Case: Mittereder v. Noem

1:25-cv-01991 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Nov. 7, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenges the Transportation Security Administration’s directive prohibiting transgender Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) from conducting security pat-downs of airline passengers in response to Executive Order 14168, Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.  Plaintiff Danielle Mittereder, a current TSO, filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on November 7, 2025. Mittereder …

This case challenges the Transportation Security Administration’s directive prohibiting transgender Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) from conducting security pat-downs of airline passengers in response to Executive Order 14168, Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. 

Plaintiff Danielle Mittereder, a current TSO, filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on November 7, 2025. Mittereder named Kristi Noem, acting in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, as Defendant. Mittereder alleges that Defendant has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against her on the basis of sex. Mittereder sought a declaration that Defendant’s action violated the Civil Rights Act, an injunction blocking the Transportation Security Administration’s directive, as well as compensatory damages and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued EO 14168, which sought to “defend women’s rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.” EO 14168 ordered all agencies to “effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.” In response to EO 14168, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued a directive prohibiting all transgender TSOs from conducting security pat-downs of airline passengers. Pat-downs in airports are typically administered by TSOs who are the same gender as the traveler. The TSA directive also prohibited TSOs from using TSA-controlled restrooms that align with their gender identity. 

Mittereder is a transgender woman who has been working as a TSO at Dulles International Airport since July 1, 2024. After the TSA directive, Mittereder was prohibited from conducting pat-downs on female travelers. The only basis provided to Mittereder for this prohibition was her transgender status. As a result of the TSA directive, Mittereder is unable to perform a significant portion of her TSO job functions. In addition, Mittereder has been forced to disclose her gender identity to travelers during pat-down procedures. Because advancement and increased compensation at TSA are based on conducting pat-downs, the TSA directive also hampers Mittereder’s career development. 

On November 7, this case was initially assigned to Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. 

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Allison Opheim (11/29/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71889590/parties/mittereder-v-mullin/


Judge(s)

Nachmanoff, Michael S. (Virginia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Brown, Carla Denette (Virginia)

Puth, Jonathan Craig (Virginia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:25-cv-01991

Complaint

Nov. 7, 2025

Nov. 7, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71889590/mittereder-v-mullin/

Last updated July 22, 2026, 3:48 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 7, 2025

COMPLAINT (Filing Fee $405, receipt number AVAEDC-10575573), filed by Danielle Mittereder. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 11/07/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Nov. 7, 2025

Proposed Summons in re 1 COMPLAINT [Attorney General] by Danielle Mittereder. (Brown, Carla) Modified text on 11/7/2025 (triv). (Entered: 11/07/2025)

RECAP
3 Nov. 7, 2025

Proposed Summons in re 1 COMPLAINT [Kristi Noem] by Danielle Mittereder. (Brown, Carla) Modified text on 11/7/2025 (triv). (Entered: 11/07/2025)

RECAP
4 Nov. 7, 2025

Proposed Summons in re 1 COMPLAINT [US Attorney] by Danielle Mittereder. (Brown, Carla) Modified text on 11/7/2025 (triv). (Entered: 11/07/2025)

RECAP
5 Nov. 7, 2025

MOTION to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jonathan C. Puth and Certification of Local Counsel Carla D. Brown. Filing Fee $75, receipt number AVAEDC-10575841 by Danielle Mittereder. (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 11/07/2025)

RECAP
6 Nov. 7, 2025

Summons Issued as to Kristi Noem, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: # 1 Notice to Attorney) (triv) (Entered: 11/07/2025)

1 Notice to Attorney

View on PACER

RECAP
Nov. 7, 2025

Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (triv)

7 Nov. 10, 2025

ORDER granting 5 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Jonathan Craig Puth for Danielle Mittereder. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 11/10/2025. (swil) (Entered: 11/10/2025)

RECAP
8 Nov. 13, 2025

DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Danielle Mittereder. (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 11/13/2025)

RECAP
9 Nov. 18, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danielle Mittereder. Kristi Noem served on 11/14/2025, answer due 1/13/2026. (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 11/18/2025)

RECAP
10 Nov. 19, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danielle Mittereder. Kristi Noem served on 11/12/2025, answer due 1/13/2026. (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 11/19/2025)

RECAP
11 Nov. 20, 2025

NOTICE by Danielle Mittereder re 9 Summons Returned Executed as to USA (Notice of Withdrawal of Dkt. Entry 9] (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 11/20/2025)

RECAP
12 Dec. 2, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danielle Mittereder. Kristi Noem served on 11/17/2025, answer due 1/16/2026. (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 12/02/2025)

RECAP
13 Dec. 2, 2025

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Kelsey S. Speyer and Certification of Local Counsel Carla D. Brown Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-10619228. by Danielle Mittereder. (Brown, Carla) (Entered: 12/02/2025)

RECAP
14 Dec. 3, 2025

ORDER granting 13 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Kelsey Sarah Speyer for Danielle Mittereder. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 12/3/2025. (swil) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

RECAP
15 Jan. 5, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Mezger on behalf of Kristi Noem (Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 01/05/2026)

RECAP
16 Jan. 5, 2026

Certificate Reporting Service by Kristi Noem. All Defendants. (Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 01/05/2026)

RECAP
17 Jan. 5, 2026

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint by Kristi Noem. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 01/05/2026)

RECAP
18 Jan. 6, 2026

ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Defendants Consent Motion for an extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint (Motion) [Dkt. No. 17]. This matter can be resolved without oral argument, as such argument would not aid the decisional process. Upon consideration of the Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than January 26, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 1/6/26. (yguy) (Entered: 01/06/2026)

RECAP
19 Jan. 26, 2026

MOTION to Dismiss by Kristi Noem. (Mezger, Matthew) Modified text on 1/27/2026 (triv). (Entered: 01/26/2026)

RECAP
20 Jan. 26, 2026

Memorandum of Law in Support in re 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kristi Noem. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 1, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7)(Mezger, Matthew) Modified text on 1/27/2026 (triv). (Entered: 01/26/2026)

RECAP
21 Jan. 26, 2026

Notice of Hearing Date in re 19 MOTION to Dismiss, 20 Memorandum of Law in Support, (Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

RECAP
Jan. 27, 2026

Set Deadlines as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2026 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 600 before District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (wgar, )

22 Feb. 9, 2026

AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kristi Noem, filed by Danielle Mittereder.(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 02/09/2026)

RECAP
23 Feb. 9, 2026

Opposition to 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Danielle Mittereder. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 02/09/2026)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
24 Feb. 17, 2026

NOTICE by Kristi Noem re 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Baumhart, Peter) (Entered: 02/17/2026)

RECAP
25 Feb. 18, 2026

So Ordered in re 24 NOTICE filed by Kristi Noem. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 2/18/2026. (swil) (Entered: 02/18/2026)

RECAP
26 Feb. 23, 2026

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Kristi Noem. (Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

RECAP
27 Feb. 23, 2026

Memorandum in Support re 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kristi Noem. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 01, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 02, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 03, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 04, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 05, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 06, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 07)(Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

1 Exhibit Ex. 01

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Ex. 02

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Ex. 03

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Ex. 04

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Ex. 05

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Ex. 06

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Ex. 07

View on PACER

RECAP
28 Feb. 23, 2026

Notice of Hearing Date re 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 27 Memorandum in Support, (Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 24, 2026

Motion Hearing set for 3/27/2026 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 600 before District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (dzir)

29 March 9, 2026

Opposition to 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Danielle Mittereder. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 03/09/2026)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
30 March 16, 2026

REPLY to Response to Motion re 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kristi Noem. (Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

RECAP
March 19, 2026

Reset Deadlines as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Motion Hearing reset for 3/26/2026 at 02:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 600 before District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff. (lcre, )

31 March 26, 2026

Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff: Motion Hearing held on 3/26/2026. Counsel Jonathan Puth and Carla Brown appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel Matthew Mezger and Peter Baumhart appeared on behalf of Defendant. MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re 26 argued and DENIED. Government permitted 14 days to file response as articulated in open court. Order to follow. (Court Reporter D. Salters.)(lcre, ) (Entered: 03/26/2026)

RECAP
32 March 26, 2026

ORDERED that the Motion re 26 is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendant will respond to the Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 3/26/2026. (lcre, ) (Entered: 03/26/2026)

RECAP
33 April 3, 2026

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 3-26-26, before Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff., Court Reporter/Transcriber Diane Salters, Telephone number 301-338-8033. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 5/4/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/3/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/2/2026. (lcre, ) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

RECAP
34 April 9, 2026

ANSWER to Complaint by Kristi Noem.(Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

RECAP
35 April 10, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/6/2026 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 301 before Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/20/2026 at 02:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 600 before District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff. Discovery due by 8/14/2026. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 4/10/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form, # 2 Pretrial Notice)(lcre, ) (Entered: 04/10/2026)

RECAP
36 April 29, 2026

Joint Proposed Discovery Plan by Danielle Mittereder.(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 04/29/2026)

RECAP
37 May 1, 2026

Amended Discovery Plan by Danielle Mittereder.(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

RECAP
38 May 4, 2026

Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. Because the parties' Rule 26(f) Joint Proposed Discovery Plan 37 adequately addresses the matters that would be discussed during the initial pretrial conference and counsel consent to waiving their appearances at the initial pretrial conference, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for May 6, 2026, pursuant to Rule 16(b) and this Court's April 10, 2026, Order 35, is cancelled. Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Rule 26(f) Joint Proposed Discovery Plan 37, the Court makes the following rulings: 1. All discovery shall be concluded by August 14, 2026. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 5/4/2026. (lgue, ) (Entered: 05/04/2026)

RECAP
39 May 8, 2026

Joint MOTION for Protective Order (Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order) by Danielle Mittereder. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Brown, Carla) (Entered: 05/08/2026)

RECAP
40 May 11, 2026

PROTECTIVE ORDER: Re Handling and Labeling of Confidential Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 5/11/2026. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (wgar, ) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

RECAP
41 May 18, 2026

Joint MOTION for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order for Materials Constituting Sensitive Security Information by Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

RECAP
42 May 19, 2026

Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Amended Stipulated Protective Order for Materials Constituting Sensitive Security Information)(Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

RECAP
43 May 20, 2026

PROTECTIVE ORDER. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 5/20/2026. (lgue, ) (Entered: 05/20/2026)

RECAP
44 May 20, 2026

ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion for Protective Order (Motion) 41 . This matter can be resolved without oral argument, as such argument would not aid the decisional process. Upon consideration of the Motion and subsequent filings, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 5/20/2026. (lgue, ) (Entered: 05/20/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Virginia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 7, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff is a transgender woman who works as a Travel Security Officer for TSA

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Virginia 1:25-cv-01991

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Discrimination Basis:

Gender identity

Sex discrimination

Recommended Citation