Case: Smith v. Jackson

3:01-cv-00367 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

Filed Date: May 14, 2001

Closed Date: 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 14, 2001, several police officers 40 years of age or older filed a lawsuit against the City of Jackson, Mississippi and the Jackson Police Department under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, alleged age discrimination and asked the court for in…

On May 14, 2001, several police officers 40 years of age or older filed a lawsuit against the City of Jackson, Mississippi and the Jackson Police Department under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, alleged age discrimination and asked the court for injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as compensatory damages. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that a pay plan adopted by the city violated the ADEA and caused disparate treatment and disparate impact. The pay plan granted raises to all police officers and police dispatchers in the city's attempt to bring the starting salaries of police officers up to regional averages, but those who had less than five years of tenure received proportionately greater raises when compared to the former pay than those with more seniority.

According to the PACER docket, on June 7, 2002, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On September 6, 2002, the court (Judge William H. Barbour) granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice. The court found that the officers had failed to demonstrate that the city had conducted unlawful age discrimination, that the city had a legitimate reason for the pay plan, and that the ADEA did not enable claims of disparate impact. Smith v. City of Jackson, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27284 (S.D. Miss. 2002).

The plaintiffs appealed the case. On November 16, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment regarding disparate impact and vacated the judgment of the District Court regarding disparate treatment, and remanded the case back to the District Court. Smith v. City of Jackson, 351 F.3d. 183 (5th Cir. 2003). Following oral argument, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals. Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005).

According to the PACER docket, on March 30, 2007, a settlement conference was held but no agreement was reached. On October 10, 2007, the court (Judge Barbour) dismissed the case with prejudice due to resolution of the parties' underlying differences and the parties were ordered to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

Summary Authors

Emily Kuznick (4/14/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4798722/parties/smith-v-city-of-jackson/


Judge(s)

Anderson, Linda Randle (Mississippi)

Barbour, William Henry Jr. (Mississippi)

Breyer, Stephen Gerald (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Brand, Samuel M. Jr. (Mississippi)

Attorney for Defendant

Begley, Samuel L. (Mississippi)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:01-cv-00367

Docket (PACER)

Smith v. City of Jackson

Oct. 10, 2007

Oct. 10, 2007

Docket
77

3:01-cv-00367

Motion for Summary Judgment Granted

Smith v. City of Jackson

Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 27284

02-60850

Opinion (Court of Appeals)

Smith v. City of Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nov. 13, 2003

Nov. 13, 2003

Order/Opinion

351 F.3d 183

03-01160

Opinion (Supreme Court)

Smith v. City of Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

Order/Opinion

544 U.S. 228

98

3:01-cv-00367

Amended Answer to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses

Smith et al. v. City of Jackson et al.

April 4, 2006

April 4, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief

2006 WL 1479308

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4798722/smith-v-city-of-jackson/

Last updated Oct. 13, 2025, 2:49 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT Filing Fee $ 150.00 Receipt # 3996; jury demand; Notice of Assignment mailed. (thr) (Entered: 05/15/2001)

May 14, 2001

May 14, 2001

PACER

Magistrate Judge Assignment Alfred G. Nicols (thr)

May 14, 2001

May 14, 2001

PACER

Case assigned to Pending Track - designation of appropriate track will be made after Case Management Conference and a final track assignment. (thr)

May 14, 2001

May 14, 2001

PACER

SUMMONS(ES) issued for defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. (thr)

May 14, 2001

May 14, 2001

PACER
2

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to defendant City of Jackson 5/24/01 Answer due on 6/13/01 for City of Jackson (sec) (Entered: 06/01/2001)

May 31, 2001

May 31, 2001

PACER
3

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to defendant Jackson Police Dept. 5/24/01 Answer due on 6/13/01 for Jackson Police Dept. (sec) (Entered: 06/01/2001)

May 31, 2001

May 31, 2001

PACER
4

Notice of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure by plaintiff all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 06/01/2001)

May 31, 2001

May 31, 2001

PACER
5

ANSWER to Complaint by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. (Attorney J. Anthony Williams), (cwl) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

PACER
6

Rule 16.1(A) Initial Order; copies mailed (cwl) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

PACER

Telephonic Case Management Conference set 11:00 8/16/01 location: Jackson, MS before Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols copies mailed to J. Anthony Williams, Samuel M. Brand Jr., Dennis L. Horn (cwl)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

PACER
7

Notice of Service of Pre-Disclosure by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. (sec) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

Aug. 10, 2001

Aug. 10, 2001

PACER

Telephonic Case Management Conference held (sec)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

PACER
8

Minute entry: hearing on Telephonic Case Management Conference before Magistrate Judge Nicols on 8/16/01, Jackson, MS. Action Taken: Trial,Pretrial and Settlement Conference dates set. (sec) (Entered: 08/20/2001)

Aug. 20, 2001

Aug. 20, 2001

PACER
9

CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER Case Assigned to CJRA Track: Standard Scheduling Deadlines: Jury Trial 10/7/02 and Final Pretrial Conference for 9/6/02, before Judge Barbour, Jackson, Ms ; Discovery cutoff 5/7/02 ; Joining of parties,amending of pleadings by 9/16/01 ; Pla. Designation of Experts by 2/7/02 ; Dft Designation of Experts by 3/7/02 ; Motion Filing deadline on 5/22/02 ; Settlement Conference for 10:00 5/27/02 ; ( signed by Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols ) copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 08/20/2001)

Aug. 20, 2001

Aug. 20, 2001

PACER

Case assigned to Standard Track. (sec)

Aug. 20, 2001

Aug. 20, 2001

PACER
10

Notice of Service - Request for Admissions by all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

Sept. 4, 2001

Sept. 4, 2001

PACER
11

Notice of Service of Response by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to Request for Admissions (sec) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

Oct. 3, 2001

Oct. 3, 2001

PACER
12

Notice of Service of Second Set of Interrogatories by all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

Oct. 9, 2001

Oct. 9, 2001

PACER
13

ORDER RESETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; that due to clerical error the settlement confernece set by the initial Case Management Plan Order should be reset on another date; reset Settlement Conference for 10:00 a.m. on 5/20/02 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 10/12/2001)

Oct. 12, 2001

Oct. 12, 2001

PACER
14

Notice of Service of Response by defendant City of Jackson to interrogatories, production requests (lwe) (Entered: 11/14/2001)

Nov. 13, 2001

Nov. 13, 2001

PACER
15

MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs to Compel discovery (sec) (Entered: 12/12/2001)

Dec. 11, 2001

Dec. 11, 2001

PACER
16

RESPONSE by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to [15-1] motion to Compel discovery by plaintiff (sec) Modified on 01/16/2002 (Entered: 12/27/2001)

Dec. 26, 2001

Dec. 26, 2001

PACER
17

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [15-1] motion to Compel discovery (sec) Modified on 01/16/2002 (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 4, 2002

Jan. 4, 2002

PACER
18

Notice of Service of Supplemental Disclosure by all plaintiffs. (sec) Modified on 01/08/2002 (Entered: 01/08/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

PACER
19

REBUTTAL by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to [17-1] response reply by plaintiff (sec) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 15, 2002

Jan. 15, 2002

PACER
20

ORDER granting [15-1] motion to Compel discovery; that defendants directed to fully comply with this Order on or before 15-days from the filing of this Order ( signed by Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

PACER
21

JOINT MOTION by all plaintiffs, defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to Extend Time to designate experts (sec) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002

Jan. 23, 2002

PACER
22

ORDER granting [21-1] joint motion to Extend Time to designate experts, Set Case Management Order Deadlines Pla. Designation of Experts by 3/9/02 ; Dft Designation of Experts by 4/6/02 ; ( signed by Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 24, 2002

Jan. 24, 2002

PACER
23

Notice of Service of Supplemental Responses by defendant City of Jackson to First and Second Interrogatories. (sec) (Entered: 01/31/2002)

Jan. 31, 2002

Jan. 31, 2002

PACER
24

DESIGNATION of EXPERTS for PLAINTIFF by plaintiff all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 03/11/2002)

March 11, 2002

March 11, 2002

PACER
25

Notice of Service of First Combined Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, Interrogatories and Requests for Productions of Documents by all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 03/28/2002)

March 27, 2002

March 27, 2002

PACER
26

Notice of Service - Second Request for Admissions by plaintiff Azel P. Smith, plaintiff Jacqueline Butler, plaintiff all plaintiffs, plaintiff Ruthie Porter, plaintiff Gloria plaintiff Willie Allen, plaintiff Joe L. Austin, plaintiff Jerry Brister, plaintiff Harvey L. Davis, plaintiff William H. Gladney Sr., plaintiff Tommie L. Grant, plaintiff Ned Garner, plaintiff William R. Gardner, plaintiff Samuel Haymer, plaintiff James J. Howard, plaintiff Warren E. plaintiff Thomas Hunter, plaintiff Arlander Luallen Jr., plaintiff Willie Mack, plaintiff Eugene McDonald, plaintiff Carey N. Parkinson, plaintiff Cleotha Ratliff, plaintiff John M. Russell, plaintiff David L. Shaw, plaintiff Wayne Simpson Jr., plaintiff Richard J. Smith, plaintiff Kenneth W. Stemmons, plaintiff James B. Strawbridge, plaintiff Alphonso Taylor, plaintiff Miller Weston, plaintiff Shirley Williams (sec) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 2, 2002

April 2, 2002

PACER
27

DESIGNATION of EXPERTS for DEFENDANT by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. (sec) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

April 5, 2002

April 5, 2002

PACER
28

NOTICE of Service of Designatin of Expert Witnesses by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. (sec) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

April 8, 2002

April 8, 2002

PACER
29

Notice of Service of Response by all plaintiffs to Requests for Admissions (sec) (Entered: 04/25/2002)

April 24, 2002

April 24, 2002

PACER
30

NOTICE by plaintiff all plaintiffs to take deposition of City of Jackson and City of Jackson Police Department on 5/6/02. (sec) (Entered: 04/26/2002)

April 26, 2002

April 26, 2002

PACER
31

MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs to Extend Time to respond to defendants' First Interrogatories and Requests for Production (sec) (Entered: 04/26/2002)

April 26, 2002

April 26, 2002

PACER
32

JOINT MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs, defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to Extend Time for discovery and motion deadlines (sec) (Entered: 05/02/2002)

May 1, 2002

May 1, 2002

PACER
33

Notice of Service of Supplemental Pre-Discovery Disclosure by all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 05/03/2002)

May 3, 2002

May 3, 2002

PACER
34

Notice of Service of Response by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to Second Request for Admissions (sec) (Entered: 05/03/2002)

May 3, 2002

May 3, 2002

PACER
35

ORDER granting [32-1] joint motion to Extend Time for discovery and motion deadlines, cs Set Case Management Order Deadlines Discovery Cutoff 6/1/02 ; Motion Filing Deadline on 6/7/02 ; ( signed by Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 05/07/2002)

May 6, 2002

May 6, 2002

PACER
36

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time referring to: [31-1] motion to Extend Time to respond by plaintiff (sec) (Entered: 05/07/2002)

May 7, 2002

May 7, 2002

PACER
37

ORDER granting [36-1] supplemental amended motion to Extend Time, [31-1] motion to Extend Time to respond; that plaintiffs responses to be delivered on or before 5/13/02 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Alfred G. Nicols ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 05/10/2002)

May 9, 2002

May 9, 2002

PACER
38

Notice of Service of Supplemental Pre-Discovery Disclosure by plaintiff Azel P. Smith, plaintiff Jacqueline Butler, plaintiff all plaintiffs, plaintiff Ruthie Porter, plaintiff Gloria Burns, plaintiff Willie Allen, plaintiff Joe L. Austin, plaintiff Jerry Brister, plaintiff Harvey L. Davis, plaintiff William H. Gladney Sr., plaintiff Tommie L. Grant, plaintiff Ned Garner, plaintiff William R. Gardner, plaintiff Samuel Haymer, plaintiff James J. Howard, plaintiff Warren E. Hull, plaintiff Thomas Hunter, plaintiff Arlander Luallen Jr., plaintiff Willie Mack, plaintiff Eugene McDonald, plaintiff Carey N. Parkinson, plaintiff Cleotha Ratliff, plaintiff John M. Russell, plaintiff David L. Shaw, plaintiff Wayne Simpson Jr., plaintiff Richard J. Smith, plaintiff Kenneth W. Stemmons, plaintiff James B. Strawbridge, plaintiff Alphonso Taylor, plaintiff Miller Weston, plaintiff Shirley Williams (sec) (Entered: 05/15/2002)

May 13, 2002

May 13, 2002

PACER
39

Notice of Service of Response by defendant City of Jackson to Combined Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents (sec) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

May 14, 2002

May 14, 2002

PACER
40

RE-NOTICE by plaintiff all plaintiffs to take deposition of representative of defendant City of Jackson, MS, Police Department on 5/22/02. (sec) (Entered: 05/16/2002)

May 15, 2002

May 15, 2002

PACER
41

NOTICE by all plaintiffs to take deposition of Marilyn Hedrick, Jesse Robinson, Linda Taylor Otho Burton on 5/22/02 and Dr. George Terry, Jarilyn Latson, Frederick Fleming on 5/23/02. (sec) (Entered: 05/17/2002)

May 16, 2002

May 16, 2002

PACER
42

NOTICE by plaintiff all plaintiffs to take deposition of Marilyn Hetrick, Dr. George Terry, Joyce Scott on 5/24/02, Linda Taylor, Otho Burton, Jesse Robinson, Marilyn Latson, Frederick Fleming on 5/30/02 (sec) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

May 21, 2002

May 21, 2002

PACER
43

RE-NOTICE by plaintiff all plaintiffs to take deposition of representative of defendants City of Jackson and MS Police Department on 5/24/02. (sec) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

May 21, 2002

May 21, 2002

PACER
44

Minute entry: hearing on settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Nicols on 5/20/02, Jackson,MS. Action Taken: case not resolved. (sec) (Entered: 05/22/2002)

May 22, 2002

May 22, 2002

PACER
45

RETURN of SUBPOENA executed 5/22/02 as to Marilyn Hetrick (sec) (Entered: 05/24/2002)

May 22, 2002

May 22, 2002

PACER
46

RETURN of SUBPOENA executed 5/22/02 as to Joyce Scott (sec) (Entered: 05/24/2002)

May 22, 2002

May 22, 2002

PACER
47

NOTICE by all plaintiffs to take deposition of Bracy Coleman, Cherlyn Miller on 5/30/02 (sec) (Entered: 05/28/2002)

May 23, 2002

May 23, 2002

PACER
48

RETURN of SUBPOENA executed 5/23/02 as to Dr. George Terry (sec) (Entered: 05/28/2002)

May 28, 2002

May 28, 2002

PACER
49

RE-NOTICE by plaintiff all plaintiffs to take deposition of Linda Taylor, Otho Burton, Jesse Robinson, Marilyn Latson,Frederick Fleming, Bracy Coleman, Cherlyn Miller, on 5/31/02 and Dr. George Terry on 6/3/02 (sec) (Entered: 05/31/2002)

May 31, 2002

May 31, 2002

PACER
50

RETURN of SUBPOENA executed5/30/02 as to Bracy Coleman. (sec) (Entered: 06/04/2002)

May 31, 2002

May 31, 2002

PACER
51

Notice of Service of Response by plaintiffs to Combined Interrogatories and Request to Production of Documents (sec) (Entered: 06/07/2002)

June 4, 2002

June 4, 2002

PACER
52

Notice of Service of Third Supplemental Pre-Discovery Disclosure by plaintiff all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 06/07/2002)

June 4, 2002

June 4, 2002

PACER
53

MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs for Sanctions, for Default Judgment, and for Attorney Fees (sec) (Entered: 06/10/2002)

June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

PACER
54

MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs to Strike portions of defendants' expert witnesses reports and tetimony (sec) (Entered: 06/10/2002)

June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

PACER
55

MOTION by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. for Summary Judgment (sec) Modified on 06/10/2002 (Entered: 06/10/2002)

June 7, 2002

June 7, 2002

PACER
56

Letter requesting Attachment(Exhibit-7) by City of Jackson, Jackson Police Dept. to [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment by defendants (sec) (Entered: 06/12/2002)

June 10, 2002

June 10, 2002

PACER
57

MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs to Extend Time to respond to motion for summary judgmemt. (sec) (Entered: 06/26/2002)

June 24, 2002

June 24, 2002

PACER
58

ORDER granting [57-1] motion to Extend Time, Response to Motion reset to 7/8/02 for [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 07/01/2002)

June 28, 2002

June 28, 2002

PACER
59

MOTION by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to Extend Time (sec) (Entered: 07/01/2002)

June 28, 2002

June 28, 2002

PACER
60

ORDER granting [59-1] motion to Extend Time, Response to Motion reset to 7/10/02 for [54-1] motion to Strike, reset to 7/10/02 for [53-1] motion for Sanctions, reset to 7/10/02 for [53-2] motion for Default Judgment, reset to 7/10/02 for [53-3] motion for Attorney Fees ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

July 2, 2002

July 2, 2002

PACER
61

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment (sec) (Entered: 07/08/2002)

July 3, 2002

July 3, 2002

PACER
62

ORDER granting [61-1] motion to Extend Time to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment, Response to Motion reset to 7/10/02 for [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 07/08/2002)

July 5, 2002

July 5, 2002

PACER
63

RESPONSE by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to [53-1] motion for Sanctions by plaintiff, [53-2] motion for Default Judgment by plaintiff, [53-3] motion for Attorney Fees by plaintiff (sec) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

July 10, 2002

July 10, 2002

PACER
64

RESPONSE by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to [54-1] motion to Strike by plaintiff (sec) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

July 10, 2002

July 10, 2002

PACER
65

MOTION by plaintiff all plaintiffs to Strike [56-1] attach by Jackson Police Dept., City of Jackson (sec) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

July 11, 2002

July 11, 2002

PACER
66

RESPONSE by plaintiff all plaintiffs in opposition to [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment by defendants (sec) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

July 11, 2002

July 11, 2002

PACER
67

Letter requesting attachment by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept., re that Exh. 4 be attached to their (67-1) Response. (cwl) (Entered: 07/12/2002)

July 12, 2002

July 12, 2002

PACER
68

Letter requesting attachment by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept., re that Exh. 1,2,3,6,7, and 9 be attached to their (68-1) Response to plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions, etc. (cwl) (Entered: 07/12/2002)

July 12, 2002

July 12, 2002

PACER
69

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Strike Memorandum Brief in Support of defendants' response to plaintiffs' Motion for Sanction, a Default Judgment, Attorneys' fees and expenses, expert witness fees and a continuance and to reply on said brief's assertions in support of plaintiffs' motion for sanctions, a default judgment, attorneys' fees and expenses, expert witness fees and a continuance (sec) (Entered: 07/22/2002)

July 19, 2002

July 19, 2002

PACER
70

REBUTTAL by plaintiff all plaintiffs to [63-1] motion response by defendants (sec) (Entered: 07/22/2002)

July 19, 2002

July 19, 2002

PACER
71

MOTION by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to Extend Time to reply to plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply Memorandum (sec) (Entered: 07/22/2002)

July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

PACER
72

ORDER granting [71-1] motion to Extend Time, Reply to Response to Motion reset to 7/29/02 for [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment, and Response to Motion reset to 7/29/02 for [65-1] motion to Strike [56-1] attach by Jackson Police Dept., City of Jackson and Memorandum Brief in support thereof ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 07/29/2002)

July 29, 2002

July 29, 2002

PACER
73

RESPONSE by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to [65-1] motion to Strike [56-1] attach by Jackson Police Dept., City of Jackson by plaintiff (sec) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

July 29, 2002

July 29, 2002

PACER
74

REPLY by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. in support of [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment by defendants (sec) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

July 29, 2002

July 29, 2002

PACER
75

RESPONSE by defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. to [69-1] motion to Strike by plaintiff (sec) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

Aug. 7, 2002

Aug. 7, 2002

PACER
76

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. by Samuel L. Begley (sec) (Entered: 09/04/2002)

Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

PACER
77

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying [69-1] motion to Strike, denying [65-1] motion to Strike [56-1] attach by Jackson Police Dept., City of Jackson, granting [55-1] motion for Summary Judgment, denying [54-1] motion to Strike, denying [53-1] motion for Sanctions, denying [53-2] motion for Default Judgment, denying [53-3] motion for Attorney Fees ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ) ; copies mailed. ob: 2002 page: 2930-2943 (fe) (Entered: 09/10/2002)

Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

PACER
78

JUDGMENT for defendant City of Jackson, defendant Jackson Police Dept. against all plaintiffs and this cause is dismissed with prejudice. ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ); copies mailed. ob 2002 page 2944 (fe) (Entered: 09/10/2002)

Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

PACER

Case closed (fe)

Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

PACER
79

NOTICE OF APPEAL of [78-1] judgment order, [77-1] order by all plaintiffs . FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 086900 Appeal record due on 10/18/02 (lbt) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

Oct. 3, 2002

Oct. 3, 2002

PACER

Notice of Appeal and certified copy of docket to USCA: [79-1] appeal by all plaintiffs (lbt)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

PACER

Transcript Order Form mailed to Dennis Horn, Attorney. (lbt)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

PACER

Transcript Order Form - No Hearings (lbt)

Oct. 15, 2002

Oct. 15, 2002

PACER

Certified and transmitted Record on Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [79-1] appeal by all plaintiffs (lbt)

Oct. 17, 2002

Oct. 17, 2002

PACER

USCA Case Number Re: [79-1] appeal by all plaintiffs USCA NUMBER: 02-60850 (lbt)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

PACER
80

OPINION of USCA Re: [79-1] appeal by all plaintiffs (sec) (Entered: 12/17/2003)

Dec. 16, 2003

Dec. 16, 2003

PACER
81

JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy) Re: [79-1] appeal by all plaintiffs; that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed in part and vacated in part, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of this Court; that defendants-appellees pay to plaintiffs-appellants the costs on appeal to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court; (copy to Judge and Magistrate Judge) (sec) (Entered: 12/17/2003)

Dec. 16, 2003

Dec. 16, 2003

PACER
82

ORDER OF USCA ( copy) Re: [79-1] appeal by all plaintiffs; the appellant moton for stay Denied. (copy to Judge and Magistrate Judge) (sec) Modified on 12/17/2003 (Entered: 12/17/2003)

Dec. 16, 2003

Dec. 16, 2003

PACER
83

USCA's Bill of costs(copy) in the amount of $366.50 (sec) (Entered: 12/17/2003)

Dec. 16, 2003

Dec. 16, 2003

PACER

USCA's letter stating record/original papers/exhibits to be returned at later date. (sec)

Dec. 16, 2003

Dec. 16, 2003

PACER

Case reopened (sec)

Dec. 16, 2003

Dec. 16, 2003

PACER

Record on Appeal returned from U.S. Court of Appeals: [79-1] (5-vols) (sec)

Dec. 23, 2003

Dec. 23, 2003

PACER
84

ORDER; that in light of the Opinion rendered by the Fifth Circuit, all parties are ordered to submit to the undersigned in writing, by 1/21/04, their opinions of the current posture of the case, as set out ( signed by Judge William H. Barbour Jr. ); copies mailed. (sec) (Entered: 01/13/2004)

Jan. 13, 2004

Jan. 13, 2004

PACER
85

REPORT to [84-1] Order by all plaintiffs, pursuant to Court order of 1/13/04. (sec) (Entered: 01/22/2004)

Jan. 21, 2004

Jan. 21, 2004

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Mississippi

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Private Employment Class Actions

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 14, 2001

Closing Date: 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Police officers and dispatchers with more than 5 years of tenure

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

City of Jackson, City

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

U.S. Supreme Court merits opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Race, unspecified

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male