Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
411 cases, 2,520 documents
Ordered by
POLICING
People of the State of California v. City of Riverside

355410 | California state trial court

Filed Date: March 5, 2001

Closed Date: March 2, 2006

In 2000, California became the first state to statutorily authorize its attorney general to address issues regarding police misconduct. On March 5, 2001, the Attorney General of California (Bill Lockyer) filed a complaint and stipulated judgment in Riverside County Superior Court. This stipulated judgment resolved issues uncovered by the Attorney General during a nearly two-year investigation of the Riverside Police Department ("RPD"). That investigation was sparked by the 1998 shooting death o…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. QUILTED CARE, LTD CO. AND CONCORDIA QUILT, LLC DBA CONCORDIA

5:05-cv-05128 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

Filed Date: July 26, 2005

Closed Date: Feb. 21, 2007

The Little Rock (along with Memphis) office of the EEOC filed Title VII sex discrimination suit against Quilted Care, LTD and Concordia Quilt, LLC in July 2005, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The complaint was not available; therefore, the cause of action is unknown. The parties entered into a Settlement Agreement a few months after the court set the final schedule. The Settlement Agreement is binding on the parties for one year. According to the agreement…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Moore & Cowart Contractors

3:03-cv-00121 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: April 7, 2003

Closed Date: 2007

In April 2003, the EEOC San Antonio District Office filed this suit against Moore & Cowart Contractors, Inc., a general construction firm, in the U.S. District Court for Western District of Texas. The aggrieved female employee initially filed a claim under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. This case was then consolidated with the EEOC's suit, which alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it allowed the aggrieved employee to suffer from inappr…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. NELSON TREE SERVICE, INC.

5:04-cv-02019 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2004

Closed Date: 2008

In September 2004, the New Orleans District Office of the EEOC filed this suit against Nelson Tree Services in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, alleging that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by subjecting the charging party, a male employee, to a sexually hostile work environment. Specifically, the charging party was subjected to sexual harassment by his male supervisor including requests for sexual favors, unwelcome sexual comments…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. CREST DISCOUNT FOODS, INC.

5:01-cv-00143 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: Jan. 16, 2001

Closed Date: Oct. 23, 2003

The EEOC's Oklahoma City district office sued Crest Discount Food, Inc. on January 16, 2001 in the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Oklahoma. The EEOC's claim was based on the defendant's violation of Title VII by firing one of its employees, who intervened in February 2001, because of her marriage to an African American man. The parties settled after court-ordered ADR and the court entered a consent decree on October 23, 2001. The consent decree stipulated that Crest would be …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. INITIAL SECURITY

1:04-cv-01309 | U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2004

Closed Date: 2007

The Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Initial Security, in September 2004, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. The suit is based on racial discrimination and retaliation against a black male employee in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Initial Security filed a motion for summary judgment which was never ruled on, and after the case went to court ordered mediation, a settlement was reached. The consent decree was iss…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Oxycare Plus

5:03-cv-00243 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 26, 2003

Closed Date: 2007

In September 2003, the EEOC district office of El Paso, Texas brought this suit against Oxycare Plus, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was alleged that the defendant unlawfully limited the aggrieved employee's hours by denying her the right to work weekends or to work on an "on call" basis. It was also alleged that the employee was unlawfully discharged. …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. FOOTSTAR, CORPORATION dba FOOTACTION, USA

3:97-cv-01570 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: June 30, 1997

Closed Date: Aug. 27, 1999

The Dallas District Office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against Footstar Corporation d/b/a Footaction, USA in June 1997, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged that the defendant failed to promote the charging party (and others similarly situated) to Merchandise Manager because of their sex, and the defendant constructively discharged the charging party. The court entered a consent decree in August 1997. The two year consent decree requi…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. K-MART CORPORATION

5:98-cv-00980 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina

Filed Date: Dec. 31, 1998

Closed Date: 1999

In December 1998, the Charlotte District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Kmart Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina alleging violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for discrimination on the basis of religion. Specifically, the defendant failed to reasonably accommodate the charging party's religious beliefs by refusing to give the employee a full-time position because she was a Seventh Day Adventist who had a religious o…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. PREFERRED TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

2:99-cv-01569 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 1999

Closed Date: July 7, 2002

The Seattle District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, against Preferred Technical Services. The complaint, filed in September 1999, alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that Defendant had subjected the charging party to a hostile work environment, sexual harassment and retaliation. Prior to discovery, in July 2000, the parties agreed to…