Case: State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

2:24-cv-00173 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Aug. 15, 2024

Closed Date: May 15, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is a follow-up to a case brought by Texas against the EEOC about its similar 2022 workplace harassment guidance regarding transgender employees; in that case, District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ruled that the EEOC exceeded its statutory rulemaking by “...conflat[ing] protected class status with all correlated conduct.” Texas v. EEOC, 2022 WL 4835346 at *13 (N.D. Tex. 2022). This case challenges the EEOC’s April 2024 guidance under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act about workplac…

This case is a follow-up to a case brought by Texas against the EEOC about its similar 2022 workplace harassment guidance regarding transgender employees; in that case, District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk ruled that the EEOC exceeded its statutory rulemaking by “...conflat[ing] protected class status with all correlated conduct.” Texas v. EEOC, 2022 WL 4835346 at *13 (N.D. Tex. 2022).

This case challenges the EEOC’s April 2024 guidance under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act about workplace harassment of transgender employees. Represented by the Heritage Foundation, Texas contested the EEOC’s interpretation of Title VII; in particular, Texas alleged, the parts of the Guidance about pronouns, bathrooms, and dress codes conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court's carefully limited holding in Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), and with Title VII, which (Texas argued) does not require employers to accommodate sex, but merely requires non-discrimination.

Texas filed the case on August 15, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, seeking an injunction to stop implementation and enforcement of the 2024 Guidance, because it was not (as it should have been) published in the Federal Register, was contrary to law, arbitrary and capricious, and exceeded EEOC's statutory rulemaking authority under the Administrative Procedure Act. 

In October and November 2024, both parties moved for summary judgment. In January 2025, the newly inaugurated President Trump issued several Executive Orders stating there is no federal obligation to avoid discrimination against transgender people. On January 27, 2025, Judge Kacsmaryk ordered the parties to submit a joint brief detailing how new Executive Orders bear on the disposition of the litigation. Pursuant to the court's order, parties submitted the joint brief on February 10, 2025. In this brief, the parties agreed that plaintiffs retained standing and that, even in light of prior Executive Orders, the case was not moot.

On May 15, 2025, Judge Kacsmaryk granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, holding that denial of accommodations for gender non-conforming employees did not constitute actionable discrimination by an employer under Loper Bright. 2025 WL 1414332. Judge Kacsmaryk further stated that Congress reserved the exclusive authority to define its definition of "sex" under Title VII, holding that the EEOC had overstepped its authority. The decision effectively vacated relevant portions of the updated EEOC guidelines.

This outcome was precisely the one desired by the Trump Administration.  

Summary Authors

Ashley Hamilton (2/5/2025)

Ben Hefter (6/4/2025)

Related Cases

State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Northern District of Texas (2021)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69048644/parties/state-of-texas-v-equal-employment-opportunity-commission/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

2:24-cv-00173

Complaint

Aug. 15, 2024

Aug. 15, 2024

Complaint
29

2:24-cv-00173

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment

Oct. 23, 2024

Oct. 23, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
30

2:24-cv-00173

Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment

Oct. 23, 2024

Oct. 23, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
34

2:24-cv-00173

Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

Nov. 13, 2024

Nov. 13, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
35

2:24-cv-00173

Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Summary Judgment

Nov. 13, 2024

Nov. 13, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
46

2:24-cv-00173

[Proposed] Brief of Amici Curiae the National Women's Law Center and Fifteen Nonprofit Organizations Advocating for Gender Justice in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Summary Judgment

Nov. 26, 2024

Nov. 26, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
47

2:24-cv-00173

Brief of Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance, and American Sustainable Business Council as Amici Curiae in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Anti-Harassment Guidance

Nov. 26, 2024

Nov. 26, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
53

2:24-cv-00173

Joint Brief on Effect of Recent Executive Order

Feb. 10, 2025

Feb. 10, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
53-1

2:24-cv-00173

Exhibit

No Court

Feb. 10, 2025

Feb. 10, 2025

Other
59

2:24-cv-00173

Memorandum Opinion and Order

May 15, 2025

May 15, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 1414332

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title Description External URL Date / External URL

EO 14168 - Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government

President Donald Trump

Declaring that the United States government recognized two biologically-defined sexes, male and female and implementing this definition of gender in various legal spaces, including but not limited to… Jan. 20, 2025

Jan. 20, 2025

https://www.federalregister.gov/...

Federal judge requires state of Texas to file new lawsuit to challenge recent EEOC guidance on gender identity discrimination

Emily Harbison, Cheryl Blount, Heather Raun

In July of this year, a Texas federal district court judge denied the state of Texas’ request to vacate the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) most recent guidance relating to gender id… Sept. 3, 2024

Sept. 3, 2024

https://www.employmentlawwatch.com/...

Texas Federal Court Nixes Initial Challenge to EEOC’s Guidance on LGBTQ+ Protections

Nonnie L. Shivers

On July 17, 2024, the U.S. District for the Northern District of Texas rejected the State of Texas’s request that it vacate recent guidance from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC… July 25, 2024

July 25, 2024

https://ogletree.com/...

Dear Colleague Letter [rescinding prior letters relating to bathroom access for trans students]

Sandra Battle & T.E. Wheeler

Feb. 22, 2017

Feb. 22, 2017

https://assets.documentcloud.org/...

Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students

Catherine E. Lhamon and Vanita Gupta

May 13, 2016

May 13, 2016

https://www2.ed.gov/...

Examples of Policies and Emerging Practices for Supporting Transgender Students

United States Department of Education

May 2016

May 1, 2016

https://www2.ed.gov/...

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69048644/state-of-texas-v-equal-employment-opportunity-commission/

Last updated Sept. 8, 2026, 4:15 a.m.

Docket for: State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 15, 2024

COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by The Heritage Foundation, State of Texas. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14843641) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements and Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s)) (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 08/15/2024)

1 Exhibit(s)

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
2 Aug. 15, 2024

Supplemental Document by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation as to 1 Complaint,,,, Civil Cover Sheet. (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 08/15/2024)

RECAP
3 Aug. 15, 2024

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 08/15/2024)

RECAP
4 Aug. 16, 2024

New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) (Entered: 08/16/2024)

RECAP
5 Aug. 16, 2024

Summons issued as to Charlotte A. Burrows, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (awc) (Entered: 08/16/2024)

RECAP
6 Aug. 16, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14846989) filed by The Heritage Foundation Attorney R Trent McCotter added to party The Heritage Foundation(pty:pla) (McCotter, R Trent) (Entered: 08/16/2024)

RECAP
7 Aug. 21, 2024

ORDER deferring ruling on 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice: The Application is therefore DEFERRED for 14 days from the date of this Order soThe Heritage Foundation can comply with the Local Rules. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 8/21/2024) (cmk) (Entered: 08/21/2024)

RECAP
8 Aug. 27, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Clerk Note: Filer states no fee is to be collected due to prior payment or waiver by MO 16 or prior order.) filed by The Heritage Foundation (McCotter, R) (Entered: 08/27/2024)

Clearinghouse
9 Sept. 3, 2024

ORDER terminating 6 ; granting 8 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 9/3/2024) (cmk) (Entered: 09/03/2024)

RECAP
10 Sept. 6, 2024

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Charlotte A. Burrows ; served on 8/22/2024. (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 09/06/2024)

RECAP
11 Sept. 6, 2024

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ; served on 8/22/2024. (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 09/06/2024)

RECAP
12 Sept. 6, 2024

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Merrick Garland ; served on 8/22/2024. (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 09/06/2024)

RECAP
13 Sept. 17, 2024

ORDER: Smith is therefore ORDERED either to submit an application for admission pro hac vice or to gain admission to practice in the Northern District of Texas within 21 days from the date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 9/17/2024) (nht) (Entered: 09/17/2024)

RECAP
14 Sept. 27, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14950687) filed by The Heritage Foundation (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Andrew) (Entered: 09/27/2024)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
15 Sept. 27, 2024

MOTION by all Parties to Stay Answer Deadline and for Entry of a Scheduling Order filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 09/27/2024)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
16 Sept. 30, 2024

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Allyson Scher on behalf of Charlotte A. Burrows, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Merrick Garland. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Scher, Allyson) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
17 Sept. 30, 2024

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jacob S Siler on behalf of Charlotte A. Burrows, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Merrick Garland. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Siler, Jacob) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
18 Sept. 30, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Siler, Jacob) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
19 Sept. 30, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Scher, Allyson) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
20 Sept. 30, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (McCotter, R) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
21 Sept. 30, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Przada, Jacob) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
22 Sept. 30, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
23 Sept. 30, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Tebo, Kyle) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

RECAP
24 Oct. 3, 2024

ORDER granting 14 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Andrew W Smith. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 10/3/2024) (nht) (Entered: 10/03/2024)

RECAP
25 Oct. 3, 2024

SCHEDULING ORDER re: 15 Motion. (See Order for deadlines) (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 10/3/2024) (nht) (Entered: 10/03/2024)

RECAP
26 Oct. 7, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Smith, Andrew) (Entered: 10/07/2024)

RECAP
27 Oct. 11, 2024

Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Johnathan Stone filed by State of Texas (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Stone, Johnathan) (Entered: 10/11/2024)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
28 Oct. 15, 2024

ORDER granting 27 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Johnathan Stone terminated (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 10/15/2024) (nht) (Entered: 10/15/2024)

RECAP
29 Oct. 23, 2024

MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 10/23/2024)

Clearinghouse
30 Oct. 23, 2024

Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation re 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 10/23/2024)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
31 Oct. 23, 2024

Appendix in Support filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation re 30 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Walters, Ryan) (Entered: 10/23/2024)

RECAP
32 Nov. 13, 2024

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Taisa M. Goodnature on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, Merrick Garland. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Goodnature, Taisa) (Entered: 11/13/2024)

RECAP
33 Nov. 13, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Goodnature, Taisa) (Entered: 11/13/2024)

RECAP
34 Nov. 13, 2024

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, Merrick Garland (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Siler, Jacob) (Entered: 11/13/2024)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
35 Nov. 13, 2024

Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, Merrick Garland re 34 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Siler, Jacob) (Entered: 11/13/2024)

Clearinghouse
36 Nov. 20, 2024

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File amicus brief in support of defendant EEOC filed by National Women's Law Center (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Proposed amicus brief). Party National Women's Law Center added.Attorney Elizabeth Theran added to party National Women's Law Center(pty:am) (Theran, Elizabeth) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

1 Exhibit(s) Proposed amicus brief

View on PACER

RECAP
37 Nov. 20, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Theran, Elizabeth) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

RECAP
38 Nov. 20, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-15076662) filed by National Women's Law Center (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Theran, Elizabeth) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

RECAP
39 Nov. 20, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-15076543) filed by National Women's Law Center (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Sandson, Katherine) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

RECAP
40 Nov. 20, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-15077143) filed by National Women's Law Center (Smith, Rachel) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

RECAP
41 Nov. 20, 2024

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File amicus brief and to proceed without local counsel filed by Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance, American Sustainable Business Council (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Proposed Amicus Brief). Party Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance, and American Sustainable Business Council added.Attorney Sarah Goetz added to party Small Business Majority(pty:am), Attorney Sarah Goetz added to party Main Street Alliance(pty:am), Attorney Sarah Goetz added to party American Sustainable Business Council(pty:am) (Goetz, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

1 Exhibit(s) Proposed Amicus Brief

View on PACER

RECAP
42 Nov. 20, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-15078610) filed by Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance, American Sustainable Business Council (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Goetz, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

RECAP
43 Nov. 20, 2024

Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements. (Goetz, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2024)

RECAP
44 Nov. 21, 2024

Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-15080565) filed by Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance, American Sustainable Business Council Attorney Sunu Chandy added to party Small Business Majority(pty:am), Attorney Sunu Chandy added to party Main Street Alliance(pty:am), Attorney Sunu Chandy added to party American Sustainable Business Council(pty:am) (Chandy, Sunu) (Entered: 11/21/2024)

RECAP
45 Nov. 26, 2024

ORDER granting 36 Motion for Leave to File; granting 41 Motion for Leave to File (Unless the document has already been filed, clerk to enter the document as of the date of this order.); granting 38 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 39 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 40 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 42 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 44 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 11/26/2024) (cmk) (Entered: 11/26/2024)

RECAP
46 Nov. 26, 2024

AMICUS BRIEF/Memorandum in Support filed by National Women's Law Center re 34 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (cmk) (Entered: 11/26/2024)

Clearinghouse
47 Nov. 26, 2024

AMICUS BRIEF/Memorandum in Support filed by Small Business Majority, Main Street Alliance, American Sustainable Business Council re 34 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (cmk) (Entered: 11/26/2024)

Clearinghouse
48 Dec. 4, 2024

REPLY in Support filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation re 30 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 31 Appendix in Support, 34 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, 35 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Walters, Ryan) Modified docket text on 12/5/2024 (cmk). (Entered: 12/04/2024)

RECAP
49 Dec. 11, 2024

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 48 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, Merrick Garland (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Siler, Jacob) (Entered: 12/11/2024)

RECAP
50 Dec. 26, 2024

ORDER granting 49 Motion to Extend Time to File Reply: Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' Motion and ORDERS Defendants to file their reply no later than Friday, January 10, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 12/26/2024) (cmk) (Entered: 12/26/2024)

RECAP
51 Jan. 10, 2025

REPLY filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, Merrick Garland re: 34 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Siler, Jacob) (Entered: 01/10/2025)

RECAP
52 Jan. 27, 2025

ORDER: The Court ORDERS the parties to submit a joint brief detailing how this executive order bears on the disposition of this litigation. The joint brief must be submitted on or before Monday, February 10, 2025. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 1/27/2025) (nht)

RECAP
53 Feb. 10, 2025

NOTICE of Joint Brief on Effect of Recent Executive Order re: [52] Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit(s)) (Walters, Ryan)

1 Exhibit(s)

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
54 Feb. 28, 2025

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Charlotte A. Burrows, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Merrick Garland (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order) (Goodnature, Taisa)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
55 March 3, 2025

ORDER: the Court ORDERS that Merrick Garland, former Attorney General of the United States, be terminated as a party and that Pamela Bondi, current Attorney General of the United States, be substituted. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 3/3/2025) (ars) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

RECAP
56 March 3, 2025

ORDER GRANTING re: 54 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Taisa M. Goodnature terminated. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 3/3/2025) (ars) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

RECAP
57 March 31, 2025

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Pamela Bondi, Charlotte A. Burrows, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Scher, Allyson) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
58 April 2, 2025

ORDER granting re: 57 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Allyson Scher terminated. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 4/2/2025) (ars) (Entered: 04/02/2025)

RECAP
59 May 15, 2025

Memorandum Opinion and Order - re: 29 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by State of Texas, The Heritage Foundation and re: 34 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 5/15/2025) (vls) (Main Document 59 replaced with text searchable image on 5/16/2025) (cmk). (Entered: 05/15/2025)

Clearinghouse
60 May 22, 2025

JUDGMENT: The Court GRANTED Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIED Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 5/22/2025) (cmk) (Entered: 05/22/2025)

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Transgender Bathroom Access Cases

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Reversing Course on Existing Litigation

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 15, 2024

Closing Date: May 15, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State of Texas

Plaintiff Type(s):

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

EEOC

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Texas 2:24-cv-00173

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

General/Misc.:

Bathing and hygiene

Bathrooms

Classification / placement

Other

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Gender identity

Sexual orientation

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Intersex

Transgender

LGBTQ+:

LGBTQ+

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Medical care, unspecified

Recommended Citation