Case: EEOC v. EXEL, INC. (f/k/a EXEL LOGISTICS)

4:01-cv-00154 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closed Date: June 27, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In January 2001 the St. Louis district office of the EEOC brought this suit against Exel, Inc. f/k/a Exel Logistics in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The complaint is unavailable, however court documents indicate that the EEOC alleged on behalf of a charging party a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The EEOC alleged that the defendant took adverse employment actions against the charging party because he was perceived as disabled. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss in May 2001, which was later denied. The parties attempted to resolve the case through Alternative Dispute Resolution in February 2002, but the case did not settle. In May 2002 the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The defendant's motion was granted in June 2002, and the case was dismissed. See E.E.O.C. v. Exel, Inc., 208 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (E.D. Mo. 2002).

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (11/1/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/20369404/parties/eeoc-v-exel-inc/


Judge(s)

Hamilton, Jean Constance (Missouri)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Gusewelle, Anne E. (Missouri)

Harper, Donna L. (Missouri)

Johnson, Robert G. (Missouri)

Attorney for Defendant

Foster, James N. (Missouri)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:01-cv-00154

Docket

EEOC v. Exel Inc

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Docket
31

4:01-cv-00154

Protective Order

EEOC v. Exel Inc

Sept. 5, 2001

Sept. 5, 2001

Order/Opinion
62

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motions to Compel]

EEOC v. Exel Inc

March 6, 2002

March 6, 2002

Order/Opinion

190 F.Supp.2d 1179

87

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Denying Motion to Strike]

EEOC v. Exel, Inc.

May 15, 2002

May 15, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 WL 1455782

101

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment]

EEOC v. Exel Inc

June 21, 2002

June 21, 2002

Order/Opinion

208 F.Supp.2d 1013

117

4:01-cv-00154

Memorandum and Order [Re: Fees and Costs]

EEOC v. Exel, Inc.

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 WL 31856870

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/20369404/eeoc-v-exel-inc/

Last updated Nov. 4, 2026, 7:15 p.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. Exel Inc.
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 31, 2001

COMPLAINT; # Waivers of Service Issued: 1 # Counts: 1 Disclosure of Corp Cert issued to: defendant; jury demand (FCE) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

RECAP
2 Jan. 31, 2001

TRACK INFORMATION STATEMENT filed by plaintiff EEOC track 2 preferred (FCE) (Entered: 01/31/2001)

RECAP
3 Feb. 13, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Exel Inc. on 2/8/01 certified mail by serving Robert c. Shipple (CEL) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

RECAP
4 March 5, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Exel Inc. on 2/1/01 personal by serving Wm. Jones (CLA) (Entered: 03/09/2001)

RECAP
5 April 2, 2001

Notice of Motion: dismiss or sum. jgm. by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

RECAP
6 April 2, 2001

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Exel Inc. by James Foster and Wm. Jones (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

RECAP
7 April 2, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

RECAP
8 April 2, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for more definite statement w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

RECAP
9 April 12, 2001

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to motion for more definite statement [8-1], to motion to strike [7-1] (CLA) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

RECAP
10 April 12, 2001

AMENDED COMPLAINT by plaintiff EEOC [1-1]; jury demand (CLA) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

RECAP
11 April 25, 2001

RULE 16 ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton ; standard(2) track, ; Rule 16 Conference 5/29/01 ; joint scheduling plan ddl 5/19/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/25/2001)

RECAP
12 April 25, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to strike [7-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

RECAP
13 April 25, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion for more definite statement [8-1], terminating notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: dismiss or sum. jgm. [5-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

RECAP
April 25, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike (CLA) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

PACER
April 25, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike (CLA)

14 April 26, 2001

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff EEOC by Melvin D. Kennedy (CLA) (Entered: 04/27/2001)

RECAP
15 April 27, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to withdraw attorney Rebecca Stith [14-1] attorney Rebecca S. Stith for EEOC (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

15 April 27, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to withdraw attorney Rebecca Stith [14-1] attorney Rebecca S. Stith for EEOC (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

RECAP
16 April 30, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton finding the motion to strike [0-1] moot. (cc: all counsel) (CEL) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

RECAP
18 May 1, 2001

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss [18-1], motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (CLA) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

RECAP
17 May 10, 2001

ANSWER by defendant Exel Inc. to [10-1] (CEL) (Entered: 05/10/2001)

RECAP
19 May 18, 2001

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 05/21/2001)

RECAP
20 May 24, 2001

ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton It is hereby ordered that the telephone rule 16 conference in the above styled case is removed from the present setting 5/29/01. It is further ordered that the rule 16 conference is reset for 6/4/01 at 10:15 a.m. ; Rule 16 Conference 6/4/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/24/2001)

RECAP
21 May 29, 2001

DISCLOSURE of Corporation Interests Certificate Parent companies: none Subsidiaries: none Publicly held company: none by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

RECAP
22 June 5, 2001

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton ; standard(2) track,, ; motion to add party ddl 7/31/01 ; Disc completion ddl 3/15/02 ; Notice of Motion ddl set for 3/22/02 ; Motion Package ddl set for 5/1/02 ; non-disp motion ddl 3/27/02 ; jury trial 7/1/02 ; pt comp ddl 6/10/02 ; ADR future refer 12/1/01 ends 2/1/02 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/05/2001)

RECAP
23 June 7, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to extend time until 6/15/01 to submit mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

RECAP
24 June 11, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to extend time until 6/15/01 to submit mtn. pkg. [23-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

RECAP
25 June 19, 2001

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file attachment inadvertently omitted from reply brief submitted with mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

RECAP
26 June 20, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file attachment inadvertently omitted from reply brief submitted with mtn. pkg. [25-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

RECAP
27 June 20, 2001

EXHIBITS FILED by defendant Exel Inc. exhibits received: A Court. (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

27 June 20, 2001

EXHIBITS FILED by defendant Exel Inc. exhibits received: A Court. (CLA) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

RECAP
28 July 9, 2001

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton terminating notice of motion motion Notice of Motion: motion to dismiss [18-1], denying motion to dismiss Date Motion Received: 6/15/01 [18-1] [18-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 07/10/2001)

RECAP
29 July 30, 2001

ANSWER to paragraph 8(B) by defendant Exel Inc. to [10-1]; jury demand (CLA) (Entered: 08/02/2001)

RECAP
30 Aug. 23, 2001

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for protective order (CLA) (Entered: 08/29/2001)

RECAP
31 Sept. 5, 2001

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton : granting motion for protective order [30-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

RECAP
32 Sept. 27, 2001

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. to amend cmo order (CLA) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

RECAP
33 Sept. 28, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo order [32-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

RECAP
34 Dec. 3, 2001

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton Case set for m Designation of Lead Counsel: Robert Johnson ; ADR completion ddl 2/1/01 Designation of Neutral 12/21/01 ADR Conference Report ddl 12/21/01 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

RECAP
35 Dec. 3, 2001

ADR TIMELINESS ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines set forth are to be met timely with the appropriate forms filed with the Clerk of the District Court as indicated in the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a deadline cannot be met, the designated lead counsel shall file a motion requesting an extension of the deadline prior to the expiration of that deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if compliance with a deadline set forth in the Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution has not occurred, such noncompliance may result in the imposition of sanctions to the appropriate party or parties. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

RECAP
36 Dec. 21, 2001

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. for order to modify the adr referral (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
37 Dec. 21, 2001

MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
38 Dec. 21, 2001

DESIGNATION NEUTRAL REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. Neutral: Thomas Cipolla date of conference: 2/22/02 time: 9:00 location: McMahon, Berger (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
39 Dec. 21, 2001

NOTICE of appointment of neutral; neutral: Thomas Cipolla; neutral selected by: parties (CLA) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
40 Dec. 26, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for order to modify the adr referral [36-1] ADR completion ddl 2/22/02 (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001)

RECAP
41 Dec. 26, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [37-1] (Deadline for Deft to depose Pltf's expert witnesses Up to and Including 1/17/02; Deadline for the parties to request mental and physical exams Up to and Including 1/4/02; Deadline for completion of mental and physical exams of the parties Up to and Including 1/25/02; Deadline for disclosure of Deft's expert witnesses Up to and Including 2/8/02) (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001)

41 Dec. 26, 2001

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [37-1] (Deadline for Deft to depose Pltf's expert witnesses Up to and Including 1/17/02; Deadline for the parties to request mental and physical exams Up to and Including 1/4/02; Deadline for completion of mental and physical exams of the parties Up to and Including 1/25/02; Deadline for disclosure of Deft's expert witnesses Up to and Including 2/8/02) (cc: all counsel) (CMA) (Entered: 12/26/2001)

RECAP
42 Jan. 23, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to compel (CLA) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

RECAP
43 Jan. 23, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file response to Elbert Walton and Custodian of records obj. to subpoenas and deft.'s memo in support of mtn. to compel in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 01/23/2002)

RECAP
54 Jan. 24, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file response to Elbert Walton and Custodian of records obj. to subpoenas and deft.'s memo in support of mtn. to compel in excess of 15 pages [43-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
44 Feb. 4, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file deft's memo in support of motion to compel depo testimony which exceeds 15 pages (CEL) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

RECAP
45 Feb. 5, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file deft's memo in support of motion to compel depo testimony which exceeds 15 pages [44-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 02/05/2002)

RECAP
46 Feb. 5, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel depo testimony, and for sanctions w/memo in support and exhibits A - W (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
47 Feb. 5, 2002

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel [42-1] (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
48 Feb. 14, 2002

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], to motion for sanctions [46-2], to motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], to motion for sanctions [46-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

RECAP
49 Feb. 15, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for order to exclude evidence w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

RECAP
50 Feb. 19, 2002

MOTION second by defendant Exel Inc. to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/20/2002)

RECAP
51 Feb. 21, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to compel, and for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
52 Feb. 21, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
53 Feb. 21, 2002

NOTICE of revised service date for pltff.'s mtn. to exclude evidence and pltff.'s memo in support by plaintiff EEOC (CLA) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

RECAP
55 Feb. 22, 2002

MEMORANDUM (reply in support) by defendant Exel Inc. re: motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], re: motion for sanctions [46-2], re: motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], re: motion for sanctions [46-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

RECAP
56 Feb. 26, 2002

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions [50-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

RECAP
57 Feb. 27, 2002

TRANSCRIPT filed from telephone conference call of 2/11/02; court reporter: P. White (CLA) (Entered: 03/04/2002)

RECAP
58 March 4, 2002

ADR COMPLIANCE REPORT An ADR conference was held on 2/22/02; Neutral: Thomas Cipolla; The parties did not achieve a settlement. (CLA) (Entered: 03/05/2002)

RECAP
61 March 4, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [52-1] (cc: all counsel) (see mtn.) (CLA) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

RECAP
59 March 5, 2002

MEMORANDUM by defendant Exel Inc. in opposition to motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] w/exhibit A thru D attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

RECAP
60 March 5, 2002

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. re [50-1]w/ exhibit A attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

RECAP
64 March 5, 2002

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to compel [51-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

RECAP
62 March 6, 2002

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denied without prejudice motion to compel compliance w/ subpoenas and for sanctions [50-1], granting motion to compel depo testimony [46-1] and charging party Gray is ordered to answer all questions regarding his injuries and ability to perform his job duties, granting motion for sanctions [46-2] and pltff. EEOC is ordered to reimburse deft. for its fees and costs incurred in preparing and filing its motion to compel deposition testimony from charging party Gray, motion to compel depo testimony [46-1], motion for sanctions [46-2], It is further ordered that deft.'s motion to compel is denied without prejudice [42-1] It is further ordered that deft. is granted until 3/20/02 within which to file its request for costs incurred in association with its mtn. to compel deposition testimony from Gray. Pltff. will then have until 8/3/02, within which to file any objections to such request. It is further ordered that defense counsel and Walton must reschedule Walton's deposition, to take place on a date subsequent to the conclusion of Gray's deposition. Walton's failure to appear, testify, and produce documents at the rescheduled deposition may result in the imposition of sanctions. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/07/2002)

RECAP
63 March 7, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file memo in opposition to mtn. to exclude evidence (CLA) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

RECAP
65 March 12, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to amend cmo (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

RECAP
66 March 12, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file memo in opposition to mtn. to exclude evidence [63-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

RECAP
67 March 13, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to amend cmo [65-1] ; Disc completion ddl 3/29/02 ; Notice of Motion ddl set for 4/15/02 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

RECAP
68 March 13, 2002

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

68 March 13, 2002

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

RECAP
69 March 15, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to withdraw motion to exclude evidence (CLA) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

RECAP
70 March 15, 2002

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to compel [51-1], motion for sanctions [51-2] (CLA) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

RECAP
71 March 18, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to withdraw motion to exclude evidence [69-1] terminating motion for order to exclude evidence [49-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/19/2002)

RECAP
72 March 18, 2002

RESPONSE by defendant Exel Inc. to [69-1] w/exhibit A thru B attached. (CLA) (Entered: 03/19/2002)

RECAP
73 March 20, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to compel [51-1], denying motion for sanctions [51-2] without prejudice. (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 03/21/2002)

RECAP
74 March 20, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray (CLA) (Entered: 03/22/2002)

RECAP
75 March 27, 2002

RESPONSE (objections) by plaintiff EEOC to motion for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray [74-1] (CLA) (Entered: 03/29/2002)

RECAP
76 March 28, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file deft.'s memo in support mtn. to strike expert David Schriber in excess of 15 pgs. (CLA) (Entered: 04/01/2002)

RECAP
77 April 1, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file deft.'s memo in support mtn. to strike expert David Schriber in excess of 15 pgs. [76-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

RECAP
78 April 1, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber w/memo in support and exhibits 1 thru 18 attached. (CLA) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

RECAP
79 April 5, 2002

Notice of Motion: sum. jgm. by defendant Exel Inc. (CLA) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

RECAP
80 April 8, 2002

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] w/attachments A - F. (CLA) (Entered: 04/10/2002)

RECAP
81 April 16, 2002

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] (CLA) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

81 April 16, 2002

REPLY by defendant Exel Inc. to response to motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] (CLA) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

RECAP
82 April 24, 2002

ORDER by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton motion for attorney fees/costs incurred in pursuing deft.'s mtn. to compel deposition testimony of Alan Gray [74-1] is granted in part, and pltff. EEOC is ordered to reimburse deft. in the amt. of $1,750.00 (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 04/24/2002)

RECAP
83 May 9, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for leave to file in excess of page limit (CLA) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

RECAP
84 May 10, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file in excess of page limit [83-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

RECAP
85 May 13, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/14/2002)

RECAP
86 May 14, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file in excess of 15 pages [85-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

RECAP
87 May 15, 2002

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton denying motion to strike the report and testimony of expert wit. David Schreiber [78-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

RECAP
88 May 15, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Exel Inc. to extend time of one day to file mtn. pkg. (CLA) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

RECAP
89 May 16, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion to extend time of one day to file mtn. pkg. [88-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

RECAP
91 May 16, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for sanctions w/memo in support. (CLA) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

RECAP
90 May 17, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. for leave to file a memo in excess of 15 pages (CLA) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

RECAP
92 May 17, 2002

RULED DOCUMENT by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton granting motion for leave to file a memo in excess of 15 pages [90-1] (cc: all counsel) (CLA) (Entered: 05/20/2002)

RECAP
93 May 21, 2002

MOTION by defendant Exel Inc. to strike the report and testimony of James Israel (CLA) (Entered: 05/22/2002)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Missouri

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closing Date: June 27, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Exel, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Missouri 4:01-cv-00154

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation