Case: EEOC v. STAR STAINLESS SCREW COMPANY

1:99-cv-01994 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: Aug. 3, 1999

Closed Date: March 31, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In August 1999 the Atlanta office of the EEOC brought this suit against Star Stainless Screw Co. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. After the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in October 1999, the court stayed the proceeding and the parties settled the case. The EEOC filed a motion to reconsider the stay in February 2000, and the court lifted the stay in March 2000. The case settled by entry of a consent decree in March 2000. No information was made available pertaining to the nature of the suit or the consent decree.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (7/14/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11121782/parties/equal-employment-v-star-stainless-screw/

Judge(s)

Hunt, Willis B. (Georgia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bell, Charles T. (Georgia)

Malone, Maureen G. (Georgia)

Attorney for Defendant

Barron, David L. (Georgia)

Linker, John K. (Georgia)

Judge(s)

Hunt, Willis B. (Georgia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bell, Charles T. (Georgia)

Malone, Maureen G. (Georgia)

Attorney for Defendant

Barron, David L. (Georgia)

Linker, John K. (Georgia)

Redwine, Earnest Redwine (Georgia)

Schraeder, Terry E. (Georgia)

Wood, Joseph L. (Georgia)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:99-cv-01994	Docket [PACER] EEOC v. Star Stainless Screw Company	March 31, 2000	March 31, 2000 Docket

show / hide documents

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Under the Radar: Visibility and the Effects of Discrimination Lawsuits in Small and Large Firms Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev	Research on how discrimination lawsuits affect corporate diversity has yielded mixed results. Qualitative studies highlight the limited efficacy of lawsuits in the typical workplace, finding that lit…	March 2022	April 1, 2022 https://cris.tau.ac.il/...

show / hide resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11121782/equal-employment-v-star-stainless-screw/

Last updated Nov. 3, 2026, 10:19 p.m.

Docket for: Equal Employment v. Star Stainless Screw

ECF Number	Date	Description	Link
1	Aug. 3, 1999	COMPLAINT filed and summons(es) issued. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand (aar) (Entered: 08/06/1999)	RECAP
2	Aug. 3, 1999	ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff (aar) (Entered: 08/06/1999)	RECAP
	Aug. 3, 1999	CASE REFERRED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman (Calendar sheets forwarded) (aar) (Entered: 08/06/1999)	PACER
	Aug. 3, 1999	CASE REFERRED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman (Calendar sheets forwarded) (aar)
3	Aug. 16, 1999	ORDER by Judge Charles A. Moye Jr., reassigning case to Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. (cc w/notice) (aet) (Entered: 08/19/1999)	RECAP
4	Sept. 28, 1999	Applications for admission of John K. Linker, Terry E. Schraeder, David L. Barron, Joseph L. Wood III pro hac vice for defendant (to WBH) (kt) Modified on 10/04/1999 (Entered: 10/04/1999)	RECAP
5	Oct. 4, 1999	ANSWER by defendant to complaint [1-1] Discovery ends 3/2/00 (kt) (Entered: 10/04/1999)	RECAP
	Oct. 5, 1999	ENDORSED ORDER APPROVING [4-1] pro hac vice applications of Joseph L. Wood, III and John K. Linker (by CRD)(cc) (kt) Modified on 10/06/1999 (Entered: 10/06/1999)	PACER
	Oct. 5, 1999	ENDORSED ORDER APPROVING [4-1] pro hac vice applications of Joseph L. Wood, III and John K. Linker (by CRD)(cc) (kt) Modified on 10/06/1999
6	Oct. 8, 1999	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Star Stainless Screw mailed 8/23/99 Answer due by 10/25/99 for Star Stainless Screw (kt) (Entered: 10/14/1999)	RECAP
7	Oct. 18, 1999	ORDER by CRD APPROVING [4-1] pro hac vice applications of Terry Schraeder and David L. Barron (cc) (kt) (Entered: 10/19/1999)	RECAP
8	Oct. 19, 1999	Certificate of interested persons. (to JMF) (kt) (Entered: 10/20/1999)	RECAP
9	Oct. 19, 1999	ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by defendant (kt) (Entered: 10/20/1999)	RECAP
10	Oct. 29, 1999	MOTION by defendant for summary judgment with brief in support. (bsm) (Entered: 11/02/1999)	RECAP
11	Nov. 4, 1999	Joint Preliminary Statement and Scheduling Order. (to JMF) (kt) (Entered: 11/05/1999)	RECAP
12	Nov. 17, 1999	Notice of video deposition agreement . (kt) (Entered: 11/18/1999)	RECAP
13	Nov. 18, 1999	Memorandum by plaintiff in opposition to [10-1] motion for summary judgment, with declaration of Larry E. Roby, response to stmt. of material facts, and plas' stmt. of uncontested facts. (kt) Modified on 11/19/1999 (Entered: 11/19/1999)	RECAP
14	Nov. 18, 1999	Notice to take deposition of Larry Roby by defendant (kt) (Entered: 11/19/1999)	RECAP
	Nov. 19, 1999	SUBMITTED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman on [10-1] motion for summary judgment (kt) (Entered: 11/19/1999)	PACER
	Nov. 19, 1999	SUBMITTED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman on [10-1] motion for summary judgment (kt)
15	Nov. 26, 1999	Amended Notice to take deposition of Larry Roby and subpoena Duces Tecum by defendant (as) (Entered: 11/30/1999)	RECAP
16	Nov. 26, 1999	Notice to take deposition of Vicky Fletcher, Sarita Davis, and Angela Kendrick by defendant (as) (Entered: 11/30/1999)	RECAP
18	Dec. 6, 1999	Reply by defendant to plas' memorandum in opposition to dfts' [10-1] motion for summary judgment. (kt) (Entered: 12/13/1999)	RECAP
19	Dec. 6, 1999	Response by defendant to plas' statement of uncontensted and contested material facts contained in [10-1] motion for summary judgment. (kt) (Entered: 12/13/1999)	RECAP
17	Dec. 8, 1999	ORDER by Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be stayed 60 days, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event this case is not resolved through conciliation, the pla shall, within 10 days thereafter, amend its complaint and pleadings to fully comply with LR 23.1 NDGa, or notify this Court that it is not seeking to file a class action. (cc) (VACATED pursuant to [23-1] order)(kt) Modified on 03/09/2000 (Entered: 12/09/1999)	RECAP
20	Feb. 8, 2000	Notice to take deposition of Karen Redmond by defendant and subpoena duces tecum. (as) (Entered: 02/15/2000)	RECAP
21	Feb. 18, 2000	MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of [17-1] order with brief in support. (kt) (Entered: 02/22/2000)	RECAP
22	Feb. 25, 2000	Response by defendant to [21-1] motion for reconsideration of [17-1] order. (kt) (Entered: 02/28/2000)	RECAP
	Feb. 28, 2000	SUBMITTED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman on [21-1] motion for reconsideration of [17-1] order. (kt) (Entered: 02/28/2000)	PACER
	Feb. 28, 2000	SUBMITTED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman on [21-1] motion for reconsideration of [17-1] order. (kt)
23	March 9, 2000	ORDER by Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman GRANTING [21-1] motion for reconsideration of [17-1] order, VACATING AND SET ASIDE [17-1] order. (cc) (kt) (Entered: 03/09/2000)	RECAP
24	March 24, 2000	Stipulation DISMISSING [1-1] complaint (to WBH) (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)	RECAP
	March 24, 2000	Proposed Consent Decree (to WBH) (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)	PACER
	March 24, 2000	Proposed Consent Decree (to WBH) (kt)
25	March 31, 2000	CONSENT ORDER by Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. GRANTING the Consent Decree (cc) (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)	RECAP
	March 31, 2000	ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. GRANTING [24-1] stipulation of dismissal (cc) (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)	PACER
	March 31, 2000	Case terminated. (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)	PACER
	March 31, 2000	ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. GRANTING [24-1] stipulation of dismissal (cc) (kt)
	March 31, 2000	Completed referral to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)	PACER
	March 31, 2000	Case terminated. (kt)
	March 31, 2000	Completed referral to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman (kt)

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory:

Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 3, 1999

Closing Date: March 31, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Star Stainless Screw Company

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Georgia 1:99-cv-01994

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation

Case Summary of EEOC v. STAR STAINLESS SCREW COMPANY, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/8170/ (last updated 7/14/2007).