Case: EEOC v. CALMAT COMPANY of NEW MEXICO & CALMAT COMPANY

6:97-cv-01068 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico

Filed Date: Aug. 13, 1997

Closed Date: March 24, 1998

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Phoenix and Albuquerque offices of the EEOC filed this action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. The Defendant was CalMat Co. of New Mexico, a producer of construction aggregates. Little is known about the allegations or outcome as only the docket was available. The lawsuit was filed in August of 1997 and was eventually resolved by consent decree in March of 1998.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/30/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10676320/parties/eeoc-v-calmat-co-of-nm/

Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Humphrey, Kelly M. (New Mexico)

Medina, Loretta F (New Mexico)

Molina, Veronica A (New Mexico)

O'Neill, Mary Jo (New Mexico)

Attorney for Defendant

Bingham, Wayne E (New Mexico)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

6:97-cv-01068

Docket [PACER]

EEOC and Albert Houston v. CalMat Co of New Mexico and CalMat Co

March 24, 1998

March 24, 1998

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10676320/eeoc-v-calmat-co-of-nm/

Last updated Sept. 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. CalMat Co of NM
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 13, 1997

COMPLAINT (NATURE OF THE ACTION) with jury demand (1 Summons(es) issued) (referred to Magistrate Joe H. Galvan) (pz) Modified on 08/14/1997 (Entered: 08/14/1997)

RECAP
2 Sept. 10, 1997

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE for defts by Wayne E. Bingham (kd) (Entered: 09/10/1997)

RECAP
3 Sept. 10, 1997

MOTION by defts to extend time to answer pltf's complaint until 10/3/97 (kd) (Entered: 09/10/1997)

RECAP
4 Sept. 18, 1997

ORDER by Judge Martha Vazquez granting motion to extend time to answer pltf's complaint until 10/3/97 [3-1] (cc: all counsel) (msm) (Entered: 09/18/1997)

RECAP
5 Oct. 3, 1997

ANSWER by defendants [1-1] (sl) Modified on 10/03/1997 (Entered: 10/03/1997)

RECAP
6 Nov. 4, 1997

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE for pltf by Kelly M. Humphrey (kd) (Entered: 11/04/1997)

RECAP
7 Nov. 4, 1997

INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Joe H. Galvan Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 11/14/97 at 4:30 pm; parties to meet and confer by 11/7/97; IPTR/provisional discovery plan 11/10/97 (cc: all counsel) (former employee) (Entered: 11/05/1997)

RECAP
8 Nov. 12, 1997

PROVISIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN by the parties (kd) (Entered: 11/12/1997)

RECAP
9 Nov. 17, 1997

CLERK'S MINUTES: before Magistrate Joe H. Galvan Rule 16 scheduling conference held on 11/14/97 (Clerk: A. Lyman) (former employee) (Entered: 11/17/1997)

RECAP
10 Nov. 20, 1997

NOTICE by plaintiff of initial disclosure statement to counsel on 11/18/97 (former employee) (Entered: 11/20/1997)

RECAP
11 Nov. 25, 1997

INTERIM SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Joe H. Galvan staying discovery except for informal exchange of information; parties to inform Court re status of settlement by 1/15/98 (cc: all counsel) (former employee) (Entered: 11/25/1997)

RECAP
12 Jan. 12, 1998

MOTION by pltf to amend complaint to add party, Albert Houston (rd) (Entered: 01/14/1998)

RECAP
13 Jan. 15, 1998

ORDER by Judge Martha Vazquez granting pltf's motion to amend complaint to add party, Albert Houston [12-1] (cc: all counsel) (mk) (Entered: 01/15/1998)

RECAP
14 Jan. 26, 1998

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiff; jury demand; adding Albert Houston (sl) (Entered: 01/27/1998)

RECAP
15 March 24, 1998

ORDER (CONSENT DECREE) by Judge Martha Vazquez dismissing case (cc: all counsel) (mjr) (Entered: 03/24/1998)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

New Mexico

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 13, 1997

Closing Date: March 24, 1998

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

CalMat Co of New Mexico

CalMat Co.

Case Details

Other Dockets:

District of New Mexico 6:97-cv-01068

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation