Case: EEOC v. Neuro-Restorative Associates, Inc.

3:01-cv-00534 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

Filed Date: June 18, 2001

Closed Date: Nov. 6, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In June 2001, the EEOC brought this suit against Neuro-Restorative Associates, Inc., doing business as Timer Ridge UMC Neurorestorative Center, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The complaint is currently unavailable. The docket suggests that the case was brought under Title VII. Before the defendant was required to file a formal answer with the court, the parties settled and a consent decree was issued in November 2001. Although the consent decree is not available, the dockets states that a female received $60,000 in damages.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (6/24/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11421931/parties/eeoc-v-neuro-restorative/

Judge(s)

Echols, Robert L. (Tennessee)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ramsey, Sally (Tennessee)

Attorney for Defendant

Oliver, James Craig (Tennessee)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

3:01-cv-00534

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Neuro-Restorative Associates, Inc. dba Timber Ridge UMC Neurorestorative Center

Nov. 6, 2001

Nov. 6, 2001

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11421931/eeoc-v-neuro-restorative/

Last updated Oct. 6, 2026, 6:35 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Neuro-Restorative
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 June 18, 2001

COMPLAINT (NO Summons(es) issued-Waiver forms) (af) Modified on 06/19/2001 (Entered: 06/19/2001)

RECAP
2 June 18, 2001

NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference Case referred to Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles, ; Case Management Conference set for 10:00 a.m. on 8/13/01 (af) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

RECAP
3 June 29, 2001

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Case Management Conference reset for 10:30 a.m. on 8/16/01 . Counsel for the pltf shall serve a copy of this Order on any defts who have not yet entered an appearance. EOD 7/2/01 (cc: all counsel) (seal) (Entered: 07/02/2001)

RECAP
4 July 20, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE mailed upon deft Neuro-Restorative on 7/5/01. (dlt) (Entered: 07/23/2001)

RECAP
5 Aug. 20, 2001

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Case Management Conference reset for 11:00 on 9/10/01. EOD 8/21/01 (cc: all counsel) (gi) (Entered: 08/21/2001)

RECAP
Aug. 20, 2001

PROPOSED Agreed Order allowing deft Neuro-Restorative an additional 30 days to within which to serve its answer or other responsive pleading in this action (vh) (Entered: 08/21/2001)

PACER
Aug. 20, 2001

PROPOSED Agreed Order allowing deft Neuro-Restorative an additional 30 days to within which to serve its answer or other responsive pleading in this action (vh)

6 Aug. 24, 2001

AGREED ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Deft shall have until 9/19/01 to file an answer. EOD 8/27/01 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 08/27/2001)

RECAP
7 Sept. 7, 2001

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Case Management Conference set for 11:30 a.m. on 10/11/01 . Counsel for the pltf shall serve a copy of this Order on any defts who have not yet entered an appearance. EOD 9/10/01 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 09/10/2001)

RECAP
Sept. 18, 2001

PROPOSED Order extending time for 30 days for deft to answer (gi) (Entered: 09/18/2001)

PACER
Sept. 18, 2001

PROPOSED Order extending time for 30 days for deft to answer (gi)

8 Sept. 20, 2001

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Deft shall serve its answer by 10/19/01. Parties will notify the Court immediately should they finalize the settlement of this action prior to such date. EOD 9/21/01 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 09/21/2001)

RECAP
9 Oct. 10, 2001

ORDER by Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles: Court has been advised that the parties have settled this case. Case Management Conference set for 10/11/01 is cancelled. Parties shall submit an agreed order of dismissal by 10/29/01. Clerk is directed to forward this file to Judge Echols for his consideration; terminating case referral to Magistrate Judge E. C. Knowles . EOD 10/11/01 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 10/11/2001)

RECAP
Oct. 29, 2001

PROPOSED Consent Decree (dlt) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

PACER
Oct. 29, 2001

PROPOSED Consent Decree (dlt)

10 Nov. 6, 2001

CONSENT DECREE ORDER by Judge Robert L. Echols: The Court approves the Consent Decree. In compromise and settlement of these disputed claims, deft agrees to pay a lump sum payment of $37,876 in back pay, less withholgin taxes, plus $3,921 in interest; and $18,203 compensatory damages to Doris Odom. W/in 21 days of entry of this decree, deft shall mail a cashier's check to Doris Odom; terminating case . EOD 11/7/01 (cc: all counsel) (dlt) (Entered: 11/07/2001)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Tennessee

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 18, 2001

Closing Date: Nov. 6, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Neuro-Restorative Associates, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Middle District of Tennessee 3:01-cv-00534

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 60000

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation