Case: EEOC v. SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG CENTERS, INC. D/B/A PRICERITE

2:04-cv-01117 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico

Filed Date: Dec. 22, 2004

Closed Date: 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2004, the Albuquerque Area Office of the EEOC (with the participation from the Phoenix District Office) brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico against Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc., d/b/a PriceRite. The EEOC's complaint alleged that PriceRite violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating on the basis of sex. In particular, the complaint alleged that a PriceRite manager made unwanted sexual comments to the charging …

In September 2004, the Albuquerque Area Office of the EEOC (with the participation from the Phoenix District Office) brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico against Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc., d/b/a PriceRite. The EEOC's complaint alleged that PriceRite violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating on the basis of sex. In particular, the complaint alleged that a PriceRite manager made unwanted sexual comments to the charging party, a female employee, and that he inappropriately touched her creating a hostile work environment.

In November 2004, the charging party and her husband filed a separate action in New Mexico State Court alleging violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act. In December 2004, this action was removed to federal court and consolidated with the EEOC's case. In January 2005, the charging party and her husband filed a motion for remand which was granted in April 2005. In May 2005, the parties settled all their claims through a two-year consent degree, containing both non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses.

The decree required PriceRite to: provide the charging party with a neutral reference, distribute their anti-discrimination policies to employees, designate a special investigations officer to investigate discrimination complaints, provide annual EEOC-approved Title VII managerial training, and pay the charging party a sum of $75,000.

The decree was entered in 2005 and scheduled to last 2007. No further docket entries exist, so the case is closed.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (5/30/2007)

Clearinghouse (12/23/2018)

Related Cases

Sandoval v. Pricerite, District of New Mexico (2004)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:04-cv-01417

Docket [consol case]

Sandoval, et al v. Pricerite, et al

April 28, 2005

April 28, 2005

Docket

2:04-cv-01117

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.

May 20, 2005

May 20, 2005

Docket
1

2:04-cv-01117

Complaint

EEOC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

Complaint
44

2:04-cv-01117

Memorandum Opinion and Order

EEOC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.

April 28, 2005

April 28, 2005

Order/Opinion
45

2:04-cv-01117

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.

May 20, 2005

May 20, 2005

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5288945/eeoc-v-smiths-food-drug/

Last updated April 10, 2024, 3:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 2nd Judicial District Court w/state court complaint Case Number: 1:04:CV:7643 (referred to Magistrate Judge W. D. Schneider) (jmg) Modified on 12/22/2004 (Entered: 12/22/2004)

Dec. 22, 2004

Dec. 22, 2004

2

ANSWER by defendants [1 − 1] (jmg) (Entered: 12/22/2004)

Dec. 22, 2004

Dec. 22, 2004

3

NOTICE by deft Pricerite of related cases 04cv1117 (bap) Modified on 01/06/2005 (Entered: 01/04/2005)

Jan. 3, 2005

Jan. 3, 2005

4

CERTIFICATE of Service by defts of Pricerite's first set of requests for production of documents, mailed to counsel on 1/12/05 (bap) (Entered: 01/12/2005)

Jan. 12, 2005

Jan. 12, 2005

5

ORDER by District Judge Robert Brack consolidating cases 04 − 1417 w/04 − 1117 (cc: all counsel) (yc) (Entered: 01/18/2005)

Jan. 18, 2005

Jan. 18, 2005

6

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: by District Judge Robert Brack that the remaining claims brought in 04cv1417 are remanded to Second Judicial District Court remanding case to state court (cc: all counsel) (bap) (Entered: 04/28/2005)

April 28, 2005

April 28, 2005

44

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER: by District Judge Robert Brack granting deft Pricerite's motion for leave to file a surreply to pltf's motion to remand [28-1], and granting pltfs' motion for remand to state court [11-1]; dismissing Count 5 and portion of Count 3 against deft Pricerite are dismissed w/out prejudice remanding case to state court (2:04-cv-01417) (cc: all counsel*) (bap)

April 28, 2005

April 28, 2005

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: New Mexico

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 22, 2004

Closing Date: 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Jose Mendoza, Private Entity/Person

Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc. (Albuquerque), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

State Anti-Discrimination Law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 75000

Order Duration: 2005 - 2007

Content of Injunction:

Expungement of Employment Record

Neutral/Positive Reference

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits