Case: EEOC v. EXEL, INC. (f/k/a EXEL LOGISTICS)

4:01-cv-00154 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closed Date: June 27, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In January 2001 the St. Louis district office of the EEOC brought this suit against Exel, Inc. f/k/a Exel Logistics in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The complaint is unavailable, however court documents indicate that the EEOC alleged on behalf of a charging party a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The EEOC alleged that the defendant took adverse employment actions against the charging party because he was perceived as disabled. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss in May 2001, which was later denied. The parties attempted to resolve the case through Alternative Dispute Resolution in February 2002, but the case did not settle. In May 2002 the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The defendant's motion was granted in June 2002, and the case was dismissed. See E.E.O.C. v. Exel, Inc., 208 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (E.D. Mo. 2002).

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (11/1/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket

EEOC v. Exel Inc

Sept. 9, 2002 Docket
31

Protective Order

EEOC v. Exel Inc

Sept. 5, 2001 Order/Opinion
62

Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motions to Compel]

EEOC v. Exel Inc

190 F.Supp.2d 1179

March 6, 2002 Order/Opinion
87

Memorandum and Order [Denying Motion to Strike]

EEOC v. Exel, Inc.

2002 WL 1455782, 2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 16664

May 15, 2002 Order/Opinion
101

Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment]

EEOC v. Exel Inc

208 F.Supp.2d 1013

June 21, 2002 Order/Opinion
117

Memorandum and Order [Re: Fees and Costs]

EEOC v. Exel, Inc.

2002 WL 31856870, 2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 25613

Sept. 9, 2002 Order/Opinion

Docket

Last updated May 11, 2022, 8 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link
1

COMPLAINT; # Waivers of Service Issued: 1 # Counts: 1 Disclosure of Corp Cert issued to: defendant; jury demand (FCE) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001
2

TRACK INFORMATION STATEMENT filed by plaintiff EEOC track 2 preferred (FCE) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001
3

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Exel Inc. on 2/8/01 certified mail by serving Robert c. Shipple (CEL) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

Feb. 13, 2001
4

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Exel Inc. on 2/1/01 personal by serving Wm. Jones (CLA) (Entered: 03/09/2001)

March 5, 2001
5

Notice of Motion: dismiss or sum. jgm. by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001
6

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Exel Inc. by James Foster and Wm. Jones (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001
7

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001
8

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for more definite statement w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 2, 2001
9

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to motion for more definite statement [8-1], to motion to strike [7-1] (CLA) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

April 12, 2001
10

AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC [1-1]; jury demand (CLA) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

April 12, 2001
11

RULE 16 ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton ; standard(2) track , ; Rule 16 Conference 5/29/01 ; joint scheduling plan ddl 5/19/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/25/2001)

April 25, 2001
12

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to strike [7-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

April 25, 2001
13

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion for more definite statement [8-1], terminating notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: dismiss or sum. jgm. [5-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

April 25, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike (CLA) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

April 25, 2001
14

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to withdraw attorney Rebecca Stith (CLA) (Entered: 04/27/2001)

April 26, 2001
14

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff EEOC by Melvin D. Kennedy (CLA) (Entered: 04/27/2001)

April 26, 2001
16

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton finding the motion to strike [0-1] moot. (cc: all counsel) (CEL) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

April 30, 2001
18

Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss by defendant Exel Inc. (CEL) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 1, 2001
18

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

May 1, 2001
18

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

May 1, 2001
18

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss [18-1], motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

May 1, 2001
17

ANSWER by defendant Exel Inc. to [10-1] (CEL) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

May 10, 2001
19

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 05/21/2001)

May 18, 2001
20

ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton It is hereby ordered that the telephone rule 16 conference in the above styled case is removed from the present setting 5/29/01. It is further ordered that the rule 16 conference is reset for 6/4/01 at 10:15 a.m. ; Rule 16 Conference 6/4/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/24/2001)

May 24, 2001
21

DISCLOSURE of Corporation Interests Certificate Parent companies: none Subsidiaries: none Publicly held company: none by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

May 29, 2001
22

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton ; standard(2) track , , ; motion to add party ddl 7/31/01 ; Disc completion ddl 3/15/02 ; Notice of Motion ddl set for 3/22/02 ; Motion Package ddl set for 5/1/02 ; non-disp motion ddl 3/27/02 ; jury trial 7/1/02 ; pt comp ddl 6/10/02 ; ADR future refer 12/1/01 ends 2/1/02 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/05/2001)

June 5, 2001
23

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to extend time until 6/15/01 to submit mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

June 7, 2001
24

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to extend time until 6/15/01 to submit mtn. pkg. [23-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

June 11, 2001
25

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file attachment inadvertently omitted from reply brief submitted with mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 19, 2001
26

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file attachment inadvertently omitted from reply brief submitted with mtn. pkg. [25-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 20, 2001
28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton terminating notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss [18-1], denying motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 07/10/2001)

July 9, 2001
29

ANSWER to paragraph 8(B) by defendant Exel Inc. to [10-1]; jury demand (CLA) (Entered: 08/02/2001)

July 30, 2001
30

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for protective order (CLA) (Entered: 08/29/2001)

Aug. 23, 2001
31

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton : granting motion for protective order [30-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

Sept. 5, 2001
32

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. to amend cmo order (CLA) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 27, 2001
33

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo order [32-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001
34

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton Case set for m Designation of Lead Counsel: Robert Johnson ; ADR completion ddl 2/1/01 Designation of Neutral 12/21/01 ADR Conference Report ddl 12/21/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

Dec. 3, 2001
35

ADR TIMELINESS ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines set forth are to be met timely with the appropriate forms filed with the Clerk of the District Court as indicated in the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a deadline cannot be met, the designated lead counsel shall file a motion requesting an extension of the deadline prior to the expiration of that deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if compliance with a deadline set forth in the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution has not occurred, such noncompliance may result in the imposition of sanctions to the appropriate party or parties. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

Dec. 3, 2001
36

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. for order to modify the adr referral (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001
37

MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001
38

DESIGNATION NEUTRAL REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. Neutral: Thomas Cipolla date of conference: 2/22/02 time: 9:00 location: McMahon, Berger (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001
39

NOTICE of appointment of neutral; neutral: Thomas Cipolla; neutral selected by: parties (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 21, 2001
40

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for order to modify the adr referral [36-1] ADR completion ddl 2/22/02 (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001) cmo [37-1] (Deadline for Deft to depose Pltf's expert witnesses Up to and Including 1/17/02; Deadline for the parties to request mental and physical exams Up to and Including 1/4/02; Deadline for completion of mental and physical exams of the parties Up to and Including 1/25/02; Deadline for disclosure of Deft's expert witnesses Up to and Including 2/8/02) (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001)

Dec. 26, 2001
42

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to compel (CLA) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002
43

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file response to Elbert Walton and Custodian of records obj. to subpoenas and deft.'s memo in support of mtn. to compel in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002
54

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file response to Elbert Walton and Custodian of records obj. to subpoenas and deft.'s memo in support of mtn. to compel in excess of 15 pages [43-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002
44

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file deft's memo in support of motion to compel depo testimony which exceeds 15 pages (CEL) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

Feb. 4, 2002
45

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file deft's memo in support of motion to compel depo testimony which exceeds 15 pages [44-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 02/05/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002
46

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel depo testimony , and for sanctions w/memo in support and exhibits A -W attached. (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002
46

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel depo testimony , and for sanctions w/memo in support and exhibits A - W (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002
47

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel [42-1] (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 5, 2002
48

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], to motion for sanctions [46-2], to motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], to motion for sanctions [46-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

Feb. 14, 2002
49

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for order to exclude evidence w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

Feb. 15, 2002
50

MOTION second by defendant Exel Inc. to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/20/2002)

Feb. 19, 2002
51

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel , and for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 21, 2002
52

MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 21, 2002
53

NOTICE of revised service date for pltff.'s mtn. to exclude evidence and pltff.'s memo in support by plaintiff EEOC (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 21, 2002
55

MEMORANDUM (reply in support) by defendant Exel Inc. re: motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], re: motion for sanctions [46-2], re: motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], re: motion for sanctions [46-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

Feb. 22, 2002
56

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions [50-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

Feb. 26, 2002
57

TRANSCRIPT filed from telephone conference call of 2/11/02; court reporter: P. White (CLA) (Entered: 03/04/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002
58

ADR COMPLIANCE REPORT An ADR conference was held on 2/22/02; Neutral: Thomas Cipolla; The parties did not achieve a settlement. (CLA) (Entered: 03/05/2002)

March 4, 2002
61

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [52-1] (cc: all counsel) (see mtn.) (CLA) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

March 4, 2002
59

MEMORANDUM by defendant Exel Inc. in opposition to motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] w/exhibit A thru D attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

March 5, 2002
64

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel [51-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

March 5, 2002
60

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. re [50-1]w/ exhibit A attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

March 5, 2002
62

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denied without prejudice motion to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions [50-1], granting motion to compel depo testimony [46-1] and charging party Gray is ordered to answer all questions regarding his injuries and ability to perform his job duties, granting motion for sanctions [46-2] and pltff. EEOC is ordered to reimburse deft. for its fees and costs incurred in preparing and filing its motion to compel deposition testimony from charging party Gray, motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], motion for sanctions [46-2], It is further ordered that deft.'s motion to compel is denied without prejudice [42-1] It is further ordered that deft. is granted until 3/20/02 within which to file its request for costs incurred in association with its mtn. to compel deposition testimony from Gray. Pltff. will then have until 8/3/02, within which to file any objections to such request. It is further ordered that defense counsel and Walton must reschedule Walton's deposition, to take place on a date subsequent to the conclusion of Gray's deposition. Walton's failure to appear, testify , and produce documents at the rescheduled deposition may result in the imposition of sanctions. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/07/2002)

March 6, 2002
63

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file memo in opposition to mtn. to exclude evidence (CLA) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

March 7, 2002
65

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 12, 2002
66

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file memo in opposition to mtn. to exclude evidence [63-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 12, 2002
67

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [65-1] ; Disc completion ddl 3/29/02 ; Notice of Motion ddl set for 4/15/02 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 13, 2002
69

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to withdraw motion to exclude evidence (CLA) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002
70

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to compel [51-1], motion for sanctions [51-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002
71

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to withdraw motion to exclude evidence [69-1] terminating motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/19/2002)

March 18, 2002
72

RESPONSE by defendant Exel Inc. to [69-1] w/exhibit A thru B attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/19/2002)

March 18, 2002
73

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to compel [51-1], denying motion for sanctions [51-2] without prejudice. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/21/2002)

March 20, 2002
74

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray (CLA) (Entered: 03/22/2002)

March 20, 2002
75

RESPONSE (objections) by plaintiff EEOC to motion for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray [74-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/29/2002)

March 27, 2002
76

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file deft.'s memo in support mtn. to strike expert David Schriber in excess of 15 pgs. (CLA) (Entered: 04/01/2002)

March 28, 2002
77

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file deft.'s memo in support mtn. to strike expert David Schriber in excess of 15 pgs. [76-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002
78

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber w/memo in support and exhibits 1 thru 18 attached. (CLA) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002
79

Notice of Motion: sum. jgm. by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

April 5, 2002
79

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for summary judgment Date Motion Received: 5/16/02 [79-1] w/memo in support and exhibits 1 - 37 attached. (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

April 5, 2002
79

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion for summary judgment Date Motion Received: 5/16/02 [79-1] [79-1] (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

April 5, 2002
79

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion for summary judgment Date Motion Received: 5/16/02 [79-1] [79-1], notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: sum. jgm. [79-1] (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

April 5, 2002
80

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] w/attachments A - F. (CLA) (Entered: 04/10/2002)

April 8, 2002
82

ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton motion for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray [74-1] is granted in part, and pltff. EEOC is ordered to reimburse deft. in the amt. of $1,750.00 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/24/2002)

April 24, 2002
83

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for leave to file in excess of page limit (CLA) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

May 9, 2002
84

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file in excess of page limit [83-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

May 10, 2002
85

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/14/2002)

May 13, 2002
86

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file in excess of 15 pages [85-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

May 14, 2002
87

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

May 15, 2002
88

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. to extend time of one day to file mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

May 15, 2002
89

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to extend time of one day to file mtn. pkg. [88-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

May 16, 2002
91

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

May 16, 2002
90

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file a memo in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

May 17, 2002
92

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file a memo in excess of 15 pages [90-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

May 17, 2002
93

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike the report and testimony of James Israel (CLA) (Entered: 05/22/2002)

May 21, 2002
94

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/22/2002)

May 21, 2002
95

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to strike the report and testimony of James Israel [93-1] w/attachments A thru E. (CLA) (Entered: 06/04/2002)

June 3, 2002

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to strike the report and testimony of James Israel [93-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/12/2002)

June 10, 2002

State / Territory: Missouri

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closing Date: June 27, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Exel, Inc. (St. Peters, MO), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-area:

Accommodation / Leave

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits