Case: EEOC v. FOUR PALMER ENTERPRISES INC (d/b/a HEATHCOTE DELICATESSEN AND RESTAURANT)

7:99-cv-10172 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Oct. 1, 1999

Closed Date: 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The New York City Office brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, against Four Palmer Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Heathcote Delicatessen and Restaurant. The complaint was filed in September 1999 and the case was referred to mediation in January 2000. A consent decree was entered in May 2000. The only document we have access to for this case is the docket.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/14/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

7:99-cv-10172

Docket

EEOC v. Four Palmer Enterprises Inc

July 21, 2000

July 21, 2000

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 11, 2022, 3:19 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed; Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c); FILING FEE $ USA RECEIPT # (bm) (Entered: 10/07/1999)

Oct. 1, 1999

Oct. 1, 1999

Magistrate Judge Peck is so Designated. (bm) (Entered: 10/07/1999)

Oct. 1, 1999

Oct. 1, 1999

2

Memo-Endorsement on letter addressed to Judge Chin from Joseph A. Saccomano, Jr., dated 10/27/99; defendant respectfully requests that pursuant to Rules 21 and 22 that this case be officially transferred to White Plains; as the EEOC does not dispute the facts that the complainants and all witnesses reside in or about Westchester, that the defendant is located in Westchester, and all the material facts occured in Westchester, this case is transferred to the White Plains Courthouse pursuant to Local Rule 21(a)(i) . ( signed by Judge Denny Chin ); Copies mailed; sent copy of this document to the Case Reassignments Clerk (pl) Modified on 11/09/1999 (Entered: 11/05/1999)

Nov. 3, 1999

Nov. 3, 1999

3

Notice of reasgmnt to Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. Copy of notice and judge's rules mailed to Attorney(s) of record: Sunu P. Chandy, Elizabeth A. Grossman, James L. Lee. Redesignated to Mag. Mark D. Fox. (ec) (Entered: 11/16/1999)

Nov. 16, 1999

Nov. 16, 1999

4

ANSWER to Complaint by Four Palmer (Attorney Joseph A. Saccomano Jr.from the Firm: Jackson Lewis Schnitzler&Krupm) (ec) (Entered: 11/16/1999)

Nov. 16, 1999

Nov. 16, 1999

5

RULE 1.9 CERTIFICATE filed by Four Palmer . (ec) (Entered: 11/16/1999)

Nov. 16, 1999

Nov. 16, 1999

6

SCHEDULING ORDER: ..... amended pleadings and additional 3rd parties by 2/16/00; depositions by 1/00; requests for prod. of docs by 4/00; expert rpts by dft 3/1/00; dft's experts to be provided to the plntf by 4/3/00; discovery by 4/16/00; pretrial papers by 6/16/00; pretrial conf. 6/23/00 at 2pm... ( signed by Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. ); Copies mailed. (ds) (Entered: 12/17/1999)

Dec. 17, 1999

Dec. 17, 1999

Pretrial Conference held before Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. . (ds) (Entered: 12/20/1999)

Dec. 17, 1999

Dec. 17, 1999

7

Order referring action to the Clerk to assign the above-entitled action to mediation...All Issues Are Eligible. So Ordered: ( signed by Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. ) (pf) (Entered: 01/04/2000)

Jan. 4, 2000

Jan. 4, 2000

8

Notice of selection of mediator. (sc) (Entered: 01/06/2000)

Jan. 6, 2000

Jan. 6, 2000

9

ORDER ... In order tof acilitate the progress of pre-trial discovery of this litigation in a just, speedy and inexpensive manner, to insure compliance with the case management plan, and to prevent the accumulation of unresolved discovery issues, the following procedures will be followed for the resolution of discovery disputes:(see document for details). ( signed by Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. ); Copies mailed. (ec) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

March 13, 2000

March 13, 2000

Pretrial Conference held before Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. . (ds) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

11

Order of discontinuance: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is Ordered, that the action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening within thirty(30) days of the date hereof solely to enforce the terms of the settlement. So ordered: ( signed by Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. ) (pf) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

Case closed. (pf) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

12

Memo-Endorsement on letter addressed to USDJ Parker from Sunu P. Chandy, dated April 20, 2000. Re:request for additional time to complete the settlement process of 15 days until 5/9/00...ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So ordered: ( signed by Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. ); Copies mailed. (pf) (Entered: 04/21/2000)

April 21, 2000

April 21, 2000

13

CONSENT DECREE: ... In consideration of the mutual promises of each party to this Decree, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed and it if Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed as follows: This decree resolves all the issues raised by EEOC Charge Numbers 160-99-0341 and 160-99-2165 and the Complaint filed by the EEOC in this case; The parties agree that this Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the parties, that venue is proper,and all administrative prerequisites have been met ... ( see document for complete details)... So Ordered: ( signed by Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. ); (pf) (Entered: 05/10/2000)

May 9, 2000

May 9, 2000

14

Report of the Clerk of Court regarding court-ordered mediation: Paragraph 1, 2, 3, or 6 and the Court must make the appropriate order. (Signed by George O'Malley, Counsel for the Clerk of Court) (sc) (Entered: 07/21/2000)

July 21, 2000

July 21, 2000

15

Report of Mediator to the Clerk that the court-ordered mediation in this case was held and produced a sitpulation settling all of the issues in this case. (sc) (Entered: 07/21/2000)

July 21, 2000

July 21, 2000

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 1, 1999

Closing Date: 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Four Palmer Enterprises, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits