Case: EEOC v. THE INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS

8:98-cv-00711 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Aug. 21, 1998

Closed Date: April 23, 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In August 1998, the EEOC district office in Los Angeles brought this suit against The Institute for Applied Behavioral Analysis in the U.S. District court for the Central District of California. Although the complaint is currently unavailable, the docket states that part of the settlement barred the defendant from discriminating against disabled employees. Therefore, it is highly likely that the suit was brought under the ADA. Two months after the defendant's answer, the parties settled in January 1999.

The settlement agreement is not currently available. The docket states that the defendant must pay the complainant $18,000 and refrain from discriminating against disabled employees or job applicants.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (6/9/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13847434/parties/useeoc-v-inst-for-applied/


Judge(s)

Stotler, Alicemarie Huber (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ehrlich, Anat (California)

Hernandez, Evangelina Fierro (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Mason, Belle C (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

8:98-cv-00711

Docket

EEOC v. The Institute for Applied Behavioral Analysis

April 23, 1999

April 23, 1999

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13847434/useeoc-v-inst-for-applied/

Last updated Oct. 6, 2026, 8:22 p.m.

Docket for: USEEOC v. Inst for Applied
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 21, 1998

COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) issd referred to Discovery Arthur Nakazato (rm) (Entered: 08/25/1998)

RECAP
2 Oct. 7, 1998

STIPULATION and ORDER-DENIED by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler (krpa) (Entered: 10/15/1998)

RECAP
3 Nov. 9, 1998

ANSWER filed by defendant Inst for Applied to complaint [1-1] (mrgo) (Entered: 11/10/1998)

RECAP
5 Nov. 10, 1998

Proof of WAIVER OF SERVICE of SUMMONS by defendant Inst for Applied sent by plf on 9/17/98 (krpa) (Entered: 12/01/1998)

RECAP
4 Nov. 19, 1998

ORDER re early mtg of cnsl & status conf by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler ; mandatory status conference set on 1:30 1/11/99 (mrgo) (Entered: 11/24/1998)

RECAP
6 Jan. 5, 1999

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT filed by plaintiff (jj) (Entered: 01/11/1999)

RECAP
7 Jan. 12, 1999

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT & ORDER: Ord that this agrmnt is final & bind upon the Comm & IABA as to all clms alleged in the cmp fld in the stld act; crt will retain juris to resolve all disputes arising in connect w/ this agrmnt; this decree shall in no manner be construed as an admission of liab by IABA; IABA agrs to tender pymnt in amt of $18,000 in full & final resolution of the stld act; the pymnt will be md pybl in 2 chks to Shannon Carson to be sent dir to her at: 23251 Los Alisos #83, Lake Forest, CA 92630; the 1st chk in amt of $9,000 will be mld to Ms Carson w/i 10 dys after this agrmnt has been executed; a 2nd chk for $9,000 will be mld to Ms Carson 30 dys after mailing of the 1st chk; IABA will send the pymnts by priority mail; if a pymnt is more than 3 dys late dft shall be required to py an add $250.00 for each dy pymnt is late from the dt of written notification to IABA by fax; true & correct cpys of all chk md pybl to Shannon Carson shall be mld to the Commission; IABA agrs to refrain from any sort of discretionatory act agst any disabled employee or appl; all ntcs to the Commission shall be sent to Evangelina Hernandez US Equal Employment Opp Comm 255 E Temple Street 4th Street 4th Floor LA CA 90012; the terms of this agrmnt are & shall be binding upon the pres & future officers dir, employs, creditors, agts, trustees, admin, successors, reps, & assigns of both the Commission & IABA; the Commission & IABA agree that each will bear its own crt costs & attys' fees; if any provisions of this agrmnt is hld determined or adjud to be invalid unenfrcbl or void for any reason whatsoever each such portions provisions or prts of this agrmnt & shall not affect the valid of enfrcblity of such remaining portions provisions or prts by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler (krpa) (Entered: 01/14/1999)

RECAP
8 April 23, 1999

MINUTES: (in chambs) Ord that case should have been prev closed on entry dtd 1-12-99 (stlmnt agrmnt) terminating case ; by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler CR: none; (ENT-4-26-99) Mld ntc of entry to cnsl/ptys; MD JS 6 (krpa) (Entered: 04/26/1999)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 21, 1998

Closing Date: April 23, 1999

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

The Institute for Applied Behavioral Analysis

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Central District of California 8:98-cv-00711

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 18000

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation