Case: Guerra v. Celanese Corp.

2:80-cv-00115 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: Aug. 23, 1980

Closed Date: 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 23, 1980, a Mexican-American employee of Celanese Corporation filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e against Celanese Corporation and the contracting firm of Arthur Brothers, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Plaintiff, represented by private counsel, claimed that Celanese and ABI denied him and other Mexican-American workers an equal opportunity to compete with Caucasian employees for the preferred jobs at Celanese.On May 1, 1981, the …

On August 23, 1980, a Mexican-American employee of Celanese Corporation filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e against Celanese Corporation and the contracting firm of Arthur Brothers, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Plaintiff, represented by private counsel, claimed that Celanese and ABI denied him and other Mexican-American workers an equal opportunity to compete with Caucasian employees for the preferred jobs at Celanese.

On May 1, 1981, the District Court (Judge Ricardo Hinojosa) partially dismissed individual claims and completely dismissed class allegations against Celanese Corporation. The case proceeded as an individual action. (order not available)

As of September 28, 1995, the cases had settled on all issues except the issue of attorney fees. Celanese Corporation paid Guerra $12,500 to settle Guerra's claim. The Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees and costs. (order not available)

The Court dismissed Plaintiffs' claims against Celanese Corporation on March 28, 1996. The case was dismissed with prejudice. About one year later, and pursuant to Plaintiffs' motion, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs' claims against Arthur Brothers with prejudice on March 31, 1997. The Court also refused to award attorney fees against Arthur Brothers. (order not available)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the District Court on August 14, 1997. Guerra v. Celanese Corporation, 124 F.3d 192 (5th Cir. 1997).

On January 9, 1998, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded in part. Guerra v. Celanese Corporation, 136 F.3d 137 (5th Cir. 1997). The Court held that the District Court had erred when it declared that Plaintiff Guerra was not a prevailing party. The Court remanded the case to the District Court to determine a reasonable amount of attorney fees.

On remand, the District Court (Judge Ricardo Hinojosa) ordered Defendant to pay $5,000 in attorney fees plus related costs.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court on August 15, 2000. Guerra v. Celanese Corporation, 232 F.3d 207 (5th Cir. 2000).

On March 31, 2001, the District Court ordered Defendant to pay $203 in costs. The Court denied Plaintiffs' request for additional costs.

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the District Court on March 19, 2002. Guerra v. Celanese Corporation, 34 Fed. Appx. 151 (5th Cir. 2002).

Summary Authors

Haley Waller (10/4/2010)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10167058/parties/guerra-v-celanese-corp/


Judge(s)

DeMoss, Harold R. Jr. (Texas)

Hinojosa, Ricardo H. (Texas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hall, David G. (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

Gerard, Steve (New Jersey)

Green, Kathryn F. (Texas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:80-cv-00115

Docket

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

Aug. 12, 2003

Aug. 12, 2003

Docket

2:80-cv-00115

95-40874

Appeal

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Aug. 14, 1997

Aug. 14, 1997

Order/Opinion

124 F.3d 192

2:80-cv-00115

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Jan. 9, 1998

Jan. 9, 1998

Order/Opinion

136 F.3d 137

184

2:80-cv-00115

ORDER (granting attorneys' fees and costs)

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

March 31, 1999

March 31, 1999

Order/Opinion

2:80-cv-00115

99-40557

BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Dec. 7, 1999

Dec. 7, 1999

Pleading / Motion / Brief

2:80-cv-00115

99-40547

BRIEF OF APPELLEES

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Feb. 4, 2000

Feb. 4, 2000

Pleading / Motion / Brief

2:80-cv-00115

99-40557

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

March 10, 2000

March 10, 2000

Pleading / Motion / Brief

2:80-cv-00115

99-40547

99-40557

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Aug. 15, 2000

Aug. 15, 2000

Order/Opinion

232 F.3d 207

192

2:80-cv-00115

ORDER (awarding costs)

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

March 31, 2001

March 31, 2001

Order/Opinion

2:80-cv-00115

01-40474

BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

Guerra v. Celanese Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Oct. 23, 2001

Oct. 23, 2001

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10167058/guerra-v-celanese-corp/

Last updated Sept. 22, 2026, 8:46 p.m.

Docket for: Guerra v. Celanese Corp.
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 25, 1980

COMPLAINT class action for declaratory and injunctive relief, money damages filed; (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
2 Sept. 11, 1980

RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to Inc. Arthur Brothers by serving Larry Smith 9/11/80 filed Answer due on 10/1/80 for Inc. Arthur Brothers (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
3 Sept. 22, 1980

MOTION to dismiss under rule 12-(b) by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 10/12/80 [3-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
4 Sept. 22, 1980

ANSWER to Complaint by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co (Added attorney ), filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
5 Sept. 26, 1980

ANSWER to Complaint by Inc. Arthur Brothers (Added attorney ), filed. Part 2 of instr #5 (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
8 Oct. 6, 1980

NOTICE by Celanese Corp. to take deposition of Oscar Guerra 10/27/80 @ 2:00 p.m., filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
6 Oct. 9, 1980

RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to Celanese Corp. 9/10/80 by serving Gayle Williams filed Answer due on 9/30/80 for Celanese Corp. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
7 Oct. 9, 1980

RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to Celanese Chemical Co by serving Gayle Williams 9/10/80 filed Answer due on 9/30/80 for Celanese Chemical Co (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
9 Oct. 17, 1980

MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [5-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12(b), [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b), filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
10 Jan. 26, 1981

ORDER, Motion hearing set for 1:30 3/30/81 for [5-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12(b), set for 1:30 3/30/81 for [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b), entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
11 Feb. 27, 1981

First Set of INTERROGATORIES of Oscar Guerra to Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Inc. Arthur Brothers, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
12 March 19, 1981

SUPPLEMENTAL [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b) by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co Supplemental Motion Docket Date 4/8/81 [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b), filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
13 March 19, 1981

MOTION for protective order by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 4/8/81 [13-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
14 March 20, 1981

MOTION for protective order as Corrected by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 4/9/81 [14-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
15 March 20, 1981

SUPPLEMENTAL [5-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12(b) as corrected for typographical errors, [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b) as corrected for tyographical errors by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co Motion Docket Date 4/9/81 [5-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12(b), 4/9/81 [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b), filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
16 March 20, 1981

NOTICE of modification and supplementation of its motion to dismiss under rule 12(b) by Inc. Arthur Brothers, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
17 March 20, 1981

RESPONSE by Inc. Arthur Brothers in opposition to [11-1] interrogatory(s) requested, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
18 March 30, 1981

Motion hearing re: [5-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12(b) Motion hearing held;, [3-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12-(b) Motion hearing held; Ct Reporter: Paul Clendening; Arguments of counsel; Court took matter under advisement. Hearing concluded. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/02/1992)

RECAP
19 March 30, 1981

Exhibit list by Oscar Guerra, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
20 April 6, 1981

MOTION and ORDER Pursuant to Local Rule 1 by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 4/26/81 [20-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
21 April 22, 1981

ORDER denying [20-1] motion Pursuant to Local Rule 1, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
22 April 24, 1981

MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [14-1] motion for protective order as Corrected, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
23 April 27, 1981

MOTION for John Williamson to withdraw as attorney, written consent of clients, and for entry of appearance of counsel by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 5/17/81 motion, 5/17/81 [23-2] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
24 May 1, 1981

ORDER granting [23-1] motion for John Williamson to withdraw as attorney, written consent of clients (Terminated granting [23-2] motion entry of appearance of counsel, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
25 May 1, 1981

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, of partial dismissal of individual claims and full dismissal of class allegations against Celanese, entered. Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
26 May 1, 1981

ORDER granting [5-1] motion to dismiss under rule 12(b), entered; Parties notified. Case shall proceed as induvidual action based upon pltf's allegations of discrim. by deftArthur Bros. to recover attys fees and costs in connection w/motion to dismiss 7under rule 12(b). ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
27 Nov. 13, 1981

ORDER, entered; Parties notified. I hereby recuse myself from presiding over the above styled cause. ( signed by Judge Hayden W. Head Jr. ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
28 Nov. 30, 1981

JOINT MOTION to intervene pursuant to rule 24(b) and notice of motion by Oscar Guerra, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
29 Nov. 30, 1981

MOTION pursuant to local rule 15(b)(2) for oral argument on pltfs' joint motion to intervene pursuant to rule 42(a) and notice of motion by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 12/20/81 [29-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
30 Nov. 30, 1981

NOTICE of related litigation pursuant to local rule 5 by Oscar Guerra, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
31 Nov. 30, 1981

MOTION pursuant to rule 26(f) for a discovery conference by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 12/20/81 [31-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
Dec. 4, 1981

Letter from Clerk assigning this case to Judge James DeAnda. A case of equal import is to be transferred to Judge Hayden Head by Judge DeAnda. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

PACER
Dec. 4, 1981

Record mailed to Judge DeAnda's Clerk. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

PACER
Dec. 4, 1981

Letter from Clerk assigning this case to Judge James DeAnda. A case of equal import is to be transferred to Judge Hayden Head by Judge DeAnda. (bchurchill)

Dec. 4, 1981

Record mailed to Judge DeAnda's Clerk. (bchurchill)

32 Dec. 28, 1981

MOTION for leave to file interrogatories exceeding the number set by local rule by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 1/17/82 [32-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
Dec. 28, 1981

Duplicate record mailed to Judge AeAnda's Clerk. (bchurchill)

33 Jan. 11, 1982

INTERROGATORIES of Oscar Guerra pursuant to rule 33 and request for productin of documents pursuant to rule 34 (second set), filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
34 Jan. 15, 1982

RESPONSE by Inc. Arthur Brothers to [31-1] motion pursuant to rule 26(f) for a discovery conference, [29-1] motion pursuant to local rule 15(b)(2) for oral argument on pltfs' joint motion to intervene pursuant to rule 42(a) and notice of motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
35 Feb. 10, 1982

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co to [31-1] motion pursuant to rule 26(f) for a discovery conference, [29-1] motion pursuant to local rule 15(b)(2) for oral argument on pltfs' joint motion to intervene pursuant to rule 42(a) and notice of motion, [28-1] joint motion to intervene pursuant to rule 24(b) and notice of motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
36 Feb. 10, 1982

NOTICE by Oscar Guerra to take deposition of Employee of Celanese in charge 2/18/82 @ 3:30 p.m., filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
37 Feb. 17, 1982

MOTION to consolidate pursuant to rule 42(a) and notice of motion by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 3/9/82 [37-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
38 Feb. 25, 1982

Pre-trial conference held before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa Tape Number: 62-1; Pltf's motion to consolidate pending before Judge DeAnda and upon ruling on said motion, additional status conf. will be scheduled. Hearing concluded. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
39 March 10, 1982

OBJECTIONS AND ANSWER by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co to Interrogatories pursuant to rule 33 (second set and request for production of documents (second set), filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
40 March 19, 1982

REQUEST by Oscar Guerra for Production of Documents from Celanese Corp., filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
41 Aug. 5, 1982

ANSWER by Inc. Arthur Brothers to Interrogatories, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
42 Oct. 14, 1982

NOTICE by Oscar Guerra to take deposition of Robert Regan 10/15/82 @ 9:30 a.m., filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
43 Oct. 14, 1982

NOTICE by Oscar Guerra to take deposition of Jack Lockhart 10/15/82 @ 11:00 a.m., filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

RECAP
March 31, 1983

Minute entry:, set pretrial conference for 9:30 4/29/83 , set pretrial order due for 4/22/83 , set dispositive motion for extension of time filing deadline for 4/15/83 , (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/03/1992)

PACER
March 31, 1983

Minute entry:, set pretrial conference for 9:30 4/29/83, set pretrial order due for 4/22/83, set dispositive motion for extension of time filing deadline for 4/15/83, (bchurchill)

44 April 15, 1983

JOINT MOTION to extend time for filing pre-trial order by Oscar Guerra, Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Inc. Arthur Brothers, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
45 April 25, 1983

Minute entry: denying [44-1] joint motion to extend time for filing pre-trial order, reset pretrial order due for 4/27/83, entered. Parties ntfd. ( Signed by Chief Judge James DeAnda ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
46 April 29, 1983

Minute entry: Pre-Trial Conf. held before Chief Judge James DeAnda, Minutes refer to case C-76-134 & C-80-115. Proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order in file; Opposition to motion to consolidate by defts Mireles and Guerra should be out of the case - Trevino is okay; Court feels that any fingdings made in the Trevino case could be applied to the sub-classes, if appropriate; Mr. Horton to decide w/i 10 days the dismissal of Mireles and Guerra; set Court hearing on the certificate of the porposed class for 9:30 9/27/83, set amended motion to certifity the class due for 5/31/83, set discovery due for 8/30/83, entered. Parties ntfd. () (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
47 April 29, 1983

MOTION to certify class pursuant to rule 23 by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 5/19/83 [47-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
48 April 29, 1983

MOTION for reconsideration of various pre-trial orders by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 5/19/83 [48-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
49 April 29, 1983

MEMORANDUM by Oscar Guerra in support of [48-1] motion for reconsideration of various pre-trial orders, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
50 May 10, 1983

INTERROGATORIES of Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co to Oscar Guerra, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
51 June 1, 1983

MOTION to certify class pursuant to rule 23(b)(2) by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 6/21/83 [51-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
52 June 13, 1983

REQUEST of Oscar Guerra for Admissions pursuant to rule 16, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
53 June 13, 1983

RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [50-1] interrogatory(s) requested, filed. (first set) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
54 June 24, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co to [52-1] admission requested, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
55 June 29, 1983

RESPONSE by Inc. Arthur Brothers to [52-1] admission requested, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
56 June 29, 1983

MOTION to extend time to respond to pltf's request for admissions pursuant to rule 36. by Inc. Arthur Brothers, Motion Docket Date 7/19/83 [56-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
57 June 29, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co to [52-1] admission requested, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
June 29, 1983

Text not available. (Entered: 11/04/1992)

PACER
June 29, 1983

Text not available.

58 July 7, 1983

MOTION pursuant to rule 37 to compel discovery by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 7/27/83 [58-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
59 Aug. 3, 1983

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [50-1] interrogatory(s) requested, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
60 Aug. 3, 1983

RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [58-1] motion pursuant to rule 37 to compel discovery, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
61 Aug. 5, 1983

MOTION for sanctions pursuant to rule 37 by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 8/25/83 [61-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
62 Aug. 22, 1983

RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [61-1] motion for sanctions pursuant to rule 37, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
64 Aug. 22, 1983

Status conference set at 9:00 9/23/83 in re: Cases Nos. 76-C-134; C-80-49; & C-80-115 (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
63 Aug. 25, 1983

SUPPLEMENTAL [58-1] motion pursuant to rule 37 to compel discovery by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co Supplemental Motion Docket Date 9/14/83 [58-1] motion pursuant to rule 37 to compel discovery, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
65 Sept. 23, 1983

Minute entry:, Any party that feels Judge Hinojosa should recuse himself from this case should file a motion for recusal no later than 10/3/83, entered. Parties ntfd. ( Signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
66 Oct. 3, 1983

RESPONSE by Oscar Guerra to [65-1] miscellaneous Any party that feels Judge Hinojosa should recuse himself from this case should file a motion for recusal no later than 10/3/83, filed. Pltf's has no objection to Judge Hinojosa presiding over this case. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
67 Oct. 14, 1983

Status conference held before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa Ct Reporter: Jack Cire; Court will send docket control letters. Attys. are requested to submit w/i 15 days, any pending motions they are urging. Joint employer issue in Trevino & Guerra cases only. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
68 Oct. 14, 1983

Minute entry: Parties are ordered to file with the court w/i 15 days, a list of all pending motions they are urging., entered. Parties ntfd. ( Signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
69 Oct. 25, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co to pltf's motion for atty fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. $1988 and 2000-e SEQ., filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
70 Oct. 25, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co in opposition to to pltfs request for production of documents pursuant to rule 34 (second set), filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
71 Oct. 25, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co in opposition to [37-1] motion to consolidate pursuant to rule 42(a) and notice of motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
72 Oct. 25, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co in opposition to, filed motion for partial summary judgment (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
73 Oct. 25, 1983

RESPONSE by Celanese Corp. to [47-1] motion to certify class pursuant to rule 23, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
74 Oct. 26, 1983

RESPONSE by Inc. Arthur Brothers in opposition to [37-1] motion to consolidate pursuant to rule 42(a) and notice of motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
75 Oct. 26, 1983

RESPONSE by Inc. Arthur Brothers to motion for atty fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. $1988 and 20003 et seq., filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
76 Oct. 26, 1983

RESPONSE by Inc. Arthur Brothers to pltf's joint motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to rule 56 and motion to suspend local rule 13(b), filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
77 Nov. 14, 1983

MOTION to expedite, and to bifurcate resolution of the joint employer issue in Guerra and Trevino by Inc. Arthur Brothers, Motion Docket Date 12/4/83 [77-1] motion, 12/4/83 [77-2] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
78 Dec. 6, 1983

MOTION for expedited, and bifurcated resolution of the joint employer issue in Guerra and Trevino by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 12/26/83 [78-1] motion, 12/26/83 [78-2] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
79 July 31, 1984

Pre-trial conference set at 10:30 8/10/84 (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
80 Aug. 3, 1984

MOTION postpone pre-trial conf by Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Motion Docket Date 8/23/84 [80-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
81 Aug. 9, 1984

ORDER granting [80-1] motion postpone pre-trial conf, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
88 Feb. 10, 1991

MOTION regarding order of 12/16/91 for partial consolidation of prehearing proceedings in the Mireles, Trevino and Guerra related cases and notice of motion. by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 3/4/91 [88-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
82 Oct. 23, 1991

Minute entry: All pending motions are denied without prejudice to reurging the same by filing a writtne notice with the court by 11/15/91, indicating which, if any, motion a party would like to reurge. A status conf. is set on 12/16/91 @ 2:30 p.m., entered. Parties ntfd. ( Signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
83 Nov. 15, 1991

MOTION for change of atty in charge of deft Hoechst Celanese Advanced Material, Motion Docket Date 12/5/91 [83-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
84 Nov. 27, 1991

MOTION for change of atty in charge by Inc. Arthur Brothers, Motion Docket Date 12/17/91 [84-1] motion, filed (instr. #84-A) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
85 Dec. 5, 1991

ORDER granting [84-1] motion for change of atty in charge terminated Philip J. Pfeiffer Added Paul E. Sexton Jr., entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
86 Dec. 16, 1991

MOTION to substitute attorney for deft Hoechst Celanese Advanced Materials Group, Motion Docket Date 1/5/92 [86-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
87 Dec. 16, 1991

Minute entry: Status Conf. held before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa Ct Reporter: Irma Soto granting [86-1] motion to substitute attorney for deft Hoechst Celanese Advanced Materials Group terminated Added granting [77-2] motion to bifurcate resolution of the joint employer issue in Guerra and Trevino, Court advises counsel to file any evidence they will be presenting by 2/14/92 and set evidentiary hearing for 10:00 2/24/92, entered. Parties ntfd. () (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
90 Dec. 30, 1991

MOTION for David Horton to withdraw as attorney by Oscar Guerra, Motion Docket Date 1/19/92 [90-1] motion, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
89 Feb. 13, 1992

JOINT MOTION to modify order of 12/16/91 regarding prehearing procedure and for clarification regarding nature and scope of hearing on joint employer issue. by Oscar Guerra, Celanese Corp., Celanese Chemical Co, Inc. Arthur Brothers, filed (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

RECAP
91 March 5, 1992

JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER, filed. (bchurchill) (Entered: 11/05/1992)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Private Employment Class Actions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 23, 1980

Closing Date: 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Mexican American employee of Celanese Corporation

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Arthur Brothers Incorporated

Celanese Corporation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Texas 2:80-cv-00115

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 95-40874

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 99-40547

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 99-40557

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 01-40474

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 01-40471

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Amount Defendant Pays: 12,500

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Hispanic

Recommended Citation