Case: EEOC v. DWW PARTNERS LLLP

2:03-cv-00657 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: April 8, 2003

Closed Date: April 18, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2003, the EEOC district office in Phoenix, Arizona brought this suit against DWW Partners, LLP, doing business as Right Honda, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The complaint is currently unavailable. Four days after the parties consented to a trial by magistrate, a consent decree was entered. The consent decree states that an aggrieved male would receive $112,500, that were was injunctive relief agreed upon, and that the terms of the agreement would run for three years. No fees or costs were awarded.

Summary Authors

Joel Pettit (6/19/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
2:03-cv-00657	Docket EEOC v. DWW Partners LLLP	April 18, 2003	April 18, 2003 Docket

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Under the Radar: Visibility and the Effects of Discrimination Lawsuits in Small and Large Firms Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev	Research on how discrimination lawsuits affect corporate diversity has yielded mixed results. Qualitative studies highlight the limited efficacy of lawsuits in the typical workplace, finding that lit…	March 2022	April 1, 2022 https://cris.tau.ac.il/...

show / hide resources

Docket

Last updated March 23, 2025, 9:20 a.m.

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT FILED (ESH) (Entered: 04/09/2003)	April 8, 2003	April 8, 2003
2	Party agrees to mag judge jurisdiction (MAP) (Entered: 04/14/2003)	April 10, 2003	April 10, 2003
3	Party agrees to mag judge jurisdiction (MAP) (Entered: 04/15/2003)	April 14, 2003	April 14, 2003
	CONSENT of all parties to proceed before mag judge Mag Judge Virginia A. Mathis (MAP) (Entered: 04/15/2003)	April 14, 2003	April 14, 2003
4	MINUTE ORDER In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Virginia A. Mathis conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. (cc: all counsel/VAM) [4-1] re: order (minute) [4-1] (MAP) (Entered: 04/15/2003)	April 15, 2003	April 15, 2003
5	CONSENT JUDGMENT by Mag Judge Virginia A. Mathis: that this Decree resolves all claims of the Commission against Dft, including pay back, compensatory and punitive damages, interest, injunctive relief, atty's fees and costs arising out of the issues in this lawsuit. Dft shall pay to Mr Dale Long the amount of $112,500. See Consent Decree for full details, break-downs, etc. FURTHER ORDERED each party shall bear own costs and fees. The duration of this Decree shall be 36 months from its entry. This Court shall retail jurisdiction over this action for the duration of the decree. Absent extension, this Decree shall expire by its own terms at the end of 36 months from the entry date w/out further action by the parties. The parties agree to the entry of this Decree subject to final approval by the Court terminating case (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 04/18/2003)	April 18, 2003	April 18, 2003