Case: EEOC v. RK ASSOCIATES

1:98-cv-08056 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Dec. 16, 1998

Closed Date: Aug. 3, 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In December 1998, the Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against RK Associates in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The only document publicly available regarding this case is the docket; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. After a few status conferences, the parties settled in August 1999 through a consent decree.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (7/26/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10812562/parties/eeoc-v-rk-assc/


Judge(s)

Lindberg, George Wakem (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:98-cv-08056

Docket

EEOC v. RK Associates

Aug. 3, 1999

Aug. 3, 1999

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10812562/eeoc-v-rk-assc/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2026, 6:31 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. RK Assc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Dec. 16, 1998

COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson, Jean Powers Kamp, Mary B. Manzo as attorney(s) for plaintiff ( no summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (dmkf) (Entered: 12/21/1998)

PACER
Jan. 22, 1999

SUMMONS and one copy issued as to defendant (dmkf) (Entered: 01/25/1999)

PACER
2 March 1, 1999

AGREED MOTION by defendant for extension of time to answer complaint ; Notice of motion (dmkf) (Entered: 03/10/1999)

PACER
3 March 9, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 3/9/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to answer the complaint is granted answer due 03/15/99 [2-1]. Discovery cutoff set for 07/06/99. Motion for summary judgment due 06/16/99. Response due 07/30/99. Reply due 08/06/99. Ruling set for 10/04/99 at 9:45a.m. Proposed final pretrial order to be submitted to chambers on 10/18/99 at 10:00a.m. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 03/10/1999)

PACER
4 March 9, 1999

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant RK Assc by Elaine Saphier Fox, Jeremy J. Glenn (dmkf) (Entered: 03/10/1999)

PACER
5 March 16, 1999

NOTICE of filing regarding answer to complaint by defendant (dmkf) (Entered: 03/18/1999)

PACER
6 March 16, 1999

ANSWER to complaint by defendant (mak) (Entered: 03/22/1999)

PACER
March 16, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 3/16/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Trial set for Novemb 1, 1999 at 10:00a.m. Mailed notice (slb) (Entered: 03/16/1999)

PACER
April 7, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 4/7/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Status hearing reset to 9:30 4/22/99 . Mailed notice (slb) (Entered: 04/07/1999)

PACER
May 6, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 5/6/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Status hearing held and continued to 9:30 5/12/99 . No notice (slb) (Entered: 05/06/1999)

PACER
May 11, 1999

SCHEDULE set on 5/11/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Status hearing reset to 9:30 6/2/99 . Mailed notice (slb) (Entered: 05/11/1999)

PACER
7 June 2, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 6/2/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Status hearing held. This action is dismissed with leave to reinstate on or before 08/02/99 terminating case . Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 06/03/1999)

PACER
8 July 27, 1999

AGREED MOTION by plaintiff to reinstate case and for entry of consent decree ; Notice (lal) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

PACER
9 Aug. 3, 1999

CONSENT DECREE. (lal) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

PACER
10 Aug. 3, 1999

MINUTE ORDER of 8/3/99 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Plaintiff's agreed motion to reinstate case and for entry of consent decree is granted. [8-1], [8-2] Enter Consent Decree. This action is hereby terminated. Mailed notice (lal) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 16, 1998

Closing Date: Aug. 3, 1999

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

RK Associates

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:98-cv-08056

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation