Case: EEOC v. ACROPOLIS SYSTEMS, INC.

5:99-cv-20966 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 23, 1999

Closed Date: Aug. 10, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The San Francisco District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, against Acropolis Systems, Inc. The complaint was filed in September 1999, but we do not have access to this document. In March 2001 the case was settled and in August 2001, the case was voluntarily dismissed. The only document we have for this case is the docket, which indicates that the cause of action is probably Title VII (42 USC 2000e).

Summary Authors

Shankar Viswanathan (7/5/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

5:99-cv-20966

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Acropolis Systems

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 11, 2022, 3:17 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT Civil Rights-Employment Discrimination Fee status ex entered on 9/23/99 (); jury demand [5:99-cv-20966] (sus, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/27/1999)

Sept. 23, 1999

Sept. 23, 1999

2

ORDER RE COURT PROCEDURE and SCHEDULE by Judge Ronald M. Whyte : Proof of service to be filed by 11/8/99 ; counsels' case management statement to be filed by 1/11/00 ; initial case management conference will be held 10:30 1/21/00 . (cc: all counsel) (sus, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/27/1999)

Sept. 23, 1999

Sept. 23, 1999

3

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Acropolis Systems, on 10/22/99 [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

Nov. 3, 1999

Nov. 3, 1999

4

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION WITH MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES before Judge Ronald M. Whyte by defendant Acropolis Systems, for more definite statement with Notice set for 1/7/00 at 9:00 [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/22/1999)

Nov. 15, 1999

Nov. 15, 1999

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, ) re: motion for more definite statement [4-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/22/1999)

Nov. 15, 1999

Nov. 15, 1999

5

OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Equal Employment to motion for more definite statement [4-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

Dec. 17, 1999

Dec. 17, 1999

6

DECLARATION by Sanya P. Hill on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment in support of opposition [5-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

Dec. 17, 1999

Dec. 17, 1999

7

REPLY by defendant Acropolis Systems, to opposition to motion for more definite statement [4-1] ;declaration of John C. Gorman [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/05/2000)

Dec. 28, 1999

Dec. 28, 1999

8

NOTICE by Plaintiff Equal Employment of change of address of attorney [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

Jan. 4, 2000

Jan. 4, 2000

Docket Modification (Administrative) to for referral to Early Neutral Evaluation (ADR L.R.5) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/06/2000)

Jan. 6, 2000

Jan. 6, 2000

9

MINUTES: ( C/R Lee-Anne Shortridge) ( Hearing Date: 1/7/00) that the motion for more definite statement [4-1] is submitted [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/14/2000)

Jan. 11, 2000

Jan. 11, 2000

10

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte : Last day to hold second meet and confer re Case Management is 3/6/00; Case Management Statement is due 3/14/00 ; Case Management Conference set for 10:30 3/24/00 ; (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/14/2000)

Jan. 11, 2000

Jan. 11, 2000

11

ANSWER by defendant Acropolis Systems, to complaint [1-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/19/2000)

Jan. 14, 2000

Jan. 14, 2000

12

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte denying motion for more definite statement [4-1] ( Date Entered: 1/20/00) (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/20/2000)

Jan. 14, 2000

Jan. 14, 2000

13

CLERK'S NOTICE Case Management Conference set for 10:30 4/14/00 ; [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

March 7, 2000

March 7, 2000

14

CERTIFICATION of discussion of ADR options by Plaintiff Equal Employment . [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

March 14, 2000

March 14, 2000

15

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

March 14, 2000

March 14, 2000

16

CERTIFICATION of discussion of ADR options by defendant Acropolis Systems, . [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/17/2000)

March 15, 2000

March 15, 2000

17

MINUTES: ( C/R not reported) ( Hearing Date: 4/14/00) Discovery cutoff set for 1/31/01 ; All motions will be heard by 9:00 2/2/01 ; Pretrial conference set for 2:00 4/5/01 ; Jury trial will be held 1:30 4/16/01 ; cutoff date for expert discovery is 1/31/01 ; pre-trial statement due by 3/30/01 ; [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

April 20, 2000

April 20, 2000

18

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) Modified on 05/09/2000 (Entered: 05/09/2000)

May 2, 2000

May 2, 2000

19

JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/15/2000)

May 9, 2000

May 9, 2000

RECEIVED Stipulation & Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, ) to extend discovery cutoff [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

Jan. 24, 2001

Jan. 24, 2001

20

STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : Discovery cutoff shall be extended to 3/2/01 solely for the limited purpose of conducting the deposition of Ken Schmitt ; (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/16/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001

Jan. 31, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, )re waiver of atorney-client privilege [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/11/2001)

Feb. 7, 2001

Feb. 7, 2001

22

DECLARATION by Lucila G. Rosas on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment re motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) re: motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

23

MOTION before Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull by Plaintiff Equal Employment to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

24

NOTICE of hearing by Plaintiff Equal Employment setting motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] ; hearing set for 10:00 2/27/01 [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) re: motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

25

MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Equal Employment in support of motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/22/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

26

MEMORANDUM by defendant Acropolis Systems, in opposition to motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

Feb. 14, 2001

Feb. 14, 2001

27

REPLY by Plaintiff Equal Employment to opposition to motion to shorten time on motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] [23-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

Feb. 15, 2001

Feb. 15, 2001

28

DECLARATION by Sanya P. Hill on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment re motion reply [27-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

Feb. 15, 2001

Feb. 15, 2001

RECEIVED Stipulation & Proposed Order to extend discovery cutoff ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

Feb. 16, 2001

Feb. 16, 2001

29

STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : re waiver of attorney-client privilege as to matters related to Lisa Buchanan and Arlene DiSalvo (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/27/2001)

Feb. 16, 2001

Feb. 16, 2001

31

STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : Discovery cutoff is extended for the limited purpose of completing the deposition of John Pham and Lisa Buchanan until 3/9/01 (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

Feb. 20, 2001

Feb. 20, 2001

32

MEMORANDUM by defendant Acropolis Systems, in opposition to motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] and request for sanctions; Declaration of John C. Gorman [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/04/2001)

March 1, 2001

March 1, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Acropolis Systems, ) re: opposition memorandum [32-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/04/2001)

March 1, 2001

March 1, 2001

33

REPLY by Plaintiff Equal Employment to opposition to motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] and request for sanctions [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/08/2001)

March 7, 2001

March 7, 2001

34

DECLARATION by Lucila G. Rosas on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment re motion reply [33-1] [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/08/2001)

March 7, 2001

March 7, 2001

40

LETTER dated 3/8/01 from Marcia L. Mitchell for Equal Employment re settlement conference set for 3/20/01 at 9:30 [5:99-cv-20966] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/05/2001)

March 9, 2001

March 9, 2001

35

MINUTES: ( C/R S. Barrera) ( Hearing Date: 3/13/01) that the motion to compel production of documents and response to interrogatories [21-1] is submitted [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/16/2001)

March 13, 2001

March 13, 2001

36

ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull re pltf's motion to compel production of documents and responses to interrogatories [21-1] Pltf's request for monetary sanctions is denied. ( Date Entered: 3/21/01) (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/21/2001)

March 14, 2001

March 14, 2001

RECEIVED Stipulated Proposed Protective Order ( Plaintiff Equal Employment ) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/20/2001)

March 16, 2001

March 16, 2001

37

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull : (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

March 20, 2001

March 20, 2001

38

MINUTES: ( C/R not recorded) ( Hearing Date: 3/20/01) Settlement conference held, case not settled. Settlement conf. (Mag) at 2:00 3/26/01 ; [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 26, 2001

March 26, 2001

39

MINUTES: ( C/R Peter Torreano) ( Hearing Date: 3/26/01) further settlement conference held, case settled [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

41

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Plaintiff Equal Employment Judge Ronald M. Whyte pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) (cc: all counsel) [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/20/2001)

Aug. 10, 2001

Aug. 10, 2001

42

CERTIFICATION of Jacqueline Wong re EEO Training by defendant Acropolis Systems, [5:99-cv-20966] (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 23, 1999

Closing Date: Aug. 10, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Acropolis Systems, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Acroplis Systems, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits