Case: Jones v. CCH-LIS Legal Information Services

1:97-cv-04372 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: June 13, 1997

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On June 13, 1997, five black employees of CCH Legal Information Services filed this class action lawsuit on behalf of CCH's 334 black employees in the Southern District of New York under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They alleged that CCH had engaged in a practice of denying equal opportunities for promotion to black employees because of their race and that CCH discriminated against black employees who did receive promotions by denying them terms and conditions of employment equal …

On June 13, 1997, five black employees of CCH Legal Information Services filed this class action lawsuit on behalf of CCH's 334 black employees in the Southern District of New York under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They alleged that CCH had engaged in a practice of denying equal opportunities for promotion to black employees because of their race and that CCH discriminated against black employees who did receive promotions by denying them terms and conditions of employment equal to white employees working in the same positions. The case was assigned to Judge Robert Sweet.

On March 18, 1998, the court appointed a special master to assist with and monitor settlement negotiations between the parties. The parties reached and the court approved a settlement agreement on July 17. The details of the settlement are not known to the Clearinghouse, but the docket shows that the parties agreed to class certification and a consent decree to be supervised by the court.

On September 23, 1998, the court entered the consent decree contemplated by the settlement. It instructed CCH to take all actions necessary to implement the terms of the settlement agreement. The court also retained jurisdiction to enforce the decree for 2½ years. On September 28, Judge Sweet certified the class, finding all necessary elements of numerosity, typicality and adequacy of representation were present.

On November 5, the court extended the period of supervision to last until April 30, 2001.

Class members continued to file individual claims for relief pursuant to the settlement agreement for the next two years. On December 3, 1998, the court awarded supplemental attorney’s fees of $46,432 and costs of $1,489. The court further ordered $39,505 in attorney’s fees on March 11, 1999 and a further $59,783 on June 15, 1999.

There has been little activity on the docket since 2001, when the 1998 consent decree was set to expire. In 2019, the court destroyed sealed documents that had been submitted to it during the lawsuit because no party had retrieved them. The case is likely now closed.

Summary Authors

Jonah Feitelson (3/20/2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10518645/parties/jones-v-cch-legal-inf/


Judge(s)

Sweet, Robert Workman (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Vladeck, Judith P (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Rosenberg, David Beresh (New York)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Warren, Jay P (New York)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:97-cv-04372

Docket [PACER]

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

Docket
24

1:97-cv-04372

Memorandum and Order

Sept. 28, 1998

Sept. 28, 1998

Order/Opinion

1998 WL 671446

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10518645/jones-v-cch-legal-inf/

Last updated Aug. 20, 2025, 11:16 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
166

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
167

Sealed Document Disposed

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 13, 1997

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The class of black employees of CCH Legal Information Services

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

CCH-LIS Legal Information Services, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Special Case Type(s):

Non-court arbitration/mediation

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: 147,000

Order Duration: 1998 - 2001

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black