Case: EEOC v. Pretty Products Inc

2:99-cv-00033 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Jan. 15, 1999

Closed Date: Nov. 13, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In January 1999, the Birmingham (along with Washington, D.C.) office of the EEOC brought this suit against Pretty Products Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in January 2000, and the court granted the summary judgement in favor of the defendant in May 2000. The plaintiff filed an appeal in July 2000, but the parties voluntarily dismissed the appeal in November 2000.

Summary Authors

Lionel Joiner (6/18/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/27244533/parties/eeoc-v-pretty-products-inc/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:99-cv-00033

00-03952

Docket [Appeals Court]

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Nov. 9, 2000

Nov. 9, 2000

Docket

2:99-cv-00033

Docket

Nov. 13, 2000

Nov. 13, 2000

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/27244533/eeoc-v-pretty-products-inc/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2026, 7:42 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Pretty Products Inc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 15, 1999

COMPLAINT (referred to Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel ) () (bw) (Entered: 01/19/1999)

PACER
2 Feb. 18, 1999

WAIVER OF SERVICE mailed to defendant Pretty Products Inc on 1/21/99 () (bw) (Entered: 02/22/1999)

PACER
3 March 22, 1999

ANSWER by defendant () (bw) (Entered: 03/24/1999)

PACER
4 March 30, 1999

NOTICE setting this action for Preliminary PTC 11:00 5/27/99 (cc: all counsel) (bw) (Entered: 03/31/1999)

5 June 1, 1999

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel ; Preliminary pretrial conf was held on 11:00 5/27/99 ; discovery cutoff ddl set for 9/30/99 ;mtn filing ddl set for 11/5/99 ( no pgs: 4) (cc: all counsel) (bw) (Entered: 06/01/1999)

PACER
6 Aug. 31, 1999

STIPULATION ext time for discovery to be completed by 11-30-99 and dispositive motoins to be filed by 1-14-00 (bw) (Entered: 09/01/1999)

PACER
7 Sept. 9, 1999

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel -Discovery ddl reset to 11/30/99 -Mtn filing ddl reset to 1/14/00 (cc: all counsel) (no pgs: 1) (wh) (Entered: 09/09/1999)

PACER
8 Oct. 22, 1999

NOTICE OF TRIAL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 10:00 6/23/00 ; Trial set for 9:00 7/24/00 (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (bw) Modified on 10/25/1999 (Entered: 10/25/1999)

PACER
Jan. 10, 2000

Deposition of Eugenia Web (3 vol) (bw) (Entered: 01/18/2000)

PACER
9 Jan. 14, 2000

MOTION by defendant for summary judgment () (bw) (Entered: 01/18/2000)

PACER
10 Jan. 14, 2000

MOTION by defendant for summary judgment on laches defense () (bw) (Entered: 01/18/2000)

PACER
11 Feb. 1, 2000

JOINT MOTION by plaintiffi & defendant for protective order () (bw) (Entered: 02/02/2000)

PACER
12 Feb. 3, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff to extend time to file a memo in opposition to the motion to dismiss () (bw) (Entered: 02/03/2000)

PACER
13 Feb. 7, 2000

ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel granting motion to extend time to file a memo in opposition to the motion to dismiss [12-1] resp to dispositive motions due by 2-15-00 (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (bw) (Entered: 02/08/2000)

PACER
14 Feb. 7, 2000

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel : granting motion for protective order [11-1] (cc: all counsel) () (bw) (Entered: 02/08/2000)

PACER
15 Feb. 15, 2000

NOTICE by plaintiff of filing depositions of Virginia King and Eddie Salmon (bw) (Entered: 02/16/2000)

PACER
16 Feb. 15, 2000

RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion for summary judgment [9-1] () (bw) (Entered: 02/16/2000)

PACER
17 Feb. 15, 2000

RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion for summary judgment on laches defense [10-1] () (bw) (Entered: 02/16/2000)

PACER
Feb. 15, 2000

Deposition of Virginia King and Eddie Salmon (bw) (Entered: 02/16/2000)

18 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by defendant to extendi time to file a reply () (bw) (Entered: 02/23/2000)

PACER
19 Feb. 29, 2000

NOTICE In-court hearing on defts motions for sj set at 9:00 on 3/17/00 (cc: all counsel) (bw) (Entered: 02/29/2000)

PACER
20 March 1, 2000

ORDER by Mag. Judge Mark R. Abel granting motion to extend time to file a reply [18-1] by 3-7-00. (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (bw) (Entered: 03/01/2000)

21 March 7, 2000

REPLY by defendant to response to motion for summary judgment [9-1] () (bw) (Entered: 03/08/2000)

PACER
22 March 7, 2000

REPLY by defendant to response to motion for summary judgment on laches defense [10-1] () (bw) (Entered: 03/08/2000)

PACER
23 March 10, 2000

NOTICE of rescheduling the hearing on the motions for summary judgment for hearing at 10:00 on 3/23/00 hearing rescheduled (cc: all counsel) (bw) (Entered: 03/10/2000)

PACER
24 March 13, 2000

NOTICE by plaintiff of filing the signature page of the depositions of Virginia King and Ed Salmon (bw) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

PACER
25 March 23, 2000

CIVIL MINUTES: Proceeding hearing on motions for sj was held before Judge James L. Graham a written decision to issued as soon as possible. (cc: all counsel) () (bw) (Entered: 03/23/2000)

PACER
26 April 26, 2000

BRIEF in support FILED by defendant Pretty Products Inc in obtaining physicians afdt ( no pgs: 11) (sh) (Entered: 05/01/2000)

PACER
27 May 1, 2000

Supplemental Recent 6th Circuit Authority by plaintiff EEOC relevant to the claim of Honest Belief (bw) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

PACER
28 May 1, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of the motion to strike affidavits (bw) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

PACER
29 May 8, 2000

MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE by plaintiff to [26-1] () (bw) (Entered: 05/09/2000)

PACER
30 May 24, 2000

Pretrial Disclosure of Witness list submitted by defendant () (bw) (Entered: 05/25/2000)

PACER
31 May 30, 2000

Pretrial Disclosure of Witness list submitted by plaintiff () (bw) (Entered: 05/30/2000)

PACER
32 May 30, 2000

ORDER by Judge James L. Graham denying the motion of pltf. to strike the affidavits of Dr. Sveda and Dr Cannell is DENIED. (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 7) (bw) (Entered: 05/30/2000)

PACER
33 May 30, 2000

ORDER by Judge James L. Graham denying motion for summary judgment on laches defense [10-1] by defendant Pretty Products Inc granting motion for summary judgment [9-1] on the merits by defendant Pretty Products Inc and directing judgment to enter for the defts of all of pltfs claims. terminating case (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 29) (bw) (Entered: 05/30/2000)

PACER
34 May 30, 2000

JUDGMENT ENTERED as to #33: (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (bw) (Entered: 05/30/2000)

PACER
July 17, 2000

Remark depositions on file were disposed of (bw) (Entered: 07/17/2000)

PACER
35 July 26, 2000

NOTICE OF APPEAL by plaintiff EEOC from Dist. Court decision [34-1] of 05/30/00 ( no pgs: 2) (sln) (Entered: 07/27/2000)

PACER
July 26, 2000

APPEAL fee waived () (sln) (Entered: 07/27/2000)

PACER
July 27, 2000

APPEAL NOTIFICATION issued CA. (sln) (Entered: 07/27/2000)

Aug. 9, 2000

RECEIPT OF USCA APPEAL NUMBER - Number Assigned: 00-3952 (sln) (Entered: 08/09/2000)

PACER
Aug. 23, 2000

TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM unnecessary (sln) (Entered: 08/23/2000)

PACER
Aug. 30, 2000

TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM necessary oral argument on motion for summary judgment on 3/23/00 (sln) (Entered: 08/31/2000)

PACER
36 Nov. 13, 2000

ORDER OF USCA 6th: dismissing the appeal upon consideration of the parties to voluntarily dismiss [35-1] ( no pgs: 1) (sln) (Entered: 11/13/2000)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Ohio

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 15, 1999

Closing Date: Nov. 13, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Pretty Products Incorporated

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Ohio 2:99-cv-00033

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 00-03952

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation