Case: EEOC v. Saks Fifth Avenue

1:01-cv-01307 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: May 3, 2001

Closed Date: May 6, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC Baltimore office filed this suit on May 3, 2001 in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division. After noting that the parties had settled in principal, the court dismissed the case subject to reopening if the parties could not reach a final settlement agreement. The parties moved for an extension of time once before notifying the court that a final agreement had been reached, and the case was closed for good on May 6, 2002. Neither the complaint nor the settlement agreement is currently available.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/26/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11374799/parties/eeoc-v-saks-fifth-avenue/


Judge(s)

Legg, Benson Everett (Maryland)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hostetler, Pamela Elizabeth (Maryland)

Kiel, Gerald S (Maryland)

Attorney for Defendant

Topazian, Jonathan R (Maryland)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:01-cv-01307

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Saks Fifth Avenue, et al

May 7, 2002

May 7, 2002

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11374799/eeoc-v-saks-fifth-avenue/

Last updated Sept. 29, 2026, 11:13 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Saks Fifth Avenue
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 3, 2001

DEMAND for jury trial by EEOC (ljs, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 05/03/2001)

RECAP
2 May 3, 2001

NOTICE OF LAWSUIT AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER of service as to Saks Fifth Avenue 5/3/01 Waiver of Service due by 06/04/01. (ljs, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 05/03/2001)

RECAP
3 July 2, 2001

ANSWER to Complaint by Saks Fifth Avenue (Attorney Jonathan R. Topazian) (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/02/2001)

RECAP
4 July 20, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER (signed by Judge Benson E. Legg 7/19/01) (c/m 7/20/01 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/20/2001)

RECAP
5 July 23, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Saks Fifth Avenue 6/1/01; Answer due on 7/31/01 for Saks Fifth Avenue. (das, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

RECAP
6 Aug. 2, 2001

JOINT STATUS REPORT by EEOC, Saks Fifth Avenue (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/03/2001)

RECAP
7 Aug. 6, 2001

ORDER APPROVING [6-1] Status Report of 15 deposition hours per side. (signed by Judge Benson E. Legg 8/4/01) (c/i 8/6/01 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/06/2001)

RECAP
8 Aug. 30, 2001

MOTION with memorandum in support by EEOC for Leave to File Amended Complaint with Proposed Amended Complaint (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

RECAP
9 Oct. 16, 2001

ORDER GRANTING [8-1] motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; No opposition having been filed. (signed by Judge Benson E. Legg 10/15/01) (c/i 10/16/01 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/16/2001)

RECAP
10 Oct. 16, 2001

AMENDED COMPLAINT by EEOC, (Answer due 10/26/01 for Saks Fifth Avenue ) amending [1-1] complaint against Saks Fifth Avenue Distribution Company and Saks Incorporated (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/16/2001)

RECAP
11 Oct. 30, 2001

ANSWER by Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Incorporated to amended complaint (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/31/2001)

RECAP
12 Dec. 10, 2001

JOINT MOTION by EEOC, Saks Fifth Avenue to Amend [4-1] Scheduling Order, and to Extend Discovery Deadline (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/10/2001)

RECAP
13 Jan. 17, 2002

SECOND JOINT MOTION by EEOC, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Incorporated to Amend [4-1] Scheduling Order, and Extend Discovery Deadline (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

RECAP
13 Jan. 17, 2002

ORDER granting [13-1] Second Joint Motion to Amend [4-1] Scheduling Order, granting [13-2] Second Joint Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline (signed by Benson E. Legg 1/17/02) (c/i 1/17/02 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/17/2002)

RECAP
14 Feb. 1, 2002

JOINT STATUS REPORT by EEOC, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Incorporated (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/01/2002)

RECAP
15 March 12, 2002

ORDER DISMISSING Case with each party to bear its own costs unless otherwise agreed without prejudice to the right of a party to move for good cause within 40 days to reopen this action if settlement is not consummated ( signed by Judge Benson E. Legg 3/11/02) (c/i 3/12/02 ms) (MICROFILMED 3/12/02 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/12/2002)

RECAP
16 March 12, 2002

ORDER ADVISING Counsel because "Case has settled in principle", Rule 111.1 Order has been signed with the right of Counsel to reopen." (signed by Judge Benson E. Legg 3/11/02) (c/i 3/12/02 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/12/2002)

RECAP
March 12, 2002

Case closed (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/12/2002)

PACER
March 12, 2002

Case closed (mms, Deputy Clerk)

17 April 19, 2002

JOINT MOTION by EEOC, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Incorporated to Extend Time to Reopen Case (c/s) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 04/19/2002)

RECAP
17 April 19, 2002

ORDER granting [17-1] joint motion to Extend Time to Reopen Case (signed by Judge Benson E. Legg 4/18/02) (c/i 4/19/02 ms) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 04/19/2002)

RECAP
18 May 7, 2002

STATUS REPORT by EEOC of Settlement Consummation and "APPROVAL." (Signed: Judge Benson E. Legg, 5/6/02) (mms, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 05/07/2002)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Maryland

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 3, 2001

Closing Date: May 6, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Saks Fifth Avenue

Case Details

Other Dockets:

District of Maryland 1:01-cv-01307

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation