Case: EEOC v. J.R. CRICKETS, INC.

1:01-cv-02517 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: Sept. 20, 2001

Closed Date: May 17, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Atlanta District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, against J.R. Crickets, Inc. The complaint was filed in September 2001 and the charging party intervened in April 2002. The parties entered into a consent decree the same month. The docket states that the decree required Defendant to pay charging party $71,000, post a notice of non-discrimination and provide mandatory EEO training to its employees. The only document that we have for this case is the docket.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Glassman (7/24/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-02517

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. J.R. Crickets, Inc.

May 17, 2002

May 17, 2002

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated Dec. 20, 2024, 5:37 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory:

Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 20, 2001

Closing Date: May 17, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

J.R. Crickets, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Georgia 1:01-cv-02517

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 71000

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit