Case: EEOC v. EXIDE CORPORATION

2:01-cv-02287 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: May 10, 2001

Closed Date: Sept. 5, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2001, the Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC filed this complaint against Exide Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. The charging party intervened in this lawsuit in October 2001. Following the defendant' declaration of bankruptcy and reformation as a new corporation in April-June 2002, and an administrative closure of the case in July 2002, the parties settled the lawsuit in September 2003 through a consent decree. We do not have a copy of the Decree; therefore, the exact terms of the agreement are unknown.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (10/25/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11359829/parties/eeoc-v-exide-corporation/


Judge(s)

Brody, Anita Blumstein (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Plaintiff

LOCKE, CYNTHIA A. (Pennsylvania)

MCNAIR, JACQUELINE H. (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Defendant

FIALKOWSKI, ELISE A. (Pennsylvania)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

CICCARELLI, LEE A. (Pennsylvania)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:01-cv-02287

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Exide Corporation, et al

Sept. 5, 2003

Sept. 5, 2003

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11359829/eeoc-v-exide-corporation/

Last updated Nov. 4, 2026, 6:30 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. EXIDE CORPORATION
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 10, 2001

Complaint. (ss) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

RECAP
May 10, 2001

Summons(es) issued, One original Forwarded to: counsel 5/10/01 (ss) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

PACER
May 10, 2001

Demand for jury trial by PLAINTIFF EEOC (ss) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

PACER
May 10, 2001

Summons(es) issued, One original Forwarded to: counsel 5/10/01 (ss)

May 10, 2001

Demand for jury trial by PLAINTIFF EEOC (ss)

2 June 13, 2001

MOTION by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jl) (Entered: 06/14/2001)

RECAP
3 June 19, 2001

Affidavit of: RICHARD SAUPPE re: served summons and complaint upon DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION . Served by: PERSONAL SERVICE on 6/1/01 (service accepted by James Sweeney). (jl) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

RECAP
4 June 20, 2001

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT IS GRANTED, DEFENDANT MAY HAVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME, THROUGH AND INCLUDING 7/11/01, TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 6/20/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

RECAP
5 July 11, 2001

MOTION by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF PLANITFF'S CLAIMS, MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (afm) (Entered: 07/12/2001)

RECAP
July 11, 2001

Demand for jury trial by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION ., Certificate of Service. (See paper #5) (afm)

6 July 24, 2001

Memorandum by PLAINTIFF EEOC in opposition to DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF PLANITFF'S CLAIMS, Certificate of Service, Memorandum, Affidavit. (jl) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
Aug. 8, 2001

Pretrial Scheduling conference SET at 4:15 9/26/01. (afm) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

PACER
Aug. 8, 2001

Pretrial Scheduling conference SET at 4:15 9/26/01. (afm)

7 Aug. 9, 2001

MOTION by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REPLY BRIEF ATTACHED). (rv) (Entered: 08/10/2001)

RECAP
8 Sept. 5, 2001

Notice on behalf of DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION to withdraw the appearance of DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP as counsel of record for Defendant EXIDE CORPORATION and enter the appearance of MICHAEL G. TIERCE, ESQUIRE and JONATHAN NADLER, ESQUIRE of SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP AS counsel of record for DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION in the matter above. (jl) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

RECAP
9 Sept. 18, 2001

ORDER THAT THE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 9/26/01 AT 4:15 IS CANCELED AND RESCHEDULED FOR 10/2/01 AT 2:00; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 9/19/01 ENTERED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS ON 9/17/01. (jl) (Entered: 09/19/2001)

RECAP
10 Sept. 26, 2001

MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT ROBIN PRATT, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (complaint attached). (jl) (Entered: 09/26/2001)

RECAP
11 Oct. 2, 2001

Minute entry: 10/2/01, Scheduling Conference. The Defendant's motion for a more definite statement of the plaintiff's claims is withdrawn. The movant Robin Pratt's motion to intervene is granted. (jl) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

RECAP
12 Oct. 9, 2001

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS IS WITHDRAWN AND THE MOVANT ROBIN PRATT'S MOTION TO INTERVENE IS GRANTED AS STATED ON THE RECORD OF 10/2/01 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 10/9/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 10/09/2001)

RECAP
13 Oct. 9, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER THAT THE PARTIES SHALL SCHEDULE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON 3/22/02; ALL FACT DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 4/5/02 ; PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 5/14/02 ; DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM 5/21/02 ; ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 4/25/02; THIS CASE WILL BE PLACED IN THE TRIAL POOL ON 5/28/02; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 10/9/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 10/09/2001)

RECAP
14 Nov. 9, 2001

ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY TO THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA . ( BY CLERK OF COURT MICHAEL E. KUNZ ) 11/9/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 11/09/2001)

RECAP
15 Nov. 21, 2001

ORDER THAT THIS CASE WILL BE PLACED IN THE TRIAL POOL ON 6/1/02; A FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 5/23/02 AT 9:30; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ) 11/21/01 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED. (jl) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

RECAP
16 Dec. 6, 2001

Answer with affirmative defenses to Complaint by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION, Certificate of Service. (jl) (Entered: 12/06/2001)

RECAP
Dec. 6, 2001

ISSUE JOINED. (jl) (Entered: 12/06/2001)

PACER
Dec. 6, 2001

ISSUE JOINED. (jl)

17 Feb. 22, 2002

ORDER THAT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE WILL BE HELD ON 3/18/02 AT 2:30 P.M.; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ) 2/22/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
18 March 13, 2002

ORDER THAT THIS MATTER SHALL BE PLACED IN THE TRIAL POOL AS OF 8/1/02; A FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 5/23/02 IS CONTINUED TO 8/6/02 AT 10:30; THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 3/18/02 IS CONTINUED TO 5/23/02 AT 9:30; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ) 3/13/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

RECAP
19 April 12, 2002

ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA TO THE CALENDAR OF JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY . ( SIGNED BY JUDGE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ) 4/12/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 04/12/2002)

RECAP
20 April 17, 2002

Suggestion of bankruptcy by DEFENDANT EXIDE CORPORATION under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware filed under case no. 02-11127. (jl) (Entered: 04/18/2002)

RECAP
21 May 21, 2002

ORDER REFERRED TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIANE M. WELSH FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 5/21/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

RECAP
22 May 21, 2002

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER THAT ALL DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 8/26/02; ALL FACT DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 8/5/02 ; PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 9/12/02 ; DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 9/19/02 ; THIS CASE WILL BE PLACED INTO THE TRIAL POOL ON 9/26/02; ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 5/21/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

RECAP
23 June 14, 2002

STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE NAME OF THE DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION SHALL BE CHANGED FROM EXIDE CORPORATION TO EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES WILL NOT ASSERT ANY DEFENSES IN THIS MATTER WHICH IN WHOLE OR IN PART ASSERT THAT IT IS IN ANY WAY NOT LIABLE FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF EXIDE CORPORATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE TIME WHEN EXIDE CORPORATION EXISTED AS A CORPORATE ENTITY; INC. (SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 6/14/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 06/14/2002)

RECAP
24 July 8, 2002

Notice of Withdrawal of appearance by MICHAEL G. TIERCE for DEFENDANT . EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES (jl) (Entered: 07/08/2002)

RECAP
25 July 24, 2002

ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ) 7/24/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jl) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

RECAP
26 Sept. 5, 2002

Appearance of ELISE A. FIALKOWSKI for DEFENDANT . EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES (withdrawal of appearanceo JONATHAN NADLER). (jl) (Entered: 09/06/2002)

RECAP
27 Sept. 25, 2002

ORDER THAT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 10/22/02 AT 10:00 IN ROOM 3029; ETC. ( SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIANE M. WELSH ) 9/25/02 ENTERED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 09/25/2002)

RECAP
28 Oct. 25, 2002

ORDER THAT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER FOR 10/22/02 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO 11/18/02 AT 2:00 P.M.;ETC. ( SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DIANE M. WELSH ) 10/25/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS. (jl) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

RECAP
29 Sept. 5, 2003

CONSENT DECREE ORDER BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT THIS DECREE IS FINAL AND BINDING BETWEEN THE PARTIES SIGNATORY HERETO AS TO ALL ISSUES RAISED IN THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 01-2287 AND THE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION FILED BY ROBIN PRATT AS CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-5296. THIS DECREE IS ENTERED INTO IN COMPROMISE TO AVOID THE EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE OF LITIGATION AND IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR CONSTRUED AS AN ADMISSION OF LIABILITY BY DEFENDANT, WHO HAS DENIED AND CONTINUES TO DENY ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. DEFENDANT VIGOROUSLY CONTESTS EACH OF THE CLAIMS AND HAS AGREED TO SETTLE EACH OF THE CLAIMS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COMPANY, THE BANKRUPT ESTATE AND CREDITORS TO AVOID NOT ONLY THE UNCERTAINTY OF TRIAL BUT ALSO EXPENSIVE LITIGATION. THIS CASE AND THE CASE FILED IN INTERVENTION BY ROBIN PRATT AS CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-5296 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, SUBJECT TO THIS COURT'S JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CONSENT DECREE, ETC.. SIGNED BY JUDGE ANITA B. BRODY ON 9/5/03. 9/5/03 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jl, ) (Entered: 09/05/2003)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 10, 2001

Closing Date: Sept. 5, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Exide Technologies, Inc.

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2:01-cv-02287

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation