Case: Hammock v. City of Auburn

3:87-cv-00680 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Filed Date: July 20, 1987

Closed Date: Oct. 27, 1993

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In July 1987, a class of past, present, and future employees of the City of Auburn, Alabama, filed a putative class-action lawsuit against the City and its officials in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. The plaintiff alleged a continuing pattern and practice of discrimination arising from the City Fire Chief's policy of favoritism within the fire department, as well as discrimination tacitly approved by the other defendants. The plaintiffs claimed they had been deprive…

In July 1987, a class of past, present, and future employees of the City of Auburn, Alabama, filed a putative class-action lawsuit against the City and its officials in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. The plaintiff alleged a continuing pattern and practice of discrimination arising from the City Fire Chief's policy of favoritism within the fire department, as well as discrimination tacitly approved by the other defendants. The plaintiffs claimed they had been deprived of equal protection and due process rights at the whim of the Fire Chief, which violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments and of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The complaint alleged these violations were manifested through denials of access to public records, denial of access to the courts, unfair promotion practices, denial of merit pay increases, denial of overtime pay and sick pay, denial of equal access to schools and seminars, and denial of the opportunity to fully benefit from the State's retirement system. An important subset of allegations stated the racial discrimination claims of a subclass of black plaintiffs pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment. 953 F.2d 1355 (11th Cir. 1992).

The case docket only starts with entry #278 and information before that is limited, so this summary focuses on events happened after February 1991.

On February 15, 1991, Judge Robert E. Varner approved a Settlement Agreement from November 1990 and directed all the parties to implement the terms of conditions of the class settlement. On August 20, 1992, Judge Varner dismissed the petition for attorney’s fees and closed the case.

However, in September 1993, the defendant filed a motion for instructions for lack of jurisdiction by this court, so the case was reopened as of September 20, 1993. On October 27, 1993, Judge Varner denied this motion for instructions and closed the case on the same day.

Summary Authors

Sichun Liu (1/13/2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8918692/parties/hammock-v-the-city-of-auburn/


Judge(s)

Edmondson, James Larry (Georgia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Biggers, Deborah Hill (Alabama)

Glassroth, Steve (Alabama)

Attorney for Defendant

Bush, Russell K. (Alabama)

Meadows, Robert Turner III (Alabama)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:87-cv-00680

Docket

Oct. 27, 1993

Oct. 27, 1993

Docket

91-07301

3:87-cv-00680

Opinion

Manning v. City of Auburn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Feb. 19, 1992

Feb. 19, 1992

Order/Opinion

953 F.2d 1355

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8918692/hammock-v-the-city-of-auburn/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.

Docket for: Hammock v. The City of Auburn
ECF Number Date Description Link
278 Feb. 15, 1991

ORDER approving the Settlement Agreement dated ll/90; directing all parties to implement the terms and conditions of said Notice of Proposed Class Settlement ( signed by Judge Robert E. Varner ) , copies mailed. (war) (Entered: 09/30/1993)

PACER
289 Aug. 20, 1992

ORDER dismissing the Petition for Attorney's Fees filed 3/2l/9l as supplemented 4//9l by the law firm of Perry and Perry; that the Clerk close out the file in this case and remove the case from the active docket of this Court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Varner ) , copies mailed. (war) (Entered: 09/30/1993)

PACER
290 Sept. 20, 1993

MOTION by The City of Auburn for instructions (Exhibit A attached) referred to Judge Robert E. Varner (war) (Entered: 09/30/1993)

PACER
Sept. 29, 1993

Skeleton Docket Case − Case Reopened as of 9/20/93. (war) (Entered: 09/29/1993)

PACER
291 Oct. 27, 1993

ORDER denying [290 − 1] motion for instructions for lack of jurisdiction by this court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Varner ) , copies mailed to counsel. (war) (Entered: 10/27/1993)

PACER
Oct. 27, 1993

Case closed (war) (Entered: 10/27/1993)

PACER
292 July 7, 2026

Reopen Case

RECAP
294 July 8, 2026

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
July 8, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

295 July 13, 2026

Order

RECAP
296 July 22, 2026

Response to Order

RECAP
297 July 23, 2026

Order to Show Cause

RECAP
298 July 23, 2026

Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
299 July 27, 2026

Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
Aug. 26, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings

301 Sept. 2, 2026

Status Conference

RECAP
302 Sept. 8, 2026

Order

RECAP
303 Sept. 8, 2026

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
304 Sept. 8, 2026

Order

RECAP
Sept. 8, 2026

Add and Terminate Attorneys

Case Details

State / Territory:

Alabama

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 20, 1987

Closing Date: Oct. 27, 1993

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Past, present and future employees of the City of Auburn, Alabama.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

City

City of Auburn

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Middle District of Alabama 3:87-cv-00680

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 91-07301

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General/Misc.:

Records Disclosure

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Recommended Citation