Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
34 cases, 289 documents
Ordered by
EDUCATION
Oklahoma v. Cardona

5:24-cv-00461 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: May 6, 2024

Case Ongoing

This case is a challenge to the Biden administration's interpretation of Title IX. On April 19, 2024, the Department of Education announced an interpretation of Title IX ("the Final Rule"), to go into effect on August 1, 2024, that gave LGBTQ+ students and others explicit protection from sex discrimination “based on sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.” The Final Rule also broadened the definition of prohibited harassmen…
EDUCATION
State of Texas v. The United States of America

2:24-cv-00086 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: April 29, 2024

Case Ongoing

This case involves an attempt to block new Title IX rules from going into effect. On April 19, 2024, the Biden administration introduced its "Final Rule," which clarifies the interpretation of Title IX to broaden protections against sex discrimination in education. Texas filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on April 29, 2024, against the United States of America, the U.S. Secretary of Education, the U.S. Department of Education, the Assistant Secretary f…
EDUCATION
Alabama v. Cardona

7:24-cv-00533 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Filed Date: April 29, 2024

Case Ongoing

This case is a challenge to the Biden administration's interpretation of Title IX. On April 19, 2024, the administration unveiled its Final Rule, which expanded Title IX's protections against sex discrimination in education. On April 29, 2024, four southern states and several nonprofit organizations focused on free speech, K-12 education and policy issues of concern to women filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama against the U.S. Department of Education.…
EDUCATION
State of Tennessee v. Cardona

2:24-cv-00072 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: April 30, 2024

Case Ongoing

In this case, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia and West Virginia challenged the U.S. Department of Education’s regulation (the “Rule”) which interpreted Title IX’s definition of sex discrimination to include discrimination based on gender identity, expanded the definition of harassment, and incorporated a de minimis harm standard for determining sex discrimination. The Rule went into effect on August 1, 2024, but has been enjoined from enforcement in several states due to this case …
EDUCATION
Oklahoma State Department of Education v. United States of America

5:24-cv-00459 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: May 6, 2024

Closed Date: Jan. 26, 2025

On May 6, 2024, the Oklahoma Department of Education filed suit against the US Secretary of Education, the Department of Education's (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, and the DOE's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Oklahoma sought to challenge DOE's notice that in the enforcement of Title IX's prohibitions on sex discrimination, that DOE would interpret the term "sex" to include sexual orientation and gender ide…
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
Doe v. Boyertown Area School District

5:17-cv-01249 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: March 21, 2017

Closed Date: Sept. 19, 2019

The case involves a challenge brought by cisgender students against their school’s gender-affirming policies for transgender students.  On March 21, 2017 a cisgender student brought suit in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Boyertown Area School District and several school officials in their official capacity. Represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, Plaintiff alleged that the School District’s policy of allowing transgender students to use the facilities al…
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
Parents for Privacy v. Sessions

3:17-cv-01813 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Nov. 13, 2017

Closed Date: Dec. 11, 2020

This case is a challenge to an Oregon school’s policy of allowing transgender students to use the restroom that aligned with their gender identity, claiming that it violated the rights of cisgender students and parents. On November 13, 2017, Parents for Privacy, Parents Rights in Education, and a few private plaintiffs on behalf of their children (collectively, “Parents for Privacy”) sued Dallas School District No. 2, Oregon Department of Education, the Superintendent of Public Instruction for …
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
CODING IN PROCESS
Meadows v. Liberty High School

CVCV086130 | Iowa state trial court

(This summary is temporary while we research the case further). In this lawsuit, a transgender parent challenged an Iowa City Community School District policy that restricted use based on biological sex. Represented by the ACLU of Iowa, the plaintiff filed suit against Liberty High School and  the Iowa City Community School District on February 17, 2025. The parent plaintiff dismissed the suit on March 31, 2025. 
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
CODING IN PROCESS
Perkins v. State

25-282 | Montana state trial court

(This summary is temporary while we investigate the case further). This is a challenge to a new state law in Montana banning transgender individuals from using bathrooms, changing rooms, and sleeping quarters that correspond to their gender identity. 
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

2:24-cv-00173 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Aug. 15, 2024

Closed Date: May 15, 2025

This case is a follow-up to a case brought by Texas against the EEOC about its similar 2022 workplace harassment guidance regarding transgender employees; in that case, District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ruled that the EEOC exceeded its statutory rulemaking by “...conflat[ing] protected class status with all correlated conduct.” Texas v. EEOC, 2022 WL 4835346 at *13 (N.D. Tex. 2022) (emphasis included). This case challenges the EEOC’s April 2024 guidance under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Right…