Case: United States v. State of Arkansas

4:78-cv-00025 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: Feb. 1, 1978

Closed Date: Sept. 5, 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On February 1st, 1978, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") filed an employment discrimination lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the State of Arkansas. Documents including the complaint are unavailable until 2001. The complaint against the State of Arkansas and Directors and Commissioners of the Arkansas State Police Department ("ASPD" alleged that the defendants had engaged in a pattern or practice of unlawful employment discrimination…

On February 1st, 1978, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") filed an employment discrimination lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the State of Arkansas. Documents including the complaint are unavailable until 2001.

The complaint against the State of Arkansas and Directors and Commissioners of the Arkansas State Police Department ("ASPD" alleged that the defendants had engaged in a pattern or practice of unlawful employment discrimination against African-Americans and women on the basis of race and sex. That same day, a Consent Decree was entered between the United States and the State of Arkansas, the purpose and intent of which was to ensure that African-Americans and women are not disadvantaged by the hiring, promotion, assignment and other employment policies and practices of the ASPD.

On September 27th, 1991, African-American employees of the ASPD filed a class action complaint against ASPD, engaging that ASPD had engaged in unlawful employment discrimination against them and other African-American State Troopers. (See Tappin v. Arkansas State Police Department, 4:91cv627). By way of relief, the plaintiff sought the enforcement of the 1978 Consent Decree in this case. The two actions were consolidated and class action status was granted. On October 6th, 1995, a Settlement Agreement similar to the 1978 Consent Decree was approved

On November 24th, 2003, a joint motion was entered by the plaintiff and defendants to modify the Consent Decree.

On September 22nd, 2004, the District Court (Judge Susan W. Wright) granted the motion to modify the Consent Decree and stated that the Consent Decree would remain in effect for two years from the date of the Order.

The Consent Decree expired on September 23rd, 2006, and the DOJ closed the case. The case thereafter proceeded solely pursuant to the Tappin Settlement Agreement.

On August 4th, 2006, plaintiffs filed a Motion for Extension of Tappin Settlement Agreement, alleging that there have been violations of the Settlement Agreement concerning adverse impact to African-American troopers in the implementation and utilization of polygraph and written entrance exams. ASPD opposed this motion, and filed Defendant's Renewed Motion to Terminate the Court's Supervision of the Tappin Settlement, claiming that the terms had been met.

On November 21st, 2006, the District Court (Judge Susan W. Wright) held a hearing on Defendant's Renewed Motion to Terminate the Court's Supervision of the Tappin Settlement Agreement and plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Enforcement of Tappin agreement. On March 28th, 2007 the Court (Judge Susan W. Wright) entered an order granting the Defendant's Renewed Motion to Terminate the Court's Supervision of the Tappin Settlement Agreement.

On September 5, 2007, the District Court denied the plaintiff's motion for attorneys' costs and fees. United States v. State of Arkansas, 2007 WL 2609583 (E.D.Ark. 2007).

Summary Authors

Jennifer Hau (11/27/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5353708/parties/united-states-v-arkansas-state-of/


Judge(s)

Cavaneau, Jerry W. (Arkansas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

America, United States (Arkansas)

Attorney for Defendant

Hogan, Rick D. (Arkansas)

Humphries, Tim C. (Arkansas)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Kaplan, Philip E. (Arkansas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:78-cv-00025

Docket

USA v. Arkansas, State of

March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

Docket

4:78-cv-00025

Opinion

Sept. 5, 2007

Sept. 5, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 2609583

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5353708/united-states-v-arkansas-state-of/

Last updated July 22, 2026, 5:10 a.m.

Docket for: United States v. Arkansas, State of
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 1, 1978

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) issued) and returned to: attorney (bmt) (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
2 Feb. 1, 1978

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Terry L. Shell (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 10/25/1993)

RECAP
3 July 26, 1978

MOTION by plaintiff for enforcement of the Individual Relief Provisions of the Consent Decree entered on 2/1/78 (bmt) Modified on 10/25/1993 (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
4 July 26, 1982

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion for enforcement of the Individual Relief Provisions of the Consent Decree entered on 2/1/78 [3 -1] (bmt) Modified on 10/25/1993 (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
5 Dec. 3, 1982

RESPONSE by defendants to motion for enforcement of the Individual Relief Provisions of the Consent Decree entered on 2/1/78 [3-1] (bmt) Modified on 10/25/1993 (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 1983

ORDER Judge William Overton on 1/3/93, deft mailed offers of employment as Arkansas State Troopers to those class members who were certified as eligible for employhment by the Arkansas State Police Commission on 12/22/82. Class members will, upon being hired by deft, receive from deft the seniority & back pay to which they are entitled under paragraphs 9 and 16 of the consent decree. Further investigation going on regarding Clifford Monroe. Ordered that upon hiring of the class members referred to and their receipt of seniority & back pay, the request for relief specified in the motion shall be deemed satisfied. It is further Ordered that should class member Monroe be refused an offer of employment, nothing in this order shall be construed to prohibit pltf from challenging that refusal or otherwise seeking relief (cc: all counsel) (bmt) Modified on 10/25/1993 (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
7 Sept. 7, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to consolidate case w/LR-C-91-627 (bmt) Modified on 10/25/1993 (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
8 Oct. 8, 1993

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner granting motion to consolidate case w/LR-C-91-627 [7-1]; all pleadings to be filed in Lead Case LR-C-78-25 with member case 4:91-cv-627 and case reopened (cc: all counsel) (bmt) Modified on 10/25/1993 (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
9 May 26, 1994

SCHEDULING ORDER: non-jury trial set for 9:30 12/5/94; discovery due 10/11/94; pretrial info sheet due 11/7/94 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) Modified on 05/27/1994 (Entered: 05/27/1994)

RECAP
10 June 30, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on joint motion of the parties & for good cause shown, the Arkansas State Police is ordered to deposit $295,000 into the registry of the Court to be invested in an interest-bearing account until such time as the defts request that it be invested in other accounts or instruments or until the proceeds are disbursed as ordered by the Court; the clerk is directed to deduct from the income earned on the account a fee not exceeding that authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United States & set by the Director of the Administrative Office (cc: all counsel) EOD 6/30/94 (bmt) Modified on 06/30/1994 (Entered: 06/30/1994)

RECAP
11 Nov. 7, 1994

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION SHEET by pltfs (7 to 10 days) (bmt) (Entered: 11/08/1994)

RECAP
12 Nov. 15, 1994

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner upon oral motion of parties, the time for defts to file their pretrial conf info sheet is extended to 11/16/94 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 11/16/1994)

RECAP
13 Nov. 22, 1994

NOTICE/ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner scheduling settlement hearing for 9:30 on 1/13/95 for the purpose of determining if the proposed settlement is fair & reasonable for the purpose of awarding relief to the parties including attys' fees & costs (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 11/23/1994)

RECAP
14 Nov. 22, 1994

NOTICE/ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner to non-class members regarding settlement hearing scheduled for 1/13/95 at 9:30 a.m. in Little Rock (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 11/23/1994)

RECAP
15 Nov. 29, 1994

AMENDED NOTICE/ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner to Arkansas State Police Trooper (non -class members) regarding settlement hearing scheduled for 1/13/95 at 9:30 a.m. in Little Rock (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 11/29/1994)

RECAP
16 Nov. 30, 1994

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner upon oral motion of defts & w/o opposition from pltfs, the time for defts to file their pretrial conf info sheet is extended until 11/25/95 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 12/01/1994)

RECAP
17 Dec. 7, 1994

MOTION to withdraw as attorney for pltf by Kenneth F. Stoll (bmt) (Entered: 12/08/1994)

RECAP
18 Dec. 27, 1994

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner granting motion to withdraw as attorney for pltf by Kenneth F. Stoll [17-1] (cc: all counsel) EOD 12/27/94 (bmt) (Entered: 12/27/1994)

RECAP
19 Dec. 29, 1994

MOTION by movants to intervene (bmt) (Entered: 01/03/1995)

RECAP
20 Dec. 29, 1994

BRIEF by movants in support of motion to intervene [19-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/03/1995)

RECAP
21 Jan. 6, 1995

RESPONSE by pltfs Tappin, Anthony Jr, Bazzelle, Briggs, Dowd, Fleming, Harris, Lamar, Lewis, Smith, Swanigan, and Wright to motion to intervene [19-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/09/1995)

RECAP
22 Jan. 6, 1995

BRIEF by pltfs Tappin, Anthony, Bazzelle, Briggs, Dowd, Fleming, Harris, Lamar, Lewis, Smith, Swanigan & Wright in support of motion response [21-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/09/1995)

RECAP
23 Jan. 10, 1995

FIRST AMENDED RESPONSE by pltfs Tappin, Anthony, Bazzelle, Briggs, Dowd, Fleming, Harris, Lamar, Lewis, Smith, Swanigan & Wright to motion to intervene [19-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/10/1995)

RECAP
24 Jan. 12, 1995

JOINT STIPULATION of facts by plaintiffs and defts (bmt) (Entered: 01/13/1995)

RECAP
25 Jan. 19, 1995

MEMO TO FILE: finding the motion to intervene moot [19-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/20/1995)

RECAP
26 Jan. 27, 1995

WRITTEN STATUS REPORT by pltfs Frank E Tappin, Perry Anthony Jr, Larry Bazzelle, Derrick S Briggs, Charles Anthony Dowd, Robert Fleming, Morstine Harris, Henry Lamar, Sigfrid Lewis, Rhodis Smith, Ruth M Swanigan & Joe Lee Wright (bmt) (Entered: 01/31/1995)

RECAP
27 Feb. 12, 1995

MOTION by plaintiffs for protective order (bmt) (Entered: 02/22/1995)

RECAP
28 Feb. 12, 1995

BRIEF by plaintiffs in support of motion for protective order [27-1] (bmt) (Entered: 02/22/1995)

RECAP
29 Feb. 21, 1995

RESPONSE by defendant Arkansas St Police to motion for protective order [27-1] (bmt) (Entered: 02/22/1995)

RECAP
30 March 30, 1995

NOTICE TO COUNSEL (DOC) resumption of the fairness hearing set for 9:30 4/17/95 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 03/31/1995)

RECAP
31 April 11, 1995

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE as attorney for defendants by Rick D. Hogan and Tim Humphries (bmt) (Entered: 04/12/1995)

RECAP
32 April 18, 1995

NOTICE/ORDER (DOC) resumption of the fairness hearing set for 1:30 on 5/1/95 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 04/18/1995)

RECAP
33 May 8, 1995

STIPULATED & PROTECTIVE ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner: granting motion for protective order [27-1]; all documents produce in connection with objectors' request shall be deemed as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; the parties shall not disclosed any confidential information to any person except that such information may be disclosed to attys of record for parties in case (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 05/09/1995)

RECAP
34 Sept. 28, 1995

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner approving the settlement agreement with the exception of the provisions in paragraphs (B)(1) and (2) of section III of the Settlement Agreement; the Court will not modify the Consent Decree & should not w/o the participation of the Justice Department in this litigation (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 09/29/1995)

RECAP
35 Oct. 18, 1995

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner the letter/motion of atty Philip E. Kaplan for an extension of time in which to file a motion for atty's fees is granted until 10/25/95 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 10/19/1995)

RECAP
36 Oct. 25, 1995

MOTION by movants (objectors) for attorney fees (bmt) (Entered: 10/26/1995)

RECAP
37 Oct. 25, 1995

BRIEF by movants (objectors) in support of motion for attorney fees [36-1] (bmt) (Entered: 10/26/1995)

RECAP
Oct. 27, 1995

DOCKET NOTE: check #112793 issued to Duncan & Rainwater in the amount of $238,578.75 (bmt)

38 Nov. 6, 1995

MOTION by deft Arkansas St Police to extend time in which to resp to objectors' motion for attys' fees (bmt) (Entered: 11/07/1995)

RECAP
39 Nov. 7, 1995

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner granting motion to extend time in which to resp to objectors' motion for attys' fees until 11/16/95 [38-1] [36-1] (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 11/08/1995)

RECAP
40 Nov. 16, 1995

RESPONSE by Arkansas St Police to objectors' motion for attorney fees [36-1] (bmt) (Entered: 11/17/1995)

RECAP
41 Nov. 16, 1995

BRIEF by Arkansas St Police in support of response to objectors' motion for attys' fees [40-1] (bmt) (Entered: 11/17/1995)

RECAP
Feb. 29, 1996

DOCKET NOTE: Check in the amount of $2,206 issued to Dr. Veres per order (bmt)

42 March 14, 1996

NOTICE/ORDER (DOC) scheduling hearing on objectors' motion for attorney fees [36-1] at 9:30 on 5/9/96 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 03/15/1996)

RECAP
43 May 9, 1996

CLERK'S MINUTES: Hearing held on objectors' motion for attorneys' fees. Order to be entered. (Ct. Reporter: Genie Power) (former empl) (Entered: 05/09/1996)

RECAP
44 May 9, 1996

ORDER by Chief Judge Stephen M. Reasoner setting aside memo to file which rendered the motion to intervene moot [25-1]; granting motion to intervene [19-1]; granting in part intervenors' motion for attorney fees in the sum of $9,907.86 [36-1] (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 05/10/1996)

RECAP
45 April 9, 2001

ORDER by Judge Stephen M. Reasoner granting motion to substitute atty Wendy K. Michaelis in place of Tim Humphries, Victra Fewell and Rick Hogan for defts (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

RECAP
46 Nov. 24, 2003

JOINT MOTION by plaintiff and defendants to modify the Consent Decree (bmt) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

RECAP
47 Nov. 24, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff and defendants in support of joint motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1] (bmt) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

RECAP
48 Nov. 24, 2003

JOINT MOTION by plaintiff and defendants for entry of agreement and order (bmt) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

RECAP
49 Dec. 5, 2003

RESPONSE by Class Pltfs to motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1] (bmt) (Entered: 12/08/2003)

RECAP
50 Dec. 11, 2003

JOINT REPLY by plaintiff USA and defendants to Tappin Pltfs' response to motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1] (bmt) (Entered: 12/11/2003)

RECAP
51 Jan. 2, 2004

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE by Tappin Pltfs to joint motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/02/2004)

RECAP
52 Jan. 20, 2004

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY by Tappin plaintiffs to response to motion for status hearing and supplemental response to joint motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1] (bmt) (Entered: 01/21/2004)

RECAP
53 Feb. 11, 2004

JOINT DECLARATION by plaintiff and defendants (bmt) (Entered: 02/12/2004)

RECAP
54 Feb. 11, 2004

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by pltf and defts of joint declaration upon counsel for Tappin pltfs [53-1] (bmt) (Entered: 02/12/2004)

RECAP
55 Feb. 12, 2004

ORDER by Judge Stephen M. Reasoner for the purposes of easing the burden on the Clerk's Office, the Court orders that cases 4:91cv00627 and 4:78cv00025 be consolidated; all pleadings to be consolidated into case number 4:91cv00627 (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 02/13/2004)

RECAP
56 April 5, 2004

ORDER by Judge Stephen M. Reasoner granting joint motion for entry of agreement and order [48-1] (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 04/06/2004)

RECAP
April 5, 2004

AGREEMENT AND ORDER by Judge Stephen M. Reasoner regarding settlement of allegations made by the United States as to noncompliance by the defts with the 1978 Consent Decree concerning the selection procedure for promotion to Sergeant, as set forth in this Order, the United States and the defts agree to the entry of this Agreement and Order (cc: all counsel) (bmt) Modified on 04/07/2004

57 Aug. 20, 2004

ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright Purs to the hearing held on 8/12/04, the Court makes the following ruling: the joint motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1] is held in abeyance for 30 days from the date of the hearing; the Court will make a determination after the 30 days has expired (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 08/23/2004)

RECAP
58 Aug. 25, 2004

ORDER (DOC); Case reassigned to Chief Judge Susan W. Wright (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 08/26/2004)

RECAP
Sept. 13, 2004

RESPONSE by Tappin pltfs to joint motion to modify the consent decree (vjt)

Sept. 20, 2004

REPLY by defts to Tappin pltfs' second response to joint motion to modify the consent decree (vjt) Modified on 09/22/2004

Sept. 21, 2004

REPLY by USA to Tappin pltfs' response to joint motion to modify the consent decree (vjt)

59 Sept. 22, 2004

ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright granting motion to modify the Consent Decree [46-1]; unless specifically dissolved or amended by this Order, all provisions of the Consent Decree shall remain in full force and effect until further Order of the Court (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

RECAP
Sept. 22, 2004

ORDER by Chief Judge Susan W. Wright, as noted in its Order of 8/20/04, this Court has continuing jurisdiction over the Tappin Settlement Agreement; therefore, any further issues involving the Tappin Settlement Agreement, including changes to the policy re promotion procedure, will be controlled by the Agreement (cc: all counsel) (vjt)

60 Nov. 22, 2006

ORDER following hearing on 11/21/2006 to address the status of pending motions; directing the Clerk of Court to take the steps necessary to ensure that United States v. State of Arkansas, et al., No. 4:78cv25 be closed on the Court's docket. This case will proceed pursuant to the Settlement Agreement in Tappin, et al. v. Arkansas State Police Department, et al., No. 4:91cv629. (Also filed in the Lead Case: 4:91cv627) Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/22/2006. (thd) (Entered: 11/22/2006)

RECAP
61 Dec. 13, 2006

TRANSCRIPT of Hearing on Motions held on 11/21/06 before Judge Susan Webber Wright. Court Reporter: Cheryl Bartnett Nelson. (vjt) (Entered: 12/13/2006)

RECAP
62 March 28, 2007

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defts' Renewed Motion to Terminate the Court's Supervision of the Tappin Settlement Agreement (doc.#189 in Case No. 4:91cv00627) is GRANTED; Pltfs' Amended Motion for Enforcement of Tappin Settlement Agreement (doc.#190 in Case No. 4:91cv00627) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/28/07. (vjt) (Entered: 03/28/2007)

RECAP
63 July 10, 2009

ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to refund to the Arkansas State Police any and all sums plus accrued interest which the Arkansas State Police had deposited into the registry of the Court in above-styled case pursuant to the Order entered June 30, 1994. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/10/09. (bkp) (Entered: 07/10/2009)

RECAP
July 15, 2009

Docket Note: pursuant to Orders 63 and 10, check #354 in the amount of $1,831.44 was issued to USDC - Eastern District of Arkansas, and check #355 in the amount of $43,665.91 was issued to Arkansas State Police, Attn: Ken Stoll, Legal Counsel, on 7/15/09. (vjt)

Case Details

State / Territory:

Arkansas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 1, 1978

Closing Date: Sept. 5, 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

United States, on behalf of African Americans and women

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

State of Arkansas

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Arkansas 4:78-cv-00025

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1978 - 2006

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination Area:

Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc.)

Hiring

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Recommended Citation