Case: Buckley v. Chicago Tribune, LLC

1:24-cv-04027 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 16, 2024

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case alleging systematic pay disparities between male and female employees and between Black and white employees.  Seven Chicago Tribune journalists filed a class action lawsuit against the newspaper and its owner in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on May 16, 2024. Plaintiffs alleged systematic pay disparities between male and female employees and between Black and white employees. The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against the Chicago Tribune, LLC, Alden…

This is a case alleging systematic pay disparities between male and female employees and between Black and white employees. 

Seven Chicago Tribune journalists filed a class action lawsuit against the newspaper and its owner in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on May 16, 2024. Plaintiffs alleged systematic pay disparities between male and female employees and between Black and white employees. The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against the Chicago Tribune, LLC, Alden Global Capital, and Tribune Publishing Company. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants relied on diversity recruitment programs, which hire employees into temporary year-long positions that pay significantly less than non-diversity recruitment hirees, thus limiting the salary of women and minority journalists. Plaintiffs also alleged the defendants hired minority journalists from lower paying suburban newspapers in order to keep their starting salary lower; white male journalists were more often recruited from other major news organizations and were offered higher salaries to induce them to accept employment. Plaintiffs also alleged that defendants encouraged a culture of  “ pay secrecy,” which had a disparate negative impact on female and Black employees without a legitimate business need. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit under the Federal Equal Pay Act, Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Illinois Human Rights Act, and Illinois Equal Pay Act. Plaintiffs sought declaratory relief that defendants have engaged in systemic Sex and racial discrimination against the Classes by paying female and/or African American employees less than their male or non-African American counterparts for substantially equal or substantially 

similar work; a permanent injunction against such continuing discriminatory pay practices, policies, and procedures; injunctive relief that effectuates a restructuring of Defendants’ compensation policies, practices, and procedures; the unpaid balance of wages owed, plus interest on that amount; liquidated damages; compensatory damages; attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses; statutory and civil penalties; and other equitable remedies necessary. 

Plaintiffs sought to certify multiple classes. The plaintiffs sought to certify two “discrimination classes” under Title VII and IHRA: the sex-based class (for all non-managerial female employees) and the race-based class (for all non-managerial Black employees).  Plaintiffs also sought to certify several sex-based classes under the Illinois Equal Pay Act: Sex-based Reporter Class (all female reporters in Illinois), State Sex-Based Editor Class (all female editors in Illinois) and State Sex-Based Photojournalist Class (all female photojournalists in Illinois). They also sought to certify race-based classes under the Illinois Equal Pay Act: race-based Reporter Class (all Black reporters in Illinois), State Race-Based Editor Class (all Black editors in Illinois) and State Race-Based Photojournalist Class (all Black photojournalists in Illinois). Additionally, they requested to certify sex-based classes of reporters, editors, and photojournalists under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The case was assigned to District Judge Thomas M. Durkin.

On August 12, 2024, defendant Alden Global filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint. The motion argued that the Chicago Tribune is the plaintiffs’ employer, not defendant Alden, thus defendant Alden should not be held liable for any alleged discrimination. Further, defendant Alden argued that the plaintiffs did not fully exhaust their claims with administrative remedies before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Illinois Department of Human Rights. On the same day, the defendant Chicago Tribune, LLC filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint. They also argued that the plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. The plaintiffs filed their response to the motion to dismiss on September 26, 2024.

As of January 2025, this case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Cara Claflin (1/19/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68536525/parties/buckley-v-chicago-tribune-llc/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:24-cv-04027

Class and Collective Action Complaint For Damages and Injunctive Relief

Buckley v. Chicago Tribune

May 16, 2024

May 16, 2024

Complaint
21

1:24-cv-04027

Defendant Alden Global Capital LLC's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint

Buckley v. Chicago Tribune

Aug. 12, 2024

Aug. 12, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68536525/buckley-v-chicago-tribune-llc/

Last updated July 28, 2026, 7:23 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 16, 2024

COMPLAINT filed by Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Madeline Buckley, Colleen Kujawa, Deanese Williams; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21975059. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cole, Kevin) (Entered: 05/16/2024)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 May 16, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 7/25/2024, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 05/16/2024)

RECAP
May 16, 2024

case assigned

May 16, 2024

clerk's notice

May 16, 2024

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jcc, )

May 16, 2024

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcc, )

3 May 19, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21982365. (Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 05/19/2024)

RECAP
4 May 19, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21982371. (Gil, Jacqueline) (Entered: 05/19/2024)

RECAP
5 May 20, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motions to appear pro hac vice 3 4 are granted. Attorneys Michael Morrison and Jacqueline Gil for plaintiffs added. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 05/20/2024)

RECAP
May 30, 2024

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Alden Global Capital, Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company (smb, )

6 June 14, 2024

WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Madeline Buckley, Colleen Kujawa, Deanese Williams. Chicago Tribune, LLC waiver sent on 6/13/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. (Cole, Kevin) (Entered: 06/14/2024)

RECAP
7 June 19, 2024

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Madeline Buckley, Colleen Kujawa, Deanese Williams as to Alden Global Capital on 6/12/2024, answer due 7/3/2024. (Cole, Kevin) (Entered: 06/19/2024)

RECAP
8 June 19, 2024

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Madeline Buckley, Colleen Kujawa, Deanese Williams as to Tribune Publishing Company on 6/12/2024, answer due 7/3/2024. (Cole, Kevin) (Entered: 06/19/2024)

RECAP
9 July 2, 2024

MOTION by Defendant Alden Global Capital for extension of time to extend time to respond to complaint (Gordon, David) (Entered: 07/02/2024)

RECAP
10 July 2, 2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Alden Global Capital by David Andrew Gordon (Gordon, David) (Entered: 07/02/2024)

RECAP
11 July 2, 2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Alden Global Capital by Robert Johnson, III (Johnson, Robert) (Entered: 07/02/2024)

RECAP
12 July 2, 2024

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Alden Global Capital (Gordon, David) (Entered: 07/02/2024)

RECAP
13 July 3, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Defendant Alden Global Capital LLC's uncontested motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint 9 is granted. Alden's responsive pleading deadline is extended to 8/12/2024. The 7/25/2024 joint status report deadline is extended to 8/26/2024. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 07/03/2024)

RECAP
14 July 3, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-22210024. (Mackay, Aimee) (Entered: 07/03/2024)

RECAP
15 July 3, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to appear pro hac vice 14 is granted. Attorney Aimee Grace Mackay for Alden Global Capital added. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 07/03/2024)

RECAP
16 July 3, 2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company by Andrew S. Rosenman (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 07/03/2024)

RECAP
17 July 3, 2024

MOTION by Defendant Tribune Publishing Company for extension of time to respond to the Complaint (unopposed) (Rosenman, Andrew) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 7/8/2024 (aee, ). (Entered: 07/03/2024)

RECAP
18 July 3, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time 17 is granted. Tribune Publishing Company is to file its response to the Complaint by 8/12/2024. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 07/03/2024)

RECAP
19 Aug. 7, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Judge Durkin was a partner at Mayer Brown until January 2013. He is acquainted with and friendly with the defense attorney of record, but is not a close personal friend. This order is entered as a matter of disclosure and the court does not believe it is a basis for recusal. But if any party believes such a motion is appropriate the court will consider it. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 08/07/2024)

RECAP
20 Aug. 12, 2024

MOTION by Defendant Alden Global Capital to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint (Gordon, David) (Entered: 08/12/2024)

RECAP
21 Aug. 12, 2024

MEMORANDUM by Alden Global Capital in support of motion to dismiss 20 (Gordon, David) (Entered: 08/12/2024)

Clearinghouse
22 Aug. 12, 2024

MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company to dismiss and to Strike Class Allegations (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/12/2024)

RECAP
23 Aug. 12, 2024

MEMORANDUM by Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company in support of motion to dismiss 22 and to Strike Class Allegations (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/12/2024)

RECAP
24 Aug. 12, 2024

DECLARATION of Jean Nechvatal regarding memorandum in support of motion 23 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/12/2024)

RECAP
25 Aug. 13, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court enters the following agreed briefing schedule as to the motions to dismiss 20, 22 : Plaintiffs' responses are due by 9/26/2024; Defendants' replies are due by 10/17/2024. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 08/13/2024)

RECAP
26 Aug. 26, 2024

STATUS Report (Joint) by Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/26/2024)

RECAP
27 Aug. 30, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court has reviewed the parties' joint status report 26 . Defendants' request for a stay of discovery pending the Court's ruling on the motions to dismiss needs to be made by a formal motion. Defendants should confer with Plaintiffs before filing such a motion, and if Plaintiffs oppose a stay, the parties should propose a briefing schedule on the motion. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2024)

RECAP
28 Sept. 26, 2024

MEMORANDUM by Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williams in Opposition to motion to dismiss 20 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF MICHAEL MORRISON IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS CHICAGO TRIBUNE, LLC, TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY, AND ALDEN GLOBAL CAPITAL'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE)(Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 09/26/2024)

RECAP
29 Sept. 26, 2024

MEMORANDUM by Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williams in Opposition to motion to dismiss 22 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF MICHAEL MORRISON IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS CHICAGO TRIBUNE, LLC, TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY, AND ALDEN GLOBAL CAPITAL'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE)(Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 09/26/2024)

RECAP
30 Sept. 26, 2024

RESPONSE by Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williamsin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Alden Global Capital to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint 20, MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company to dismiss and to Strike Class Allegations 22 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF MICHAEL MORRISON IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS CHICAGO TRIBUNE, LLC, TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY, AND ALDEN GLOBAL CAPITAL'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE)(Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 09/26/2024)

RECAP
31 Oct. 17, 2024

MEMORANDUM by Alden Global Capital in support of motion to dismiss 20 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Gordon, David) (Entered: 10/17/2024)

RECAP
32 Oct. 17, 2024

REPLY by Tribune Publishing Company, Chicago Tribune, LLC to MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company to dismiss and to Strike Class Allegations 22 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 10/17/2024)

RECAP
33 Oct. 23, 2024

MOTION by Plaintiffs Madeline Buckley, Terrence James, Stacey Wescott, Colleen Kujawa, Deanese Williams, Darcel Rockett, Christy Gutowski for leave to file COMPLIANT OPPOSITION BRIEF, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FILE A BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Filing PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE COMPLIANT OPPOSITION BRIEF, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FILE A BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES, # 2 Declaration PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE COMPLIANT OPPOSITION BRIEF, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FILE A BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 15 PAGES)(Gil, Jacqueline) (Entered: 10/23/2024)

RECAP
34 Oct. 24, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court grants Plaintiffs' motion 33 for leave to file a brief in excess of 15 pages. The opposition brief at Dkt No. 29 will stand as filed. By the same token, the Court denies Defendants' request to strike the brief. Although the brief did not comply with Local Rules 5.2(e) and 7.1, and a violation of either of those Local Rules is a sufficient basis for striking a brief in its entirety, striking the brief here would be "a disproportionate response to the nature of the violations at issue." See Young v. Control Sols., LLC, No. 15-CV-3162, 2017 WL 2633679, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 19, 2017) (declining to strike plaintiff's opposition brief that had line spacing of 1.49 lines). The Court cautions Plaintiffs' counsel, however, that they must comply with all Local Rules moving forward. If Defendants believe they need additional pages to reply to Plaintiffs' opposition brief, they should seek leave to file an amended, enlarged reply or surreply. If Defendants do not seek said leave by 11/5/2024, the Court will consider the briefing complete and rule on the motions to dismiss. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 10/24/2024)

RECAP
35 Dec. 19, 2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Oral argument on the motions to dismiss set for 1/30/2025 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 1441. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 12/19/2024)

RECAP
37 Dec. 27, 2024

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. (tg, ) (Entered: 12/30/2024)

RECAP
36 Dec. 30, 2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Alden Global Capital by Hussin Javier Kordi (Kordi, Hussin) (Entered: 12/30/2024)

RECAP
38 Jan. 8, 2025

MOTION by Attorney Aimee Grace Mackay to withdraw as attorney for Alden Global Capital. No party information provided (Gordon, David) (Entered: 01/08/2025)

RECAP
39 Jan. 10, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to withdraw as attorney 38 is granted. Attorney Aimee Grace Mackay terminated. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 01/10/2025)

RECAP
40 Jan. 30, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Oral argument on the motions to dismiss held on 1/30/2025. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 01/31/2025)

RECAP
41 Feb. 11, 2025

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' motions to dismiss and denies the motion to strike. The EPA and IEPA claims are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint by March 11, 2025. The amended complaint should include the allegations proposed in the declaration attached to Plaintiffs' opposition brief and any other factual allegations they believe will remedy the deficiencies identified herein and support their claims. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/11/2025. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

RECAP
42 Feb. 11, 2025

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 01/30/2025 before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Oral Argument. Order Number: 50937. Court Reporter Contact Information: Elia E. Carrion, EECarrionOfficialTranscript@gmail.com, 312.408.7782. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 3/4/2025. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/14/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/12/2025. (Carrion, Elia) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

RECAP
43 March 11, 2025

FIRST AMENDED complaint by Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Madeline Buckley, Colleen Kujawa, Deanese Williams against All Defendants (Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 03/11/2025)

RECAP
44 March 20, 2025

MOTION by Defendants Alden Global Capital, Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company for extension of time to file response/reply (Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint) (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
45 March 20, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint 44 is granted. Defendants are to file their respective responses to the first amended complaint by 4/18/2025. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
46 March 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company by Marcia E. Goodman (Goodman, Marcia) (Entered: 03/24/2025)

RECAP
47 March 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company by Kyla J Miller (Miller, Kyla) (Entered: 03/24/2025)

RECAP
48 March 24, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-23249718. (Zadikany, Ruth) (Entered: 03/24/2025)

RECAP
49 March 24, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to appear pro hac vice 48 is granted. Attorney Ruth Zadikany for Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company added. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 03/24/2025)

RECAP
50 March 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Alden Global Capital by Teresa Lynn Reuter (Reuter, Teresa) (Entered: 03/24/2025)

RECAP
51 April 18, 2025

ANSWER to amended complaint by Alden Global Capital(Reuter, Teresa) (Entered: 04/18/2025)

RECAP
52 April 18, 2025

ANSWER to amended complaint and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company(Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/18/2025)

RECAP
53 May 12, 2025

Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 05/12/2025)

RECAP
54 May 13, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter having been referred to the magistrate judge for discovery supervision (doc. # 53 ), the Court directs the parties to confer under Rule 26(f) and file a joint status report with an agreed or contested discovery schedule by noon on 5/20/25 in advance of an initial status hearing set for the 9 a.m. status call on 5/21/25 in Courtroom 1342 of the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse. The parties are directed to review the Court's Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Magistrate Judge Fuentes, its advisory Appendix, and the Top Ten Ways to Defeat Settlement, all available on the Court's website. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/13/2025)

RECAP
55 May 15, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: At the request of counsel and by agreement, the 5/21/25 initial status hearing is reset for 9 a.m. on 5/22/25. DATE CHANGE ONLY. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/15/2025)

RECAP
56 May 20, 2025

STATUS Report (Joint) by Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company Presented before Magistrate Judge (Goodman, Marcia) (Entered: 05/20/2025)

RECAP
57 May 22, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Initial status hearing upon referral held. Plaintiffs' counsel makes an oral motion for leave to appear by telephone. That motion is granted without objection. Oral motion from Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC and Tribune Publishing Company to bifurcate discovery. That motion is entered and continued. The parties are directed to confer further, and respective briefs on the motion or a joint status report from the parties are to be filed by noon on 6/12/25. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/22/2025)

RECAP
May 22, 2025

ORAL MOTION by Plaintiffs' counsel for leave to appear by telephone. (lxk, )

May 22, 2025

Bifurcate

May 22, 2025

Appear

May 22, 2025

ORAL MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company to bifurcate discovery. (lxk, )

58 May 29, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Rather than have the oral motion for bifurcation of class certification discovery sitting on the docket and not yet ruled upon pending further conferral (doc # 57 ), for hygienic reasons the Court denies that pending oral motion without prejudice with the parties having full leave to file any bifurcation motion and briefing (or report) as they wish by the Court's previously set 6/12/25 deadline, with the arguments in the 5/20/25 status report (doc. # 56 ) already duly noted and under consideration. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 05/29/2025)

RECAP
59 June 12, 2025

MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company for extension of time (Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Provide the Court with an Updated Status with Respect to Defendants' Pending Motion to Bifurcate Discovery) Presented before Magistrate Judge (Goodman, Marcia) (Entered: 06/12/2025)

RECAP
60 July 3, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: On review of the parties' joint motion for extension of time (doc. # 59 ), that motion is granted for good cause shown. The parties have full leave to file any bifurcation motion and briefing (or report) as they wish by noon on 7/11/25. Mailed notice (ber, ) (Entered: 07/03/2025)

RECAP
61 July 10, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiffs Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williams to bifurcate SECOND JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH AN UPDATED STATUS WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS PENDING MOTION TO BIFURCATE DISCOVERY Presented before District Judge (Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 07/10/2025)

RECAP
62 July 11, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: On review of the parties' second joint motion for extension of time (doc. # 61 ), falling within the scope of the referral to the magistrate judge (doc. # 53 ), that motion is granted for good cause shown. The parties have full leave to file any bifurcation motion and briefing (or report) as they wish by noon on 8/8/25. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 07/11/2025)

RECAP
63 July 17, 2025

NOTICE by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 1, # 2 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 2, # 3 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 3, # 4 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 4, # 5 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 5, # 6 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 6, # 7 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 7, # 8 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 8, # 9 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 9, # 10 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 10, # 11 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 11, # 12 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 12, # 13 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 13, # 14 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 14, # 15 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 15, # 16 Appendix CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 16, # 17 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 17, # 18 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 18, # 19 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 19, # 20 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 20, # 21 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 21, # 22 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 22, # 23 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 23, # 24 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 24, # 25 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 25, # 26 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 26, # 27 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO., # 28 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 28, # 29 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO., # 30 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 30, # 31 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 31, # 32 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 32, # 33 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 33, # 34 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 34, # 35 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 35, # 36 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 36, # 37 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 37, # 38 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 38, # 39 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 39, # 40 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 40, # 41 Affidavit CONSENT TO JOIN FORM NO. 41)(Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 07/17/2025)

RECAP
64 July 30, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiffs Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williams for protective order Presented before Magistrate Judge (Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 07/30/2025)

RECAP
65 July 31, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: On review of the document filed as Plaintiffs' motion for protective order (doc. # 64 ), the motion is entered and continued, and the Court notes that the document filed was not a motion but was in fact a proposed agreed order. Accordingly, the Court kindly requests the parties file on the docket an agreed motion for protective order and submit the proposed agreed order in Word format to the Court's Proposed Order email box at Proposed_Order_Fuentes@ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

RECAP
66 Aug. 4, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiffs Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williams for order JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Presented before District Judge (Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 08/04/2025)

RECAP
67 Aug. 5, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The parties' joint motion for protective order (doc. # 66 ) is within the scope of the referral to the magistrate judge and is granted. Enter Agreed Confidentiality Order. In addition to the language in Paragraph 7 of the Agreed Confidentiality Order entered today, the parties are advised that motions to seal will not be granted as to discovery documents filed with the Court unless the request complies with the common law of this Circuit. See Bond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061, 1073 (7th Cir. 2009) (noting that public "has a presumptive right to access discovery materials that are filed with the court"); Baxter Int'l, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544, 545-46 (7th Cir. 2002) (stating that filed discovery documents "that influence or underpin the judicial decision are open to public inspection unless they meet the definition of trade secrets or other categories of bona fide long-term confidentiality... In civil litigation only trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege (such as the attorney-client privilege), and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence (such as the name of a minor victim of sexual assault) is entitled to be kept secret"); Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000) ("Many a litigant would prefer that the subject matter of a case... be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing."); Citizens First Nat'l Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 178 F.3d 943, 945-46 (7th Cir. 1999) (warning courts not to allow parties "to seal whatever they want" and urging them to apply "a neutral balancing of the relevant interests" in connection with any good-cause determination presented by a motion to seal). Parties moving to seal are directed to review the foregoing case law, and any motion to seal will be taken by the Court as a certification that the movant has read the applicable case law and has ensured that it is making a good-faith argument that the document in question qualifies for sealing under the Seventh Circuit's stringent standards. Further, as to Paragraph 5(b)(7), this is a highly restrictive provision which prevents counsel even from showing designated material to a prospective witness during an interview or during deposition preparation, and the Court is open to a motion to lift or modify it as necessary, while under Paragraph 5(b)(9), the parties may reach their own agreement(s) to allow such use of designated material in this fashion. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 08/05/2025)

RECAP
68 Aug. 5, 2025

CONFIDENTIALITY Order. Signed by the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes on 8/5/2025. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 08/05/2025)

RECAP
69 Aug. 7, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiffs Madeline Buckley, Christy Gutowski, Terrence James, Colleen Kujawa, Darcel Rockett, Stacey Wescott, Deanese Williams for extension of time THIRD JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH AN UPDATED STATUS WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS PENDING MOTION TO BIFURCATE DISCOVERY Presented before District Judge (Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 08/07/2025)

RECAP
70 Aug. 11, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: On review of the parties' third joint motion for extension of time (doc. # 69 ), falling within the scope of the referral to the magistrate judge (doc. # 53 ), that motion is granted for good cause shown. The parties have full leave to file any bifurcation motion and briefing (or report) as they wish by noon on 9/16/25. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 08/11/2025)

RECAP
71 Sept. 5, 2025

MOTION by Defendant Alden Global Capital for extension of time to provide the court with an updated status with respect to Defendants' pending motion to bifurcate discovery (Fourth Joint Motion) Presented before District Judge (Reuter, Teresa) (Entered: 09/05/2025)

RECAP
72 Sept. 8, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The Court has reviewed the parties' fourth joint motion for an extension of time for the parties to agree on a discovery plan without formally bifurcating discovery (doc. # 71). The motion, falling within the scope of the referral to the magistrate judge (doc. # 53), is granted for good cause shown. The Court appreciates the parties' updates and their continued efforts to resolve their disputes without Court intervention. The parties have full leave to file any bifurcation motion and briefing, or joint status report, by noon on 9/30/25. (ec, ) (Entered: 09/08/2025)

RECAP
73 Sept. 30, 2025

MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company for extension of time (Fifth Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Provide the Court with an Updated Status with Respect to Defendants' Pending Motion to Bifurcate Discovery) Presented before Magistrate Judge (Goodman, Marcia) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

RECAP
74 Oct. 1, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The Court has reviewed the parties' fifth joint motion for an extension of time for the parties to agree on a discovery plan without formally bifurcating discovery (doc. # 73 ). The motion, falling within the scope of the referral to the magistrate judge (doc. # 53 ), is granted for good cause shown. The Court appreciates the parties' updates and their continued efforts to resolve their disputes without Court intervention. The parties have full leave to file any bifurcation motion and briefing, or joint status report, by noon on 10/14/25. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 10/01/2025)

RECAP
75 Oct. 14, 2025

STATUS Report (Joint Status Report with Respect to Defendants' Pending Motion to Bifurcate Discovery) by Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company Presented before Magistrate Judge (Goodman, Marcia) (Entered: 10/14/2025)

RECAP
76 Oct. 15, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Upon review of the parties' joint status report (doc. # 75 ), stating that the parties reached a compromise to resolve the outstanding issues with regard to Plaintiffs' written discovery requests to date and that there are no issues currently requiring judicial review, the Court commends the parties on their efforts and directs the parties to confer under Rule 26(f) and file a joint status report with an agreed or contested discovery schedule by noon on 11/5/25. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 10/15/2025)

RECAP
77 Nov. 5, 2025

MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company for extension of time to file (Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Provide the Court With a Status Report With an Agreed or Contested Discovery Schedule) Presented before Magistrate Judge (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 11/05/2025)

RECAP
78 Nov. 6, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The parties' joint motion to extend the due date for their discovery scheduling joint status report (doc. # 77 ) is granted, and the report is due at noon on 12/9/25 by agreement. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 11/06/2025)

RECAP
79 Dec. 9, 2025

MOTION by Defendants Chicago Tribune, LLC, Tribune Publishing Company for extension of time to file (Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Provide the Court with a Status Report with an Agreed or Contested Discovery Schedule) Presented before Magistrate Judge (Rosenman, Andrew) (Entered: 12/09/2025)

RECAP
80 Dec. 9, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The parties' second joint motion to extend the due date for their joint report on an agreed or contested discovery schedule (doc. # 79 ) is denied, as the Court would prefer to get a schedule in place now while the parties continue their progress toward the actual conduct of the discovery. A discovery status and scheduling hearing is set for 11 a.m. on 12/12/25 in Courtroom 1342 of the Dirksen U.S Courthouse. The status report due on 12/9/25 is vacated. Mailed notice. (jn, ) (Entered: 12/09/2025)

RECAP
81 Dec. 11, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Upon consultation with counsel about scheduling, the Court wishes to accommodate counsel by vacating the 12/12/25 hearing and accommodating counsel's earlier request (doc. # 79 ) to submit their proposed discovery schedule no later than 1/14/26 as a final extension. The Court wishes all a happy holiday period. Mailed notice. (jn,) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

RECAP
82 Dec. 12, 2025

NOTICE by All Plaintiffs PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FILING WRITTEN CONSENT FORMS PURSUANT TO U.S.C. § 216(b) (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Gonner Consent Form, # 2 Affidavit Kubzansky Consent Form, # 3 Affidavit Thayer Consent Form)(Morrison, Michael) (Entered: 12/12/2025)

RECAP
83 Jan. 5, 2026

Local Rule 3.2 Annual Reminder Order

RECAP
86 April 21, 2026

Extension of Time to File Document

RECAP
92 May 29, 2026

Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
93 May 29, 2026

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
95 May 29, 2026

Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
96 May 29, 2026

Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
98 May 29, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
100 May 29, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
102 May 29, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 16, 2024

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Seven Chicago Tribune journalists who are women and/or people of color.

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Alden Global Capital

Chicago Tribune, LLC

Tribune Publishing Company

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:24-cv-04027

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Recommended Citation