Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
70 cases, 72 documents
Ordered by
JAIL CONDITIONS
Bull v. City and County of San Francisco

3:03-cv-01840 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 23, 2003

Closed Date: 2013

On April 23, 2003, nine plaintiffs, acting through private attorneys, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenging the strip search policy of the City and County of San Francisco ("CCSF"). Specifically, Plaintiffs alleged that, under CCSF policy, all prisoners who were placed in the general jail population at the CCSF's jails were subjected to strip and visual body cavity searches, with those refusing to consent be…
NURSING HOME CONDITIONS
U.S. v. District of Columbia

1:95-cv-00948 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: May 19, 1995

Closed Date: 1997

On August 19, 1991, the United States Department of Justice [DOJ] issued its findings letter to the mayor of Washington, DC providing details of its investigation of the Village Nursing Home (DC Village) conducted pursuant to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA). DC Village was licensed as a long-term-care nursing home for geriatric patients but overflow from other institutions was causing additional residents to be placed in the facility. These residents included adults …
PRISON CONDITIONS
Lindell v. Frank

3:02-cv-00021 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: Jan. 17, 2002

Closed Date: 2005

On January 17, 2002, a prisoner confined at the Supermax Correctional Institution (Supermax) in Boscobel, Wisconsin, filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin against employees of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Supermax. The plaintiff claimed that prison rules and practices violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1. …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Royal Wood Care Center

2:05-cv-06795 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 15, 2005

Closed Date: April 13, 2009

In September 2005, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC and Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund brought this lawsuit against healthcare providers Royal Wood Care Center LLC, Fountain View Subacute and Nursing Center LLC, Fountain View Inc., Skilled Healthcare LLC (doing business as Royalwood Care Center), Fountain View Holdings Inc., Fountain View Management Inc., Fountain View Subacute Nursing Center Inc., Fountain View Therapy Services Inc., The Royalwood Convalescent H…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Milgard Manufacturing Incorporated dba Milgard Windows

1:01-cv-01731 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: Aug. 31, 2001

Closed Date: 2004

In August 2001, the Denver District Office brought this suit against Milgard Manufacturing, Inc., a producer of windows and sliding doors, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado alleging discrimination on the basis of race, African-American, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the EEOC's litigation settlement report that the complaint …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. TACO BELL, INC., dba TACO BELL EXPRESS & DOUBLE-D

4:97-cv-04160 | U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota

Filed Date: July 31, 1997

Closed Date: Sept. 8, 1998

The EEOC's Denver office filed this suit on July 31, 1997 in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota against Taco Bell, Inc. and Double-D Inc. The complaint alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by subjecting female employees to sexual harassment. Both defendants filed motions for summary judgment which were subsequently denied. The parties stipulated to the dismissal of defendant Double-D on August 18, 1998 and the court ordered the dismissal t…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. KROGER FOOD STORES

4:99-cv-04187 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Aug. 23, 1999

Closed Date: 2001

The Chicago office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, against Kroger Food Stores. The complaint was filed in August 1999 and Defendant moved for summary judgment in March 2000, but the motion was denied in July 2000. Defendant moved for summary judgment again in September 2000, but the motion was again denied in January 2001. In February 2001 the case went to trial, but after two days the parties settled. The only document that we…
JAIL CONDITIONS
Augustin v. Jablonsky

0:99-cv-03126 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: June 3, 1999

Closed Date: 2017

On June 3, 1999, a plaintiff represented by New York attorney Robert L. Herbst filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiff challenged the blanket strip search policy of the Nassau County Correctional Center. Under the policy, all misdemeanor and minor offense arrestees were allegedly strip-searched without any suspicion that they were concealing weapons or other contraband. The plaintiff claimed that the poli…
JAIL CONDITIONS
Flick v. San Francisco, California

3:03-cv-04022 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 3, 2003

Closed Date: Sept. 30, 2013

This case, Flick v. City and County of San Francisco, is a companion case to Bull v. City and County of San Francisco (N.D. Cal.), a class action case challenging the strip search policy of the City and County of San Francisco. Flick filed her case on September 3, 2003, represented by attorneys C. Schwartz and Mark E. Merin, who were also class counsel in the Bull case. Flick alleged that she was subjected to false arrest by several San Francisco police officers, purportedly for the charge of p…
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (OTHER)
Moore v. Rees

3:06-cv-00022 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: April 19, 2006

Closed Date: 2015

On April 19, 2006, the plaintiff, a death row inmate in Kentucky represented by private counsel, filed a lawsuit against the Kentucky Department of Corrections, the warden of the Kentucky State Penitentiary, the medical director of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, and the governor of Kentucky in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. The plaintiff sought a temporary restraining order, injunctive and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his E…