Case: EEOC v. MagneTek, Inc.

2:02-cv-00920 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: Sept. 17, 2002

Closed Date: Oct. 17, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Milwaukee office of the EEOC brought this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern of Wisconsin, against Magnetek Inc. d/b/a Drives & Systems. The complaint, filed in September 2002, alleged disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Specifically, the charging party alleged that Defendant regarded her as having a disability (carpel tunnel syndrome) and this belief motivated its employment decisions. In October 2002 the charging party intervened.

In November 2003, Defendant moved for summary judgment, and, after some discovery, the motion was granted in September 2004 on the grounds that even if the facts relied on upon by the EEOC were considered, the EEOC would not have presented enough evidence upon which a jury could reasonably infer that the Defendant had regarded the charging party as disabled.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/5/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11818095/parties/eeoc-v-magnetek-inc/


Judge(s)

Randa, Rudolph Thomas (Wisconsin)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Fox, Rosemary J (Wisconsin)

Kamp, Jean P (Wisconsin)

McDonald, Shannon D (Wisconsin)

Attorney for Defendant

Pepelnjak, Anna M (Wisconsin)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:02-cv-00920

Docket [PACER]

Oct. 17, 2005

Oct. 17, 2005

Docket
48

2:02-cv-00920

Decision and Order

Dec. 27, 2004

Dec. 27, 2004

Order/Opinion
54

2:02-cv-00920

Notice of Appeal

Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11818095/eeoc-v-magnetek-inc/

Last updated July 5, 2026, 6:17 a.m.

Docket for: EEOC v. MagneTek Inc
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 17, 2002

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) issued); jury demand Consent Forms Distributed for Magistrate Judge Gorence (jll, ) (Entered: 09/18/2002)

RECAP
2 Sept. 19, 2002

CONSENT to Proceed before Magistrate Judge by plaintiff EEOC (cms, )

RECAP
3 Oct. 8, 2002

Rule 7.4 expedited non-dispositive MOTION to intervene by Debbie Gibbons (jll, ) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

RECAP
4 Oct. 8, 2002

AFFIDAVIT of Nola J. Hitchcock Cross; attachment (jll, ) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

RECAP
5 Oct. 8, 2002

CERTIFICATE of service by Debbie Gibbons (jll, ) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

RECAP
6 Oct. 21, 2002

DECISION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Rudolph T. Randa granting Gibbons' motion to intervene [3-1] add party; adding intervenor plaintiff Debbie Gibbons (cc: all counsel) (jll, ) (Entered: 10/22/2002)

RECAP
7 Oct. 22, 2002

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant MagneTek Inc by Remzy D Bitar (jll, )

RECAP
8 Oct. 22, 2002

REFUSAL to Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge by defendant MagneTek Inc (jll, )

RECAP
9 Oct. 22, 2002

CERTIFICATE of interest by defendant MagneTek Inc (jll, )

RECAP
10 Dec. 6, 2002

NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference Call set for 2/4/2003 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Rudolph T Randa. (jll, ) (Entered: 12/09/2002)

RECAP
11 Jan. 17, 2003

NOTICE of Appearance by Anna M Pepelnjak on behalf of MagneTek Inc (jll, ) (Entered: 01/21/2003)

RECAP
12 Jan. 28, 2003

Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by all parties (jll, )

RECAP
13 Jan. 28, 2003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant MagneTek Inc (jll, )

RECAP
14 Feb. 4, 2003

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rudolph T Randa : Scheduling Conference Call held on 2/4/2003 Amended Pleadings due by 3/1/2003. Pltf's lay witnes list due: 4/15/03; Deft's lay witness list due: 6/15/03; Discovery due by 10/31/2003. Dispositive motions due by 11/15/03 Plaintiffs Expert Witness Reports due by 7/15/2003. Defendants Expert Witness Reports due by 9/15/2003. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2004 02:00 PM before Chief Judge Rudolph T Randa. Jury Trial set for 5/10/2004 09:00 AM in Courtroom 320 before Chief Judge Rudolph T Randa. (jll, ) (Entered: 02/05/2003)

RECAP
15 Feb. 4, 2003

SCHEDULING ORDER: (See hearing minutes above) signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 2/4/03. (cc: all counsel)(jll, ) (Entered: 02/05/2003)

RECAP
16 June 6, 2003

NOTICE of Appearance by Robert F Tomlinson on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (jll, )

RECAP
17 Sept. 23, 2003

STIPULATION AND ORDER for leave to file first amended answer signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 9/23/03. (cc: all counsel)(jll, ) (Entered: 09/24/2003)

RECAP
18 Sept. 23, 2003

First AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint by MagneTek Inc. (jll, ) (Entered: 09/24/2003)

RECAP
19 Nov. 14, 2003

MOTION for Summary Judgment by MagneTek Inc. (jll, ) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

RECAP
20 Nov. 14, 2003

BRIEF in Support re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MagneTek Inc. (jll, ) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

RECAP
21 Nov. 14, 2003

PROPOSED findings of fact filed by MagneTek Inc (jll, ) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

RECAP
22 Nov. 14, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Anna M. Pepelnjak (jll, ) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

RECAP
23 Dec. 9, 2003

STIPULATION AND ORDER; ddl for plaintiff and intervenor to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment is 12/23/03; defendant's reply ddl is 1/12/04. signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 12/9/03. (cc: all counsel)(jll, ) (Entered: 12/10/2003)

RECAP
Dec. 9, 2003

Attorney Shannon McDonald for Debbie Gibbons added. (jll, )

24 Dec. 22, 2003

BRIEF in Opposition re 19 defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ; attachments. (jll, ) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
25 Dec. 22, 2003

RESPONSE to defendant's proposed findings of fact and plaintiff's statement of material facts in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment. filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (jll, ) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
26 Dec. 22, 2003

AFFIDAVIT of Robert F. Tomlinson (jll, ) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
27 Dec. 22, 2003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (jll, ) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
28 Jan. 12, 2004

REPLY BRIEF in Support re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MagneTek Inc. (jld, )

RECAP
29 Jan. 12, 2004

AFFIDAVIT of Anna M. Pepelnjak (jld, )

RECAP
30 Jan. 14, 2004

NOTICE by MagneTek Inc ; Remzy D. Bitar is no longer an attorney of record on this matter (jld, )

RECAP
Jan. 14, 2004

Attorney Remzy D Bitar terminated. (jld, )

31 March 24, 2004

PRETRIAL Report by MagneTek Inc (jld, ) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

RECAP
32 March 24, 2004

PROPOSED Voir Dire questions filed by MagneTek Inc (jld, ) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

RECAP
33 March 24, 2004

PROPOSED Jury Instructions filed by MagneTek Inc (jld, ) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

RECAP
34 March 24, 2004

PROPOSED Special Verdict filed by MagneTek Inc (jld, ) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

RECAP
35 March 25, 2004

PRETRIAL Report by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (jld, ) (Entered: 03/26/2004)

RECAP
36 March 29, 2004

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rudolph T Randa : Final Pretrial Conference Call held on 3/29/2004 Motions in limine ddl is 4/26/04; response ddl is 5/3/04. 3-day Jury Trial reset for 5/12/2004 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 320 before Chief Judge Rudolph T Randa. (jld, ) (Entered: 04/01/2004)

RECAP
37 April 22, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 4/22/04 that the trial date of 5/12/04 be adjourned. The Court will conduct a telephonic scheduling conference 5/12/2004 11:00 AM to re-set the jury trial. (cc: all counsel)(djd ) (Entered: 04/23/2004)

RECAP
April 22, 2004

Deadlines/Hearings terminated (jury trial 5/12/04). (djd )

38 May 12, 2004

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rudolph T Randa : Scheduling Conference Call held on 5/12/2004 Motions in limine ddl is 9/17/04; responses due 9/27/04. Final Pretrial Conference Call set for 9/17/2004 at 10:00 AM before Chief Judge Rudolph T Randa. Jury Trial set for 10/25/2004 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 320 before Chief Judge Rudolph T Randa. (jld, ) (Entered: 05/13/2004)

RECAP
39 May 12, 2004

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: See hearing minutes above. signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 5/12/04. (cc: all counsel)(jld, ) (Entered: 05/13/2004)

RECAP
40 Sept. 10, 2004

Decision and ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 9/10/04 granting 19 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing this action with prejudice; judgment to be entered. (cc: all counsel) (kmm, ) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
41 Sept. 10, 2004

JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/10/04 dismissing this action with prejudice. (cc: all counsel)(kmm, ) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

RECAP
42 Sept. 22, 2004

MOTION for Reconsideration of summary judgment by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (jld, ) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

RECAP
43 Sept. 22, 2004

BRIEF in Support re 42 MOTION for Reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (jld, ) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

RECAP
44 Sept. 27, 2004

BILL OF COSTS Proposed with attachments by MagneTek Inc (Pepelnjak, Anna)

RECAP
45 Sept. 27, 2004

AFFIDAVIT of Anna M. Pepelnjak in Support of Defendant's Bill of Costs (Pepelnjak, Anna)

RECAP
Sept. 28, 2004

Docket Annotation : briefing letter mailed (jld, )

46 Sept. 30, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER; the time for parties plaintiff and intervenor to respond to defendant's Bill of Costs shall be stayed until the Court has ruled on EEOC's motion for reconsideration signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 9/30/04. (cc: all counsel)(jld, ) (Entered: 10/01/2004)

RECAP
47 Oct. 14, 2004

RESPONSE to Motion re 42 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by MagneTek Inc. (jld, ) (Entered: 10/15/2004)

RECAP
48 Dec. 27, 2004

ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on December 27, 2004 denying 42 Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment. (cc: all counsel, via US Mail to Jean Kamp)(Randa, Rudolph) (Entered: 12/28/2004)

Clearinghouse
49 Dec. 30, 2004

LETTER re bill of costs, from Anna M. Pepelnjak (jld, ) (Entered: 01/04/2005)

RECAP
50 Jan. 10, 2005

OBJECTIONS to defendant's bill of costs, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter)(jld, )

RECAP
51 Jan. 20, 2005

RESPONSE to plaintiff EEOC's objection to bill of costs filed by MagneTek Inc. (cms, ) (Entered: 01/21/2005)

RECAP
52 Jan. 20, 2005

AFFIDAVIT of Anna M. Pepelnjak (cms, ) (Entered: 01/21/2005)

RECAP
53 Jan. 27, 2005

COSTS TAXED for MagneTek Inc by Chief Deputy Clerk in amount of $1,783.85 against plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor. (cc: all counsel) (jld, ) (Entered: 01/28/2005)

RECAP
54 Feb. 23, 2005

NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Filing Fee waived (cc: all counsel) (cms, ) (Entered: 02/24/2005)

Clearinghouse
Feb. 24, 2005

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 54 Notice of Appeal (cms, )

March 3, 2005

USCA Case Number 05-1479 re: 54 Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (vlh, )

March 7, 2005

Appeal Record Prepared consisting of one volume of pleadings and three loose pleadings #'s 22, 24, 29 re 54 Notice of Appeal (cms, )

55 July 15, 2005

LETTER from plaintiff (vlh, ) FILED IN ERROR. SEE 02-C-940 (vlh, ).

RECAP
56 Oct. 17, 2005

USCA Mandate (certified copy) as to 54 Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, USCA Number 05-1479, dismissing appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) (vlh, ) (Entered: 10/18/2005)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Wisconsin

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 17, 2002

Closing Date: Oct. 17, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

MagneTek Inc., Drives and Systems

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Wisconsin 2:02-cv-00920

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation