing set for 9:00 6/25/97 ; (N) (jeb) (Entered: 05/20/1997)

RECAP
7 June 2, 1997

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [1-1] by defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU . (lkn) (Entered: 06/03/1997)

RECAP
June 3, 1997

MAILED ADR brochure and Meet and Confer list to defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU . (lkn) (Entered: 06/03/1997)

PACER
June 3, 1997

MAILED ADR brochure and Meet and Confer list to defendant CLARK CONSTRUCTION, defendant GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRU . (lkn)

8 June 11, 1997

ORDER by Judge James Robertson : dismissing complaint [1-1] with prejudice; directing that this Court will retain jurisdiction over the parties settlement agreement should either party allege a breach of said agreement. (N) (jeb) (Entered: 06/11/1997)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 20, 1997

Closing Date: June 11, 1997

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

The Clark Construction Group, Inc.

The George Hyman Cosntruction Company

Case Details

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:97-cv-00353

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation