Case: Reilly v. Bondi

2:25-cv-00950 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Filed Date: Oct. 21, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) revocation of a career Financial Analyst’s security clearance, allegedly in retaliation for expressing protected political views about the 2020 presidential election. In February 2021, the analyst privately voiced concerns regarding election irregularities and potential legal challenges. Following this, the FBI suspended her, citing concerns about vulnerability to manipulation related to her political views and alleged belief in c…

This case challenged the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) revocation of a career Financial Analyst’s security clearance, allegedly in retaliation for expressing protected political views about the 2020 presidential election.

In February 2021, the analyst privately voiced concerns regarding election irregularities and potential legal challenges. Following this, the FBI suspended her, citing concerns about vulnerability to manipulation related to her political views and alleged belief in conspiracy theories. In June 2021, the FBI formally revoked her clearance, accusing her of promoting unfounded conspiratorial beliefs linked to “QAnon-influenced social media.” They claimed that she failed to renounce these views during an internal investigation. The FBI also allegedly disregarded her requests for discovery and withheld relevant records for more than three years during her appeals process. 

On October 22, 2025, the former FBI analyst filed suit against the FBI, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and the respective leaders of these agencies, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida – Fort Myers Division. Plaintiff brought claims under the First and Fifth Amendments, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and the Back Pay Act. Plaintiff sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, as well as attorneys’ fees. This case was assigned to Judge Kyle C. Dudek. 

In her complaint, Plaintiff alleged that defendants (i) violated the First Amendment by retaliating against her and revoking her security clearance based on her political beliefs; (ii) violated the Fifth Amendment by depriving her of employment and permanently stigmatizing her professional reputation through false and shifting justifications, without providing procedural due process; and (iii) violated the APA by acting arbitrarily, capriciously, and contrary to law in the security clearance process, including relying on shifting and unsupported justifications and failing to follow required procedures under Executive Order 12968. She further sought relief under the Back Pay Act, All Writs Act, and Mandamus Act to obtain full back pay, prevent evasion of judicial review, and compel the FBI to recognize her as having retired in good standing, respectively.

This case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Dahlia Gottlieb (12/3/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71712631/parties/reilly-v-bondi/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Kuchta, John David (Florida)

Wilson, Desiree (Florida)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

2:25-cv-00950

Civil Complaint for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief Requested and Demanded for a Jury Trial

Reilly v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al.

Oct. 22, 2025

Oct. 22, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title Description External URL Date / External URL

Executive Order 12968—Access to Classified Information

Aug. 4, 1995

Aug. 4, 1995

https://www.govinfo.gov/...

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71712631/reilly-v-bondi/

Last updated Aug. 30, 2026, 3:40 a.m.

Docket for: Reilly v. Bondi
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Oct. 22, 2025

COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24021008) with Jury Demand filed by Kelli-ann Reilly. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet JS44 Civil Cover Sheet Reilly v. Bondi et. al, # 2 Proposed Summons Summons to USAO MDFL, # 3 Proposed Summons Summons to FBI, # 4 Proposed Summons Summons to DOJ Civil Process Clerk, # 5 Proposed Summons Summons to Kash Patel FBI Director, # 6 Proposed Summons Summons to Pam Bondi, AG of the US)(Kuchta, John) Modified to add payment information on 10/23/2025 (RLD). (Entered: 10/22/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet JS44 Civil Cover Sheet Reilly v. Bondi et. al

View on PACER

2 Proposed Summons Summons to USAO MDFL

View on PACER

3 Proposed Summons Summons to FBI

View on PACER

4 Proposed Summons Summons to DOJ Civil Process Clerk

View on PACER

5 Proposed Summons Summons to Kash Patel FBI Director

View on PACER

6 Proposed Summons Summons to Pam Bondi, AG of the US

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Oct. 22, 2025

NEW CASE ASSIGNED to District Judge Kyle C. Dudek and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:25-cv-950-KCD-NPM. (RLD) (Entered: 10/22/2025)

RECAP
Oct. 22, 2025

Case Assigned/Reassigned

3 Oct. 23, 2025

CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 10/23/2025. (CGW) (Entered: 10/23/2025)

RECAP
4 Oct. 28, 2025

SUMMONS issued as to Director of the FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice. (RLD) (Entered: 10/28/2025)

RECAP
5 Dec. 4, 2025

SUMMONS returned executed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. Director of the FBI served on 11/12/2025, answer due 1/12/2026. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

RECAP
6 Dec. 4, 2025

SUMMONS returned executed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. United States Attorney General served on 11/12/2025, answer due 1/12/2026. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

RECAP
7 Dec. 4, 2025

SUMMONS returned executed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. Federal Bureau of Investigation served on 11/12/2025, answer due 1/12/2026. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

RECAP
8 Dec. 4, 2025

SUMMONS returned executed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. United States Department of Justice served on 11/12/2025, answer due 1/12/2026. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

RECAP
9 Dec. 4, 2025

SUMMONS returned executed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. United States Department of Justice served on 11/10/2025, answer due 1/12/2026. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

RECAP
10 Dec. 17, 2025

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by Kelli-Ann Reilly.(Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

RECAP
11 Dec. 18, 2025

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (Huguelet, Kevin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (Entered: 12/18/2025)

RECAP
12 Dec. 18, 2025

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Director of the FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice. (Huguelet, Kevin) (Entered: 12/18/2025)

RECAP
13 Dec. 19, 2025

ENDORSED ORDER granting 11 defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time. By February 16, 2026, defendants must file their response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 12/19/2025. (RCD) (Entered: 12/19/2025)

RECAP
Dec. 19, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

14 Dec. 23, 2025

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Kelli-Ann Reilly. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

RECAP
15 Feb. 12, 2026

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (Huguelet, Kevin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (Entered: 02/12/2026)

RECAP
16 Feb. 13, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER granting 15 defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time. By February 20, 2026, defendants must respond to the amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 2/13/2026. (RCD) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 13, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

17 Feb. 20, 2026

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2/21 Letter, # 2 Exhibit 6/21 Letter, # 3 Exhibit 6/25 Letter)(Huguelet, Kevin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (Entered: 02/20/2026)

1 Exhibit 2/21 Letter

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 6/21 Letter

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 6/25 Letter

View on PACER

RECAP
18 March 2, 2026

First MOTION to File Excess Pages to Govt Mot to Dismiss by Kelli-Ann Reilly. (Kuchta, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (Entered: 03/02/2026)

RECAP
19 March 6, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER granting 18 plaintiff's unopposed motion to exceed the page limit. Plaintiff may file a response to the motion to dismiss that does not exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 3/6/2026. (RCD) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

RECAP
March 6, 2026

Order on Motion to File Excess Pages

20 March 11, 2026

Plaintiff's Response to Government's Motion to Dismiss re 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit OIG Report, # 2 Exhibit OIG Press Release, # 3 Exhibit OIG Congressional Testimony, # 4 Exhibit FBI Ethics Policy Guide)(Kuchta, John) Modified on 3/12/2026 as to docket text and to correct to motion (LJC). Modified event on 3/13/2026 (ABM). (Entered: 03/11/2026)

RECAP
21 June 18, 2026

ORDER granting 17 the Government's Motion to Dismiss and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions or deadlines, and close the case. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 6/18/2026. (CGW) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

RECAP
22 June 18, 2026

JUDGMENT entered that Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) is GRANTED, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 6/18/2026. (AW) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

RECAP
23 June 18, 2026

NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AW) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

RECAP
June 18, 2026

Notice to Counsel of Local Rule

24 June 28, 2026

Notice of substitution of AUSA. Lacy R. Harwell, Jr substituting for AUSA Kevin Huguelet. (Harwell, Lacy) (Entered: 06/28/2026)

RECAP
25 July 27, 2026

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 22 Judgment by Kelli-Ann Reilly. Filing fee not paid. ***Case Stayed. (Kuchta, John) (Entered: 07/27/2026)

RECAP
26 July 27, 2026

First MOTION for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis by Kelli-Ann Reilly. (Attachments: # 1 AO240)(Kuchta, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. (Entered: 07/27/2026)

RECAP
27 July 28, 2026

TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to the U.S. Court of Appeals - 11th Circuit re 25 Notice of Appeal. In Forma Pauperis Motion filed. (BD) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
July 29, 2026

USCA Case Number

July 29, 2026

***11th Circuit Case Number: 26-12621-G for 25 Notice of Appeal filed by Kelli-Ann Reilly. (ABM)

28 Aug. 13, 2026

Alter Judgment

RECAP
29 Aug. 18, 2026

Leave to File Document

1 11th Circuit Transcript Order Form

View on PACER

RECAP
30 Aug. 26, 2026

TEXT ORDER directing Plaintiff to supplement 26 motion to appeal IFP. By September 1, 2026, Plaintiff must fully complete, execute, and file Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/26/2026. (RCD) (Entered: 08/26/2026)

RECAP
31 Aug. 26, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER granting 29 motion for an extension of time to file the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form. As explained in the Eleventh Circuit's internal operating procedures for FRAP 10, the use of the form is permissive. Moreover, when there are no district court hearings to transcribe--as is the case here--the internal operating procedures further provide that the absence of either the form or the FRAP 10(b)(1)(B) certificate is not considered a deficiency. Finally, use of the form does not appear necessary when a FRAP 10(b)(1)(B) certificate is filed, as was done here. Nevertheless, the Transcript Order Form (Doc. 29-1) is deemed timely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/26/2026. (RCD) (Entered: 08/26/2026)

RECAP
Aug. 26, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

Aug. 26, 2026

Order

Case Details

State / Territory:

Florida

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 21, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff was a career Financial Analyst’s at the Federal Bureau of Investigations.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Acting Attorney General of the United States

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

The United States of America

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Freedom of speech/association

Other Dockets:

Middle District of Florida 2:25-cv-00950

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Discipline

Pay / Benefits

Recommended Citation