Case: EEOC v. EXEL, INC. (f/k/a EXEL LOGISTICS)

4:01-cv-00154 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closed Date: June 27, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In January 2001 the St. Louis district office of the EEOC brought this suit against Exel, Inc. f/k/a Exel Logistics in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The complaint is unavailable, however court documents indicate that the EEOC alleged on behalf of a charging party a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The EEOC alleged that the defendant took adverse employment actions against the charging party because he was perceived as disabled. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss in May 2001, which was later denied. The parties attempted to resolve the case through Alternative Dispute Resolution in February 2002, but the case did not settle. In May 2002 the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The defendant's motion was granted in June 2002, and the case was dismissed. See E.E.O.C. v. Exel, Inc., 208 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (E.D. Mo. 2002).

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (11/1/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:01-cv-00154

Docket

EEOC v. Exel Inc

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Docket
31

4:01-cv-00154

Protective Order

EEOC v. Exel Inc

Sept. 5, 2001

Sept. 5, 2001

Order/Opinion
62

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motions to Compel]

EEOC v. Exel Inc

March 6, 2002

March 6, 2002

Order/Opinion
87

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Denying Motion to Strike]

EEOC v. Exel, Inc.

May 15, 2002

May 15, 2002

Order/Opinion
101

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment]

EEOC v. Exel Inc

June 21, 2002

June 21, 2002

Order/Opinion
117

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Re: Fees and Costs]

EEOC v. Exel, Inc.

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 29, 2022, 3:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; # Waivers of Service Issued: 1 # Counts: 1 Disclosure of Corp Cert issued to: defendant; jury demand (FCE) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001

Jan. 31, 2001

2

TRACK INFORMATION STATEMENT filed by plaintiff EEOC track 2 preferred (FCE) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001

Jan. 31, 2001

3

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Exel Inc. on 2/8/01 certified mail by serving Robert c. Shipple (CEL) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

Feb. 13, 2001

Feb. 13, 2001

4

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Exel Inc. on 2/1/01 personal by serving Wm. Jones (CLA) (Entered: 03/09/2001)

March 5, 2001

March 5, 2001

5

Notice of Motion: dismiss or sum. jgm. by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001

April 2, 2001

6

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Exel Inc. by James Foster and Wm. Jones (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001

April 2, 2001

7

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001

April 2, 2001

8

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for more definite statement w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001

April 2, 2001

9

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to motion for more definite statement [8-1], to motion to strike [7-1] (CLA) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

April 12, 2001

April 12, 2001

10

AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC [1-1]; jury demand (CLA) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

April 12, 2001

April 12, 2001

11

RULE 16 ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton ; standard(2) track , ; Rule 16 Conference 5/29/01 ; joint scheduling plan ddl 5/19/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/25/2001)

April 25, 2001

April 25, 2001

12

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to strike [7-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

April 25, 2001

April 25, 2001

13

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion for more definite statement [8-1], terminating notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: dismiss or sum. jgm. [5-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

April 25, 2001

April 25, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike (CLA) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

April 25, 2001

April 25, 2001

14

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to withdraw attorney Rebecca Stith (CLA) (Entered: 04/27/2001)

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

14

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff EEOC by Melvin D. Kennedy (CLA) (Entered: 04/27/2001)

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

16

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton finding the motion to strike [0-1] moot. (cc: all counsel) (CEL) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

April 30, 2001

April 30, 2001

18

Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss by defendant Exel Inc. (CEL) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 1, 2001

May 1, 2001

18

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

May 1, 2001

May 1, 2001

18

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

May 1, 2001

May 1, 2001

18

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss [18-1], motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

May 1, 2001

May 1, 2001

17

ANSWER by defendant Exel Inc. to [10-1] (CEL) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 10, 2001

May 10, 2001

19

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 05/21/2001)

May 18, 2001

May 18, 2001

20

ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton It is hereby ordered that the telephone rule 16 conference in the above styled case is removed from the present setting 5/29/01. It is further ordered that the rule 16 conference is reset for 6/4/01 at 10:15 a.m. ; Rule 16 Conference 6/4/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/24/2001)

May 24, 2001

May 24, 2001

21

DISCLOSURE of Corporation Interests Certificate Parent companies: none Subsidiaries: none Publicly held company: none by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

May 29, 2001

May 29, 2001

22

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton ; standard(2) track , , ; motion to add party ddl 7/31/01 ; Disc completion ddl 3/15/02 ; Notice of Motion ddl set for 3/22/02 ; Motion Package ddl set for 5/1/02 ; non-disp motion ddl 3/27/02 ; jury trial 7/1/02 ; pt comp ddl 6/10/02 ; ADR future refer 12/1/01 ends 2/1/02 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/05/2001)

June 5, 2001

June 5, 2001

23

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to extend time until 6/15/01 to submit mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

June 7, 2001

June 7, 2001

24

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to extend time until 6/15/01 to submit mtn. pkg. [23-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

June 11, 2001

June 11, 2001

25

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file attachment inadvertently omitted from reply brief submitted with mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

26

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file attachment inadvertently omitted from reply brief submitted with mtn. pkg. [25-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 20, 2001

June 20, 2001

28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton terminating notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss [18-1], denying motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 07/10/2001)

July 9, 2001

July 9, 2001

29

ANSWER to paragraph 8(B) by defendant Exel Inc. to [10-1]; jury demand (CLA) (Entered: 08/02/2001)

July 30, 2001

July 30, 2001

30

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for protective order (CLA) (Entered: 08/29/2001)

Aug. 23, 2001

Aug. 23, 2001

31

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton : granting motion for protective order [30-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

Sept. 5, 2001

Sept. 5, 2001

32

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. to amend cmo order (CLA) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 27, 2001

Sept. 27, 2001

33

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo order [32-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

34

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton Case set for m Designation of Lead Counsel: Robert Johnson ; ADR completion ddl 2/1/01 Designation of Neutral 12/21/01 ADR Conference Report ddl 12/21/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

Dec. 3, 2001

Dec. 3, 2001

35

ADR TIMELINESS ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines set forth are to be met timely with the appropriate forms filed with the Clerk of the District Court as indicated in the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a deadline cannot be met, the designated lead counsel shall file a motion requesting an extension of the deadline prior to the expiration of that deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if compliance with a deadline set forth in the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution has not occurred, such noncompliance may result in the imposition of sanctions to the appropriate party or parties. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

Dec. 3, 2001

Dec. 3, 2001

36

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. for order to modify the adr referral (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

37

MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

38

DESIGNATION NEUTRAL REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. Neutral: Thomas Cipolla date of conference: 2/22/02 time: 9:00 location: McMahon, Berger (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

39

NOTICE of appointment of neutral; neutral: Thomas Cipolla; neutral selected by: parties (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

40

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for order to modify the adr referral [36-1] ADR completion ddl 2/22/02 (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001) cmo [37-1] (Deadline for Deft to depose Pltf's expert witnesses Up to and Including 1/17/02; Deadline for the parties to request mental and physical exams Up to and Including 1/4/02; Deadline for completion of mental and physical exams of the parties Up to and Including 1/25/02; Deadline for disclosure of Deft's expert witnesses Up to and Including 2/8/02) (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001)

Dec. 26, 2001

Dec. 26, 2001

42

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to compel (CLA) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002

Jan. 23, 2002

43

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file response to Elbert Walton and Custodian of records obj. to subpoenas and deft.'s memo in support of mtn. to compel in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002

Jan. 23, 2002

54

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file response to Elbert Walton and Custodian of records obj. to subpoenas and deft.'s memo in support of mtn. to compel in excess of 15 pages [43-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

44

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file deft's memo in support of motion to compel depo testimony which exceeds 15 pages (CEL) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

Feb. 4, 2002

Feb. 4, 2002

45

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file deft's memo in support of motion to compel depo testimony which exceeds 15 pages [44-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 02/05/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002

Feb. 5, 2002

46

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel depo testimony , and for sanctions w/memo in support and exhibits A -W attached. (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002

Feb. 5, 2002

46

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel depo testimony , and for sanctions w/memo in support and exhibits A - W (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002

Feb. 5, 2002

47

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel [42-1] (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002

Feb. 5, 2002

48

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], to motion for sanctions [46-2], to motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], to motion for sanctions [46-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

Feb. 14, 2002

Feb. 14, 2002

49

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for order to exclude evidence w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

Feb. 15, 2002

Feb. 15, 2002

50

MOTION second by defendant Exel Inc. to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/20/2002)

Feb. 19, 2002

Feb. 19, 2002

51

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel , and for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 21, 2002

Feb. 21, 2002

52

MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 21, 2002

Feb. 21, 2002

53

NOTICE of revised service date for pltff.'s mtn. to exclude evidence and pltff.'s memo in support by plaintiff EEOC (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 21, 2002

Feb. 21, 2002

55

MEMORANDUM (reply in support) by defendant Exel Inc. re: motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], re: motion for sanctions [46-2], re: motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], re: motion for sanctions [46-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

Feb. 22, 2002

Feb. 22, 2002

56

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions [50-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

Feb. 26, 2002

Feb. 26, 2002

57

TRANSCRIPT filed from telephone conference call of 2/11/02; court reporter: P. White (CLA) (Entered: 03/04/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002

Feb. 27, 2002

58

ADR COMPLIANCE REPORT An ADR conference was held on 2/22/02; Neutral: Thomas Cipolla; The parties did not achieve a settlement. (CLA) (Entered: 03/05/2002)

March 4, 2002

March 4, 2002

61

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [52-1] (cc: all counsel) (see mtn.) (CLA) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

March 4, 2002

March 4, 2002

59

MEMORANDUM by defendant Exel Inc. in opposition to motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] w/exhibit A thru D attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

March 5, 2002

March 5, 2002

64

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel [51-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

March 5, 2002

March 5, 2002

60

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. re [50-1]w/ exhibit A attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

March 5, 2002

March 5, 2002

62

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denied without prejudice motion to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions [50-1], granting motion to compel depo testimony [46-1] and charging party Gray is ordered to answer all questions regarding his injuries and ability to perform his job duties, granting motion for sanctions [46-2] and pltff. EEOC is ordered to reimburse deft. for its fees and costs incurred in preparing and filing its motion to compel deposition testimony from charging party Gray, motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], motion for sanctions [46-2], It is further ordered that deft.'s motion to compel is denied without prejudice [42-1] It is further ordered that deft. is granted until 3/20/02 within which to file its request for costs incurred in association with its mtn. to compel deposition testimony from Gray. Pltff. will then have until 8/3/02, within which to file any objections to such request. It is further ordered that defense counsel and Walton must reschedule Walton's deposition, to take place on a date subsequent to the conclusion of Gray's deposition. Walton's failure to appear, testify , and produce documents at the rescheduled deposition may result in the imposition of sanctions. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/07/2002)

March 6, 2002

March 6, 2002

63

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file memo in opposition to mtn. to exclude evidence (CLA) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

March 7, 2002

March 7, 2002

65

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 12, 2002

March 12, 2002

66

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file memo in opposition to mtn. to exclude evidence [63-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 12, 2002

March 12, 2002

67

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [65-1] ; Disc completion ddl 3/29/02 ; Notice of Motion ddl set for 4/15/02 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 13, 2002

March 13, 2002

69

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to withdraw motion to exclude evidence (CLA) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002

March 15, 2002

70

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to compel [51-1], motion for sanctions [51-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002

March 15, 2002

71

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to withdraw motion to exclude evidence [69-1] terminating motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/19/2002)

March 18, 2002

March 18, 2002

72

RESPONSE by defendant Exel Inc. to [69-1] w/exhibit A thru B attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/19/2002)

March 18, 2002

March 18, 2002

73

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to compel [51-1], denying motion for sanctions [51-2] without prejudice. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/21/2002)

March 20, 2002

March 20, 2002

74

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray (CLA) (Entered: 03/22/2002)

March 20, 2002

March 20, 2002

75

RESPONSE (objections) by plaintiff EEOC to motion for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray [74-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/29/2002)

March 27, 2002

March 27, 2002

76

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file deft.'s memo in support mtn. to strike expert David Schriber in excess of 15 pgs. (CLA) (Entered: 04/01/2002)

March 28, 2002

March 28, 2002

77

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file deft.'s memo in support mtn. to strike expert David Schriber in excess of 15 pgs. [76-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002

April 1, 2002

78

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber w/memo in support and exhibits 1 thru 18 attached. (CLA) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002

April 1, 2002

79

Notice of Motion: sum. jgm. by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

April 5, 2002

April 5, 2002

79

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for summary judgment Date Motion Received: 5/16/02 [79-1] w/memo in support and exhibits 1 - 37 attached. (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

April 5, 2002

April 5, 2002

79

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion for summary judgment Date Motion Received: 5/16/02 [79-1] [79-1] (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

April 5, 2002

April 5, 2002

79

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion for summary judgment Date Motion Received: 5/16/02 [79-1] [79-1], notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: sum. jgm. [79-1] (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

April 5, 2002

April 5, 2002

80

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] w/attachments A - F. (CLA) (Entered: 04/10/2002)

April 8, 2002

April 8, 2002

82

ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton motion for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray [74-1] is granted in part, and pltff. EEOC is ordered to reimburse deft. in the amt. of $1,750.00 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/24/2002)

April 24, 2002

April 24, 2002

83

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for leave to file in excess of page limit (CLA) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

May 9, 2002

May 9, 2002

84

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file in excess of page limit [83-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

May 10, 2002

May 10, 2002

85

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/14/2002)

May 13, 2002

May 13, 2002

86

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file in excess of 15 pages [85-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

May 14, 2002

May 14, 2002

87

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

May 15, 2002

May 15, 2002

88

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. to extend time of one day to file mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

May 15, 2002

May 15, 2002

89

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to extend time of one day to file mtn. pkg. [88-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

May 16, 2002

May 16, 2002

91

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

May 16, 2002

May 16, 2002

90

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file a memo in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

May 17, 2002

May 17, 2002

92

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file a memo in excess of 15 pages [90-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

May 17, 2002

May 17, 2002

93

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike the report and testimony of James Israel (CLA) (Entered: 05/22/2002)

May 21, 2002

May 21, 2002

94

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/22/2002)

May 21, 2002

May 21, 2002

95

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to strike the report and testimony of James Israel [93-1] w/attachments A thru E. (CLA) (Entered: 06/04/2002)

June 3, 2002

June 3, 2002

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to strike the report and testimony of James Israel [93-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/12/2002)

June 10, 2002

June 10, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Missouri

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closing Date: June 27, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Exel, Inc. (St. Peters, MO), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-area:

Accommodation / Leave

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits