Case: Black Parallel School Board v. Sacramento City Unified School District

2:19-cv-01768 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 5, 2019

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 5, 2019, the Black Parallel School Board and three students in the Sacramento City Unified School District (SCUSD) filed this putative class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The plaintiffs sued SCUSD and a selection of its officers under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), and state law. Represente…

On September 5, 2019, the Black Parallel School Board and three students in the Sacramento City Unified School District (SCUSD) filed this putative class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The plaintiffs sued SCUSD and a selection of its officers under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), and state law. Represented by Disability Rights California, the National Center for Youth Law, Western Center on Law and Poverty, and the Equal Justice Society, the plaintiffs sought injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as attorneys' fees. Specifically, they asked the court to order SCUSD to reform its policies and procedures to identify, offer, and provide accommodations and modifications to all eligible students. The case was assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley.

The plaintiffs claimed that SCUSD created and perpetuated an unlawful school system that resulted in modern-day segregation and mistreatment of students with disabilities— particularly Black students with disabilities. The plaintiffs alleged that students with disabilities faced excessive and exclusionary discipline and did not receive accommodations that would allow them to participate in equal education opportunities in violation of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. The plaintiffs also alleged that approximately half of students with disabilities were segregated into separate classrooms, equivalent to a status-based denial of equal education, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs further alleged that Black students with disabilities were 2.8 times more likely to face suspension than other students with disabilities, and faced a racially hostile environment, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and California Government Code Section 11135. 

In 2017, the Council of Great City Schools—a coalition of 75 of the nation’s largest urban public school systems—had released a report regarding the inadequate special education accommodations in the SCUSD. In 2018, nonprofit advocacy groups expressed their disappointment regarding SCUSD’s continuing failures and demanded immediate action. In their complaint, the plaintiffs asserted that SCUSD had been notified of its discriminatory conduct through the 2017 report, but had not taken effective steps to rectify the problems.

On December 19, 2019, the parties jointly moved to stay proceedings in order to pursue settlement talks. The following day, Judge Nunley signed an order temporarily staying the action for seven months, as requested by the parties. After a number of additional joint motions to stay, the court extended the stay until October 3, 2022 to enable the parties to focus on settlement efforts.

The case was reassigned to Judge Dale A. Drozd in August of 2022.

The following month, on September 26, the parties again submitted a joint stipulation and joint motion for stay to allow settlement talks to continue, citing important progress to date. Judge Drozd granted the joint motion and extended the stay through November 18, 2022. The court ultimately stayed the case until July of 2023.

In April of 2023, the case was reassigned to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta, who had recently been appointed to the federal bench.

A month later, the parties notified the court that they had settled. Under the settlement agreement, an independent monitor would create a plan to achieve the outcomes in the settlement agreement and evaluate whether the district complied with the plan. These intended outcomes included, among other things, a reduction in disciplinary referrals of students with disabilities and Black students with disabilities, more integrated classrooms for students with disabilities and Black students with disabilities, systems to prevent the bullying of students with disabilities and Black students with disabilities, more appropriate special education assessments, and the creation of best practices for issues surrounding IEPs. The defendants also agreed to pay $687,969.10 in attorneys' fees and costs. The court would retain jurisdiction for five years for monitoring purposes.

On May 26, 2023, the court dismissed the case without prejudice, but retained jurisdiction. As of October 2023, the case was ongoing.

Summary Authors

Elisabeth Ng (10/24/2019)

Sandy Sulzer (11/8/2022)

Micah Pollens-Dempsey (10/7/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16293200/parties/black-parallel-school-board-v-sacramento-city-unified-school-district/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Ana, Alexandra J. (California)

Bird, Melinda R. (California)

Claycomb, Bridget (California)

Dozier, Antionette D (California)

Harris, Michael (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:19-at-00821

Civil Docket

Black Parallel School Board et al v. Sacramento City Unified School District et al,

Sept. 5, 2019

Sept. 5, 2019

Docket
1

2:19-at-00821

Class Action Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

Black Parallel School Board et al v. Sacramento City Unified School District et al,

Sept. 5, 2019

Sept. 5, 2019

Complaint
1

2:19-cv-01768

Class Action Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

Sept. 5, 2019

Sept. 5, 2019

Complaint

2:19-cv-01768

Compromise and Release Agreement

May 19, 2023

May 19, 2023

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16293200/black-parallel-school-board-v-sacramento-city-unified-school-district/

Last updated Sept. 2, 2026, 5 a.m.

Docket for: Black Parallel School Board v. Sacramento City Unified School District
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 5, 2019

COMPLAINT against All Defendants by S.A., K.E., C.S. and Black Parallel School Board. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Munson, Carly) (Entered: 09/06/2019)

RECAP
2 Sept. 5, 2019

PAYMENT FILING FEE (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8445541) (Munson, Carly) (Entered: 09/05/2019)

RECAP
3 Sept. 6, 2019

SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Jorge A. Aguilar, Christine A. Baeta, Leticia Garcia, Michael Minnick, Lisa Murawski, Christina Pritchett, Jessie Ryan, Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Education, Mai Vang, Darrel Woo* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carly J. Munson* *Disability Rights California* *1831 K Street* *Sacramento, California 95811*. (Reader, L) (Entered: 09/06/2019)

RECAP
4 Sept. 6, 2019

CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form, # 2 VDRP) (Reader, L) (Entered: 09/06/2019)

RECAP
5 Sept. 24, 2019

STIPULATION Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by defendants. Attorney Simmons, Sloan Robert added. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 9/24/2019 (Kaminski, H). (Entered: 09/24/2019)

RECAP
6 Oct. 2, 2019

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Lauren Misako Lystrup on behalf of S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. Attorney Lystrup, Lauren Misako added. (Lystrup, Lauren) (Entered: 10/02/2019)

RECAP
7 Oct. 17, 2019

SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants on 09/10/19 (Munson, Carly) Modified on 10/17/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/17/2019)

RECAP
8 Oct. 18, 2019

UNOPPOSED MOTION to PROCEED USING FICTITIOUS INITIALS and NAMES by S. A., K. E., C. S. Motion Hearing set for 11/14/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Munson, Carly) Modified on 10/24/2019 (Huang, H). (Entered: 10/18/2019)

RECAP
9 Oct. 18, 2019

PROPOSED ORDER re 8 Motion to Proceed Using Fictitious Initials and Names by S. A., K. E., C. S. (Munson, Carly) Modified on 10/24/2019 (Huang, H). (Entered: 10/18/2019)

RECAP
10 Oct. 21, 2019

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by all Defendants. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 10/24/2019 (Huang, H). (Entered: 10/21/2019)

RECAP
11 Oct. 22, 2019

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/21/2019 EXTENDING the deadline for Defendants to respond to 1 Complaint by 28 days, to 11/19/2019. (Huang, H)

RECAP
12 Oct. 25, 2019

NOTICE of GUARDIANSHIP of Minor C.S. by C. S. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samuel S.)(Claycomb, Bridget) Modified on 10/28/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/25/2019)

RECAP
13 Oct. 25, 2019

PROPOSED ORDER re 12 Notice by C. S. (Claycomb, Bridget) Modified on 10/28/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/25/2019)

RECAP
14 Oct. 25, 2019

NOTICE of GUARDIANSHIP of Minor K.E. by K. E. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer E.)(Claycomb, Bridget) Modified on 10/28/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/25/2019)

RECAP
15 Oct. 25, 2019

PROPOSED ORDER re 14 Notice by K. E. (Claycomb, Bridget) Modified on 10/28/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/25/2019)

RECAP
16 Oct. 25, 2019

MOTION to APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM Amy A. by S. A. Motion Hearing set for 12/5/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amy A.)(Lystrup, Lauren) Modified on 10/28/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/25/2019)

RECAP
17 Oct. 25, 2019

PROPOSED ORDER re 16 Motion by S. A. (Lystrup, Lauren) Modified on 10/28/2019 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 10/25/2019)

RECAP
18 Nov. 5, 2019

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/19 GRANTING 8 Motion to Proceed Using Fictitious Initials and Names. (Coll, A)

RECAP
19 Nov. 6, 2019

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/2019 APPROVING Samuel S., as C.S.'s court-appointed guardian, on his behalf pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(1). If Samuel S.'s guardianship is terminated before C.S. attains the age of majority, C.S. shall notify the Court of the change in guardianship status within thirty (30) days of the termination and shall seek appointment of a proper replacement representative. (Becknal, R)

RECAP
20 Nov. 6, 2019

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/2019 APPROVING Jennifer E., as K.E.'s court-appointed guardian, in this action on his behalf pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(1). If Jennifer E.'s guardianship is terminated befo re K.E. attains the age of majority, K.E. shall notify the Court of the change in guardianship status within thirty (30) days of the termination and shall seek appointment of a proper replacement representative. Further, all parties shall refer to Jennifer E. as K.E.'s General Guardian, rather than Next Friend, in the case caption moving forward. (Becknal, R)

RECAP
21 Nov. 6, 2019

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/2019 GRANTING Plaintiff S.A.'s 16 Motion and the Court appoints Amy A. as S.A.'s Guardian ad Litem in this action.(Becknal, R)

RECAP
22 Nov. 15, 2019

THIRD STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER re Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Jorge A. Aguilar, et al. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 11/18/2019 (Huang, H). (Entered: 11/15/2019)

RECAP
23 Nov. 18, 2019

THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/18/19 EXTENDING the deadline to 12/20/2019 for the District to respond to the Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
24 Dec. 19, 2019

JOINT MOTION to STAY by Jorge A. Aguilar, et al., (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 12/20/2019 (Krueger, M). (Entered: 12/19/2019)

RECAP
25 Dec. 20, 2019

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/20/19 TEMPORARILY STAYING this action for 7 months; EXCUSING the parties from complying with 4 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order; DIRECTING the parties to file an initial status report with 90 days with a subsequent status report due 90 days after that so long as this stay remains in effect. The Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted. (Coll, A)

RECAP
26 March 18, 2020

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time by Jorge A. Aguilar et al. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 3/19/2020 (Coll, A). (Entered: 03/18/2020)

RECAP
27 March 19, 2020

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/19/2020 EXTENDING the deadline for the parties to file their initial joint status report to 4/2/2020. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
28 April 2, 2020

JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Munson, Carly) (Entered: 04/02/2020)

RECAP
29 April 24, 2020

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Melinda R. Bird on behalf of S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. Attorney Bird, Melinda R. added. (Bird, Melinda) (Entered: 04/24/2020)

RECAP
30 April 24, 2020

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Ramaah Sadasivam on behalf of S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. Attorney Sadasivam, Ramaah added. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 04/24/2020)

RECAP
31 July 1, 2020

JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Claycomb, Bridget) (Entered: 07/01/2020)

RECAP
32 July 8, 2020

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Atasi Satpathy Uppal on behalf of S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. Attorney Uppal, Atasi Satpathy added. (Uppal, Atasi) (Entered: 07/08/2020)

RECAP
33 July 10, 2020

JOINT MOTION for Extension of Stay of Litigation; and [PROPOSED] Order by All Plaintiffs. (Lystrup, Lauren) Modified on 7/13/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). (Entered: 07/10/2020)

RECAP
34 July 14, 2020

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/20 ORDERING that this action is temporarily stayed for six months for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts. (Kaminski, H)

RECAP
35 July 20, 2020

NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel Carly Munson by All Plaintiffs. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 07/20/2020)

RECAP
36 Aug. 13, 2020

THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) Modified on 8/14/2020 (Reader, L). (Entered: 08/13/2020)

RECAP
37 Sept. 28, 2020

FOURTH JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S. (Claycomb, Bridget) Modified on 9/28/2020 (Reader, L). (Entered: 09/28/2020)

RECAP
38 Nov. 30, 2020

JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 11/30/2020)

RECAP
39 Jan. 6, 2021

JOINT MOTION to STAY by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) Modified on 1/6/2021 (Krueger, M). (Entered: 01/06/2021)

RECAP
40 Jan. 7, 2021

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/6/2021 ORDERING that: 1) This action is temporarily STAYED for five more months for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts; 2) While this stay is in effect, the Parties are excused from complying with this Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 4); 3) While this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted; and the Parties shall file a status report no later than 75 days from the date of this Order and file a subsequent status report every 75 days thereafter so long as this stay remains in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. CASE STAYED. (Tupolo, A)

RECAP
41 March 23, 2021

JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 03/23/2021)

RECAP
42 June 1, 2021

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Alexandra J. Santa Ana on behalf of Black Parallel School Board. Attorney Santa Ana, Alexandra J. added. (Santa Ana, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/01/2021)

RECAP
43 June 1, 2021

JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 06/01/2021)

RECAP
44 June 1, 2021

MOTION to STAY by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 06/01/2021)

RECAP
45 June 2, 2021

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/2/21 ORDERING this action is temporarily STAYED for four months. While this stay is in effect, the Parties are excused from complying with this Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. Whil e this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted. The Parties shall file a status report no later than 75 days from the date of this order, file a second status report 75 days after the first status report, and file a subsequent status report every 75 days thereafter so long as this stay remains in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (Kastilahn, A)

RECAP
46 Aug. 16, 2021

EIGHTH JOINT STATUS REPORT by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 08/16/2021)

RECAP
47 Sept. 27, 2021

JOINT MOTION for FURTHER EXTENSION of STAY and PROPOSED ORDER by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) Modified on 9/27/2021 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 09/27/2021)

RECAP
48 Sept. 28, 2021

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/27/21 ORDERING that this action is temporarily STAYED for four months, to 2/4/22, for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts. While this stay is in effect, t he Parties are excused from complying with this Court's 4 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. While this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted. (Kastilahn, A)

RECAP
49 Jan. 27, 2022

JOINT MOTION to STAY by the Plaintiffs. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 1/27/2022 (Krueger, M). (Entered: 01/27/2022)

RECAP
50 Jan. 27, 2022

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/27/2022 ORDERING that this action is temporarily STAYED for three months, to 5/4/2022, for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts. While this stay is in effec t, the Parties are excused from complying with this Court's 4 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. While this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
51 April 21, 2022

NOTICE of WITHDRAWAL of COUNSEL Lauren Lystrup by All Plaintiffs. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 04/21/2022)

RECAP
52 April 27, 2022

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Joint Motion for Further Extension of Stay of Litigation re 50 Order, 49 Joint Motion to Stay by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) Modified on 4/28/2022 (Reader, L). (Entered: 04/27/2022)

RECAP
53 April 28, 2022

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/28/2022 ORDERING that This action is temporarily STAYED for three months, to 8/4/2022, for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts; While t his stay is in effect, the Parties are excused from complying with this Court's 4 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order; and While this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
54 May 2, 2022

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE terminating Counsel Bridget Claycomb by All Plaintiffs. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) (Entered: 05/02/2022)

RECAP
55 May 2, 2022

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Ramaah Sadasivam for S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Sadasivam, Ramaah) Modified on 5/3/2022 (Zignago, K.). (Entered: 05/02/2022)

RECAP
56 May 26, 2022

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Stephanie Horwitz on behalf of S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. Attorney Horwitz, Stephanie added. (Horwitz, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/26/2022)

RECAP
57 June 9, 2022

NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel Atasi Uppal by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Uppal, Atasi) (Entered: 06/09/2022)

RECAP
58 June 10, 2022

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Munmeeth K. Soni on behalf of S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. Attorney Soni, Munmeeth K. added. (Soni, Munmeeth) (Entered: 06/10/2022)

RECAP
59 June 13, 2022

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE terminating counsel Ramaah Sadasivam by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Soni, Munmeeth) Modified on 6/14/2022 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 06/13/2022)

RECAP
60 June 13, 2022

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Munmeeth K. Soni for S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., and C. S., attorney Ramaah Sadasivam terminated (Soni, Munmeeth) Modified on 6/14/2022 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 06/13/2022)

RECAP
61 July 28, 2022

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Further Extension of Stay of Litigation re 52 Stipulation, 53 Stipulation and Order by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Soni, Munmeeth) Modified on 7/29/2022 (Mena-Sanchez, L). (Entered: 07/28/2022)

RECAP
62 July 29, 2022

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 07/28/22 ORDERING that This action is temporarily STAYED to 10/03/22, for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts. While this stay is in effect , the Parties are excused from complying with this Court's 4 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. While this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted.(Licea Chavez, V)

RECAP
63 Aug. 25, 2022

ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from District Judge *Troy L. Nunley* to * District Judge Dale A. Drozd* for all further proceedings. (Perdue, C.) (Entered: 08/25/2022)

RECAP
64 Aug. 25, 2022

STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2022. (Perdue, C.) (Entered: 08/25/2022)

RECAP
65 Sept. 8, 2022

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL terminating Counsel Eva Paterson by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Soni, Munmeeth) Modified on 9/9/2022 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 09/08/2022)

RECAP
66 Sept. 26, 2022

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Further Extension of Stay of Litigation by S. A., Black Parallel School Board, K. E., C. S.. (Soni, Munmeeth) Modified on 9/28/2022 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 09/26/2022)

RECAP
67 Sept. 27, 2022

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/27/2022: On 7/29/2022, the court issued an 62 Order staying this case through 10/3/2022 to enable the parties' settlement efforts. On 9/26/2022, the parties filed a 66 Stipulation requesting extension of the stay through 11/18/2022. Pursuant to that 66 stipulation and good cause appearing, this action is stayed through 11/18/2022. While the stay is in effect, the parties are excused from complying with the court's 4 scheduling order, and defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after the stay in this action is lifted.(Buzo, P) (Entered: 09/27/2022)

RECAP
Sept. 27, 2022

Minute Order

68 Nov. 15, 2022

NOTICE OF JOINT MOTION for Further Extension of Stay of Litigation re 66 Stipulation and Proposed Order, 67 Minute Order, by Plaintiffs. (Soni, Munmeeth) Modified on 11/17/2022 (Mena-Sanchez, L). (Entered: 11/15/2022)

RECAP
69 Dec. 22, 2022

DESIGNATION OF COUNSEL by All Plaintiffs. (Horwitz, Stephanie) Modified on 12/27/2022 (Coll, A). (Entered: 12/22/2022)

RECAP
70 March 9, 2023

MOTION for further EXTENSION OF STAY by Plaintiffs and Defendants. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 3/13/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). (Entered: 03/09/2023)

RECAP
71 March 9, 2023

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/2023: On 3/9/ 2023, the parties filed a joint 70 Motion requesting that the stay of this case be extended through 4/14/2023. Good cause appearing, the court hereby grants the 70 Motion to Stay. This action shall be stayed through 4/14/2023. While the stay is in effect, the parties are excused from complying with the court's 4 scheduling order, and defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after the stay in this action is lifted.(Buzo, P) (Entered: 03/09/2023)

RECAP
March 9, 2023

Order on Motion to Stay AND ~Util - Case Stayed AND Minute Order

March 9, 2023

~Util - Case Stayed AND Order on Motion to Stay AND Minute Order

March 9, 2023

Order on Motion to Stay AND Minute Order AND ~Util - Case Stayed

72 April 6, 2023

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta to the bench of the Eastern District of California, this action is reassigned from *District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta* to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta for all further proceedings. All pending motions are submitted without appearance and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and the hearing on said motions is VACATED. If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. Further, all pretrial conference and trial dates currently set in this reassigned action are VACATED and shall be reset, as necessary, by the reassigned Court. (Benson, A.) (Entered: 04/06/2023)

RECAP
73 May 2, 2023

JOINT MOTION to STAY by Jorge A. Aguilar, et al.. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 5/2/2023 (Kastilahn, A). (Entered: 05/02/2023)

RECAP
74 May 2, 2023

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/2/23 ORDERING that this action is temporarily STAYED to 7/3/23, for all purposes to enable the Parties to focus on and engage in settlement efforts. While this stay is in effect, the Partie s are excused from complying with 4 this Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. While this stay is in effect, the Defendants are not required to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after any stay in this action is lifted. A Settlement Conference is SET for 6/2/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Kastilahn, A)

RECAP
75 May 4, 2023

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/4/2023: Pursuant to the Order setting Settlement Conference on 6/2/2023 at 9:00 AM before Judge Newman (ECF No. 74 ), the parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present for the settlement conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The individual with full settlement authority to settle must also have unfettered discretion and authority to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose behind requiring attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement conference statements seven days prior to the settlement conference by COB. These statements shall be simultaneously delivered to the Court using the following email address: kjnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. These statements should not be filed on the case docket. If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the Court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Parties shall file their waivers of disqualification no later than seven days prior to the date of the settlement conference. The Settlement Conference will take place by remote means (Zoom). The parties will receive instructions closer to the hearing date on how to appear for the Settlement Conference. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY)(Waldrop, A) (Entered: 05/04/2023)

RECAP
May 4, 2023

Minute Order

76 May 23, 2023

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL of Plaintiff K.E. by and through his Next Friend, Jennifer E. by S.A., Black Parallel School Board, K.E., C.S.. (Soni, Munmeeth) (Entered: 05/23/2023)

RECAP
77 May 23, 2023

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/23/2023: Upon review of the parties' 76 Stipulation for Dismissal, Plaintiff K.E.'s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff K.E. TERMINATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) (Entered: 05/23/2023)

RECAP
May 23, 2023

Minute Order AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Parties

78 May 24, 2023

NOTICE of SETTLEMENT by Jorge A. Aguilar, et al., Christine . Dispositional Docs due by 6/14/2023. (Simmons, Sloan) Modified on 5/24/2023 (Benson, A.). (Entered: 05/24/2023)

RECAP
79 May 24, 2023

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/24/2023: The Court is advised that this action has SETTLED. See ECF No. 78 . Accordingly, the parties shall file dispositional documents within twenty-one (21) days in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160. Any hearing dates and deadlines previously set in this matter are VACATED. [TEXT ENTRY ONLY] (Michel, G.) (Entered: 05/24/2023)

RECAP
80 May 24, 2023

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Conditional Dismissal by Black Parallel School Board. (Soni, Munmeeth) (Entered: 05/24/2023)

RECAP
May 24, 2023

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

81 May 26, 2023

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 05/25/23 DISMISSING this Case without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). The Court RETAINS jurisdiction over this action for 5 years. CASE CLOSED(Licea Chavez, V)

RECAP
82 Sept. 11, 2025

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by S. Lynn Martinez on behalf of Black Parallel School Board. Attorney Martinez, S. Lynn added. (Martinez, S. Lynn) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

RECAP
83 Sept. 11, 2025

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS Melinda R. Bird and Munmeeth K. Soni by Black Parallel School Board, et al. (Martinez, S. Lynn) Modified on 9/11/2025 (GJM). (Entered: 09/11/2025)

RECAP
84 Oct. 2, 2025

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Leah Kang on behalf of Black Parallel School Board. Attorney Kang, Leah added. (Kang, Leah) (Entered: 10/02/2025)

RECAP
85 July 29, 2026

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
86 Aug. 20, 2026

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
87 Aug. 27, 2026

Notice of Appearance

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Education

Disability Rights

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 5, 2019

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The Black Parallel School Board and students in the Sacramento City Unified School District (SCUSD).

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

National Center for Youth Law

NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Mooted before ruling

Defendants

School District

Sacramento City Unified School District

Defendant Type(s):

Elementary/Secondary School

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights (PAIR), 29 U.S.C. § 794e

State law

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of California 2:19-at-00821

Eastern District of California 2:19-cv-01768

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Content of Injunction:

Goals (e.g., for hiring, admissions)

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Monitoring

Monitor/Master

Reporting

Student assignment

Training

Amount Defendant Pays: $687,969.10

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Education

Failure to train

Individualized planning

Pattern or Practice

Racial segregation

Record-keeping

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Disability and Disability Rights:

Disability, unspecified

Effective Communication (ADA)

Integrated setting

Least restrictive environment

Mental impairment

Reasonable Accommodations

Reasonable Modifications

Special education

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Intellectual/Developmental Disability

Intellectual disability/mental illness dual diagnosis

Recommended Citation