Case: EEOC v. ACROPOLIS SYSTEMS, INC.

5:99-cv-20966 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 23, 1999

Closed Date: Aug. 10, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The San Francisco District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, against Acropolis Systems, Inc. The complaint was filed in September 1999, but we do not have access to this document. In March 2001 the case was settled and in August 2001, the case was voluntarily dismissed. The only document we have for this case is the docket, which indicates that the cause of action is probably Title VII (42 USC 2000e).

Summary Authors

Shankar Viswanathan (7/5/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11258273/parties/equal-employment-v-acropolis-systems/


Judge(s)

Whyte, Ronald M. (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

5:99-cv-20966

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Acropolis Systems

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11258273/equal-employment-v-acropolis-systems/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2026, 9:58 p.m.

Docket for: Equal Employment v. Acropolis Systems
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 23, 1999

COMPLAINT Civil Rights-Employment Discrimination Fee status ex entered on 9/23/99 (); jury demand [5:99-cv-20966] (sus, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/27/1999)

PACER
2 Sept. 23, 1999

ORDER RE COURT PROCEDURE and SCHEDULE by Judge Ronald M. Whyte : Proof of service to be filed by 11/8/99 ; counsels' case management statement to be filed by 1/11/00 ; initial case management conference will be held 10:30 1/21/00 . (cc: all counsel) (sus, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/27/1999)

PACER
3 Nov. 3, 1999

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Acropolis Systems, on 10/22/99 [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

PACER
4 Nov. 15, 1999

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION WITH MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES before Judge Ronald M. Whyte by defendant Acropolis Systems, for more definite statement with Notice set for 1/7/00 at 9:00 [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/22/1999)

PACER
Nov. 15, 1999

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, ) re: motion for more definite statement [4-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/22/1999)

PACER
5 Dec. 17, 1999

OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Equal Employment to motion for more definite statement [4-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

PACER
6 Dec. 17, 1999

DECLARATION by Sanya P. Hill on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment in support of opposition [5-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

PACER
7 Dec. 28, 1999

REPLY by defendant Acropolis Systems, to opposition to motion for more definite statement [4-1] ;declaration of John C. Gorman [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/05/2000)

PACER
8 Jan. 4, 2000

NOTICE by Plaintiff Equal Employment of change of address of attorney [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

PACER
Jan. 6, 2000

Docket Modification (Administrative) to for referral to Early Neutral Evaluation (ADR L.R.5) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/06/2000)

PACER
9 Jan. 11, 2000

MINUTES: ( C/R Lee-Anne Shortridge) ( Hearing Date: 1/7/00) that the motion for more definite statement [4-1] is submitted [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/14/2000)

PACER
10 Jan. 11, 2000

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte : Last day to hold second meet and confer re Case Management is 3/6/00; Case Management Statement is due 3/14/00 ; Case Management Conference set for 10:30 3/24/00 ; (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/14/2000)

PACER
11 Jan. 14, 2000

ANSWER by defendant Acropolis Systems, to complaint [1-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/19/2000)

PACER
12 Jan. 14, 2000

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte denying motion for more definite statement [4-1] ( Date Entered: 1/20/00) (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/20/2000)

PACER
13 March 7, 2000

CLERK'S NOTICE Case Management Conference set for 10:30 4/14/00 ; [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

PACER
14 March 14, 2000

CERTIFICATION of discussion of ADR options by Plaintiff Equal Employment . [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

PACER
15 March 14, 2000

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

PACER
16 March 15, 2000

CERTIFICATION of discussion of ADR options by defendant Acropolis Systems, . [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/17/2000)

PACER
17 April 20, 2000

MINUTES: ( C/R not reported) ( Hearing Date: 4/14/00) Discovery cutoff set for 1/31/01 ; All motions will be heard by 9:00 2/2/01 ; Pretrial conference set for 2:00 4/5/01 ; Jury trial will be held 1:30 4/16/01 ; cutoff date for expert discovery is 1/31/01 ; pre-trial statement due by 3/30/01 ; [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

PACER
18 May 2, 2000

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) Modified on 05/09/2000 (Entered: 05/09/2000)

PACER
19 May 9, 2000

JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/15/2000)

PACER
Jan. 24, 2001

RECEIVED Stipulation & Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, ) to extend discovery cutoff [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

PACER
20 Jan. 31, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : Discovery cutoff shall be extended to 3/2/01 solely for the limited purpose of conducting the deposition of Ken Schmitt ; (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/16/2001)

PACER
Feb. 7, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, )re waiver of atorney-client privilege [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/11/2001)

PACER
22 Feb. 12, 2001

DECLARATION by Lucila G. Rosas on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment re motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

PACER
23 Feb. 12, 2001

MOTION before Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull by Plaintiff Equal Employment to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

PACER
24 Feb. 12, 2001

NOTICE of hearing by Plaintiff Equal Employment setting motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] ; hearing set for 10:00 2/27/01 [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

PACER
25 Feb. 12, 2001

MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Equal Employment in support of motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/22/2001)

PACER
Feb. 12, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) re: motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

PACER
Feb. 12, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) re: motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

PACER
26 Feb. 14, 2001

MEMORANDUM by defendant Acropolis Systems, in opposition to motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

PACER
27 Feb. 15, 2001

REPLY by Plaintiff Equal Employment to opposition to motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

PACER
28 Feb. 15, 2001

DECLARATION by Sanya P. Hill on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment re motion reply [27-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

PACER
29 Feb. 16, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : re waiver of attorney-client privilege as to matters related to Lisa Buchanan and Arlene DiSalvo (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/27/2001)

PACER
Feb. 16, 2001

RECEIVED Stipulation & Proposed Order to extend discovery cutoff ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

PACER
31 Feb. 20, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : Discovery cutoff is extended for the limited purpose of completing the deposition of John Pham and Lisa Buchanan until 3/9/01 (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

PACER
32 March 1, 2001

MEMORANDUM by defendant Acropolis Systems, in opposition to motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] and request for sanctions; Declaration of John C. Gorman [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/04/2001)

PACER
March 1, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, ) re: opposition memorandum [32-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/04/2001)

PACER
33 March 7, 2001

REPLY by Plaintiff Equal Employment to opposition to motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] and request for sanctions [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/08/2001)

PACER
34 March 7, 2001

DECLARATION by Lucila G. Rosas on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment re motion reply [33-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/08/2001)

PACER
40 March 9, 2001

LETTER dated 3/8/01 from Marcia L. Mitchell for Equal Employment re settlement conference set for 3/20/01 at 9:30 [5:99-cv-20966] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/05/2001)

PACER
35 March 13, 2001

MINUTES: ( C/R S. Barrera) ( Hearing Date: 3/13/01) that the motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] is submitted [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/16/2001)

PACER
36 March 14, 2001

ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull re pltf's motion to compel production of documents and responses to interrogatories [21-1] Pltf's request for monetary sanctions is denied. ( Date Entered: 3/21/01) (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/21/2001)

PACER
March 16, 2001

RECEIVED Stipulated Proposed Protective Order ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/20/2001)

PACER
37 March 20, 2001

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

PACER
38 March 26, 2001

MINUTES: ( C/R not recorded) ( Hearing Date: 3/20/01) Settlement conference held, case not settled. Settlement conf. (Mag) at 2:00 3/26/01 ; [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

PACER
39 March 28, 2001

MINUTES: ( C/R Peter Torreano) ( Hearing Date: 3/26/01) further settlement conference held, case settled [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

PACER
41 Aug. 10, 2001

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Plaintiff Equal Employment Judge Ronald M. Whyte pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/20/2001)

PACER
42 Sept. 19, 2002

CERTIFICATION of Jacqueline Wong re EEO Training by defendant Acropolis Systems, [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 23, 1999

Closing Date: Aug. 10, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Acroplis Systems, Inc.

Acropolis Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 5:99-cv-20966

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation