Case: EEOC v. SANDMAN, INC. dba STAR CONCRETE

5:01-cv-20093 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closed Date: Dec. 7, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's San Fransisco district office brought suit against Sandman, Inc., a California company, on January 31, 2001 in the U.S. District Court of California's Northern Division. The docket states the basis for the complaint as sexual harassment against the intervenor employee and a subsequent retaliation. The docket is the only document available for this case. The intervenor intervened in the case in July 2001. The court referred the case to a settlement conference in August 2001, and the parties reached a settlement on November 7, 2001. The court entered a consent decree in December 2001.

Summary Authors

Aaron Weismann (5/29/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11459065/parties/equal-employment-v-sandman-inc/

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bennett, Ealy A. (California)

Peck, Jonathan T. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Nohle, Peter H. (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Gillin, Andrew R. (California)

Lucey, Kristin Marie (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bennett, Ealy A. (California)

Peck, Jonathan T. (California)

Rosas, Lucila G. (California)

Tamayo, William Robert (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Nohle, Peter H. (California)

Recchio, Judith Ann (California)

Rice, Randolf J. (California)

Other

Gillin, Andrew R. (California)

Lucey, Kristin Marie (California)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

5:01-cv-20093	Docket EEOC v. Sandman, Inc.	Dec. 7, 2001	Dec. 7, 2001 Docket

show / hide documents

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Under the Radar: Visibility and the Effects of Discrimination Lawsuits in Small and Large Firms Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev	Research on how discrimination lawsuits affect corporate diversity has yielded mixed results. Qualitative studies highlight the limited efficacy of lawsuits in the typical workplace, finding that lit…	March 2022	April 1, 2022 https://cris.tau.ac.il/...

show / hide resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11459065/equal-employment-v-sandman-inc/

Last updated July 14, 2026, 5:15 a.m.

ECF Number	Date	Description	Link
1	Jan. 31, 2001	COMPLAINT y Summons(es) issued; Fee status ex entered on 1/31/01 (); jury demand [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/31/2001)	RECAP
2	Jan. 31, 2001	ORDER RE COURT PROCEDURE and SCHEDULE (ADR Multi-Option) by Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante : counsels' case management statement to be filed by 5/29/01 ; initial case management conference will be held 1:30 6/4/01 . (cc: all counsel) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/31/2001)	RECAP
3	April 23, 2001	ANSWER by defendant Sandman, Inc. to complaint for civil rights emloyment discrimination [1-1] [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/09/2001)	RECAP
4	May 2, 2001	RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Sandman, Inc. on 3/16/01 [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/15/2001)	RECAP
5	May 14, 2001	NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (L.R. 3-5) filed by Plaintiff Equal Employment, defendant Sandman, Inc. . [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/23/2001)	RECAP
	May 15, 2001	Docket Modification (Administrative) ADR pc set for 5/24/01 at 11:30am [5:01-cv-20093] (bt, COURT STAFF)
	May 24, 2001	Telephone conference with ADR director :HAH [5:01-cv-20093] (hh, COURT STAFF)
6	May 29, 2001	JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED ORDER filed. [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/05/2001)	RECAP
7	June 6, 2001	MINUTES: ( C/R not recorded) ( Hearing Date: 06/04/01) All motions will be heard by 3/18/02 ; Pretrial conference set for 11:00 4/22/02 ; Jury trial will be held 9:00 5/14/02 ; cutoff date for expert discovery is 3/18/02 ; pretrial statements 4/12/02 [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/15/2001)	RECAP
11	June 8, 2001	CLERK'S NOTICE Discovery cutoff (magistrate) 2/11/02 ; All motions will be heard by 3/18/02 ; Pretrial conference set for 11:00 4/22/02 ; Jury trial will be held 5/14/02 ; Case Management Conference set for 9:00 8/17/02 ; [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/29/2001)	RECAP
8	June 18, 2001	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante by Intervenor Monica Olsen to intervene with Notice set for 07/23/01 at 2:00 p.m. [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/25/2001)	RECAP
9	June 18, 2001	MEMORANDUM by Intervenor Monica Olsen in support of motion to intervene [8-1] [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/25/2001)	RECAP
10	June 18, 2001	DECLARATION by Kristin Lucey on behalf of Intervenor Monica Olsen re motion to intervene [8-1] [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/25/2001)	RECAP
	June 18, 2001	RECEIVED Proposed Order (from Monica Olsen) granting leave to intervene [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF)
	June 18, 2001	RECEIVED Proposed Order ( from Monica Olsen ) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF)
12	July 5, 2001	STATEMENT of non-opposition by defendant Sandman, Inc. to motion to intervene [8-1] [5:01-cv-20093] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/23/2001)	RECAP
13	July 6, 2001	ORDER by Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante granting leave to intervene ( Date Entered: 08/06/01) (cc: all counsel) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/06/2001)	RECAP
14	July 17, 2001	PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Sandman, Inc. of Scheduling order granting leave to intervene [13-1] [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/06/2001)	RECAP
15	July 27, 2001	INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT by Intervenor Monica Olsen for sexual harassment and retaliation [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)	RECAP
16	Aug. 17, 2001	MINUTES: ( C/R not reported) ( Hearing Date: 08/17/01) referring case for settlement conference to be held within 90 days to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/28/2001)	RECAP
17	Aug. 17, 2001	ORDER by Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante referring case for settlement conference ( Date Entered: 08/28/01) (cc: all counsel) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/28/2001)	RECAP
18	Sept. 12, 2001	RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Sandman, Inc. on 8/30/01 [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/13/2001)	RECAP
19	Sept. 13, 2001	ORDER by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero Settlement conference will be held 9:30 11/7/01 ; ( Date Entered: 09/20/01) (cc: all counsel) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/20/2001)	RECAP
20	Oct. 1, 2001	ANSWER by defendant Sandman, Inc. to complaint [15-1] [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/03/2001)	RECAP
21	Nov. 7, 2001	MINUTES: ( C/R Jeanne Bishop) ( Hearing Date: 11/07/01) case settled. Settlement place on the record. Court exhibit A received into evidence. [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/13/2001)	RECAP
	Dec. 4, 2001	RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant Sandman, Inc. ) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF)
22	Dec. 7, 2001	CONSENT JUDGMENT by Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante dismissing case ; appeal filing ddl 2/11/02 (cc: all counsel) ( Date Entered: 12/13/01) [5:01-cv-20093] (lfc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/13/2001)	RECAP

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closing Date: Dec. 7, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Sandman, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 5:01-cv-20093

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit

Recommended Citation

Case Summary of EEOC v. SANDMAN, INC. dba STAR CONCRETE, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/5591/ (last updated 5/29/2007).