Case: EEOC v. SILK DYNASTY INC.

2:03-cv-01879 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 26, 2003

Closed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Phoenix office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, against Silk Dynasty, Inc. The complaint was filed in September 2003 and in September 2004 a consent decree was entered. The only document that we have for this case is the docket, but from the docket we have the following information about the consent decree: Defendant was required to pay the charging party $25,000 and was enjoined from discriminating or retaliating in violation of Title VII.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Glassman (7/9/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11833482/parties/eeoc-v-silk-dynasty-inc/


Judge(s)

Duncan, David K. (Arizona)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:03-cv-01879

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Silk Dynasty Inc.

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11833482/eeoc-v-silk-dynasty-inc/

Last updated Dec. 20, 2024, 4:11 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 26, 2003

Closing Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Silk Dynasty Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Amount Defendant Pays: 25000

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits